期刊論文| 1. | 賴擁連(19990500)。我國受刑人基本權利之保障及救濟。警學叢刊，29(6)=124，307-332。 延伸查詢 |
| 2. | Turner, William Bennett(1979)。When Prisoners Sue: A Study of Prisoner Section 1983 Suits in the Federal Courts。Harvard Law Review，92，610-663。  |
| 3. | 吳佳霖(20121000)。受刑人的法律地位及司法救濟途徑--以美國法為借鏡。東吳法律學報，24(2)，167-204。 延伸查詢 |
| 4. | Bell, Barry R.(1986)。Prisoners' Rights, Institutional Needs, and the Burger Court。Virginia Law Review，72，161-193。 |
| 5. | Branham, Lynn S.(2001)。The Prison Litigation Reform Act's enigmatic exhaustion requirement: What it means and what congress, courts, and correctional officials can learn from it。Cornell Law Review，86，483-547。 |
| 6. | Branham, Lynn S.(2001)。Toothless in Truth--The Ethereal Rational Basis Test and the Prison Litigation Reform Act's Disparate Restrictions on Attorney's Fees。California Law Review，89，999-1054。 |
| 7. | Chen, Cindy(2004)。The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Doing Away with More Than Just Crunchy Peanut Butter。St. John's Law Review，78，203-231。 |
| 8. | Cheng, Theodore K.(1999)。Invading an Article III Court's Inherent Equitable Powers: Separation of Powers and the Immediate Termination Provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act。Washington & Lee Law Review，56，969-1020。 |
| 9. | McGill, Danielle M.(2002)。To Exhaust or Not to Exhaust: The Prisoner Litigation Reform Act Requires Prisoners to Exhaust All Administrative Remedies before Filing Excessive Force Claims in Federal Court。Cleveland State Law Review，50，129-163。 |
| 10. | Johal, Kiira J.(2014)。Judges behind bars: The intrusiveness requirement's restriction on the implementation of relief under the prison litigation reform act。Columbia Law Review，114，715-754。 |
| 11. | Costa, Richard J.(1997)。The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995: A Legitimate Attempt to Curtail Frivolous Inmate Lawsuites and End the Alleged MicroManagement of State Prisons or a Violation of Separation of Powers?。Brooklyn Law Review，63，319-366。 |
| 12. | Ostrom, Brian J.、Hanson, Roger A.、Cheesman, Fred L.(2003)。Congress, Courts and Corrections: An Empirical Perspective on the Prison Litigation Reform Act。Notre Dame Law Review，78，1525-1560。 |
| 13. | Schlanger, Margo(2003)。Inmate Litigation。Harvard Law Review，116，1555-1706。 |
| 14. | Puplava, Jennifer A.(1997)。Peanut Butter and Politics: An Evaluation of the Separation-of-Powers Issues in Section 802 of the Prison Litigation Reform Act。Indiana Law Jouranl，73，329-353。 |
| 15. | Moseberger, Karen、Wolman, Harold(2003)。Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: Challenge and recommendations。Public Administration Review，63(4)，428-440。 |
圖書| 1. | Lakoff, George、梁玉玲(1994)。女人、火與危險事物：範疇所揭示之心智的奧秘。臺北：桂冠。 延伸查詢 |
| 2. | 林清山、Mayer, Richard E.(2003)。教育心理學：認知取向。臺北市：遠流。 延伸查詢 |
| 3. | 廖義銘(2002)。行政法基本理論之改革。翰蘆。 延伸查詢 |
| 4. | Bourdieu, Pierre、陳逸淳(2012)。所述之言：布赫迪厄反思社會學文集。臺北：麥田。 延伸查詢 |
| 5. | Montesquieu, Barowde、彭盛(2003)。論法的精神。臺北：華立文化。 延伸查詢 |
| 6. | Bodenheimer, Edgar、結構群(1990)。法理學：法哲學及其方法。結構群文化事業有限公司。 延伸查詢 |
| 7. | 林茂榮、楊士隆(2016)。監獄學：犯罪矯正原理與實務。台北：五南。 延伸查詢 |
| 8. | Calavita, Kitty、Jenne, Valerie(2014)。Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic。California：California University Press。 |
| 9. | 孫非、Blau, Peter M.(1998)。社會生活中的交換與權力。台北：桂冠。 延伸查詢 |