:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美日兩國教師組織工會化發展與運作之比較研究
作者:沈春生
作者(外文):SHEN CHUN SHENG
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:比較教育學系
指導教授:王家通 蔡清華
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2005
主題關鍵詞:教師組織 教師會 集體協商Teacher OrganizationsTeacher UnionCollective Bargaining
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:89
論文名稱:美日兩國教師組織工會化發展與運作之比較研究
校院系:國立暨南國際大學比較教育系 頁數:389
畢業時間:94年 6月 學位別:博士
研究生:沈春生 指導教授:王家通 蔡清華 博士
論文摘要
本研究旨在比較美日兩國教師組織工會化發展與運作之異同及特性,主要的研究目的有:(1)探討美日兩國教師組織工會化的發展;(2)探討美日兩國教師組織的運作情形;(3)比較美日兩國教師組織工會化的發展;(4)比較美日兩國教師組織的運作情形;(5) 根據研究發現,提出建議,做為我國教師組織改革之參考。
本研究採文獻分析法及比較法。其中比較法係採取貝瑞德(G.Beredey)的比較研究(Comparative Studies)法,將本研究區分為「區域研究」(Area Studies)和比較研究(Comparative Studies)。區域研究包括描述(Description)、解釋(Interpretation)二個步驟;比較研究亦包括並排(Juxtaposition)、比較(Comparison)二個步驟。
本研究在美日兩國教師組織工會化發展與運作上歸納出下列相同點:
一、兩國教師組織都以吸收會員為組織的重要工作。
二、兩國教師組織都朝工會化的方向發展。
三、兩國教師組織青年會員都有組織疏離感的傾向。
四、兩國政府都不允教師有爭議權。
五、兩國教師組織都從事政治活動。
六、兩國教師組織早年都支持特定的政黨,近年來則以議題為導向,不支持特定的政黨。
七、兩國教師組織已成為影響教育政策的第三勢力。
八、兩國教師組織都反對政府之教育改革方案。
九、兩國教師組織在教育改革上都處於被動的地位。
十、兩國都有反對教師組織的團體。
十一、兩國教師組織提供教師生涯發展的管道。
本研究在美日兩國教師組織工會化發展與運作上歸納出下列相異點:
一、美國教師組織有集體協商權,日本則沒有。
二、兩國教師組織使用罷工之策略不同。
三、美國教師組織會員日益增加,日本則日益減少。
四、日教組辦理全國教育研究大會。
五、日教組從事和平教育。
六、美國教師組織不吸收私立學校教師為會員,日教組之會員則包括私立學校教師。
根據上述結論,提出十三項建議作為我國教師組織發展之參考:(1)為會員爭取福利及捍衛其權利;(2)宜擴大會員的吸收層面;(3)宜在教師法中增列集體協商條款;(4)不可輕言罷工以避免不利的負面形象;(5)讓會員了解教師組織活動的意義;(6)向會員募款做為從事活動的基金;(7)宜從事政治活動;(8)宜使用各種方法影響教育政策;(9)宜重視教育研究活動;(10)學校教師會應與校長保持和諧的關係;(11)縣教師會也可以扮演教師組織活動的帶頭角色;(12)宜與理念相近的團體結盟;(13) 宜與大學或學術團體合作。
關鍵詞:教師組織 教師會 集體協商
Title of Thesis: The Unionization Development and operation of Teacher Organizations
Between the United States and Japan:A Comparative Study.
Name of Institute: The Department of Comparative Education,
National Chi Nan University Pages:389
Graduation Time: 6/2005 Degree Conferred: Doctor
Student Name: Chun-Sheng Shen Advisor Name: Chia -Tung Wang
Ching-Hua Tsai
Abstract:
The main purpose of this study is:(1)to explore the history of unionization development of teacher organizations in the United State and Japan;(2)to explore the operations of teacher organizations in the United State and Japan;(3)to compare the history of unionization development of teacher organizations in the United State and Japan;(4)to compare the operations of teacher organizations in the United State and Japan;(5)to make recommendations on how the teacher organizations in Taiwan could improve their development and operations.
In order to achieve its purposes, this study had methodologically adopted document analysis and comparative method.
The major similarities found are as follows:
1.The recruitment is the most important work in teacher organizations.
2.The unionization development of teacher organizations is a common phenomenon.
3. Young members have a sense of alienation from teacher unions.
4. Teachers’ strike is forbidden by both countries.
5. They are involved in politics.
6. They have move away from partisan politics toward more issues–driven politics.
7. They are the third strong power over education policies.
8. They play a passive role in education reform
9. There are anti-teacher unions groups.
10.They provide another way for teacher career.
The major differences are as follows:
1. American teacher unions have collective bargaining right, but Japan teacher unions do not have.
2. They have different considerations when using strike strategy.
3. The membership increased gradually in American teacher unions, but decreased in Japan.
4. JTU manages education research meeting every year.
5. JTU is involved in peace education.
6. American teacher unions did not recruit membership from private schools, but JTU did.
Based on the findings and conclusion above, this study offered some suggestions as follows:
1. Fighting for the welfare and rights of membership.
2. Enlarging the recruitment of membership.
3. Amending the Teacher Law to add collective bargaining clause.
4. Let members realize the meaning of teacher movement.
5. Raising funds from members in order to be engaged in activities.
6. Being involved in politics.
7. Using multifarious ways to affect education policy.
8. Taking education research seriously.
9. Don’t take strikes in order not to have negative images.
10. School building representatives should have a harmonious relationship with the
principals.
11. Local teacher unions should play an initiative role.
12. Having aligned with interest groups with same rational concept.
13. Keeping collaboration with university or academics.
Keywords: teacher organizations, teacher unions, collective Bargaining.
參考書目
一、中文部分
丁志仁(民83)。回首來時路!教師法五年來立法回顧。教師人權, 56,13-16。
王家通(民92)。日本教育制度—現況趨勢與特徵。高雄:復文。
朱輝章(民87)。我國教師組織之研究--以教師會為中心。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
李建興(民85)。師資培育法與教師法的精神與內涵。教育實習輔導,2(2),2-4。
任潔芳(民84a)。確立教師的權利與義務:教育部常務次長李建興談教師法的意義。康橋教研學會雜誌,21,16-17。
任潔芳(民84b)。教師自主還須提昇專業能力:訪國立教育資料館館長毛連塭。康橋教研學會雜誌,21,18-19。
朴順子(民68)。日本教師組合之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
吳清山(民85)。教師組織的定位與展望。教育資料與研究,8,2-8。new window
宋明順譯(民76)。今日的日本教育。教育部教育研究委員會。
宋明順(民90)。日本第三次教育改革,載於黃政傑主編各國教育改革動向。台北:師大書苑。
南方朔(民92)。觀察今日世界的全新窗口,載於許玉雯譯當企業購併國家。台北:經濟新潮社。
郭玉霞(民85)。美國教學專業化運動的發展現況,載於中華民國師範教育學會主編教育專業。台北:師大書苑。
沈春生(民87)。中美日三國教師組織之比較研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
涂慶隆(民88)。國民小學教師會集體協商功能及其運作歷程之研究。臺北市立師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
高義展(民87)。國民小學教師會組織功能、影響型態與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
高雄縣教師會(民94)。2004立委選舉—教育合作立委推薦工作報告。高雄縣教師會季刊,29,4。
張容雪(民88)。學校教師會運作情形之研究--以台北縣市學校為例。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
陳文燦(民86)。我國國民小學教師對教師會組織之態度研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
陳秀苓(民83)。中日兩國教師組織之研究。文化大學日本研究所碩士論文。
陳毓鈞(民83)。美國民主的解析。台北:允晨。
陳鵬飛(民89)。高雄縣市國民小學教師會現況及其相關因素之調查研究。國立臺南師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
翁豊珍(民84)。我國教師組織專業團體研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。未出版。
黃坤錦(民81)。各國教師專業之比較研究,輯於國際比較師範教育學術研討會論文集。台北:師大書苑。
湯堯(民89)。高級中等以下學校教師會組織與運作功能研究。教育部。
楊思偉(1999a)。輯於楊思偉主編中日學校經營之比較研究。台北:師大書苑。
楊思偉(1999b)。日本教育。台北:商鼎。
楊思偉(1999c)。日本初任者研制度之探討,輯於楊思偉主編中日學校經營之比較研究。台北:師大書苑。
蔡文正(民89)。國小教師會任務功能、組織定位與會員參與關係之研究--以屏東縣為例。國立屏東師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡清華(民85)。美國教師職級制度及其對我國的啟示與借鏡,載於蔡培村主編 教師生涯與職級制度。高雄:麗文。new window
張鈿富(民75)。我國教師專業組織之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張鈿富(民85)。教育專業問題與展望,載於中華民國師範教育學會主編教育專業(35-36)。台北:師大書苑。
劉春榮(民85)。國民小學教師專業自主知覺與教師組織功能需求及其關聯之研究。初等教育學刊,第五期。new window
劉世忠編譯(民88)。美國政府與政治。台北:五南。
劉焜輝(民76)。日本教師組織的現況及動向,中華民國教育,1,30-36。
謝文全(民81)。美國教師專業組織,臺灣教育,500,25-33。
謝文全(民90)。比較教育行政。台北:五南。
秦俊鷹、潘邦順編譯(2001)。日本政治體系。台北:風雲論壇。

二、日文部分
日本文部科學省(1978)。一九七八年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1985)。一九八五年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1988)。一九八八年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1989)。一九八九年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1990)。一九九0年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1991)。一九九一年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1992)。一九九二年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1993)。一九九三年日本教育年鑑。東京:ぎようせい。
日本文部科學省(1996)。一九九六年教育委員會月報,平成八年2月號。東京:第一法規。
日本文部科學省(1997)。一九九七教育委員會月報,平成九年5月號。東京:第一法規。
日本文部科學省(1998)。一九九八年教育委員會月報,平成十年1月號。東京:第一法規。
三輪定宜(1983)。教員政策と青年教師。東京:民眾社。
下村哲夫(1989)。組合研修の実施壮況。載於市川昭午編教職研修。教育開發研究所。
下村哲夫(1989)。教員研修の実態と問題奌,載於市川昭午編教職研修。教育開發研究所。
大熊昭三(1976)。学校は污染される。東京:潮文社。
日本教職員組合(1995)。いま、開かれた教育の世紀。東京:
日本教職員組合(1997a)。日教組50年史。東京:日本教職員組合。
日本教職員組合(1997b)。日教組50年資料集。東京:日本教職員組合。
日本教職員組合(1997c)。1997年度日教組の運動。東京:日本教職員組合。
日教組弁護团編(1986)。日教組弁護团の歷史。東京:勞慟旬報社。
木村英雄(1996)。教師の眼から戦後史。東京:明石書店。
右島洋介(1989)。教員組合の行う教育研究活動,載於鈴木慎一編著教師教育改革實践研究。東京:教育開發研究所。
市川昭午(1985)教師=專門職論の再検討。載於市川昭午編教師=專門職論の再検討。東京:教育開發研究所。
市川博訳(1976)。日本戦鬥の教師たち。東京:教育開發研究所。
本山政雄(1974)。日本の教育裁判。東京:勁草書房。
伊津野朋弘(1994)。教職観論争。載於新堀通也主編,戰後教育の論爭點。東京:教育開發研究所。
伊津野朋弘等著(1988)。教師の權利と責任。東京:教育開發研究所。
伊藤和衛編(1985)。現職教育の再檢討--教職員組合研修の動向と問題。東京:教育開發研究所。
伊藤敬(1985)。專門職化の目標と帰結。載於市川昭午編教師=專門職論の再検討。東京:教育開發研究所。
西睦夫(1994)。主任制論争。載於新堀通也主編,戰後教育の論爭點。東京:教育開發研究所。
全貌社(1997)。歪められた教育と日教。東京:全貌社
合。
有園格(1985)。專門職論の成立と展開。載於市川昭午編教師=專門職論の再検討。東京:教育開發研究所。
東谷敏雄(1988)。日教組の進むべき道。東京:教育史料。
板本秀夫(1989)。教師の研究。東京:三一書房。
河野重男等編(1978)。教育學大事典。東京:第一法規。
青木一,小川利夫(1988)。現代教育學事典。東京:勞慟旬報社。
相良惟一(1986)。日教組—死することなかれ。東京:教育開發研究所。
唐澤富太郎(1979)。教師の歷史。東京:創文社
員組合。
望月宗明(1976)。勤評鬪争。東京:勞働教育。
望月宗明(1978)。日教組30年小史。東京:勞働教育。
第一書林。
細谷俊夫等編(1990)。新教育學大事典。東京:第一法規
野垣義行(1985)。戦後教員養成史。載於新通也編教員養成再検討。東京:教育開發研究。
渡辺光雄(1989)。教職員組合研修の動向と問題,載於市川昭午編教職研修。教育開發研究所。
浅野素雄(1994)。偏向教育論争。載於新堀通也主編,戰後教育の論爭點。東京:教育開發研究所。
楠山三香男(1979)。教職員團體の基礎知識。東京:第一法規。
橫鈌正一(1988)。日教組の再生。東京:拓質。
藤井誠二(1988)。これが初任者研修の実態だ。東京:あゆみ出版編輯部。
徳武靖(1994)。學テ論争。載於新堀通也主編,戰後教育の論爭點。東京:教育開發研究所。
熊谷一乘(1994)。路線論争。載於新堀通也主編,戰後教育の論爭點。東京:
教育開發研究所。

三、英文部分
AFT Internet(2005).The history of AFT. Retrieved May 20,2004 from http://www.aft.org/.
Antonucci,M.(2001).Teachers skin deep, union to the bone:How the National Education Association manages its image. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.capitalresearch.org/.
Antonucci,M.(2002a).Left at the altar. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.eiaonline.com/.
Antonucci,M.(2002b).Due and forfeit:The absorption of charter schools. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.eiaonline.com/.
Antonucci,M. (2002c).Thy voice in my behalf teacher union political spending. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.eiaonline.com/.
Archer,J.& Bradley,A(1998).Despite national defeat, NEA and AFT work toward mergers in states. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J.(1998a).Closer to the altar. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(1998b).AFL-CIO lable is most ticklish of issues for NEA members deciding union’s future. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J.(1999). Professional group affiliates with AFT. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2000a).Union pull out stops for elections. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2000b). NEA, AFT dig down to details in effort to mobilize members. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2000c).Complaints point up murky area in union. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org./.
Archer,J(2000d).NEA dips into new fund to aid campaign. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2000e).NEA,AFT leave mark on congress,ballot measures.
activism. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2000f). Districts target teacher seniority in union contracts. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J.(2000g).NEA delegates take hard line against pay for performance. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2000h).National board is pressed to prove certified teachers make difference. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2001).AFT to urge local to consider new pay stratagies. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Archer,J(2001).Teachers seek school board overhaul. Retrieved March 25,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Aspinall,R.W.(2001).Teachers’ union and the politics of
education in japan. New York Press.
Bacharch,S.B &Mitchell,S.M(1983).Labor relations in school systerm:Attitudes toward teachers unions across school district hierarchies. (From Eric Document Reproduction Service.No.Ed:243180.)
Baird,C.W.(1997).The NEA and its federal charter. Retrieved May 20,2004 http://www.psrf.org/.
Bascia,N. (1998a).Teacher union and educational reform. In A.Hargreaves, A.Lieberman,M.Fullan,& D.Hopkins(Eds.)
International handbook of educational change. The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bascia,N. (1998b).Teacher union and teacher professionalism:Rethinking a familiar dichotomy. In B.Biddle,T.Good, & L.Goodson,(Eds.)International handbook of teachers and teaching. The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bascia,N. (1998c).The next step in teacher union research and reform. Contemporary education. 69(4),210-213.
Bascia,N. (2000).The other side of the equation: professional development and the organizational capacity of teacher unions. Educational policy Vol.14. NO.3.385-404.
Bascia,N.(2003).Triage or Tapestry?Teacher union’s work toward improving teacher quality in an era of systemic reform. Retrieved May 7,2004 from http//depts.Washington.edu/.
Bastian,A(1998).What happened to the merger?Retrieved May 17,2003 from http://www.rethinkschool.org/.
Ballou,D&Podgursky,M(1998).Some unanswered questions concerning National Board Certification of Teachers. Retrieved April 15,2004 from http//www.edweek.org/
Ballou,D.& Podgursky,M.(2000).Gaining control of professional licensing and advancement. In T.Loveless(Ed.)Conflicting Missions?69-110. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Ballou,D(2001).The New York teacher's union contract:
Shaking principal's leadership. Retrieved March 9,2004 from http//www.maknic.org/
Beauchamp,E.R & Vardamn,J.M. (1994).Japanes education since 1945. New York:Armonk.
Berthoud,J.E(1996).A fiscal and public policy profile of the American federation of teachers. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http: //www.adti.net/.
Berube,M.R.(1988).Teacher politics:The influence of unions. New York: Greenwood Press.
Blair,J(2000).National certification found valid for teachers. Retrieved January 21,2003 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Blair,J.(2002a).Gen-Xers apathetic about union label. Retrieved January 21,2003 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Blair,J.(2002b).Teachers take bids for power to legislatures. Retrieved January 21,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Blair,J.(2002c).Union’s position unheeded on ESEA. Retrieved January 21,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Blumenfeld,S.L(1984).NEA:Trojan horse in American education. Paradigm Company.
Boyd,W.L,Plank,D.N,&Sykes,G(2000).Teachers union in hard times.In T.Loveless(Ed.)Conflicting Missions?174-211. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Bradley,A(1990). A living contract. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A(1992).Board of contention:unions strive to elect friendly Board members. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A(1993).Teacher education and standards. Retrieved June 7,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A(1995).National Board announces first teacher certificates. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A.(1996).Education's dark continent. Retrieved January 13,2001 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A.(1997a). The end of era. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A.(1997b).Fate of peer review rests with NEA locals. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http//www.edweek.org/
Bradley,A(1998).NEA delegates down to final days to weigh merits of merger with AFT. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Bradley,A(1999).The not-quite profession. Retrieved December 12,2002 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Brasly,A.(1997).Licensure pact pays dividends for teaching. Retrieved May 7,2004 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Bridgman,A.(1991) Union play politics. The American school board journal.178(11),p43-47.
Brimelow,P(2003).The worm in the apple:How the teacher
unions are destroying American education. Harper
Collins.
Brouillete,M.J&Williams,J.R. (1999).The impact of school choice on school employee labor unions. Retrieved March 9,2004 from http//www.mackinac.org/.
Carlson,D(1987).Teachers as political actor from reproductive theory to the crisis of schooling. Harvard Education Review vol.57, no.3.
Castor,B(2002).Improving the profession through national-board certification. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Chapleau&Wilms(1999).The illusion of paying teachers for student performance. Retrieved May 7,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Chappel,M(1995).Seeking a new foundation: Legislative and
practical alternative to the current monopoly that will
enhance the viability of independent teacher groups.
Government Union Review, vo1,6.
Chase,B(1997).Teacher vs.Teacher?Nonsense. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Chester E.Finn Jr(2003).Teacher reform gone astray. In P.E Peterson,(Ed.).Our school and our future,211-239. Hoover Institution Press Publication.
Chubb,J.E.,& Moe,T.E. (1990). Politics, markets and American’s schools. Brookings Institution.
Chubb,J.E(2001).The system. In T.M Moe,(Ed.).A primer on America’sschool,15-43. Hoover Institution Press Publication.
Chubb,J.E(2003).Real choice. In P.E Peterson,(Ed.).Our school and our future,329-351. Hoover Institution Press Publication.
Clowes,G.A.(2002).Union hid political spending, suit charges. Retrieved May 7,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Cole,S.(1969). Teachers` strike: A study of the conversion of predisposition into action. American Journal of Sociology.74(5),p506-520.
Cooper,B.S. (1982).Collective bargaining,strikes, and financial cost in public education: A comparative review. University of Oregon.
Cooper,B.S.(1998).Merging the teachers' union. Retrieved May 7,2002 from
http://www.edweek.org/.
Cooper,B.S. (2000).An international persopective on teachers unions.In T.Loveless(Ed.)Conflicting Missions?240-281. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Cooper,K.J(2000).Teachers union poised to boost turnout for Gore. Retrieved May 7,2004 from http://www.Washingtonpost/.
Cresswell,Murphy & Kerchner(1980).Teachers,unions,and collective bargaining in public education. Berkeley,Calif.: McCutchan.
Cummings,W.K(1982).The egalitarian transformation of postwar Japanese education. Princeton University Press.
Currence,C.(1984a). Teachers on strike fewer this year as school opens. Retrieved July 21,2002 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Currence,C.(1984b). Unions predict fewest teacher strikes ever. Retrieved July 21,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Davis,M.R.(2004).NEA reaches out to republicans. Retrieved December 27,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Dawson,T.(1999). Charter schools and the long road to education reform. Retrieved July 21,2002 from http://www.pacific.org/.
Demitchell,T.D.(1998).A reinvented union: A concern for teaching, not just teachers. Journal of personnel evaluation in Education. p255-268.
Denholm,D.Y.(1998).The impact of unionism on the quality of education. Retrieved May 20,2004 http//www.psrf.org/.
Digmueller,K(1992).Teacher unions try new strategies to lobby for Retrieved July 21,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/
Digmueller,K(2002).Union labor to shape education policy. Retrieved July 21,2002 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Donely,M.O.(1976).Power to the teacher.Indiana University Press.
Eberts,R.W&Stone,J.A(1986)The effects of teachers union on American education. (From Eric Document Reproduction Service. No.ED:242084)
Education Week(1998).A chorology of merger. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Evers,W.M(2001).Standard and accountability. In T.M .Moe(Ed)A primer on America’sschool. Princeton University Press.
Finn,C.E.,Manno,B.V.& Vanourek,G.(2000).Charter schools in action:Renewing public education. Princeton University Press.
Fox,W.S.&Wince,M.H.(1976).The structure and determinants
Of occupational militancy among public school teacher.
Industrial and labor relations review.30(1)p47-58.
Fuller, H.L,Mitchell,G.A,&Hartman,M.E.(2000).Collective bargaining in Milwaukee public scjools. In T.Loveless(Ed.)Conflicting Missions?110-150. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Galley,M.(2000). Survey finds teachers supportive of unions. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http//www.edweek.org/.
Geisert,G. & Liberman,M(1994).Teacher union bargaining:
Practice and policy. Chicago:Precpt Press.
Gibulka,J.G.(2000).The NEA and school choice . In T.Loveless(Ed.)Conflicting Missions?150-174. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Gore,J(2003).Let teachers’unions pay for union business. Retrieved March 9,2004 from http//www.mackinac.org/.
Golin,S (1998).What did teachers want Newark teachers and their union. Contemporary Education,233-237.
Hanushek, E.A&Raymond(2001). The confusing world of educational accountability. Hoover Institution Press Publication.
Harr,C.K(2002).The PTA, the NEA, and education. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http//www.educationpolicy.org/.
Haar,C.K,Lieberman,M.&Troy,L.(1994).The NEA and AFT:teacher union in power and politics. Retrieved April 2,2001 from http//www.psrf.org/.
Henderson,R.D.(2004).Teacher unions: continuity and change. In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.)Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 1-33.San Diego:Elsevir.
Herman,J.J.,&Megiveron,G.E.(1993).Collective bargaining in education. Pennsylvania:Technomic Publishing Company.
Hessong,R.F. & Weeks,T.H. (1991).Introduction to education. New York:Macmillan.
Holland,R(2002).What next after the education voucher victory?Retrieved April 24,2003 from http/www.capitalresearch.org/.
Hoxby,C.M. (1996). How teacher unions affect education productivity. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http/www.edweek.org/.
Jacobson,L. (2001).Looking to France. Retrieved April 2,2004 from http/www.edweek.org/.
Jessup,D.K.(1985).Teachers, union and change. N.Y:Praeger Publishers.
Johnson,S.M. (2004).Paralysis or possibility: what do teacher unions and collective bargaining bring? In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.)Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 33-51. San Diego: Elsevir.
Johnson,S.M.& Kardos,S.M.(2000).Reforming bargaining and its promise for school improvement. In T.Loveless(Ed.)Conflicting Missions?,7-47. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Joseph,L.B(1997).Teacher union tactics draw fire. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http://www.heartland.org/.
Kasten,R.W.& Fossedal,G.(1997).Teacher union concentration in 21 countries. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http://www.adti.net/.
Kasten,R.W.& Fossedal,G.(1998).An Analysis of the planned NEA-AFT merger. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http://www.adti.net/.
Kell, (2004).Community trying to infect teacher pact. Retrieved April 24,2003 from http://www.edweek.org/
Keller,B.(1997).Critical study of NBPTS spurs state advisory group to act. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Keller,B(2002).New campaign-finance law plays to union strength. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Keller,B(2003).NEA seeks allies to bring lawsuit on ESEA funding. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Keller,B(2004).NEA sets up entity to advocate changes in education law. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Keller,K(2004).Thousands party down to promote public school. Retrieved June 24,2004 from http://www.edweek.org/.
Kelly,P.P(1998).A comparative analysis of teacher peer review programs in four urban districts: professional unionism in action. (From Eric Document Reproduction Service.No. ED:447088.)
Kerchner,C.T. (2000).The struggle for the knowledge-based work place.
Kerchner,C.T.& Koppich,J.E.(2000).Organizing around quality: the frontiers of teacher unionism. In T.Loveless(Ed.),Conflicting Missions?,281-317. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Kerchner,C.T& Caufman,K.D(1995).Lurching toward professionalism: The saga of teacher unionism.Vol 96,No 1.The Elementary School Journal.
Kerchner,C.T& Koppich,J.E.(1993).A union of professional: Labor relation and educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kerchner,C.T.& Koppich,J.E. (1997). United mind worker:Union and teaching in the knowledge society. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Kerchner,C.T.& Koppich,J.E.(2000).Organizing around quality:The frontiers of teacher unionism.In Loveless(Eds.)Conflicting Missions?281-317. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Kerchner,C.T.& Mitchell,D.E.(1988).The changing idea of a teachers' union. Philadelphia:The Flamer Press.
Kerchner,C.T.& Koppich,J.E.(2004).Organizing around quality: the struggle to organize mind workers. In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.)Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 223-259.Washington,DC:Elsevir.
Kirkpatric,D.W.(1997).Teachers unions and education reform. Retrieved May 20,2004 http//www.psrf.org/.
Kobayashi,T(1976).Society, Schools and Progress in Japan .Pergamon Press.
Koerner,J.D. (1968).Who controls America education. Boston:Beacon Press.
Kohn,A. (2002).The folly of merit pay. Retrieved April 16,2003,from http//www.edweek.org/.
Koppich,J.E(1991).The changing role of teacher union leaders.(From Eric Document Reproduction Service.No.ED:338595)
Koppich,J.E & Kerchner,C.T(2000).Rethinking labor management relation:it’s a matter of trust.(From Eric Document Reproduction Service.No.Ed:450485)
Levin,S.B.(1969).Japan. In A.A. Blum,(Ed.).teacher unions and associations: A comparative study,141-199. University of Illinois Press.
Levin,D.(1982).Teacher unions grapple with the crisis facing organized labor. The American school board journal.169(7),p34-38.
Levin,D.(2000).Shining the light of truth on the NEA:Landmark Legal challenges the NEA's political spending. Retrieved April 16,2003 from http://www.capitalresearch.org/.
Lieberman,M.(1956).Education as a profession. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Lieberman,M (1994).Teacher unions:Is the end near?How to end the teacher union veto over state education policy. (From Eric Document Reproduction Service.No.Ed:450485)
Lieberman,M.(1995). Reflections on the rationales for teacher bargaining. Retrieved May 20,2004 http://www.psrf.org/.
Lieberman,M (1998).New union or new rhetoric: The case of Peer review. Contemporary Education,vol. 69, No.4.
Lieberman,M(2000a).The teacher unions:How they sabotage educational reform and why. San Francisco:Encounter Books.
Lieberman,M(2000b).Understanding the teacher union contract. New Brunswick:Transaction Publishers.
Lieberman,M(2000c).Teachers evaluating teachers: Peer review and the new unionism. Retrieved May 20,2004, http://www.psrf.org/.
Liberman,M(2002).How and why the NEA avoids the union label. Retrieved April 24,2003,from http://www.educationpolicy.org/.
Loveless,T(2000).Conflicting missions: teachers union and
educational reform. Washington,DC: Brookings Institution
Macke,S.M(1998)Teacher unionism:Back to the future. Contemporary Education,vol.69, No.4.
McDonnell,L.& Pascal,A.(1988).Teacher unions and education reform. Calif.: Rand.
Moe,T.M(2001).Teachers unions and the public schools. In T.M .Moe,(Ed.).A primer on America’school,151-185. Hoover Institution press Publication.
Moe,T.M(2003).The politics of the status quo. In P.E Peterson,(Ed.).Our school and our future,177-211. Hoover Institution press Publication.
Moo,G.G.(1999).Power grab:How the NEA is betraying our
children. Washington,DC: Regnery.
Moore,C.C.(2001).Teachers' unions:Roadblocks to reform.
Retrieved May 20,2004 http://www.psrf.org/.
Moskow,M.H.& Doherty,R.E.(1969).United State. In A.A. Blum,(Ed).teacher unions and associations: A comparative study,293-332. University of Illinois Press.
Mowbray,J(2001).The NEA’s political machine. Retrieved April 16,2003, from http://www.capital.org/.
Mungazi,D.A(1995).Where he stand:Albert Shanker of the American Federation of Teachers. Westport, Conn.:Praeger
Munk,L(2002).Collective bargaining:Bringing education to
the table. Retrieved May 20,2004,from http://www.psrf.org/.
Murdo,P(1996).Textbook controversies in Japan. In T. Rohlen,& C.Bjork,(Eds)Educaton and training in Japan,235-256. London:Routledge.
Murphy,M.(1990).Blackboard unions:The AFT & NEA,1900-1980. Cornell University Press.
Murray,C.E.(2001).Exploring the new unionism:perceptions of recently tenured teachers. Retrieved April 16,2003,from http://www.edweek.org/.
Murray,C.E. (2004).Innovative local teacher unions: what have they accomplished?In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.)Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 149-167. San Diego:Elsevir.
NNCPA(2003).Younger teachers aren’t joining major union. Retrieved October 26,2004, from http://www.ncpa.org/.
Nathan,J.(1999).Charter schools: creating hope and opportunity for American education.Jossey-Bass.
Nelson,J.(1996).Are teacher unions hurting American
education? Retrieved July 2,2002, http://www.aft.org/.
Newman,J.W(2002).America’s teachers: An introduction to education. Allyn and Bacon.
Okano,K.& Tsuchiya,M.(1999).Education in contemporary Japan: Inequality and diversity. Cambridge,UK : Cambridge University Press.
Olson,L.& Rodman,B.(1987).Seeking profession’s soul.Retrieved October 19,2002, from http://www.edweek.org/.
Ota,H.(1985).Political teacher unionism in Japan. In Law,Matin(Ed.).The politics of teacher unionism international perspectives,78-108. Washington,D.C.:Croom Helm.
Peterson,B.(1998).What will be the future of teacher unionism. Retrieved October 19,2002, from http://www.rethinkschool.org/.
Peterson,B.(2000a).Transforming teachers union: fighting for better schools and social justice. Retrieved October 19,2002, from http://www.rethinkschool.org/.
Peterson,B.(2000b).Merit: To pay or not to pay. Retrieved October 19,2002, from http://www.rethinkschool.org/.
Peterson,P.E(2001).Choice in American school. In Moe,T.M(Ed.)A primer on America’sschool. Hoover Institution press Publication.
Pitsch,M. (1996).Poll prompt NEA to shift focus away from politics to issues. Retrieved October 26,2004, from http://www.edweek.org/
Platzer,S.(1988).Educational thought and ideology in modern Japan. University of Tokyo Press.
Podgursky,M(2001).Should state subsidize national certification?Retrieved April 24,2003,from http://www.edweek.org/
Ponessa,J(1997).Alternative teachers’groups highlighted. Retrieved October 26,2004,from http://www.edweek.org/.
Ponessa,J(2001).(1997)Teachers allege improper use of union dues. Retrieved October 26,2004,from http://www.edweek.org/.
Ravitch,D(2002).Testing and accountability--historically considered.In W.M Evers, & H.J Walberg,(Eds.),School accountability:an assessment,9-23. Hoover Institution press Publication.
Rodman,B. (1987).NEA pursues plan to establish teacher-controlled state boards. Retrieved April 24,2003,from http://www.edweek.org/.
Rohlen,T.P(1998).Conflict in institutional enviroments:politics in education. In T. Rohlen,& C.Bjork,(Eds.)Educaton and training in Japan,83-115. London: Routledge.
Rotherham,A.J.(2004).Opportunity and responsibility for National Board Certified Teachers. Retrieved October 26,2004, from http://www.ppionline.org/.
Schoppa,L.J.(1993).Education reform in Japan. London: Routledge.
Seldon,D.(1985).The teacher rebellion. Howard University Press.
Shanker,A.(1992).United States of American. In B.S.Cooper(Eds.).Labor relations in education:An international perspective. Westport:Greenwood Press.
Shedd,J.B. & Bacharach,S.B.(1991). Tangled hierarchies :teachers as professionals and the management of schools.San Francisco : Josey-Bass
Shust,D.& Lewis,C. (2004).The National Education Association’s new bipartisanship.In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.).Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 81-103.San Diego:Elsevir.
Shimahara,N. (1992). Overview of Japanese education: policy,stracture, and current issues.In R. Leestma,& H.J Walberg,(Eds.).Japanese educational productivity. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan.
Spring,J.(2002).Conflict of interrest:The politics of American education. Boston:Mcgraw-Hill.
Spring,J. (2004a).The America school. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill.
Spring,J. (2004b).America education. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill.
Stone,J.A.(2000).Collective bargaining and public schools. In T.Loveless(Ed)Conflicting Missions?47-69. Brookings Institution.
Straut,D.S(1996)Full circle:A retrospective on labor relations and educational governance. (From Eric Document Reproduction Service.No.ED:396389.)
Streshly,W.A(1994).Teacher unions and TQE: building
quality labor relations. Calif: Corwin Press.
Teacher Magazine(1996).The education of Al Shanker. Retrieved April 24,2003, from http//www.teachermagazine.org/.
Temes,P. (2001).Can teaching become an elite profession?Retrieved April 24,2003,from http://www.edweek.org/.
Thurston,D.R.(1973).Teachers and politics in Japan.
Princeton university press.
Urban,W.J(1985).Merit pay and organized teacher in the U.S.A. In Law,Matin(Eds.)The politics of teacher unionism international perspectives,205-246. Washington,D.C.:Croom Helm.
Urban,W.J(1998).More than the facts:The research Division of the National Education Association,1922-1977. Lanharm.
Urban,W.J(2000).Gender,race,and the National Education Association: Professionism and its limitation. New York:Routledge Falmer.
Urban,W.J(2004).Teacher politics. In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.).Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 103-125.San Diego:Elsevir.
Urbanski,A.& Roger,E(2000).School reform,TURN, and teacher compensation. Retrieved October 19,2002,from http:/www.pdkintl.org/
Vergari,S.;Heaa,F.M(2002).The Accreditation game. Retrieved October 6,2003,from http:/www.educationnext.org/.
Vinovskis,M.A.(2000).Teachers unions and educational research.In Loveless(Eds.)Conflicting Missions? Washington,DC: Brookings Institution.
Vinovskis,M.A. (2004).Teacher union support of education research and development: traditions and new direction. In R.D.Henderson, W.J.Urban, & P.Wolman(Eds.)Teacher unions and education policy: retrenchment or reform? 167-187.San Diego:Elsevir.
Walberg,H.J(2003)Real accountability. In P.E Peterson,(Ed),Our school and our future,305-329. Hoover Institution press Publication.
Walsh,K(2002).Positive spin. Retrieved October 6,2003,from http:/www.educationnext.org/.
Wilms,W.W(1996).Marginalizing unions: Formula for diaster.
share of state funding. Retrieved April 24,2003,from http://www.edweek.org/.
Wilms,W.W & Richard,R(1999).The illusion of paying teachers for student performance. Retrieved April 24,2003,from http://www.edweek.org/
Winick,C.(1963).When teacher strike. Teacher college record.64(7),593-604.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE