:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以QFD探討大學生之國外旅遊服務品質
書刊名:危機管理學刊
作者:韓慧林劉永崧陳俞璇陳昱傑許庭瑜卓江龍
作者(外文):Hai, H. L.Liu, Y. S.Chen, Y. S.Chen, Y. C.Shu, T. U.Zhu, J. L.
出版日期:2017
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁65-76
主題關鍵詞:海外旅遊資料包絡法投票式權重評選模式品質機能展開法Overseas tourismData envelopment analysisDEAVote-rankingQuality function deploymentQFD
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:12
大學生的海外旅遊需求急遽上升,而不同旅遊公司也非常努力定義與量測其服務品質之良窳,更希望從中找到相互之間的關係;也就是在旅行業者之服務水準下能滿足大學生之海外旅遊需求;而此思維及作業流程正好符合品質機能展開法之精神。本研究為了改善旅遊業之服務品質與提升大學生海外旅遊之滿意度,運用Google 網路問卷方式,回收具海外旅遊經驗之大學生問卷42份,應用品質機能展開法及投票式權重評選模式進行分析、權重計算與評估與求出權重值,結合矩陣上方之旅遊業服務品質評分,填注矩陣內,並獲得結論與建議如後:(1).獲得4 項主要旅遊需求如有形性、可靠性、完整性、保證性,以及17 項次要指標。(2).審閱有關服務品質之4項指標如人員服務品質、舒適性、安全性及便利性。(3).發展一套旅遊服務品質之量化評估模式。(4).提供一些建議給旅遊業者以改善其服務品質。
The college students' overseas tourism demand has risen sharply. Efforts in defining and measuring quality have come largely from the different tourism companies. They hope to find the relationship between each other. The tourism companies provide service levels to meet the overseas travel needs of college students. And this mode of thinking and procedure exactly fits the spirit of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). The study is in order to improve the service quality of travel companies and increase the satisfaction of college students' overseas travel. At present, we apply the Google questionnaires will be requested to answer by 42 college students with overseas travel experience. They will be analyzed, weight-calculated and evaluated by QFD and the vote-ranking method. The cells of matrix table are filled with the weights assigned to the college students where those requirements are affected by the parameters of tourism agency across the top of the matrix. Conclusions and suggestions are acquired as following: (1) obtaining to four major tourism indicators such as tangibility, reliability, integration assurance, and 17 sub-index, (2) reviewing the studies that have investigated four service abilities such as, service quality, comfort, safety and facility, (3) developing a quantitative assessment model of travel service quality, and (4) offering some suggestions for travel agencies to improve their service quality.
期刊論文
1.Hashimoto, A.、Ishikawa, H.(1993)。Using DEA to Evaluate The State of Society As Measured by Multiple Social Indicators。Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,27(4),257-268。  new window
2.Foroughi, A. A.、Tamiz, T.(2005)。An Effective Total Ranking Model for A Ranked Voting System。OMEGA,33,491-496。  new window
3.Noguchi, H.、Ogawa, M.、Ishii, H.(2002)。The Appropriate Total Ranking Method Using DEA for Multiple Categorized Purposes。Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,146,155-166。  new window
4.Liu, C. H.、Wu, H. H.(2008)。A fuzzy group decision-making approach in quality function deployment。Quality and Quantity,42,527-540。  new window
5.Sharma, J. R.、Rawani, A. M.(2009)。Linking company with customers and competitors: a comprehensive QFD model and its post-matrix analysis。International Journal of Modelling and Simulation,29(2),191-198。  new window
6.Dikmen, I.、Birgonul, M. T.、Kiziltas, S.(2005)。Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry。Building and Environment,40(2),245-255。  new window
7.Cook, W. D.、Kress, M.(1990)。A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings。Management Science,36(11),1302-1310。  new window
8.林亮宗、吳信宏、邱振興(20040900)。應用品質機能展開規劃以顧客為導向之電子商店--以鞋業為例。修平學報,9,169-184。  延伸查詢new window
9.翁明珠、蕭瑞民、蔡澄雄(20090200)。品質機能展開中利用模糊分析方法求解設計需求。品質學報,16(1),61-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.韓慧林、王貴民、張高福、蕭士穎、劉彥甫(20150300)。全募兵制之軍事轉型風險管理研究。危機管理學刊,12(1),33-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃士滔、莊慧蘭、蘇曉蘭(20141000)。運用QFD與TRIZ開發封裝用銅線製程參數。管理資訊計算,3(特刊),129-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.韓慧林(20140300)。應用QFD探討資訊安全服務品質--以實踐大學高雄校區為例。危機管理學刊,11(1),49-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Banker, R. D.、Cooper, W. W.、Seiford, L. M.、Thrall, R. M.、Zhu, J.(2004)。Return to scale in different DEA models。European Journal of Operational Research,154,345-362。  new window
14.Hashimoto, A.(1997)。A Ranked Voting System Using a DEA/AR Exclusion Model: a Note。European Journal of Operational Research,97,600-604。  new window
15.Obata, T.、Ishii, H.(2003)。A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data。European Journal of Operational Research,151(1),233-237。  new window
16.Liu, F. H. F.、Hai, H. L.(2005)。The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for Selecting Suppliers。The International Journal of Production Economics,97,308-317。  new window
17.杜瑞澤、鄭榮燦(20021200)。品質機能展開(QFD)於產品設計之應用研究--以臺灣機車為例。設計學報,7(3),85-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.林士彥(20050400)。非營利組織服務品質改善之研究:以品質屋決策輔助模式分析臺北市立動物園教育中心。博物館學季刊,19(2),65-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Green, R. H.、Doyle, J. R.、Cook, W. D.(1996)。Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation。European Journal of Operational Research,90(3),461-472。  new window
20.韓慧林、邱子芯、許紜綾、莊智雅、李孟潔、楊宛蓉(20150900)。以實踐大學資管系學生觀點評估關鍵成功職能。全球商業經營管理學報,7,23-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.郭財吉(20020400)。綠色產品設計--綠色品質機能展開。永續產業發展,2,45-52。  延伸查詢new window
22.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
23.簡瑞瑩、黃士滔(20080600)。結合品質機能展開與可拓優度評價法以提升綠色螺絲供應商之經營績效。品質學報,15(3),167-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Seiford, Lawrence M.(1996)。Data Envelopment Analysis: The Evolution of the state of the Art (1978-1995)。Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis,7(2/3),99-137。  new window
25.Parasuraman, Ananthanarayanan、Zeithaml, Valarie A.、Berry, Leonard L.(1985)。A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research。Journal of Marketing,49(4),41-50。  new window
26.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
會議論文
1.楊烈岱、洪清鏈(2010)。應用品質機能展開技術評估與選擇教學資源之研究。中華民國品質學會第38屆年會暨第8屆全國品質管理研討會,211-217。  延伸查詢new window
2.張志平、劉淑妙、呂偉恩(2007)。應用品質機能展開法於大學行政服務品質之研究--以華梵大學為例。中華民國品質學會第43屆年會暨第13屆全國品質管理研討會。台北。1-11。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂怡潔、劉雅玲、楊謹嘉、林容妃、蔡巧琳、賴薇琳、陳永璋(2003)。應用品質機能展開法探討現代書局之服務品質研究。中華民國品質學會第39屆年會暨第9屆全國品質管理研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.林頂立、周建基(2005)。股票金融機業服務品質機能評量之探討。第3屆『管理思維與實務』學術研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.王河星、杜壯、蔡珮娟(2000)。以品質機能展開法探討台北捷運系統之服務品質。邁向21世紀品質管理技術應用研討會。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃啟揚、林玥秀、游達榮(2003)。服務品質與顧客滿意度之外--品質機能展開技術在餐飲服務業的應用。桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂奇樺(2003)。品質機能展開法應用於員工期望差距分析之探討--以I公司為例(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林威呈(2001)。台灣地區休閒農場假日遊客旅遊行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃冠凱(2014)。以投票式評選法探討導入學習歷程平台之關鍵成功因素(碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.高起昂(2016)。應用Kano二維品質模式與品質機能展開於臺華輪旅客服務品質之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄海洋科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林連聰、宋秉明、陳思倫(2011)。觀光學概論。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chase, R. B.、Jacobs, F. R.、Aquilano, N. J.(2005)。Operations Management: For Competitive Advantage。NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
3.Stevenson, W. J.(2006)。Operations Management。NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Ritzman, L. P.、Krajewski, L. J.(2003)。Foundations of Operations Management。NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
5.Heizer, J.、Render, B.(2004)。Operations Management。Pearson Education。  new window
6.曾光華、陳貞吟、饒怡雲(2011)。觀光與餐旅行銷。新北市:前程文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.McIntosh, Robert Woodrow、Gupta, Shashikant(1977)。Tourism: principles, practices, philosophies。Grid。  new window
8.楊明賢、劉翠華(2010)。觀光學概論。新北市:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.李慈惠(2013)。旅遊糾紛與緊急事件處理。新北市:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.赤尾洋二(1995)。品質機能展開研究小組譯品質展開入門。台北:和昌。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE