臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：各國教育研究審查機制之評析
書刊名：比較教育
作者：王秋絨
作者(外文)：Wang Yang, Chiou-rong
出版日期：2016
卷期：80
頁次：頁1-26
主題關鍵詞：比較教育；同儕審查；教育研究審查機制；Comparative education；Peer review；Educational research review mechanism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:7
本研究針對英國、美國、德國等先進國家教育研究中之審查機制進行 比較，說明教育研究審查機制中的可能問題，並進一步指出各國及我國在 教育研究審查機制上的建議。經比較分析的結果，本研究指出教育研究審 查機制的問題有：研究審查機制的可靠性及公平性問題；以及「同儕審 查」機制實施的可靠性問題。最後，本研究建議：一、同儕審查機制需建 立「後設評鑑」；二、審查者及委員會委員需能充分實踐圓熟且具「論證 力」的專業性之審核水準；三、鼓勵建立科際整合或跨界的審查者之聘用 及培育制度；四、宜建立審查措施與不合適性的懲罰機制。
This paper attempts to explore the current situation of educational research review, assessment and ethical mechanisms in the UK, USA and Germany, and to understand the merits and the shortcomings of the mechanism and the ways to improve the mechanism in those countries. This exploration is based on the perspective of comparative education and the viewpoints of ideas of academic tribe of T. Becher to criticize the peer review mechanism. The research result includes, firstly, peer review system gradually developed in the 1950’s, and become a common mechanism of academic gatekeeper in educational research quality. Secondly, to make an academic excellence, the peer review is asked to be fairness and professional, specialize in a variety of “procedural justice” design. Thirdly, anonymous or not in the peer review depends on the subculture of different countries or academic communities. Fourthly, improving malpractice in ethics and reliability of peer review.
期刊論文
1.Armstrong, J. S.(1982)。Is review by peers as fair as it appears?。Interfaces，12，62-74。  new window
2.Cole, S.、Rubin, L.、Cole, J. R.(1977)。Peer review and the support of science。Scientific American，237(4)，35。  new window
3.Horner, J.、Minifie, F. D.(2011)。Research ethics II: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership。J. Speech Lang. Hear，54(1)，S330-S345。  new window
4.Jeffers, B. R.(2002)。Continuing education in research ethics for the clinical nurse。The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing，33(6)，265-269。  new window
5.Klein, T.、Olbrecht, M.(2011)。Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in panel peer review research。International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education，2(2)，342-348。  new window
6.Lane, J. A.、Linden, D. J.(2009)。Is there gender bias in the peer review process at journal of neurophysiology。Journal of Neurophysiology，101(5)，2195-2196。  new window
7.Mutch, C.(2009)。Peer review: Developing a responsive, rigorous and educative process。New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies，44(1)，15-29。  new window
8.Research Councils UK(2006)。Report of the Research Councils UK efficiency and effectiveness of peer review project。Research Councils UK. Royal Society of Medicine，99，178-182。  new window
9.Stone, R.(2007)。Germany puts money on peer review。Science，278，792-794。  new window
10.Turner, L.(2003)。Promoting F. A. I. T. H. in peer review: Five core attributes of effective peer review。Journal of Academic Ethics，1(2)，181-188。  new window
11.邱炯友(20030300)。學術電子期刊同儕評閱之探析。教育資料與圖書館學，40(3)，309-323。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃毅志、曾世杰(2008)。教育學術期刊高退稿率的編審制度、惡質評審與評審倫理。臺東大學教育學報，19(2)，183-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王保進(2007)。高等教育之研究品質評核機制探討。高教評鑑，1(1)，23-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.余曉雯、鍾宜興(20091200)。德國高等教育排名之研究。教育資料集刊，44，169-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.周祝瑛、吳榕峯、胡祝惠(20110500)。SSCI下的人文社會領域學術評鑑：以國立政治大學為例。比較教育，70，31-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陸偉明(20090900)。同儕審查制度。人文與社會科學簡訊，10(4)，117-123。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃毅志(20100400)。當前國內教育學術期刊編審制度之檢討：教育學者如何在良性學術互動中集體成長？。教育研究學報，44(1)，1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.楊深坑、鄭勝耀、馬信行、黃慕萱、謝伸裕、楊正誠(20070600)。教育學門國際期刊評比之研究。教育研究集刊，53(2)，1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃慕萱、張郁蔚(20060600)。人文社會學者學術評鑑指標之探討。圖書資訊學刊，4(1/2)，17-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Smith, R.(2006)。Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals。Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine，99(4)，178-182。  new window
圖書
1.Becher, T.(1989)。Tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines。Milton Keynes：Society for Research into Higher Education /Open University。  new window
2.Bernstein, B.(1971)。Class, code and control. Vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards a Sociology of language。London：R. K. P.。  new window
3.Fuller, S.(2001)。Knowledge management foundations。Boston, MA：Butterworth-Heinemann。  new window
4.National Academies(2011)。Our study process: Ensuring independent, objective advice。Washington, DC：National Academies。  new window
5.National Science Foundation(2006)。Report to the national science board on the national Science。Washington, DC：NSF。  new window
6.Shils, E.(1997)。The order of learning: Essays on the contemporary university。Piscataway, NJ：Transaction。  new window
7.Slaughter, S.、Rhoades, G.(2004)。Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, states and higher education。Baltimor, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
8.Macrina, F. L.(2005)。Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research。Washington, DC：ASM Press。  new window
9.Becher, T.(2001)。Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines。Philadelphia, PA：Tony Becher and Paul R. Trowler。  new window
10.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The theory of communicative action: Reason in the rationalization of society。Boston：Beacon Press。  new window
11.Slaughter, Sheila、Leslie, Larry L.(1997)。Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university。Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
12.Bereday, George Z. F.(1964)。Comparative Method in Education。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
其他
1.邱天助(20090407)。學術審查的倫理該改了。  延伸查詢new window
2.陶雨臺(19940519)。也談「國科會獎助」功過彌補「平頭現象」，視為「和誘」未免「太沉重」了。  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭雄淋(20010117)。法律意義抄襲與學術意義抄襲。  延伸查詢new window
4.龔鵬程(19990210)。知識分子權力的滋味。  延伸查詢new window
5.Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft(2007)。Peer review at the DFG: The review board，http://www.research-information.de/ Projekte/Peer_Review/projekte_peer.asp。  new window
6.Research Excellence Framework 2014(2011)。REF 2014 submissions system: Important requirements and output information，http://www.uhi.ac.uk/en/research-enterprise/research-excellence-framework/GuidanceonSubmission SREF02-2011.pdf。  new window
7.Federkei, G.(2005)。The dynamics of quality assurance in German higher education，http://www.fup.pt/admin/cipes/docs/eventos/Federkei.pdf， 20071107。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳光興、錢永祥(2005)。新自由主義全球化之下的學術生產。全球化與知識生產:反思臺灣學術評鑑。臺北：唐山。  延伸查詢new window
2.Oancea, A.(2009)。Standardisation and versatility in the assessment of education research in the United Kingdom。Assessing the quality of educational research in higher education: International perspectives。Rotterdam：Sense。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：384（臺灣：350，外國：34） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1951065 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67752014
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上