:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從原住民族自決與民族學校之法律定位展望原住民族實驗教育的方向
書刊名:台灣原住民族研究學報
作者:王前龍 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chien-lung
出版日期:2017
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁39-58
主題關鍵詞:原住民族實驗教育學校型態實驗教育家長教育選擇權民族自決民族學校Indigenous Experimental EducationSchool-Based Experimental EducationParents' Rights to School ChoiceIndigenous self-determinationIndigenous school
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:15
政府啟動「學校型態原住民族實驗教育」計畫,補助原住民地區的實驗學校將民族文化融入課程,做為設置原住民族學校的基礎。本文旨在對國際法與國內法相關文獻進行分析,探究原住民族自決與民族學校的法律定位,建議實驗教育應有的方向。在國際人權法上,在符合國家最低標準且由人自由選擇就讀的前提下,原住民族可基於自決權設置與管理其學校體系,但其法律定位取決於自決權運作的形式。在國內法上,台灣原住民族自決採「參與公共治理」的形式,迄今未能設置民族學校,但若依據『原住民族基本法』通過『原住民族自治區法』,應能以「自我管理」的自決形式,以縣級自治權限來管理區內各級學校,並依據『原住民族教育法』而轉型成民族學校;最後,各參與實驗學校應以未來族群自治區中心學校之定位,依據課程綱要較大幅度融入族群文化,以滿足重視文化傳承家長之擇校需求;同時,必須兼顧學生基本學力,使能與在自治區外學校就學的原住民學生競爭2% 的升學保障名額而升上大學,成為民族自治的儲備人才。
The Government has launched the project of "School-Based Indigenous Experimental Education" to support schools in Indigenous regions to incorporate Indigenous culture into curriculum and to construct the basis for establishing "Indigenous schools." The purpose of this article is to prospect the direction of the project from the legal positions of Indigenous self-determination and Indigenous schools with literature analysis based on related international laws and domestic laws. According to international human right laws, Indigenous Peoples should have the right to establish their own school systems based on self-determination, but the education provided has to conform the state's minimum standard and the students' participation must be optional; besides, the legal positions of the school systems was influenced by the forms of self-determination. According to domestic laws, it's essential for Indigenous Peoples to legislate the "autonomous regions law" based on the Indigenous Peoples Basic Law to obtain the jurisdictions to take over county schools in the regions, and transform them into Indigenous school systems based on the Education Act for Indigenous Peoples. Therefore, the experimental schools should play the potential role of central schools of the prospective autonomous regions, bringing in Indigenous culture into curriculum with greater extent; besides, the academic competence should also take into account to support the students to compete with the Indigenous students attending schools off Indigenous regions for the 2% preferential enrollments to college, and to become the potential human resource for Indigenous self-governance.
期刊論文
1.曾建元、郭力嘉(20070300)。原住民族自治區之設置對現行地方制度的影響。中華人文社會學報,6,44-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳張培倫(20131200)。族群發展導向積極賦權行動與原住民族。政治與社會哲學評論,47,1-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.施正鋒(20141200)。臺灣原住民族自治的路徑。台灣原住民族研究學報,4(4),189-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳宏銘(20121200)。臺灣原住民族自治制度的立法議程與規劃之研究。中華行政學報,11,73-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃錦堂(20121100)。原住民族保障與原住民族自治區法草案之研究。法令月刊,63(11),68-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.高德義(2004)。原住民自治的理論與實踐:以排灣族為例之探討及策略規劃。族群關係與國家發展學術研討會,(會議日期: 5月1日)。桃園:國立中央大學客家學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.原住民族委員會(2015)。103學年度原住民族教育調查統計。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳枝烈、張純淑(2015)。原住民族實驗學校設置規劃及民族教育政策建議計畫成果報告。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Xanthaki, Alexandra(2007)。Indigenous Rights and United Nations Standards: Self-Determination, Culture and Land。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Howard, Bradley Reed(2003)。Indigenous Peoples and the State--The Struggle for Native Rights。DeKalb, IL:Northern Illinois University Press。  new window
3.McHugh, Paul G.(2004)。Aboriginal Societies and the Common Law: A History of Sovereignty, Status, and Self-Determination。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.俞寬賜(2002)。國際法新論。台北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Creel, Barbara L.、Valencia-Weber, Gloria、Cruz, Christine Zuni、Bobroff, Kenneth、Washburn, Kevin、LaVelle, John(2005)。Cohen's handbook of Federal Indian Law。Newark, N.J.:LexisNexis。  new window
6.Anaya, S. James(2009)。International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
7.Isaac, Thomas(2004)。Aboriginal Law: Commentary, Cases and Materials。Saskatoon, Sask:Purich Publishing。  new window
其他
1.隋杜卿(2010)。「原住民族自治法(草案)」的評析與建議,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/8229。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡英文,陳建仁競選辦公室(2016)。2016 總統大選蔡英文原住民族政策主張,http://iing.tw/posts/46。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20160801)。總統代表政府向原住民族道歉,http://www.president.gov.tw/NEWS/20603, 。  延伸查詢new window
4.中華民國行政院(2017)。原住民族歷史正義與轉型正義推動已有實質進展,http://www.ey.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=F8BAEBE9491FC830&s=6280C2741A376FF0。  延伸查詢new window
5.台邦.撒沙勒(2012)。設置「原住民自治區」對高雄市之影響評析研究,http://research.kcg.gov.tw/upload/RelFile/Research/929/634913386307170490.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
6.自由時報(2016)。原教法上路近20年原住民族實驗教育終露曙光,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1936910。  延伸查詢new window
7.行政院(2009)。行政區劃法草案總說明,http://www.moi.gov.tw/files/site_node_file/4305/行政區劃法草案總說明.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
8.原住民族委員會(2007)。原住民族自治區法口頭報告,http://npl.ly.gov.tw/npl/report/961213/10.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
9.行政院原住民族委員會(2007)。原住民族自治區法草案,http://npl.ly.gov.tw/npl/report/961213/10.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部(2017)。原住民族課程發展協作中心正式揭牌,https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=0C2B16A9EC4C42F5。  延伸查詢new window
11.原住民族委員會(2015)。原住民族自治暫行條例草案總說明,http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=35AE118732EB6BAF&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C2E98D37750E2CCCF6。  延伸查詢new window
12.原住民族委員會(2016)。原民會頒布辦理學校型態原住民族實驗教育補助要點,http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID-35AE118732EB6BAF&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C2A4F87E9F5A6A9EF0。  延伸查詢new window
13.原視新聞(2017)。小清華原專班創佳績55畢業生全錄取,http://titv.ipcf.org.tw/news-30049。  延伸查詢new window
14.Hurley, Mary C.,Wherrett, Jill(2009)。Aboriginal Self-government,http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/prb0923-e.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Imai, Shin(2009)。Indigenous Self-Determination and the State。Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives。Hart Publishing。  new window
2.Walters, Mark D.(2009)。Paradox: The Emergence of Indigenous Rights Law in Canada。Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
3.Charters, Claire(2009)。Indigenous Peoples and International Law and Policy。Indigenous People and the Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives。Portland, OR:Hart Publishing。  new window
4.Richardson, Benjamin J.(2009)。The Dyadic Character of US Indian Law。Indigenous People and the Law。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
5.Richardson, Benjamin J.、Imai, Shin、McNeil, Kent(2009)。Indigenous Peoples and the Law: Historical, Comparative and Contextual issues。Indigenous Peoples and The Law: Comparative and Critical Perspectives。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
6.Ruru, Jacinta(2009)。The Maori Encounter with Aotearoa: New Zealand's Legal System。Indigenous People and the Law。Oxford:Hart Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE