:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:課程實施的忠實性:What,Why,How及挑戰
書刊名:台灣數學教師(電子)期刊
作者:羅珍珍鄭寰文
出版日期:2009
卷期:19
頁次:頁2-14
主題關鍵詞:課程實施的忠實性八十二年版國小數學課程九年一貫數學教學內容涵蓋範圍
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:5
課程實施的忠實性(fidelity of implementation)在數學教育中是一個被廣泛討 論的新興主題。在這篇文章中,我們首先將提供一些背景:它是什麼?它的重要性為何?美國和台灣的學者專家是用那些方法來研究這個主題的?然後,我們將提出一些國內外代表性文獻,包括測量實施的忠實性(教學情境、涵蓋的內容範圍、融合教學情境與課程內容)和實施的指標,並討論突顯有關研究這個議題的爭論和帶來的挑戰。最後,我們將為這個領域有興趣進行研究的人,提出一些建議供未來研究參考。
期刊論文
1.Tarr, J. E.、Reys, R. E.、Reys, B. J.、Chávez, Ó.、Shih, J.、Osterlind, S. J.(2008)。The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39(3),247-280。  new window
2.Freeman, D. J.、Porter, A. C.(1989)。Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools?。American Educational Research Journal,26,403-421。  new window
3.Stein, M. K.、Lane, S.(1996)。Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project。Educational Research and Evaluation,2,50-80。  new window
4.鍾靜(20050500)。論數學課程近十年之變革。教育研究,133,124-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Stein, M. K.、Engle, R. A.、Smith, M. S.、Hughes, E. K.(2008)。Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell。Mathematical Thinking and Learning,10(4),313-340。  new window
6.Stein, M. K.、Grover, B. W.、Henningsen, M.(1996)。Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms。American Educational Research Journal,33(2),455-488。  new window
7.劉好、易正明(20000600)。小學新課程數學科實施情況調查研究。臺中師院學報,14,321-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.鍾靜(19990100)。落實小學數學新課程之意圖與學校本位的進修活動。課程與教學,2(1),15-34+148-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.劉好(19990400)。談落實國小數學新課程的教學。國教輔導,38(4)=329,50-57。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Grouws, D. A.(2008)。Three hundred classroom visits: What did we learn?。Conference on investigating the relationships between mathematics teaching and the development of curriculum。National Chiayi University。  new window
圖書
1.游自達、林宜城、林原宏、洪賢松、陳兆君、蔡秋菊(2007)。數學領域教科書評鑑報告。九年一貫課程之教科書總評鑑:設計理念、能力指標與統整性。臺北市:中華民國課程與教學學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.National Research Council(2004)。On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the quality of K-12 mathematic evaluation。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
3.Mullis, I. V. S.、Martin, M. O.、Gonzalez, E. J.、Chrostowski, S. J.(2004)。TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades。Chestnut Hill, MA:Boston College。  new window
4.National Council of Teacher of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teacher of Mathematics。  new window
5.Senk, S. L.、Thompson, D. R.(2003)。Standard-Based School Mathematics Curricula: What Are They? What Do Students Learn?。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
圖書論文
1.鍾靜(1994)。校長角色協助數學新課程實施。國民小學數學科新課程概說(低年級)。台北:台灣省國民學校研習會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reys, B. J.、Dingmon, S.、Olson, T. A.、Sutter, A.、Teuscher, D.、Chval, K.(2006)。Analysis of K-8 number and operation grade-level learning expectations。The intended mathematics curriculum as represented in state-level curriculum: Consensus or confusion?。Washington, DC:IAP-Information Age Publishing, Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE