臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：自我調節焦點對資訊來源與內容特徵不一致現象說服力之影響
作者：林柏齊
作者(外文)：Bo-Chi Lin
校院名稱：臺灣大學
系所名稱：商學研究所
指導教授：張重昭
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2008
主題關鍵詞：自我調節焦點；不一致；說服；情感；認知；推薦；self-regulatory focus；incongruity；persuasion；affect；cognition；recommendation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:115
消費者於購買產品時，經常徵詢外部資訊以幫助決策，包括根據代言人（資訊來源）的形象，以及對其推薦產品訊息（資訊內容）的理解。本研究將該資訊成分分成兩種特徵：情感基礎與認知基礎。一般而言，消費者習慣會將資訊來源與內容特徵之間進行連結，亦即個性偏向情感基礎（認知基礎）的代言人，應會提出情感取向（認知取向）的訊息。然而在某些情形下，資訊來源的類型與資訊內容的特徵之間仍會產生不一致。
本研究認為消費者的自我調節焦點，會影響該資訊來源與內容不一致現象的說服力――根據過去研究對自我調節焦點理論、以及不一致效果的發現，本研究發現促進焦點之消費者較易為來源與內容不一致現象所說服，進而對其所推薦之品牌有較佳的評估；相對地，來源與內容一致的情形對預防焦點之消費者的說服力較高。本研究包含對相關文獻之探討、假設建構、實驗設計、以及實驗結果分析與發現，最後並探討其理論與管理意涵、研究限制、與未來研究方向。
Consumers often make a purchase decision on the basis of extrinsic information, which consists of the endorser’s (information source’s) image and his or her recommendation (information content) of a product. This study differentiates both these information components between two characteristics: affect-based versus cognition-based. Consumers naturally connect the information source’s characteristics to those of the information contents; that is, a spokesperson with affect-based (cognition-based) personality should convey affective (cognitive) messages. However, these characteristics of the source and content may seem inconsistent in some cases.
This study proposes that consumers’ self-regulatory focus influences the persuasiveness of such a source–content incongruity. In line with prior research on self-regulatory focus theory and incongruity effects, the results find that while asking others for opinions to make a decision, compared with an information source–content congruity, promotion-focused consumers are more persuaded by the recommendations in an incongruity scenario. In contrast, a source–content congruity is more persuasive for prevention-focused consumers. This study provides literature reviews, theory developments, experiment design, and the analyses and results. Theoretical implications, managerial implications, limitations, and further research directions are also discussed.
Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). ‘I’ seek pleasures and ‘we’ avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49.
Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source–position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 5-19.
Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967-984.
Campbell, M. C., & Goodstein, R. C. (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’ evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(December), 439-449.
Chakravarti, D., MacInnis, D. J., & Nakamoto, K. (1990). Product category perception, elaborative processing and brand name extension strategies. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 910-916.
Chernev, A. (2004a). Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 141-150.
Chernev, A. (2004b). Goal orientation and consumer preference for status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(December), 557-65.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(February), 117-132.
Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 202-216.
Edwards, K., & von Hippel, W. (1995). Hearts and minds: The priority of affective versus cognitive factors in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(10), 996-1011.
Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 363-381.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1003.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-40.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(December), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-91.
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 276-286.
Huskinson, T. L. H., & Haddock, G. (2004). Individual differences in attitude structure: Variance in the chronic reliance on affective and cognitive information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 82-90.
Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorsers: A social adaptation perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(March), 954-961.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.
Lee, J., & Thorson, E. (2008). The impact of celebrity-product incongruence on the effectiveness of product endorsement. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(September), 433-449.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunha, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864.
Louro, M. J., Pieters, P., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). Nagative returns on positive emotions: The influence of pride and self-regulatory goals on repurchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(March), 833-840.
Lynch, J., & Schuler, D. (1994). The matchup effect of spokesperson and product congruency: A schema theory interpretation. Psychology and Marketing, 11(5), 417-445.
Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Martin, I. M., & Stewart, D. W. (2001). The differential impact of goal congruency on attitudes, intentions, and the transfer of brand equity. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(November), 471-484.
Meyers-Levy, J., Louie, T. A., & Curren, M. T. (1994). How does the congruity of brand names affect evaluations of brand name extensions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 46-53.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 39-54.
Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1994). How ambiguous cropped objects in ad photos can affect product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 190-204.
Pham, M. T., & Avnet, T. (2004). Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance on Affect versus Substance in Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(March), 503-18.
Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49(October/November), 11-36.
Shine, B. C., Park, J., & Wyer Jr., R. S. (2007). Brand synergy effects in multiple brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(November), 663-670.
Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1-13.
Yeo, J., & Park, J. (2006). Effects of parent-extension similarity and self regulatory focus on evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 272-282.
Zhou, R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers’ investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 125-135.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1159（臺灣：1157，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67551050
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上