:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:價值衝突與價值教育:以人權教育為例
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:林佳範 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chia-fan
出版日期:2016
卷期:19:4
頁次:頁113-129
主題關鍵詞:人權教育價值衝突道德發展Human rights educationConflicts of valuesMoral development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:8
人權的議題,往往充滿爭議。此外,老師過去掌握的課堂知識或真理的權威性,已不可避免地被網路所挑戰,甚至可能被學生所挑戰。當老師在教室中的知識或真理權威被質疑,在價值上的衝突又該如何來面對?甚至當教育當局或老師被質疑在洗腦或教育不中立時,價值教育又該如何進行才有可能?本文將以人權教育為例,探討在民主多元價值的網路時代,價值教育該如何進行,才能不僅本身符合自由、平等、多元、差異等人權價值,又能使學生認知、認同與實踐人權的價值。本文最後建議教師在教室之教學,應拋棄過去教師作為教室中知識與真理的主張者角色,將教室建立成知識與價值的公共學習平台,成為民主開放的教室,才符合前揭的人權價值,與尊重學生的價值自主性。
Human rights issues are controversial. In addition, pupils now can google and challenge teachers what they are teaching in classrooms, where teachers used to monopolize knowledge and truth are no longer sustainable. While losing the position to be monopolizing in classrooms, how could teachers teach values? Even, when students challenge the educational authority to the effect that what taught at school is a kind of brainwashing, how value education is possible in teaching contexts? This study discusses these questions in terms of human rights education. It explores a possible model of teaching, which could meet the challenges and integrate human rights values, such as freedom, equality, and tolerance into the teaching process. It argues that the best model of teaching could be set up with a public platform for learning in the classroom where versatile opinions from students and teachers could be expressed and get examined freely and equally. In brief, a democratic classroom, like this platform serves, could be the best model for human rights education in the age of value pluralism and the Internet at the same time.
期刊論文
1.Oser, F. K.、Althof, W.、Higgins-D'Alessandro, A.(2008)。The Just Community approach to moral education: System change or individual change?。Journal of Moral Education,37(3),395-415。  new window
2.Pasek, J.、Feldman, L.、Romer, D.、Jamieson, H.(2008)。Schools as Incubators of Democratic Participation: Building Long-Term Political Efficacy with Civic Education。Applied Developmental Science,12(1),26-37。  new window
3.Enright, R. D.(1981)。A classroom discipline model for promoting social cognitive development in early childhood。Journal of Moral Education,11(1),47-60。  new window
4.Krogh, S.(1981)。Moral beginnings: The just community in Montessori pre-schools。Journal of Moral Education,11(1),41-46。  new window
5.Orlenius, K.(2008)。Tolerance of intolerance: Values and virtues at stake in education。Journal of Moral Education,37(4),467-484。  new window
6.Reiman, A.、Dotger, B.(2008)。What does innovation mean for moral educators?。Journal of Moral Education,37(2),151-164。  new window
圖書
1.Hunt, Lynn(2007)。Inventing Human Rights: A History。W. W. Norton & Company Ltd.。  new window
2.Power, F. C.、Higgins-D'Alessandro, Ann、Kohlberg, L.(1989)。Lawrence Kohlberg's approach to moral Education。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Habermas, Jurgen、Nicholsen, Shierry Weber、Lenhardt, Christian(1990)。Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action。Oxford:Polity Press。  new window
4.劉宗為、Fromm, Erich(2015)。逃避自由:透視現代人最深的孤獨與恐懼。臺北市:木馬文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Symonides, J.(2000)。Human rights: Concepts and standards。Aldershot, Hants, England:Burlington, Vt.:Paris:Ashgate:UNESCO。  new window
6.王泰升(2001)。台灣法律史概論。臺北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.林毓生(1983)。思想與人物。臺北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.林端(19940000)。儒家倫理與法律文化:社會學觀點的探索。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Habermas, Jürgen、Cronin, Ciaran、De Greif, Pablo(1998)。The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Watson, M.(2008)。Developmental discipline and moral education。Handbook of moral and character education。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
2.顏厥安(1999)。法文化與律文化的辯證。與Rosa歡樂起舞。臺北市:新新聞。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE