:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中小學教師組織工會相關問題之研究
書刊名:國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類
作者:鄭彩鳳 引用關係林漢庭
作者(外文):Cheng, Tsai-fengLin, Hann-tyng
出版日期:2004
卷期:17:1
頁次:頁459-491
主題關鍵詞:中小學教師教師工會教師組織Teacher unionTeacher organizationElementary and high school teachers
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:41
     本研究之主要目的乃藉由問卷調查,瞭解教育人員對於教師組織工會之支持度、參與、組織、運作、發展等相關問題的意見,並依此提出結論與建議。為達成此目的,本研究以高雄市中小學教師做為研究對象,從中共抽取34校500人進行問卷調查。本研究之結論為:1.教師籌組工會獲絕大多數教師(78.6%)的支持;2.未來的教師工會以單一型態、教師自由入會為原則,會員並以教師為主;3.理事長須經由全體成員透過選舉產生,並由專職人員負責業務,部門之設置以法律為第一優先,為提升專業發展則應成立教育研究單位;4.教師工會為教師爭取權益時,可採取集體協商的方式;5.多數教師反對教師有罷教權,若要執行則經由會員代表大會通過;6.採取「支持具有相同教育理念或維護教師權益的候選人」以達成教師工會之訴求;7.教師工會應該要有監督機制的存在;8.教師工會要收取會費,並以出版書籍、舉辦各式活動之收入擴充工會經費。
     The purposes of this study are to explore the school teachers toward teachers’ union related problems (eg., teachers support degree, participation, organization, operation, and development). To achieve the objectives mentioned above, this study surveyed 500 teachers from 34 elementary and high schools in Kaohsiung City . The conclusions drawn from this study are: (1) most of teachers (78.6%) support to establish teacher union; (2) teacher can choose to join or not; (3) the chairman must be selected by all members; (4) agree to collective bargain; (5) 61% teachers don’t degree to strike; (6) supporting those candidates who are close to teachers’ advantage or teachers’ union endorsement; (7) condition system is necessary; and (8) to collect membership fees.
期刊論文
1.Macke, S. M.(1998)。Teacher unionism: Back to the future。Contemporary Education,69(4),180-181。  new window
2.D'Agostino, J. A.(2001)。Teachers union demands death tax retention。Human Events,57(26),7-11。  new window
3.Chaddock, G. R.(1998)。Testy for teachers unions: Will we merge?。Christian Science Monitor,90(150),3。  new window
4.Bradley, A.(19960508)。Network seeks union role in reform efforts。Education Week,2-3。  new window
5.Bascia, N.(1998)。The next steps in teacher union and reform。Contemporary Education,69(4),210-213。  new window
6.Baldauf, S.(1996)。Teachers unions join school reform effort, but sit in back。Christian Science Monitor,88(194),1。  new window
7.鄭彩鳳(20030800)。美國教師工會之發展:兼論對臺灣組織教師工會之啟示。教育政策論壇,6(2),21-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉春榮(19980600)。教師組織與教師專業成長。教師天地,94,4-11。  延伸查詢new window
9.謝文全(19920800)。美國教師專業組織。臺灣教育,500,25-33。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳清山(19960100)。教師組織的定位與展望。教育資料與研究,8,2-8。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.鄭彩鳳(2003)。教師組織工會可行性及其相關問題之探討。教育論壇,國立高雄師範大學教育系 。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊深坑(2001)。德國教師組織與教育專業權運作關係之研究 (計畫編號:NSC89-2413-H-003-102FC)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bascia, N.、Stiegelbauer, S.、Jacka, N.、Watson, N.、Fullan, M.(1997)。Teacher associations and school reform: Building stronger connections。Toronto:Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto。  new window
3.姜添輝(2002)。英國教師組織與教育專業權運作關係之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 89-2413-H-024-033-FC)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳昆璋(1993)。我國公立中小學教師籌組工會可行性之研究--以臺北縣公立中小學教師為實證研究對象(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇素鸞(1991)。中學教師對工會參與及罷教之態度(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳秀苓(1994)。中日兩國教師組織之研究(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳文燦(1997)。我國國民小學教師對教師會組織之態度研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.翁豊珍(1995)。我國教師組織專業團體的研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅瑜雯(1993)。我國教師組織之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱輝章(1998)。我國教師組織之研究--以教師會為中心(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.American Federation of Teachers(1997)。Constitution of the American federation of teachers, AFL-CIO。Washington, D.C.:The Federation。  new window
2.National Education Association(1997)。NEA handbook 1996-1997。Washington, D.C.:National Education Association。  new window
3.McCarthy, M. M.、Cambron-McCabe, N. H.、Thomas, S. B.(1998)。Public school law: Teachers' and students' rights。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
4.Lieberman, M.(1997)。The teacher unions: How the NEA and AFT sabotage reform and hold parents, students, teachers, and taxpayers hostage to bureaucracy。New York:Free Press。  new window
5.Kerchner, C. T.、Koppich, J. E.(1993)。A union of professionals: Labor relations and educational reform。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
6.Jessup, D. K.(1985)。Teachers, unions and change。New York:Praeger Publishers。  new window
7.Cooper, B. S.(1992)。Labor relations in education: An international perspective。Westport:Greenwood Press。  new window
8.Lanenburg, F. C.(1991)。Educational administration。California:Wadsworth。  new window
其他
1.National Union Teachers(2003)。Professional unity,http://www.teachers.org.uk/index.php/, 2003/05/15。  new window
2.National Education Association(2003)。National Education Association Home,http://www.nea.org/aboutnea.hml/, 2003/05/15。  new window
3.Korean Federation of Teacher' Association(2003)。Organizational structure,http://www.kfta.or.kr/eng_kfta/index.asp/, 2003/05/26。  new window
4.Japan Teachers' Union(2003)。日教組政策制度要球と提言(2003~2004年度版),http://www.jtu-net.or.jp/index2.htm/, 2003/05/15。  new window
5.Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissen-schaft(2003)。Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft Landesverband Berlin,http://www.gew-berlin.de/2735.htm, 2003/08/11。  new window
6.American Federation of Teachers(2003)。About AFT,http://www.aft.org/about/, 2003/06/11。  new window
7.「教師與教師團體之定位與合理協商、協議權」工作小組(2002)。教師組織工會問題之研析,http://www.edu.tw/secretary/e2008/910920-1.htm, 2003/01/10。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Shvelson, R. J.(1985)。Teachers organization。The international encyclopedia of education research and studies。Perganpn press。  new window
2.Bascia, N.(1998)。Teacher unions and educational reform。The international handbook of educational change。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE