:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣區域容受力及生態足跡之研究
書刊名:建築學報
作者:李永展董娟鳴 引用關係林士堅
作者(外文):Lee, Yung-jaanTung, Chuan-mingLin, Shih-chien
出版日期:2017
卷期:102
頁次:頁37-52
主題關鍵詞:氣候變遷容受力生態足跡碳足跡Climate changeCarrying capacityEcological footprintCarbon footprint
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:61
  • 點閱點閱:73
台灣位處西太平洋颱風侵襲密集地區,島內七成以上土地屬於山坡地與高山林地,大部分人口則以高密度型態聚集於25%左右的平原地區,自然環境資源貧乏,且環境與地質條件敏感脆弱,配以四面環海的島嶼特性,造成台灣國土利用與山、河、海爭地,以及面對氣候變遷衝擊的高脆弱與敏感性。因此,考量有限土地資源下,台灣如何積極面對未來國土保育與經濟發展的平衡發展,有效運用區域間資源,緩解資源不足並達區域公平發展,則進行區域環境容受力的盤點,是極為重要的關鍵議題。由於過去容受力相關研究欠缺從檢視整體環境體系土地可供給及消耗量之資源量,以檢討消費差異性及發展課題。故本研究以台灣整體發展為考量,藉由檢視「土地資源」、「糧食資源」及「碳排放」角度切入容受力研析(資源供給面),以各項資源可涵養人口規模分析,來檢視區域間發展現況及未來需求,分析區域間各項資源的承載能力,並對照生態足跡(資源需求面)之評估,以作為區域調適課題之檢視。期以注入創新思維與方法,緩解資源不足及氣候變遷之壓力,尋求台灣邁向永續發展之新契機。
Taiwan is located in the Western Pacific where typhoons frequently strike. Over 73% of the land is hillsides and alpine forests, and most of the population cluster densely in the 25% plain land. The environment and geological conditions are sensitive and vulnerable. In recent years, due to the rapid socio-economic growth, pressure has increased on land development. Together with island characteristics of being surrounded by the sea, it has caused frequent conflicts for mountain, river, and sea areas when it comes to Taiwan's land use. In recent years, due to the increasing climate change impacts, how to maintain a stable equilibrium in the ecosystem and ensure people's survival and the nation's sustainable development, have become important key issues that must be actively faced, in response to climate change impacts and taking into consideration land and resource limitations. Related studies on carrying capacities in the past focused on environmental carrying capacity, recreational carrying capacity, and urban carrying capacity, which mainly explored the population limit that a single environmental system can carry or the actual degree of development. There is no careful examination on how much the land can supply in the overall environment system and the amount of resources for the amount of consumption that explores the issues of consumption differences and development. This study takes Taiwan's overall development into consideration, and analyzes carrying capacity (resource supply side) from the perspective of "land resources", "food resources", and "carbon emissions". This study analyzes the population size that can be covered by each resource to show the current situation of development between regions and future demands, the carrying capacity of each resource between each region, and compares it with ecological footprint (resource demand side), to serve as views for regional adaptation topics of discussion. This study attempts to inject innovative thinking and methods to ease resource shortage and climate change pressures, in order to seek new opportunities for Taiwan's progress toward sustainable development.
期刊論文
1.李國忠(20050400)。大自然的空調系統--人造森林。科學發展,388,28-35。  延伸查詢new window
2.Daly, H. E.(1990)。Carrying capacity as a tool of development policy: the Ecuadoran Amazon and the Paraquayan Chaco。Ecological Economics,2,187-195。  new window
3.Rahmstorf, Stefan、Cazenave, Anny、Church, John A.、Hansen, James E.、Keeling, Ralph F.、Parker, David E.、Somerville, Richard C. J.(2007)。Recent Climate Observations Compared to Projections。Science,316,709。  new window
4.Hui, C.(2006)。Carrying capacity, population equilibrium, and envrionment's maximal load。Ecological Modelling,192,317-320。  new window
5.封志明、唐焰、楊豔昭(2008)。基於GIS的中國人居環境指數模型的建立與應用。地理學報,63(12),1327-1336。  延伸查詢new window
6.Abernethy, V. D.(2001)。Carrying capacity: The tradition and policy implications of limits。Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics,2001(1),9-18。  new window
7.Betts, R.、Collins, M.、Hemming, D.、Jones, C.、Lowe, J.、Sanderson, M.(2011)。When could global warming reach 4°C?。Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,369,67-84。  new window
8.GFN(2013)。Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework。Ecological Indicators,24,518-533。  new window
9.Graymore, M. L. M.、Sipe, N. G.、Rickson, R. E.(2010)。Sustaining human carrying capacity: A tool for regional sustainability assessment。Ecological Economics,69(3),459-468。  new window
10.Kelman, I.、Gaillard, J. C.、Mercer, J.(2015)。Climate change's role in disaster risk reduction's future: Beyond vulnerability and resilience。International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,6,21-27。  new window
11.Khatiwala, S.、Primeau, F.、Hall, T.(2009)。Reconstruction of the history of anthropogenic CO2 concentrations in the ocean。Nature,462,346-350。  new window
12.Lee, Y. J.(2015)。Land, carbon and water footprints in Taiwan。Environmental Impact Assessment Review,54,1-8。  new window
13.Lee, Y. J.、Peng, L. P.(2014)。Taiwan's ecological footprint (1994-2011)。Sustainability,6,6170-6187。  new window
14.Mancini, M. S.、Galli, A.、Niccolucci, V.、Lin, D.、Bastianoni, S.、Wackernagel, M.、Marchettini, N.(2015)。Ecological footprint: Refining the carbon footprint calculation。Ecological Indicators,61。  new window
15.Martire, S.、Castellani, V.、Sala, S.(2015)。Carrying capacity assessment of forest resources: Enhancing environmental sustainability in energy production at local scale。Resources, Conservation and Recycling,94,11-20。  new window
16.Silva, J. A.、Eriksen, S.、Ombe, Z. A.(2010)。Double exposure in Mozambique's Limpopo River basin。Geographical Journal,176(1),6-24。  new window
17.Wackernagel, M.(2014)。Comment on "ecological footprint policy? land use as an environmental indictor?。Journal of Industrial Ecology,18(1),20-23。  new window
18.Rees, W. E.(2000)。Eco-footprint analysis: merits and brickbats。Ecological Economics,32(3),371-374。  new window
會議論文
1.李永展(1996)。資源導向的都市主義--超越都市界線的新思維方向。第七屆環境管理與都會發展研討會。高雄市:中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李永展、董娟鳴、陳喬琪、呂韋儒(2015)。由容受力觀點檢視台灣區域發展調適策略之擬訂。第十九屆(2015年)國土規劃論壇。台南市:國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃書禮(1987)。應用生態規劃方法於土地使用規劃之研究--土地使用適宜性分析評鑑準則之研擬與評鑑途徑之探討 (計畫編號:NSC76-0301-H-005-03)。  延伸查詢new window
2.UNISDR(2015)。Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management。Geneva:UNISDR。  new window
圖書
1.IGBP、IOC、SCOR(2013)。Ocean Acidification Summary for Policymakers--Third Symposium on the Ocean in a High-CO2 World。Stockholm:International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme。  new window
2.Ortolano, Leonard(1984)。Environmental Planning and Decision Making。New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc。  new window
3.Wackernagel, M.、Rees, W.(1996)。Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth。Gabriola Island, B. C.:New Society Publishers。  new window
4.World Economic Forum(2016)。The Global Risks Report 2016。Geneva:World Economic Forum。  new window
5.李永展(2005)。台灣生態足跡趨勢之分析與比較。台北市:行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.環境保護署(2015)。2015年中華民國國家溫室氣體清冊報告(2015年更新彙編)。台北市:行政院環境保護署。  延伸查詢new window
7.Brown, L. R.、Earth Policy Institute(2011)。World on the Edge。NY:W. W. Nortonand Company。  new window
8.FAO(2015)。Towards a Water and Food Secure Future--Critical Perspectives for Policy-makers。Marseille:World Water Council。  new window
9.Gilbert, A. J.、Braat, L. C.(1991)。Modelling for Population and Sustainable Development。New York:Routledge。  new window
10.OECD、IEA(2015)。Key World Energy Statistics。Paris:OECD。  new window
11.UNEP(2011)。Year Book 2011: Emerging Issues in Our Global Environment。Nairobi:UNEP。  new window
12.United Nations Human Settlements Programme(2011)。Cities and climate change : global report on human settlements, 2011。London:Earthscan:UN-Habitat。  new window
13.United Nations(2009)。The Millennium Development Goals Report。NY:United Nations。  new window
14.United Nations(2015)。United Nations Expert Group Meeting on the Post-2015 Era: Implications for the Global Research Agenda on Population and Development-Report of the Meeting。NY:United Nations。  new window
15.Verisk Maplecroft(2011)。Natural Hazards Risk Atlas 2011。Bath:Verisk Maplecroft。  new window
16.World Bank(2010)。The World Bank Annual Report。Washington, D.C.:World Bank。  new window
17.World Bank(2015)。World Bank Annual Report 2015。Washington, D. C.:World Bank。  new window
18.World Economic Forum(2015)。The Global Risks Report 2015。Geneva:World Economic Forum。  new window
19.Odum, H. T.(1971)。Environment, Power, and Society。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
20.黃書禮(20000000)。生態土地使用規劃。臺北:詹氏。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Schneider, David M.、Godschalk, D. R.、Axler, N.(1978)。The Carrying Capacity Concept as a Planning Tool。Chicago, ILL:American Planning Association。  new window
其他
1.IPCC(2014)。Summary for Policymakers,Cambridge:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nieswand, G.、Pizar, P.(1977)。How to apply carrying capacity analysis。Environmental Comment。Washington DC:The Urban Land Institute。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE