臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國處理工作場所性騷擾爭議之經驗--兼論對我國相關制度之啟示
書刊名：法學叢刊
作者：焦興鎧
出版日期：1999
卷期：44:2=174
頁次：頁101-126
主題關鍵詞：美國；工作場所；性騷擾
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:12
期刊論文
1.Schoenheider, Krista J.(1986)。A Theory of Tort Liability for Sexual Harassment in the Workplace。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，134(6)，1461-1495。  new window
2.Estrich, Susan(1991)。Sex at Work。Stanford Law Review，43(4)，813-861。  new window
3.Lipper, Nicolle R.(1992)。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Comparative Study of Great Britain and the United States。Comparative Labor Law Review，13，293-342。  new window
4.焦興鎧(19971200)。美國雇主對工作場所性騷擾事件之法律責任及預防之道。歐美研究，27(4)，85-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.(1997)。Sexual Harassment at the Workplace。European Industrial Relations Review，287，13-18。  new window
6.Bowes-Sperry, Lynn、Veglahn, Peter A.(1996)。Sexual Harassment and Workers' Compensation。Labor Law Journal，47，597-601。  new window
7.Acken, Brenda T.(1991)。Limiting Sexual Harassment Liability: The Best Defense is an Effective Policy Against Harassment。Journal of Accountancy，171，42-47。  new window
8.Bennett-Alexander, Dawn D.(1998)。Same-Gender Sexual Harassment: The Supreme Court Allows Coverage Under Title VII。Labor Law Journal，49，927-940。  new window
9.Vance, Ruth C.(1993)。Workers' Compensation and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Remedy for Employees, or A Shield for Employers?。Hofstra Labor Law Journal，11，141-201。  new window
10.Stewart, C. Gregory(1998)。Kilberg Wrong about EEOC。Employee Relations Law Journal，23，5-12。  new window
11.Schultz, David(1993)。From Reasonable Man to Unreasonable Victim?: Assessing Harris v. Forklift Systems and Shifting Standards of Proof and Perspective in Title VII Sexual Harassment Law。Suffolk University Law Review，27，717-748。  new window
12.Spitko, E. Gary(1997)。He Said, He Said: Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and the "Reasonable Heterosexist" Standard。Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law，18，56-97。  new window
13.Safran, Claire(1976)。What Men Do to Women on the Job: A Shocking Look at Sexual Harassment。Redbook，48，149-224。  new window
14.Robinson, Robert K.、Reithel, Brian J.、Franklin, Geralyn McClure(1998)。Same Sex Sexual Harassment: The Implications of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services。Labor Law Journal，49，941-948。  new window
15.Maypole, Donald E.(1987)。Sexual Harassment at Work: A Review of Research and Theory。Affilia，2(1)，24-38。  new window
16.Lynch, May Kathryn(1990)。The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Comments on the Agency and Its Role in Employment Discrimination Law。Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law，20，89-104。  new window
17.Lewis, Federick J.、Henderson, Thomas L.(1995)。Employer Liability for 'Hostile Work Environment' Sexual Harassment Created by Supervisors: The Search for an Appropriate Standard。University of Memphis Law Review，25，667-734。  new window
18.Lewis, Darryll M. Halcomb(1993)。Sexual Harassment under Workers' Compensation Law。Labor Law Journal，44，297-306。  new window
19.Lester, Toni P.(1994)。The Yankee Woman in King Arthur's Court--What the United States and the United Kingdom Can Learn from Each Other about Sexual Harassment Law。Boston College of International and Comparative Law Review，17，233-274。  new window
20.Lehr, Richard I.(1983)。EEOC Case-Handling Procedures: Problems and Solutions。Alabama Law Review，34，241-262。  new window
21.Kirk, Delaney J.、Clapham, Maria M.(1998)。Is It Just 'Men Behaving Badly' or Sexual Harassment? The Supreme Court Ruling on Same-Sex Harassment。Labor Law Journal，49，954-961。  new window
22.Kirstein-Ezzell, Tina(1991)。Eradicating Title VII Sexual Harassment by Recognizing an Employer's Duty to Prohibit Sexual Harassment。Arizona Law Review，33，383-399。  new window
23.Korn, Jane B.(1993)。The Fungible Woman and Other Myths of Sexual Harassment。Tulane Law Review，67，1363-1419。  new window
24.Goodman, Jill L.(1981)。Sexual Harassment: Some Observations on the Distance travelled and the Distance Yet to Go。Capital Law Review，1981(10)，445-469。  new window
25.Fain, Terri C.、Anderton, Douglas L.(1987)。Sexual Harassment: Organizational Context and Diffuse Status。Sex Roles，17，291-311。  new window
26.Cogan, Evelyn Boss(1994)。Alternative Dispute Resolution and Judicial Immunity: A Potential Pitfall?。Labor Law Journal，45，722-725。  new window
27.(1995)。Sex Discrimination: Psychological Injury from Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment--Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 114 S. Ct. 367 (interim ed. 1993)。University of Dayton Law Review，20，1049-1082。  new window
28.Fernandez, Jack E.(1988)。Equitable Tolling of Title VII Time Limits in Actions Against the Government。Cornell Law Review，74，199-221。  new window
29.John, Mary Claire(1994)。Extraterritorial Application of Title VII: The Foreign Compulsion Defense and Principles of International Comity。Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law，27，869-898。  new window
30.Fowler, Carol F.(1988)。Minimizing the Risk of Employer Liability for Sexual Harassment。Kansas Bar Association，57，25-28。  new window
31.Parliman, Gregory C.、Kelly, Theresa A.(1995)。The Evolving Case Law of Sexual Harassment。Employee Relations Law Journal，21，77-87。  new window
32.焦興鎧(19960300)。美國聯邦最高法院對工作場所性騷擾最新判決之研究。美歐月刊，11(3)=119，93-105。  延伸查詢new window
33.(1992)。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Comparative Study of Great Britain and the United States。Comp. Lab. L. Rev.，13，293-299。  new window
34.Bass, Stuart L.(1992)。The 'Reasonable Woman' Standard: The Ninth Circuit Decrees Sexes Perceive Differently。Labor Law Journal，43，449-455。  new window
35.Kirk, Delaney J.、Clapham, Maria M.(1996)。"Bagging" or "Goosing": How the Courts Are Ruling in Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claims。LAB. L. J.，47，403-413。  new window
36.Perry, Sandra J.、Fink, Ross L.(1998)。Besolving the Legality of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment: The Case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.。LAB. L. J.，49，949-953。  new window
37.Spelfogel, Evan J.(1993)。Legal and Practical Implications of ADR and Arbitration in Employment Discrimination。Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal，11(1)，247-270。  new window
38.Rose, David L.(1989)。Twenty-five Years Later Where Do We Stand on Equal Employment Opportunity Law Enforcement。Vanderbilt Law Review，42(4)，1121-1157。  new window
會議論文
1.俞慧君(1993)。論工作場所性騷擾之法律問題。工作場所性騷擾問題研討會，行政院勞工委員會(主辦) (會議日期: 1993年01月05日)。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭津津(1997)。淺談美國工作場所性騷擾相關法制--兼談我國相關立法應有之方向。八十六年度補助社會團體促進男女兩性工作平等期末檢討研習會，行政院勞工委員會 (主辦) (會議日期: 1997/06/19-20)。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺北市政府勞工局(1997)。臺北市就業歧視評議委員會業務報告。兩性工作平等研討會，台北市政府勞工局、婦女新知基金會及台大城鄉所性別與空間研究室合辦 (會議日期: 民國八十六年六月十二日)。  延伸查詢new window
4.王惠玲(1993)。由勞動法觀點論工作場所性騷擾。工作場所性騒擾問題研討會，行政院勞工委員會(主辦) (會議日期: 1993/01/05)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.中華勞資關係研究所(1996)。實施男女工作平等法環境之調查與評估。臺北：中華勞資關係研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院衛生署(1994)。醫療行為過程中性騷擾盛行情形之調查。臺北市：行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂寶靜、傅立葉(1992)。臺灣地區工作場所性騷擾之調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.臺灣省政府勞工處(1994)。臺灣省勞工生活狀況調查報告。南投縣：臺灣省政府勞工處。  延伸查詢new window
2.福爾摩沙文教基金會(1995)。1995年臺灣婦女動向民意調查分析報告。台北市：福爾摩沙文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.現代婦女基金會(1993)。臺北市上班族兩性差異對性騷擾經驗與對性騷擾態度影響之研究。臺北：現代婦女基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.United States Merit Systems Protection Board(1981)。Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem?。Washington, D.C.：U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
5.Petrocelli, William、Repa, Barbara Kate(1994)。Sexual Harassment on the Job。Berkeley, Ca：Nolo Press。  new window
6.台北市上班族協會(1997)。1997台北市上班族的工作與生活問卷調查報告。台北市：台北市上班族協會。  延伸查詢new window
7.焦興鎧(19970000)。工作場所性騷擾問題在美國所引起之法律爭議。臺北：中華民國勞資關係協進會。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.United States Merit Systems Protection Board(1988)。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: An Update。Washington, D.C.：United States Merit Systems Protection Board。  new window
9.Lindemann, Barbara、Kadue, David D.(1992)。Sexual Harassment in Employment Law。Washington, D.C.：Bureau of National Affairs。  new window
10.United States Merit Systems Protection Board(1995)。Merit Systems Protection Board Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Trends, Progress, Continuing Challenges。Washington, D.C.：U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
11.二十一世紀基金會(1995)。臺灣地區1995年婦女滿意度民意調查分析報告。臺北市：二十一世紀基金會。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳瑞蘭(1996)。護生在實習場合中性騷擾之感受與因應行為。高雄縣：高雄文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Farley, L.(1980)。Sexual Shakedown: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job。  new window
14.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(1996)。Guidelines On Discrimination Because of Sex--Sexual Harassment。  new window
15.Gutek, Barbara A.(1985)。Sex and the Workplace。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
16.臺北市上班族協會(1996)。臺北市上班族勞動條件與生活現況問卷調查報告。臺北市：臺北市上班族協會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.International Labour Office(1992)。Combating Sexual Harassment at Work。  new window
2.Biskupic, Joan(19980627)。Hight Court Holds Employers Liable for Sex Harassment by Bosses。  new window
3.Biskupic, Joan(19980424)。Judging the "Quo" Factor in Sexual Harassment: Supreme Court Case Could Affect Clinton。  new window
4.(19980313)。Sexual Harassment Finding Disturbs Tokyo。  new window
5.(19980612)。Mitsubishi Settles U.S. Lawsuit over Harassment。  new window
6.(19980206)。Ashamed Astra Settles Sex Suit: U.S. Unit to Pay Eecord Amount for Mistreating Women。  new window
7.Wasserman, Elizabeth(19960501)。Workplace Harassment: Hot-Buttom Issue of '90s。  new window
8.Levander, Michelle(19940204)。Funding, Caseload Disable EEOC。  new window
9.(19960525)。Workplace Sexual Harassment Entersinto Electronic Age。  new window
10.(19980601)。自由時報。  延伸查詢new window
11.(19980630)。聯合晚報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.焦興鎧(1995)。美國聯邦最高法院與就業歧視問題。勞工法與勞工權利之保障--美國勞工法論文集。台北：月旦。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(1995)。美國法上不當解雇之概念及其救濟之道。勞工法與勞工權利之保障--美國勞工法論文集。台北：月旦出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.焦興鎧(1998)。美國最高法院對工作場所性騷擾爭議之最新判決－Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.一案之解析。美國最高法院重要判決之研究：1993~1995。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.焦興鎧(1995)。工作場所性騷擾及其防治之道。現代家庭與社會發展。臺北：中華民國公共秩序研究會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：357（臺灣：354，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67680024
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上