:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國原住民電視臺公共問責機制的研究與想像
書刊名:廣播與電視
作者:王亞維 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Yae-wei
出版日期:2014
卷期:37
頁次:頁35-62
主題關鍵詞:原住民族原住民族電視臺問責機制TITVIndigenous mediaAccountability system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:49
  • 點閱點閱:133
我國原住民族電視台(以下簡稱原視)成立於2005年,由政府出資委由民間媒體經營,2007年再依法轉交公共電視文化事業基金會(以下簡稱公視基金會)辦理,成為公共電視基金會的成員台之一。2009年原住民族文化事業基金會(以下簡稱原文會)成立後,經過政治力積極介入下,2014年開始取代公視基金會,成為原視的治理機構,自許為「自主營運」以有別於過去。 在公共電視台(以下簡稱公視)之外,原視也為我國第二個以政府預算捐助的基金會所經營的電視媒體。雖然兩者營運經費均來自全體納稅人,但是公視有特別法《公共電視法》明確規範設置目地、董監事會的組成、權責並詳述財務來源與稽核、頻道定位、節目內容、獨立經營、電波配屬與觀眾申訴等,其目的為向公民社會負責,並具有法定的強制性。原視成立主要依據為《原住民族教育法》與《原住民族基本法》,但作為電視傳播媒體,其營運方式並無法律明文規定,未來如何對公民社會負責?又應該如何對族群負責?尤其媒體的獨立性與公共性並無法律加以保障,更為急迫的議題。 本研究希望藉由檢視原視創設歷程與治理機構轉變中出現的問題,歸納出未來潛在的危機與挑戰,並參酌國外類似的原住民電視台經營理論與實踐的經驗,希望提出可能的經營建議與設計,期裨益原視永續經營並對族群與公民社會負責。
The problem of privatization of public interests in the Taiwanese Indigenous Television Station (TITV) has become an increasingly serious issue and a challenge that the current indigenous/non-indigenous civil society has to face. Being a public media of minority, it has been suffered from the intervention steered by wrestles between political parties and government agency since its inauguration in 2005 and enrollment in 2007 as a member of the local public broadcasting system (TBS). In recent years, both the ruling party and the opposition party tended to put their interests ahead of the public media and exerted intense political intervention towards TBS and TITV. In order to maintain their influence, the legislators from different party members increasingly pressed upon the performance of public media, infringing upon public interests and undermining the professionalism and independency that civil society has appealed for years. TITV was pushed to be separated from TBS mainly due to the force from the indigenous congressmen from ruling party. It has re-established as an independent broadcaster from January 1st 2014 without any concrete media related law to protect and regulate its performance, which makes TITV totally exposed to every possible harm ever since. It is extremely important to draw up a new indigenous media law and develop the sustainable operation modle for TITV at the same time. This research examines media accountability theory and its application among major indigenous broadcasters around the world, thus provide the infrastructure basis for the imagination and design of the indigenous media accountability mechanism in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.黃葳威(19980000)。弱勢社群對電視新聞節目的回饋:以原住民為例。臺大新聞論壇,5,137-166。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉幼琍(19970700)。原住民廣電節目與電臺所有權之研究。廣播與電視,3(2),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.以撒克.阿復(20110300)。原住民族電視臺vs.公廣價值?--原視法與原住民族獨立自主電視臺之建構。臺灣原住民族研究季刊,4(1),67-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.洪清一、賴彥如(20120700)。族群頻道之公共性意涵--反思與實踐。原住民族文化傳播學刊,2,4-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Michael, M.(1995)。Idea from the bush: indigenous TV in Austrailia and Canada。Canadian Journal of Communication,20(2)。  new window
6.McQuail, D.(1997)。Accountability of Media to Society: Principles and Means。European Journal of Communication,12(4),511-529。  new window
會議論文
1.張鴻邦(2013)。台灣原住民族電視台設置之政治與論述。中華傳播學會2013年年會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.洪貞玲、林麗雲(2012)。各國原住民族電視台營運模式與法制研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳清河、陳彥龍(2010)。原住民族廣電政策法規建構暨原民電視台獨立設置可行性之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.王亞維、陳百齡(2011)。電視媒體製播新聞問責機制研究 (計畫編號:PG10006-0046)。政治大學傳播學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.McQuail, Denis(2010)。McQuail's Mass Communication Theory。Sage Publications。  new window
2.Bertrand, Claude-Jean(2000)。Media ethics and accountability systems。Transaction。  new window
3.Bertrand, C. J.(2003)。An arsenal for democracy: Media accountability systems。Cresskill:Hampton Press。  new window
4.Commission, Hutchins(1947)。Report of the Commission on the freedom of the press: A free and responsible press。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.孔文吉(1993)。讓我的同胞知道。台中:晨星。  延伸查詢new window
6.McQuail, D.(2003)。Media accountability and freedom of publication。Oxford, England:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Siebert, Fred Seaton、Peterson, Theodore、Schramm, Wilbur(1956)。Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do。Chicago。  new window
8.王嵩音(19980000)。臺灣原住民與新聞媒介:形象與再現。臺北:時英。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.McQuail, Denis(2000)。Mass communication theory: An introduction。Sage。  new window
10.McQuail, Denis(1992)。Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest。Sage Publications。  new window
11.McQuail, Denis(1994)。Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction。Sage。  new window
其他
1.尤命•蘇様(20100825)。原視隸屬公廣尤命•蘇様:「綁手綁腳」。  延伸查詢new window
2.林福岳(20120725)。毋讓原文會董事陷於不義之境,http://www.lihpao.com/7action-viewnews-itemid-120290, 2013/07/15。  延伸查詢new window
3.APTN Annual Report 2005,http://aptn.ca/corporate/financial.php, 2014/03/30。  new window
4.Babb, F. A.(20080528)。A brief history of broadcast journalism,http://www.helium.com/items/1059520-a-brief-history-of-broadcast-journalism, 2011/08/01。  new window
5.Ofcom(2011)。Ofcom Annual Report,http://www.ofcom.org.uk/files/2010/07/annrep0910.pdf, 2013/10/10。  new window
6.Moari TV Annual Report, 2012,http://www.maoritelevision.com/, 2013/03/12。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bardoel, J. L. H.、Brants, K.(2003)。From ritual to reality: Public broadcasters and social responsibility in the Netherlands。Broadcasting and convergence: New articulations of the public service remit。Goteborg:Nordicom。  new window
2.Blumler, G.、Hoffmann, W.(1992)。Toward renewed public accountability in broadcasting。Television and the public interest: Vulnerable values in west European broadcasting。London:Sage。  new window
3.Lange, B. P.、Woldt, R.(1995)。The results and main conclusions of the international comparison。The role of public service broadcasting in the information society。Dusseldorf:European Institute for the Media。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE