:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生存權的捍衛--臺灣地區的棄兒保護
書刊名:人口學刊
作者:馮燕 引用關係
作者(外文):Feng, Joyce Yen
出版日期:1998
卷期:19
頁次:頁161-194
主題關鍵詞:兒童福利兒童保護兒童人權棄兒保護Child welfareChild protection servicesChildren's rightProtection of abandoned children
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:92
  • 點閱點閱:30
自從民國八十二年見童福利法修訂通過後,台灣地區兒童保護工作便因「依法有據」,而在實務推動方面有長足的進步。然而,在對這一群生存權最受威脅的人口一棄嬰及棄兒,的保護方面,卻並未有任何特別的努力,甚至連完整的統計資料都付之闕如。本文即從兒童人權,尤其是基本生存權保障的觀點出發,探討兒童人權的內容和特質,台灣兒童人權的現況,並就棄兒(嬰)發生的原因,各國的保護工作模式,我國各地棄兒(嬰)的實際情形作一整理,並從法規、執行與資源三方面來檢視我國保護工作的不足與缺失。最後提出「預防遺棄的發生,是最佳的保護策略」的主張,並對如何預防棄兒(嬰),如何修訂法制,並在保護工作實務中落實保障兒童人權及其最佳利益,提供具體的建議。
The protective services of the abused and neglected children have been improved a great deal in Taiwan ever since the amendment of the Child Welfare Act in 1993, Though, protection of the abandoned children is still an untouched area. This artic1e intends to advocate the needs of improving the protection services of the abandoned children from the children's right perspective. In the paper, it examines the children’s rights situation, and the status quo of the abandoned children problems. The paper conc1udes by c1aimingthat“prevention is the best protection of abandoned children." Waysj of preventing child abandonment, modifying the relevant regulations and policies, and improving practice are suggested in the end.
期刊論文
1.Foster, Henry H.、Freed, Doris Jonas(1972)。A bill of rights for children。Family Law Quarterly,6(4)。  new window
2.Franklin, A. W.(1982)。Child abuse in the 1980s。Maternal and Child Health,7,12-16。  new window
3.Worsfold, V. L.(1974)。A philosophical justification for children's rights。Harvard Educational Review,44(1)。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(1998)。中華民國社會指標統計。臺北:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許純敏(1992)。社會變遷中兒童福利理念及措施之探討(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Harding, L. F.(1997)。Perspectives in child care policy。Perspectives in child care policy。London, UK:Addison Wesley。  new window
2.林國和(1993)。聯合國兒童權利公約。內政部社會司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ariès, Philippe、Baldick, Robert(1962)。Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life。Vintage Books。  new window
4.馮燕(1995)。托育服務:生態觀點的分析。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.古川孝順(1991)。兒童福祉改革。兒童福祉改革。日本,東京。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡薇麗、林國和(1991)。英國兒童法案專論。英國兒童法案專論。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.馮燕(1993)。棄嬰留置制度與現況之調查研究。棄嬰留置制度與現況之調查研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.馮燕(1997)。中華民國臺灣地區八十六年度兒童人權指標報告。中華民國臺灣地區八十六年度兒童人權指標報告。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.張煜輝(1991)。西德兒童福利簡介。兒童福利。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Boswell, J.(1988)。The kindness of strangers - The abandonment of children in Western Europe from late antiquity to the Renaissance。The kindness of strangers - The abandonment of children in Western Europe from late antiquity to the Renaissance。New York, NY。  new window
11.Murrary, T.、Eekelaar, J.、Dingwall, R.(1983)。The protection of children: State intervention and family life。The protection of children: State intervention and family life。Oxford。  new window
12.Farson, R.(1978)。Birthrights。New York, NY:Penguin。  new window
13.Stein, M.、Frost, N.(1989)。The politics of child welfare: Inequality power and change。The politics of child welfare: Inequality power and change。Hertfordshire, UK。  new window
14.(1986)。The rights of children。The rights of children。Oxford。  new window
15.Holt, J.(1975)。Escape form childhood - The needs and rights of children。Escape form childhood - The needs and rights of children。Harmondsworth, UK。  new window
16.Pringle, M. K.(1975)。The needs of children。The needs of children。London, UK。  new window
17.Saporiti, A.、Sgritta, G.(1989)。Myth and reality in the discovery and representation of childhood。Family divisions and inequality in modern society。London, UK。  new window
18.Wring, C. A.(1985)。Children's rights: A philosophy study。Children's rights: A philosophy study。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(1996)。給棄嬰活下去的力量,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅瑩雪(1998)。棄兒戶籍問題,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE