:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家長教育選擇權的可行性分析
書刊名:初等教育學報
作者:鄭新輝 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Hsin-hui
出版日期:1997
卷期:10
頁次:頁389-415
主題關鍵詞:教育選擇權家長選擇學校選擇教育券Educational cnoiceParental cnoicdCnoice of schoolVoucher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(4) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:18
  • 共同引用共同引用:155
  • 點閱點閱:45
     家長教育權是一種自然的權利,而家長教育選擇權在這一波國內教育改革運動中 ,已開始受到重視。作為一個擁有教育權主體的兒童與家長,在教育改革的權利重分配過程 中,理應透過選擇權的行使,以滿足其教育需求。本文的目的在探討家長教育選擇權的理論 基礎、美國對家長教育選擇權的實施情形、及國內在國民教育階段家長教育選擇權的可行性 ,俾提供教育決策及進一步研究的參考。家長教育選擇權,無論由哲學、經濟學、社會學、 法學及行政學的觀點,均可獲得支持性的看法。家長教育選擇權運動在美國已正式推動近二 十年,在理念上雖然仍有爭論,實施成效上仍有賴進一步的研究,但在其強調公平、效率及 追求卓越的潮流中,家長教育選擇權運動仍會持續在各州推行。臺灣的教育具有本土的文化 背景,家長教育選擇權的行使必須植基在現有架構上加以探討,才能有較實際的作為。而教 育選擇無論是入學前的選擇 (公私立學校的選擇、公立學校間的選擇、公立學校內的選擇、 教育券的實施 )、教育過程的選擇 (課程的選擇、 教育的選擇、教師的選擇 ) 及進路的選 擇 (高中職與五專聯招的選擇、高職免試入學的選擇 ),均應重視基於學生最佳利益保障下 的選擇機會。惟在推動過程中,仍應重視潛在的問題。
     The educational rights of parents are the natural rights, and the educational choice of parents have been emphasized recently on the movement of educational reforms in Taiwan. Parents and children who have the educational sovereignty position shall have the rights to make choices to satisfy their needs of education when the rights of education are reallocated under the process of reforms. The purposes of this article are to examine the rationales of the educational choice of parents, and to analyze the movement of the educational choices in America, and to explain the applications on the compulsory education in Taiwan. There are some supportive rationales of the educational choice of parents on the philosophy, economics, sociology, law, and the administrational theories. The movement of the educational choice have been implemented for about two decades in America. Although there are some issues, the movement will still be pushed in each state under the stream of the equity, efficienty, and excellence. Based on our context, the educational choice of parents can be examined on the choice of school before entrance, including the choice of public or private schools, inter-public schools, intra-public schools, and the implement of vouchers; on the processes of education, including the choice of curriculum, materials, and teachers; on the choice of trace after junior high school, including the choice of the joint examination of entrance and the free entrance of the vocational high schools. All of the choice must be considered carefully on the benefits of the children and prevented the latent problems.
期刊論文
1.Finn, C.(1984)。Toward strategic independence: nine commandments for enhancing school effectiveness。Phi Delta Kappan,65,518-524。  new window
2.Fowler, F. C.(1992)。American theory and French practice: a theoretical rationale for regulating school choice。Educational Administration Quarterly,28(4),452-472。  new window
3.Goldring, E. B.、Shapira, R.(1993)。Choice, empowerment and involvement: what satisfies parents?。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,15(4),396-409。  new window
4.Lee, V. E.(1993)。Educational choice: the stratifying effects of selecting schools and courses。Educational Policy,7(2),125-148。  new window
5.Lee, V. E.、Croninger, R. G.、Smith, J. B.(1994)。Parental choice and social stratification in education: the paradox Detroit。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,16(4),434-457。  new window
6.Levin, H. M.(1991)。The Economics of educational choice。Economics of Education Review,10(2),137-158。  new window
7.Ranson, S.(1993)。Markets or democracy for education。British Journal of Educational Studies,41(4),333-352。  new window
8.Raywid, M. A.(1988)。Excellence and choice: friends or foes?。Urban Review,19(1),39。  new window
9.吳清山、黃久芬(19951200)。美國教育選擇權之研究。初等教育學刊,4,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.莊勝義(1996)。市場導向與教育改革。國立台灣師範大學教育改革學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wilson, W. C.(1991)。Attitude toward school choice in South Carolina。The Annual Meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration。  new window
研究報告
1.陳麗珠(1996)。教育券制度在我國可行性之研究:以高級中等教育為例 (計畫編號:NSC 85-2418-H-017-003-F6)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Mintrom, Michael A.(1994)。Policy Entrepreneurship in Theory and Practice: A Comparative State Analysis of the Rise of School Choice as a Policy Idea(博士論文)。State University of New York。  new window
2.吳明益(1994)。國家管制教育市場的合理地位與制度因應--以教育權的保障為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳靖國(1995)。「民間教育改革」意識形態之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.薛曉華(1996)。台灣民間教育改革運動:國家與社會的分析。台北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.California Department of Education(1997)。Fact Book 1996-97: handbook of education information。California Department of Education。  new window
4.Cookson, P. W. Jr.(1992)。The choice controversy。California:Corwin Press。  new window
5.Cookson, P. W. Jr.(1994)。School choice: the struggle for the soul of American education。New York:Binghamton。  new window
6.Coon, J. E.、Sugarraan, S. D.(1978)。Education by choice: the case for family control。University of California Press。  new window
7.Chubb, J. E.、Moe, T. M.(1990)。Politics, markets and American schools。Washington:Brookings Institution。  new window
8.Drucker, P.(1974)。Management: task, responsibilities, practices。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
9.Henig, J. R.(1994)。Rethinking school choice: limits of the market metaphor。New Jersey:Prinection University Press。  new window
10.Hirschman, Albert O.(1970)。Exit, voice and loyalty。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Kahne, J.(1996)。Reforming educational policy: democracy, community and the individual。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
12.McArthur, E.(1995)。Use of school choice educational policy issues: statistical perspectives。Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics。  new window
13.Nathan, J.(1989)。Public school by choice。St. Paul:The institute for Learning and Teaching。  new window
14.Nelson, J. L.、Carlson, K.、Palonsky, S. B.(1994)。Critical issue in education: A dialectic approach。McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.。  new window
15.Saxe, R.(1975)。School-community interaction。Berkeley:McCutchan。  new window
16.Smith, K. B.、Meier, K. J.(1995)。The case against school choice。New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
17.Wells, A. S.(1993)。Time to choose: America at the crossroads of school choice policy。New York:Hill and Wang。  new window
18.Wilkinson, B. W.、Easton, S. T.(1994)。Education choice: necessary but not sufficient。Canada:IRPP。  new window
19.Young, T. W.、Clinchy, E.(1992)。Choice in public education。New York:Columbia University。  new window
20.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第一期諮議報告書。台北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李英毅(1994)。父母教育權之確立。國民教育的理論與實際。台北:稻香。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃政傑(1995)。教改理念。教育改革的展望。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cookson, P. W. Jr.(1992)。Public subsides for privates school: what do we know and how do we proceed?。The choice controversy。California:Corwin Press。  new window
4.Fliegel, S.(1989)。Parental choice in East Harlem schools。Public schools by choice。St. Paul:The Institute for Learning and Teaching。  new window
5.Glenn, C.(1989)。Parent choice and American value。Public schools by choice。St. Paul:The Institute for Learning and Teaching。  new window
6.Paulu, N.(1994)。Improving schools and empowering parents: Choice in American education。Concepts and issues in school choice。New York:The Edwin Mellen Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE