:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國地方審計機關績效評估之實證研究--非任意裁決性因素資料包絡分析法之應用
書刊名:會計審計論叢
作者:侍台誠郭博文 引用關係盛璧雲
作者(外文):Shih, Tai-chengKuo, Po-wenSheng, Pi-yun
出版日期:2016
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁23-53
主題關鍵詞:二階段績效評估非任意裁決性資料包絡分析Tobit迴歸分析審計機關Two-stage performance evaluationNon-discretionary data envelopment analysisDEATobit regressionAudit agency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:200
  • 點閱點閱:15
本研究採用二階段績效評估方法,並考量變數是否具可任意裁決之性質 (discretionary or non-discretionary factor),評估我國地方審計機關之審計效率。在第一階段,分別應用傳統資料包絡分析法及非任意裁決性資料包絡分析法 (non-discretionary DEA),評估 2008年至 2012年間地方審計處、室及其於 2011年組織再造前、後之績效。對於無法納入第一階段生產可 能集(production possibility set)中之外生變數(exogenous variable),在第二階段輔以 Tobit迴歸分析法,併第一階段之結果進行分析。實證結果顯示:1.非裁決性因素對績效評估具顯著影響,若未考量非裁決性因素,將使績效評估之結果產生偏誤。 2.各審計處之技術無效率主要來自組織再造前規模無效率;各審計室之技術無效率主要來自純技術無效率。3.審計室男性員工、薦任八職等以下審計人員數高於平均值者,技術效率較佳。 4.所屬人員專業證照數較多之審計室之技術、純技術效率較佳。5.政治環境中,縣市首長與中央政府同一政黨、縣市議會中有一黨過半等因素,不影響審計效率;最大黨與執政首長屬相同黨派時,審計效率較差。6.監督政府預算規模與審計機關效率呈非線性關係:與審計處效率值呈負相關,而與審計室效率值呈正相關。
This paper aims to evaluate the audit efficiencies of Taiwan’s local audit agencies, branches of National Audit Office, by adopting a two-stage performance evaluation method which takes variables with discretionary or non-discretionary attributes into consideration, and thus to examine the impacts of governmental reorganization on audit efficiencies. For those exogenous variables not contained in the first stage production possibility set, the authors proceeded the second stage analysis by conducting the Tobit regression. The research subjects comprised five audit divisions and 16 audit offices for the period of 2008 to 2012. The resulting conclusions are summarized as follows. 1.Non-discretionary factors must be taken into account in the performance evaluation, or significant biased evaluation results will be obtained. 2.The technical inefficiency of audit divisions mainly resulted from pre-reorganization scale inefficiency, but the technical inefficiency of audit offices resulted from pure technical inefficiency. 3.The ratio of the number of male auditors to that of total auditors and the ratio of the number of lower-level staffs to that of the total staffs both are positively associated with technical efficiency. 4.The number of professional licenses which the auditors possessed imposes different influences on the efficiencies of audit divisions and those of audit offices. 5.Management changes of audit agencies, auditor transfers, one-party-dominance in local government, organizational change of audit agencies, and of the same ruling party for central and local government are all not significant related with operating efficiencies of the local auditing agencies, but their signs are as expected. 6.Budget size is nonlinearly negatively related to the operating efficiencies of audit divisions but positively to those of audit offices.
期刊論文
1.解芳宜、薛富井(20101100)。運用資料包絡分析法探討臺北縣29個鄉鎮市公所之財政效率。會計學報,3(1),83-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Thanassoulis, E.(1995)。Assessing Police Forces in England and Wales using Data Envelopment Analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,87(3),641-657。  new window
3.Lewin, A. Y.、Morey, R. C.、Cook, T. J.(1982)。Evaluating the Administrative Efficiency of Courts。Omega: International Journal of Management Science,10(4),401-411。  new window
4.王肇蘭、黃德芬、楊季臻(2012)。地方審計機關績效之研究。會計學報,4(2),115-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Anderson, U.、Cooper, W. W.、Lockhart, D.(1994)。DEA evaluations of performance audits。Internal Auditing,10(2),13-22。  new window
6.Blackburn, V.、Brennan, S.、Ruggiero, J.(2014)。Measuring efficiency in Australian schools: A preliminary analysis。Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,48(1),4-9。  new window
7.Ebadi, M. J.、Shiri Shahraki, M. S.(2010)。Determination of scale elasticity in the existence of non-discretionary factors in performance analysis。Knowledge-Based Systems,23(5),434-439。  new window
8.Muñiz, M.、Paradi, J.、Ruggiero, J.、Yang, Z.(2006)。Evaluating alternative DEA models used to control for non-discretionary inputs。Computers and Operations Research,33(5),1173-1183。  new window
9.Pollitt, C.、Summa, H.(1997)。Reflexive watchdogs? How supreme audit institutions account for themselves。Public Administration,75(2),313-336。  new window
10.Stevens, P. A.(2005)。Assessing the performance of local government。National Institute Economic Review,193(1),90-101。  new window
11.Syrjänen, M. J.(2004)。Non-discretionary and discretionary factors and scale in data envelopment analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,158(1),20-33。  new window
12.Timmer, C. P.(1971)。Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency。Journal of Political Economy,79(4),776-794。  new window
13.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
14.Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。  new window
15.王國樑、張美玲、陳麗雪(20091000)。臺灣地方法院管理效率之探討:三階段資料包絡分析法之應用。管理學報,26(5),559-576。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
17.Ruggiero, J.(1998)。Non-discretionary Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,111(3),461-469。  new window
研究報告
1.審計部(2009)。中華民國97年度直轄市及縣市地方決算審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
2.審計部(2010)。中華民國98年度直轄市及縣市地方決算審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
3.審計部(2011)。中華民國99年度直轄市及縣市地方決算審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
4.審計部(2012)。中華民國100年度直轄市及縣市地方決算審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
5.審計部(2013)。中華民國101年度直轄市及縣市地方決算審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
6.審計部(2009)。中華民國97年度鄉鎮縣轄市財務審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
7.審計部(2010)。中華民國98年度鄉鎮縣轄市財務審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
8.審計部(2011)。中華民國99年度鄉鎮縣轄市財務審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
9.審計部(2012)。中華民國100年度鄉鎮縣轄市財務審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
10.審計部(2013)。中華民國101年度鄉鎮縣轄市財務審核結果年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
11.審計部(2009)。中華民國97年政府審計年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
12.審計部(2010)。中華民國98年政府審計年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
13.審計部(2011)。中華民國99年政府審計年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
14.審計部(2012)。中華民國100年政府審計年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
15.審計部(2013)。中華民國101年政府審計年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
16.審計部(2014)。中華民國102年政府審計年報。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
17.審計部(2015)。中華民國103年政府審計年報。台北:審計部。  延伸查詢new window
18.審計部(2015)。審計部民國103年度績效報告。審計部。  延伸查詢new window
19.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Lewin, A. Y.、Morey, R. C.、Rousseau, J. J.(1980)。Efficiency analysis with non-discretionary resources。Texas, Austin:Center for Cybernetic Studies:The University of Texas at Austin。  new window
學位論文
1.洪欣弘(1998)。我國政府審計機關的效率評估-資料包絡分析法的應用(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cooper, W. W.、Seiford, L. M.、Tone, K.(2000)。Data Envelopment Analysis。Norwell, Massachusetts:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Coelli, T. J.、Rao, D. S. P.、O'Donnell, C. J.、Battese, G. E.(2005)。An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
3.張金男(2004)。政府審計效能:資料包絡分析法及專家問卷實證分析。桃園:誠宏國際開發。  延伸查詢new window
4.張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏(2012)。經濟學:理論與實際。臺北:翰蘆圖書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Buttery, R.、Simpson, R. K.、Hurford, C.(1993)。Audit in the Public Sector。Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire:ICSA。  new window
6.Stewart, T. A.(1998)。Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations。New York, NY:Crown Business。  new window
7.高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸(2003)。管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法。臺北:華泰文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Edvinsson, L.、Malone, M. S.(1997)。Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower。New York, NY:Harper Business Publisher。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lovell, C. A. K.(1993)。Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency--techniques and applications。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE