:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:衝突原因、處理方式對愛情關係的影響--以焦慮依附型大學生的為例
書刊名:中華輔導學報
作者:吳嘉瑜
作者(外文):Wu, Ju-yu
出版日期:1996
卷期:4
頁次:頁119-171
主題關鍵詞:大學生依附愛情關係衝突College studentSttachmentLove relationshipConflict
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:104
     本研究目的在以焦慮依附型大學生為例加以探討衝突原因、處理方式及對愛情關 係的影響。針對研究目的,本研究問題有三:(1)焦慮依附大學生,在交往過程中,產生衝突 的原因為何?(2)處理衝突的方式為何?(3)衝突處理方式對彼此關係的影響為何?   依研究目的,本研究以「人際依附風格量表」為工具,在彰化師大二、三年級學生中。 選出十四位目前有戀愛經驗之焦慮依附大學生,並得他們同意進行訪談,為能真實反應個人 經驗,本研究以質研究中的深度訪談法,以半結構的訪談大綱進行訪談以收集資料,並以開 放性編碼方式來分析資料。所得結論如下:   研究者據受訪者所分享的經驗,發現(1)造成衝突的原因有四大類:「對關係的期待不 同」、「因對對方的不滿」、「過度自我涉入」及「因應外在阻撓因素的差異態度」,而在「對關 係的期待不同」這個大類下的「你怎沒把我放在心上」,這個因素是最多受訪者所提到的經驗。 (2)焦慮依附型大學生在處理衝突的方式,依處理的焦點,可分為:「針對情緒處理」、「針對 問題處理」、「不處理」這三大類,且發現前兩類的方式較常使用,而較少使用第三類的方式。 而其中「針對問題處理」這個大類下的「表達自己的狀況」是最多的受訪者提到的狀況。(3) 至於處理方式對關係影響的發現為:對關係會產生正向的影響的方式為「反省自己」及「調 整自己」,對關係會產生負向影響的方式為「情緒性的語言發洩」、「爭吵」及「轉移話題」, 而「冷戰」及「讓步」這兩種方式四關係影響的情形較為複雜:在「冷戰」之後,對方若以 「詢問」或是「表達自已的狀況」作為反應時,對關係多半是正面的影響,但若在「冷戰」 之後,對方的反應是「轉移話題」的話,對關係則反而是負面的影響。「讓步」對關係的影響 則是會有正負向的雙極反應,這之間的差異端賴於受訪者的心態而定;若受訪者樂於扮演這 樣的角色,對關係的影響為正向,但若受訪者覺之不公平時,對關係的影響是負向。 本研究亦針對上述研究結果加以討論,最後根據研究結果與限制,針對兩性教育、諮商 實務工作、及後續研究方法上,提出若干建議。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate anxious attachment college student's reasons for conflict、conflict mangament and its effect in love realationship. The participants in this study was high anxious attachment on ? Interpersonal attachment style scale ? and were in love experience during the period of the study. All forteen participants were junior or senior of National Chang-hua University of Education. The Qualitive method was adopted. Semi-structured interview was employed to collect data. The open coding was selected to analyze the data. The main finding were as follows. (1) As the reasons for conflict. ? the difference in their expectation of relationship ? ? being unsatisified with the other ? ? excessive self-involvement ? ? the difference attitude toward external obstacle ? were four main reasons. ? Why don't you keep me on your mind ? , the factor under the ? difference in their expectation of relationship ? , was the reason reported by the participants most frequently. (2) As conflict mangament, it could be classified into three. Categories: focusing on ? emotion mangament ? 、? problems themselves ? and ? suspending the problems alone ? . The first two methods wre used more frequently, the last one was used less. ? Expressing self condition ? , the factor under the ? focusing on problems themselves ?, was the reason reported by the participants most frequently. (3) Regarding the effect on the love relationship. However, ? to vent one feeling through language emotionally ?、 ? quarrels ? and ? to change the topic of conversation ? had negative effect. The two methods for conflict mangament were more complicated, one is ? cold war ? , the other is ? yielding ? . After ? old war? , ? inqury ? and ? self-expression ? from one of the couple had positive effects on their relationship, on the contrary, ? to change the topic of communication ? had negative effects. While ? yielding ? influened the relationship in both postive and negative way. Depended on the participants attitude toward yielding If the participants felt confortable to yield, postive effects participants felt comfortable to yield, postive effects rose. If they felt unfair, negative effects came up. Disscussion of the finding was proposed. Based on the results and limitations of this study, suggestion were made for gender education, the practice of counseling and the future research.
期刊論文
1.Simpson, J. A.(1990)。Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59(5),971-980。  new window
2.Kilmann, Ralph H.、Thomas, Kenneth W.(1975)。Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions。Psychological Reports,37(3),971-980。  new window
3.Ainsworth, M. D. S.(1989)。Attachments beyond infancy。American Psychologist,44(4),709-716。  new window
4.Rahim, M. A.(1983)。A measure of styles of handing interpersonal conflict。The Academy of Management Journal,26(2),368-376。  new window
5.Pistole, M. C.(1989)。Attachment in adult romantic relationships: Style of conflict resolution and relationship satisfaction。Journal of Social and Personal Relationship,6,505-510。  new window
6.蘇建文、龔美娟(19940600)。母親的依附經驗、教養方式與學前兒童依附關係之相關研究。教育心理學報,27,1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Collins, N. L.、Read, S. J.(1990)。Adult Attachment, Working Models, and Relationship Quality in Dating Couples。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(4),644-663。  new window
8.Feeney, J. A.、Noller, P.(1990)。Attachment styles as a predictor of adult romantic relationships。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(2),281-291。  new window
9.Matula, K. E.、Huston, T. L.、Grotevant, H. D.、Zamutt, A.(1992)。Identity and dating commitment among women and men in college。Journal of Youth and Adolescence,21(3),339-356。  new window
10.蘇建文、黃迺毓(19930700)。幼兒與母親間依附關係與其學校社會能力表現之研究。教育心理學報,26,23-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Siavelis, R. L.、Lamke, L. K.(1992)。Instrumentalness and expressiveness: Predictors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction。Sex Roles,26(3/4),149-159。  new window
12.陳秉華、廖鳳池(19930600)。大學學生輔導中心個別諮商服務的評鑑--以國立臺灣師範大學學生輔導中心為例。輔導與諮商學報.臺師大,1,57-78。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃素菲(1982)。感情三部曲--追逐、抉擇、交往。學生輔導通訊,19,31-35。  延伸查詢new window
14.張淑良(1990)。大學女生的學校生活壓力。學生輔導通訊,9,42-48。  延伸查詢new window
15.彭懷真(1993)。親密關係的學習:大學生的兩性發展考驗。婚姻與家庭月刊,7(2),3。  延伸查詢new window
16.Bell, S. M.(1970)。The development of the concept of the object as related to infant mother attachment。Child Development,41,1083-1097。  new window
17.Donohue, W. A.、Allen, M.、Burrell, N.(1988)。Mediator communicative competence。Communication Monographs,55,104-119。  new window
18.Kirkpatrick, L. A.、Davis, K. E.(1984)。Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis。Journal of Personality and Social Psyshology,66,502-512。  new window
19.Koren, P.、Carlton, K.、Shaw, D.(1980)。Marital conflict: relations among behaviors, outcomes, and distress。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,48,460-468。  new window
20.Levy, M. B.、Davis, K. E.(1988)。Love style and attachment styles compares: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,5,439-471。  new window
21.Scharfe, E.、Bartholomew, K.(1995)。Accommodation and attachment representations in young couples。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,12,389-401。  new window
22.李美枝(19831200)。兩性之間的喜歡、愛情與婚前性行為容許度。中華心理學刊,25(2),121-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Hendrick, S. S.、Hendrick, C.、Adler, N. L.(1988)。Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54(6),980-988。  new window
24.Mikulincer, M.、Nachshon, O.(1991)。Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(2),321-331。  new window
25.LaFreniere, P. J.、Sroufe, L. A.(1985)。Profiles of peer competence in the preschool: Interrelations between measures, influence of social ecology, and relation to attachment history。Developmental Psychology,21(1),56-69。  new window
26.Bartholomew, Kim、Horowitz, Leonard M.(1991)。Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(2),226-244。  new window
27.Hazan, Cindy、Shaver, Phillip R.(1987)。Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(3),511-524。  new window
28.Bartholomew, Kim(1990)。Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,7(2),147-178。  new window
學位論文
1.黃于娟(1994)。性別、依附風格與自我坦露、幽默、撒嬌之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Main, M.(1973)。Play, Exploration and competence as related to child-adult attachment(博士論文)。Johns Hopkins University。  new window
3.王慶福(1995)。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hendrick, S. S.、Hendrick, C.(1992)。Romantic Love。London。  new window
2.Cahn, D. D.(1992)。Conflict in intimate relationships。New York, NY:The Guilford Press。  new window
3.Ainsworth, M.、Blehar, M.、Waters, E.、Wall, S.(1978)。Patterns of Attachment。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
4.Brehm, S. S.(1985)。Intimate Relationships。New York, NY:Random House。  new window
5.Bowlby, J.(1980)。Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss。New York:Basic Books。  new window
6.張老師月刊編輯部(1987)。中國人的姻緣觀。臺北:張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張老師月刊編輯部(1987)。中國人的婚戀觀。臺北:張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.張老師月刊編輯部(1987)。中國人的愛情觀。臺北:張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bahr, S. J.(1989)。Family Interaction。New York:Macmillan Publishing。  new window
10.Coleman, J. C.(1988)。Intimate Relationships, Marriage, and Family。New York:Macmillan Publishing。  new window
11.Hendrick, S.、Hendrick, C.(1992)。Linking Loving and Relating。Belmont, California:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
12.Knox, David H.(1975)。Marriage: Who? When? Why?。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
13.Verderver, R. F.、Verderber, K. S.(1989)。Interact Using Interpersonal Communication Skills。California:Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
14.Chickering, A. W.(1969)。Education and identity。San Francisco, CA:New York:Jossey-Bass。  new window
15.Bowlby, John(1973)。Separation: Anxiety and Anger。Basic Books。  new window
16.Bowlby, John(1969)。Attachment and loss Vol.1. Attachment。Basic Books, Inc.。  new window
17.Erikson, Erik Homburger(1968)。Identity: Youth and crisis。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.Peterson, D. R.(1983)。Conflict。Close relationships。New York:W. H. Freeman。  new window
2.Deutsch, M.(1973)。Conflicts: productive and destructive。Conflict Resolution Through Communication。New York:Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE