臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：三位六年級教師數學課程實施之比較
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：徐偉民 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, Wei-min
出版日期：2011
卷期：57:2
頁次：頁85-120
主題關鍵詞：課程實施；國小教師；數學課程；Curriculum implementation；Elementary school teacher；Mathematics curriculum
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:81
本研究以三位不同背景的國小六年級教師為對象，探討個案教師於教室內實施數學課程的情形。本研究採用個案研究法，透過教學觀察、訪談和文件來蒐集資料，從教師使用數學任務的來源、類型和實施方式等三個面向來了解教師實施數學課程的情形。結果發現，三位教師使用的數學任務，雖然大多來自於教科書，但一位偏向調整內容以符合學生的生活經驗，另外兩位偏向忠實使用教科書的內容；三位教師使用的數學任務類型，雖然都以「有意義連結」的任務居多，但一位以小組開放討論的方式來實施，使學生大多以高認知的方式來學習數學任務，另外兩位採封閉式對話的方式來實施，使學生大多以低認知的方式來進行學習。三位教師在數學課程實施時，主要考量的因素分別是個人數學教學的信念、學校評量的政策和教學進度，以及學生的學習特性，因而呈現出不同數學課程實施的樣貌。
This study was aimed to understand how elementary school teachers implemented mathematics curriculum in their classroom， and to explore factors which influenced such processes. A case study methodology was used to compare three sixth-grade teachers with different teaching experiences and backgrounds. The primary data sources were classroom observations， teacher interviews， and documents recordedall collected during the 2009-10 school year. Data analyses indicated that most mathematics tasks which the three teachers used were from textbooks. One of the teachers usually adjusted tasks to match students' life experience， and the other teachers usually followed textbooks. Although most tasks they used were classified as ‘procedure with connection，’ one teacher let her students learn mathematics tasks in a high cognitive way， because she often used teamwork and open-ended questions. The other teachers had their students learn mathematics in a low cognitive way， because they used close-ended questions. When the three teachers implemented mathematics curriculum， they had different considerations， including personal mathematics teaching beliefs， school policy related to achievement tests and scheduled progress， and students' learning habits， respectively. Thus， they presented different pictures of implementing mathematics curriculum.
期刊論文
1.Henningsen, M.、Stein, M. K.(1997)。Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroombased factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，28(5)，524-549。  new window
2.Silver, E. A.、Mesa, V. M.、Morris, K. A.、Star, J. R.、Benken, B. M.(2009)。Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification。American Educational Research Journal，46(2)，501-531。  new window
3.Raymond, A. M.、Leinenbach, M.(2000)。Collaborative Action Research on the Learning and Teaching of Algebra: A Story of One Mathematics Teacher's Development。Educational Studies in Mathematics，41(3)，283-307。  new window
4.鄭章華、邱守榕、王夕堯(20020800)。影響國中數學教師進行建構式教學改變之因素--合作協助者之立場作為與成效分析。科學教育，12，127-146。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lloyd, G. M.(2008)。Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher's appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，39(1)，63-94。  new window
6.Tarr, J. E.、Reys, R. E.、Reys, B. J.、Chávez, Ó.、Shih, J.、Osterlind, S. J.(2008)。The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，39(3)，247-280。  new window
7.鍾靜(20050500)。論數學課程近十年之變革。教育研究月刊，133，124-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.連安青(19990100)。小學數學新課程之實施--一位小學教師的實作與反省。課程與教學，2(1)，35-48+150。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.徐偉民、徐于婷(20091200)。國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析：臺灣與香港之比較。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，67-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Nicol, C. C.、Crespo, S. M.(2006)。Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials。Educational Studies in Mathematics，62(3)，331-355。  new window
11.王玉品、徐偉民(20090600)。一位國小教師面對數學教學改革的抗拒和改變。科學教育學刊，17(3)，233-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林碧珍(20000200)。在職教師數學專業發展方案的協同行動研究。新竹師院學報，13，115-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Remillard, J. T.(2005)。Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula。Review of Educational Research，75(2)，211-246。  new window
14.陳仁輝、楊德清(20100200)。臺灣、美國與新加坡七年級代數教材之比較研究。科學教育學刊，18(1)，43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Huang, Y.-F.、Chang, C.-K.、Tzeng, J.-H.(2008)。學佈脈絡數學問題：探討一位國中數學教師課室佈題實務的改變。科學教育學刊，16(3)，255-280。  延伸查詢new window
16.Post, T. R.、Harwell, M. R.、Davis, J. D.、Maeda, Y.、Cutler, A. L.、Andersen, E. et al.(2008)。Standards-based mathematics curricula and middle-grades students' performance on standardized achievement tests。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，39(2)，184-212。  new window
17.Remillard, J.、Bryans, M.(2004)。Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，35(5)，352-388。  new window
18.Remillard, J.(1999)。Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform。A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development，29(3)，315-342。  new window
19.Gutstein, E.(2003)。Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school.。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，34(1)，37-73。  new window
20.Harwell, M. R.、Post, T. R.、Maeda, Y.、Davis, J. D.、Cutler, A. L.、Andersen, F. et al.(2007)。Standards-based mathematics curricula and secondary students' performance on standardized achievement tests.。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，38(1)，71-101。  new window
會議論文
1.Grouws, D. A.(2008)。Opportunity to learn: Three indices.。Chiayi, Taiwan。  new window
2.Boaler, J.、Brodie, K.(2004)。The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions.。Toronto,Canada。773-781。  new window
研究報告
1.Martin, M. O.、Mullis, I. V. S.、Gonzales, E. J.、Chrostowski, S. J.(2004)。TIMSS 2003 international science report: Findings from lEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades.。Chestnut Hill, MA。  new window
學位論文
1.Hsu, C. F.(2002)。國民中學數學領域課程實施之研究。國立臺南師範學院，臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Becker, J. P.、Selter, C.(1996)。Elementary School, Practices。International Handbook of Mathematics Education。Netherlands：Kluwer Academic。  new window
2.Finnish National Board of Education(2004)。National core curriculum for basic education 2004。Helsinki：Finnish National Board of Education。  new window
3.教育部(2003)。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要--數學學習領域。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Curriculum Planning and Development Division(2006)。Mathematics syllabus primary。Ministry of Education。  new window
5.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1984)。Naturalistic inquiry。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
6.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
7.Stein, M. K.、Smith, M. S.、Henningsen, M. A.、Silver, E. A.(2000)。Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
8.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA：National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
9.Huang, C-C.(1995)。教科書的正用與誤用。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
10.Brown, M.(2002)。Teaching by design: Understanding the interactions between teacher practice and the design of curricula innovation.。Evanston, IL。  new window
其他
1.Boaler, J.，Staples, M.(2005)。Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school.，http://www.stanford.edu/~jobolar/equitable.pdf， 20080815。  new window
2.Cohen, D. K.，Peterson., P. L.，Wilson, S.，Ball, D.，Putnam, R.，Prawat, R. et al(1990)。Effects of state-level reform of elementary school mathematics curriculum on classroom practice，http://ncrtl.msu.edu/http/rreports/html/pdf/rr90l4.pdf， 20090218。  new window
圖書論文
1.Stein, M. K.、Remillard, J.、Smith, M. S.(2007)。How curriculum influences student learning。Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Information Age。  new window
2.Goodlad, J. I.(1979)。The scope of curriculum field。Curriculum Inquiry: the Study of Curriculum Practice。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
3.Grouws, D. A.、Smith, M. S.、Sztajn, P.(2004)。The preparation and teaching practice of U. S. Mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8。The 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Results and interpretations。Reston, VA：NCTM。  new window
4.Cuban, L.(1992)。Curriculum stability and change。Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association。Macmillan。  new window
5.Ernest, P.(1998)。A postmodern perspective on research in mathematics education。Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identify。Dordrecht, Netherlands：Kluwer Academic。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：325（臺灣：324，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1408417 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67205480
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上