:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政策網絡與國家機關自主性:比較英國、美國與臺灣之健康保險政策網絡
書刊名:空大行政學報
作者:劉宜君 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, I-chun
出版日期:1999
卷期:9
頁次:頁279-306
主題關鍵詞:國家自主性政策網絡國家機關利益團體政策社群健康保險政策State autonomyPolicy networkState apparatusInterest groupPolicy communityHealth insurance policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:266
  • 點閱點閱:68
     利益團體在政策過程的運作與政治影響力一直是公共政策研究的核心議題之一,對於利益團體的研究主要有三種理論:多元主義(pluralism)、組合主義(corporatism)及馬克思主義(Marxism)。惟自一九八○年代,公共政策的探討興起了國家中心論(state-entered theory)的研究途徑,國家論者主張國家機關在政策制訂過程具有主動的地位,有本身的立場、企圖心和資源,可視為一個有決策自主性(autonomy)之積極行動者(actor)。有鑑於傳統公共政策的研究途徑低估國家機關在決策過程中的角色,本文試圖以政策網絡(policy network)的觀念檢視國家機關與利益團體間的關係,以及將國家行動者(state actor)的利益與活動視為國家機關自主性的表現,分析國家行動者與利益團體之間關係的性質,及此關係對於政策結果造成的影響,並進一步以英國、美國及臺灣的健康保險政策網絡作為實例分析。最後提出結論與政策建議。
     The political influence of the interest groups has long been central to the study of the public policy. Traditionally, interest groups studies have been dominated by three major political theories: pluralism, corporatism and Marxism. These theories can be seen as society-centered theories. Recently, some theorists have suggested the state-centered approach. They claimed that the state has distinct interests and policy preferences, which have high influence on policy outcomes. Thus, the key focus of this study is the nature of the relationships between state actors and interest groups, and the impact that these relationships have on policy development and final outcomes. In this study, the author will examine such relationships with two parts. The first part of this research is to introduce the concepts of policy networks and state autonomy. The second one is to use these concepts to analyze health insurance policy in Britain, the United States and Taiwan. Finally, the author will make some brief conclusions and policy recommendations.
期刊論文
1.Jordan, A. Grant(1981)。Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process。Journal of Public Policy,1(1),95-123。  new window
2.Atkinson, M. M.、Cloeman, W. D.(1989)。Strong States or Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies。British Journal of Political Science,19,47-67。  new window
3.Morone, James A.(1993)。The Health Care Bureaucracy: Small Changes, Big Consequences。Journal of Politics, Policy and Law,18(3),723-739。  new window
4.Morone, James A.(1994)。Neglected Institutions: Politics, Administration, and Health Reform。Political Science and Politics,27(2),220-223。  new window
5.黃源協(19960900)。政府、利益團體與健康政策。社區發展季刊,75,68-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.裴晉國(1996)。臺灣地區後工業轉型的醫療保健政策。立法院院聞。  延伸查詢new window
7.Almond, Gabriel A.(1988)。The Return to the State。American Political Science Review,82(3),853-874。  new window
8.Block, F.(1980)。Beyond Relative Autonomy: State Managers as Historical Subjects。The Socialist Register。  new window
9.Campbell, J. C.、Baskin, M. A.、Baumgartner, F. R.、Halpem, N. P.(1989)。Afterword on Policy Communities: A Framework for Comparative Research。Governance,2,86-94。  new window
10.Day, P.、Klein, R.(1992)。Constitutional and Distributional Conflict in British Medical Politics: The Case of General Practice, 1911-1991。Political Studies,50,462-478。  new window
11.Gias, T. L.、Peterson, M. A.、Walker, J. L.(194)。Interest Groups, Iron Triangles and Representative Institutions in American National Government。British Journal of Political Science,14,161-185。  new window
12.Jordan, A. G.(1990)。Sub-government, Policy Communities and Networks: Refilling the Old Bottles。Journal of Theoretical Politics,2,319-338。  new window
13.Klein, R.(1990)。The State and the Profession: The Politics of the Double Bed。British Medical Journal,301,700-702。  new window
14.Mann, Michael(1984)。The Autonomous Power of the State: its Origins, Mechanisms and Results。Archives européennes de sociologie,25,185-213。  new window
15.Marmor, T.、Thomas, D.(1972)。Doctors, Politics and Pay Disputes。British Journal of Political Science,2,421-442。  new window
16.Nordlinger, E.(1988)。The Return to the State: Critiques。American Political Science Review,82,875-885。  new window
17.Saunders, P.(1975)。They Make the Rules。Policy and Politics,4,31-58。  new window
學位論文
1.徐廣正(1993)。三民主義勞工保險制度保障勞工生存權之研究(博士論文)。文化大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.姚運芸(1987)。社會保險政策效果評估--我國勞工保險個案分析(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖健男(1971)。勞工保險之研究(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.裴晉國(1998)。臺灣地區國家機關與醫療體系之發展(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾華菁(1996)。我國社會福利政策的國家角色研究--兼論全民健康保險法的規劃(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳真美(1986)。我國農民健康保險政策規劃之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jordan, A. G.、Richardson, J. J.(1987)。Government and pressure Groups in Britain。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Ripley, R. B.、Franklin, G.(1980)。Congress, the Bureaucracy and Public Policy。Illinois:Dorsey Press。  new window
3.Stockpot, Theta(1985)。States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and china。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Richardson, Jeremy J.、Jordan, A. Grant(1979)。Governing under Pressure。Oxford:Martin Robertson。  new window
5.Jessop, Bob(1990)。State Theory: Putting Capitalist State in Their Place。University Park, Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
6.Knoke, David(1990)。Political Networks: The Structural Perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.張博雅、羅紀琼、劉素芬、楊漢泉(1997)。專業奇蹟VS.民眾迷思:全民健康保險規劃紀實。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Alford, Robert R.、Friedland, Roger(1985)。Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.周育仁(1993)。政治與經濟之關係--臺灣經驗與其理論意涵。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.唐文慧、王宏仁(1994)。社會福利理論--流派與爭議。臺北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蕭慶倫、楊志良、盧瑞芬(1989)。從全民健康保險看我國醫療保健體系。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
12.Alford, Robert R.(1975)。Health Care Policy。Chicago:University of Chicago。  new window
13.Campion, F. D.(1940)。The AMA and US Health Policy Since 1940。Chicago:University of Chicago。  new window
14.Dunleavy, Patrick、O'Leary, Brendan(1984)。Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy。London:Macmillan Education Ltd.。  new window
15.Hogwood, B. W.(1986)。If Consultation is Everything then Maybe is Nothing。  new window
16.Hogwood, B. W.(1987)。From Crisis to Complacency。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
17.Leichter, Howard M.(1984)。American Public Policy in a Comparative Context。McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
18.Marin, Bernd、Mayntz, Renate(1991)。Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations。Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
19.Paton, Calum R.(1990)。US Health Politics。Aldershot, Hants:Avebury。  new window
20.Peon, M. M.(1979)。Harry S. Truman Versus the Medical Lobby: The Genesis of Medicare。Columbia:University of Missouri Press。  new window
21.Peters, B. G.(1986)。American Public Policy。London:Macmillan。  new window
22.Polsby, N.(1980)。Community Power and Political Theory。London:Yale University Press。  new window
23.Rhodes, R. A. W.(1981)。Control and Power in Center-Local Government Relations。Farnborough:Gower:SSRC。  new window
24.Richardson, J. J.、Jordan, A. G.(1985)。Governing Under Pressure。Oxford:Martin Robertson。  new window
25.Smith, M. J.(1993)。Pressure, Power and Policy。Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
26.Turner, B. S.(1987)。Medical Power and Social Knowledge。London:Sage。  new window
27.藍忠孚、李玉春、馮孝芬、陳燕鳳(1986)。區域醫療保健服務體系之研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
28.Berger, P.、Luckmann, T. L.(1967)。The Social Construction of Reality。London:Penguin。  new window
29.李允傑、丘昌泰(1999)。政策執行與評估。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
30.Starr, Paul(1982)。The Social Transformation of American Medicine。New York:Basic books。  new window
31.Rhodes, R. A. W.(1988)。Beyond Westminster and Whitehall。London:Unwin Hyman。  new window
32.龐建國(1993)。臺灣經驗的理論與實際。臺北:幼獅文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
33.Evans, Peter B.、Rueschemeyer, Dietrich、Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bringing the State Back In。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
34.林萬億(19940000)。福利國家:歷史比較的分析。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.林鍾沂(1994)。政策分析的理論與實踐。臺北:瑞興圖書。  延伸查詢new window
36.Laumann, Edward O.、Knoke, David(1987)。The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
37.Nordlinger, Eric A.(1981)。On the Autonomy of the Democratic State。Harvard University Press。  new window
38.Cerny, Philip G.(1990)。The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State。SAGE Publications。  new window
其他
1.(19900612)。實施全民健保前的準備工作。  延伸查詢new window
2.(19930926)。立委:全民健保能否如期開辦視政府決心。  延伸查詢new window
3.(19940322)。全民健保法,立法進度延滯。  延伸查詢new window
4.(19930211)。全民健保延後 對沒保險者不公平。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Helco, H.(1978)。Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment。The New American Political System。Washington, D.C.:American Entreprise Institute。  new window
2.Brown, L. D.(1987)。Introduction to a Decade of Transition。Health Policy in Transition。Durham, N.C:Duke University Press。  new window
3.Havighurst, C. C.(1987)。The Changing Locus of Decision Making。Health Policy in Transition。Durham:Duke University Press。  new window
4.Ikenbeny, G. J.、Lake, D. A.、Mastanduno, M.(1988)。Introduction: Approaches to Explaining American Foreign Economic Policy。The State and American Foreign Economic Policy。Ithaca:London:Cornell University Press。  new window
5.Jordan, A. G.、Richardson, J. J.(1982)。The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation。Policy Style in Western Europe。London:George Allen and Unwin。  new window
6.King, R.(1990)。Policy and Process in the Modem State。The State in Action。London:Pinter。  new window
7.Marsh, D.、Rhodes, R. A. W.(1992)。The Implementation Gap: Explaining Policy Change and Continuity。Implementing Thatcherite Policies: Audit of an Era。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
8.Mohan, J.(1990)。Health Care Policy and the State in ‘Austerity Capitalism'。The State in Action。London:Pinter。  new window
9.Thurber, J. A.(1991)。Dynamics of Policy Subsystems in American Politics。Interest Group Politics。Washington, D. C:Congressional Quarterly。  new window
10.傅立葉(199510)。臺灣與美國全民健保政策發展的政治經濟分析。中西社會福利政策與制度。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE