:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國智慧財產虛假訴訟與我國智慧財產權不當行使之案例研究
書刊名:公平交易季刊
作者:楊智傑 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Chih-chieh
出版日期:2017
卷期:25:4
頁次:頁67-132
主題關鍵詞:Noerr-Pennington豁免虛假訴訟例外客觀上欠缺基礎正當權利行使不當行使智慧財產權警告信函Noerr-Pennington doctrineSham litigation exceptionObjectively baselessExercise of rights properlyImproper conductWarning letters
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:161
  • 點閱點閱:17
期刊論文
1.曾品傑(19980100)。從民法到公平交易法--以損害賠償為中心。公平交易季刊,6(1),91-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Koba, James B. Jr.(1998)。The Doctrine That Will Not Die: Nobelpharma, Walker Process, and the Patent-Antitrust Counterclaim。ANTITRUST ABA,13。  new window
3.Schla, Lawrence(1998)。Compulsory Royalty-Free Licensing as an Antitrust Remedy for Patent Fraud: Law, Policy and the Patent-Antitrust Interface Revisited。Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy,7,467-513。  new window
4.楊智傑(20150100)。專利侵權之不正行為抗辯與行使詐欺取得專利之反托拉斯法制裁。公平交易季刊,23(1),101-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.楊智傑(20150100)。美國專利權人敗訴承擔律師費用之研究。專利師,20,45-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊智傑(20120400)。美國智慧財產權訴訟中核發禁制令之審查。智慧財產權,160,51-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蕭椀如(20140700)。競爭法規範智慧財產權掠奪性訴訟之研究。公平交易季刊,22(3),67-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Liang, Mark、Berliner, Brian(2013)。Fee Shifting in Patent Litigation。Virginia Journal of Law & Technology,18,59+67-68。  new window
9.王立達(20161000)。智慧財產權侵權警告函妥適規範之再探討:從公平交易法之適用與專利主張實體防治立法出發。公平交易季刊,24(4),71-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.洪儒瑤、施錦村(2016)。專利警告函資訊內容與法律責任之關連:專利權類型的干擾效果。公平交易季刊,24(3)。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳炫宇(20160200)。濫用訴訟制度與律師費用負擔--簡評臺灣高等法院臺中分院102年度上字第162號判決。軍法專刊,62(1),85-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.謝杞森(20090400)。智慧財產法院審理公平交易法涉及智財權所生行政訴訟事件之界限。公平交易季刊,17(2),45-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Brown, Suzanne K.(1999)。Omission Possible: Nobelpharma v. Implant Innovations Makes Material Omissions in Patent Applications a Possible Source of Liability for Antitrust Counterclaims。Journal of Corporation Law,25。  new window
14.Chen, Emily H.(2013)。Making Abusers Pay: Deterring Patent Litigation by Shifting Attorneys' Fees。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,28。  new window
15.Drachtman, Craig(2014)。Taking on Patent Trolls: the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine's Extension to Pre-Lawsuit Demand Letters and its Sham Litigation Exception。Rutgers Law Record,42。  new window
16.Gordon, George G.、Stack, Stephen A.(2011)。Aligning Antitrust and Patent Law: Side Effects from the Federal Circuit's Cure for the Inequitable Conduct 'Plague' in Therasense。Antitrust ABA,26。  new window
17.Mayergoyz, Anna(2009)。Lessons from Europe on How to Tame U.S. Patent Trolls。Cornell International Law Journal,42。  new window
18.O'Donnell, S. W.(2004)。Unified Theory of Antitrust Counterclaims in Patent Litigation。Virginia Journal of Law & Technology,9。  new window
19.Rakestraw, Trace W.(2009)。Leaving Fraudulent Patent Procurement to the Realm of Antitrust Liability in Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. Mosey。New England Law Review,43。  new window
20.Riedel, Eric J.(2016)。Patent Infringement Demand Letters: Does Noerr-Pennington or the First Amendment Preempt State Law Liability for Misleading Statements?。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,31。  new window
21.Roth, Daniel(2013)。Patent Litigation Attorneys' Fees: Shifting from Status to Conduct。Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property,13。  new window
22.林首愈、賴文智(20071000)。我國學名藥品的仿單著作權問題。智慧財產權月刊,106,74-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃銘傑(2009)。競爭法與智慧財產法之交會:相生與相剋之間。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.公平交易委員會(2014)。認識公平交易法。台北市:公平交易委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝銘洋(1997)。智慧財產權之基礎理論。翰蘆圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊崇森(2003)。專利法理論與應用。三民書局股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉孔中(20150000)。解構智財法及其與競爭法的衝突與調和。臺北:新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王澤鑑(2012)。民法概要。臺北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.邵瓊慧(2010)。我國智慧財產案件定暫時狀態處分制度之研究--兼論美國案例最新發展。智慧財產訴訟制度相關論文彙編。臺北:司法院。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE