臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：高齡者教育與多媒體應用--內在、外在因素與創新行為對教學與學習成效之影響
書刊名：福祉科技與服務管理學刊
作者：陳聖智 引用關係／劉芳／曾威智
作者(外文)：Chen, S.-C.／Liu, Megan, F.／Tseng, W.-C.
出版日期：2014
卷期：2:2
頁次：頁153-170
主題關鍵詞：高齡者健康管理；多媒體；跨領域；創新行為；學習成效；Elderly health care；Multimedia；Interdisciplinary；Innovative behavior；Learning effectiveness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:16
臺灣面對高齡少子化的衝擊，高齡者照護與健康管理相關產業將成為重要的社會議題與教育課題，相關專業人才培育更是刻不容緩。本研究主要目的在於未來進入高齡產業所需要人才培育因應就業時，能有多項多元能力與技能，經由課程學習多媒體應用課程之成效評估。台灣科技產業與資通訊發達，多媒體應用能力對於學習者能夠具備新媒體素養是相當重要的議題。「高齡者教育與多媒體應用課程」專業知識著重健康管理與多媒體技能培育，探討議題包含老年護理學、安寧療護實習、高齡者活動設計與安排、長期照護、高齡者教育與多媒體應用等。本研究對於高齡者教育與多媒體應用的跨領域結合進行探討，研究方法採課程教學策略設計行動研究、學習成效量表建構、與問卷統計，研究問題聚焦於「高齡者教育與多媒體應用」的跨領域、跨專業結合之問題解決。透過對台北醫學大學高齡健康與管理學系參與課程學生進行問卷調查，在其前後測之構面包含個人因素：資訊使用、自我效能、內在動機等，以及外在因素：創新支持與修課相關學習行為與教學成效分析。研究結果發現，學生在高齡者教育與多媒體應用的學習上若要有好的學習成效，老師應該要重視創始想像、構思想像、轉造想像、原創性、實用性等內在因素與創新支持、班級與課程等外在因素，這些因素都有助於學生學習高齡者教育與多媒體應用的跨領域課程。
The industry related to older adults is becoming unprecedentedly important, and thus the fostering of healthcare professionals is a pressing issue. However, prejudice and discrimination against older adults exists among healthcare professionals to students within the healthcare disciplines. This study aimed to evaluate the curriculum design together with specific teaching and learning strategies supposed to help students who work with older adults more competent. The researchers conducted surveys with a group of students from a medical university. The constructs of the pre-test and post-test included individual factors such as information utilization, self-efficacy, and internal motivation, and external factors such as innovation support. This study aimed to further explore whether students influenced by these factors differed in behaviour, teaching styles and skills, learning, and achievement. According to the research results, the curriculum arrangement of making short films and documentaries may inspire love and respect for older adults and help translate theories learned from class into practice. We also evaluated five core competencies within the curriculum including the index of health evaluation and guiding competence. (1) Having the professional knowledge regarding geriatric health management; (2) the index of caring and respect literacy: having the humanity caring competence for geriatric caring; (3) the index of social service spirit: having the humanism service spirit of caring about the society and respecting the elderly; (4) the index of cross-team communication and cooperation competences: having the competences of cross-team interpersonal communications, coordination, and cooperation; and (5) the index of integration and innovation competences: having the innovation and responding competences of geriatric health management and services. This study demonstrated the usefulness of this curriculum and its effectiveness for talent development. Also, the implementation of media literacy is valuable for the interdisciplinary binding of gerontological education and multimedia applications.
期刊論文
1.Liang, C.、Hsu, Y.、Huang, Y.、Chen, S. C.(2012)。How learning environments can stimulate student imagination。The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology，11(4)，432-441。  new window
2.陳聖智、黃英修、梁朝雲(20121200)。The Combined Effects of Learning Environment and Personality Traits on Student Imagination。教學科技與媒體，102，2-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Folkmann, M. N.(2011)。Spaces of possibility: The imaginary in design。The design Journal，14(3)，263-282。  new window
4.臧國仁(20090700)。關於傳播學如何教的一些創新想法與作法--以「傳播理論」課為例。課程與教學，12(3)，241-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡琰、臧國仁(20120400)。新聞圖文敘事之競合論述關係：以「水淹高雄岡山晉德老人安養院」個案報導為例。新聞學研究，111，89-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Costa, P. T. Jr.、McCrae, R. R.(1986)。Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology。Clinical Psychology Review，6(5)，407-423。  new window
7.梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖(20140300)。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊，61(1)，27-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Grøn, A.(2002)。Imagination and subjectivity。Ars Disputandi，2，27-36。  new window
9.梁朝雲、陳聖智、黃英修(20121000)。Awaken Imagination: Effects of Learning Environment and Individual Psychology。資訊傳播研究，3(1)，93-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Loasby, B. J.(2001)。Cognition, imagination, and institutions in demand creation。Journal of Evolutionary Economics，11(1)，7-21。  new window
11.Thomas, N. J. T.(1999)。Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content。Cognitive Science，23(2)，207-245。  new window
12.Brünken, R.、Plass, J. L.、Leutner, D.(2003)。Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning。Educational Psychologist，38(1)，53-61。  new window
13.Salgado, J. F.(1997)。The Five Factor Model of Personality and Job Performance in the European Community。Journal of Applied Psychology，82(1)，30-43。  new window
14.Paas, F. G. W. C.(1992)。Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach。Journal of Educational Psychology，84(4)，429-434。  new window
15.Digman, John M.(1990)。Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model。Annual Review of Psychology，41(1)，417-440。  new window
16.Amabile, T. M.(1993)。Motivational Synergy: Toward New Conceptualizations of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace。Human Resource Management Review，3(3)，185-201。  new window
17.Koh, L. C.(2012)。Student attitudes and educational support in caring for older people: A review of literature。Nurse Education in Practice，12(1)，16-20。  new window
18.Chen, Gilad、Gully, Stanley M.、Eden, Dov(2001)。Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale。Organizational Research Methods，4(1)，62-83。  new window
19.鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜(20111200)。「International English Big-Five Mini-Markers」之繁體中文版量表發展。管理學報，28(6)，579-600。  延伸查詢new window
20.許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(20130600)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究，21(2)，113-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.吳靜吉(20020900)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究，15，17-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Bodner, E.(2009)。On the origins of ageism among older and younger adults。Int Psychogeriatr，21(6)，1003-1014。  new window
23.許育齡、陳聖智、許明潔(20111200)。促發數位設計學生想像的心理因素及其影響。教學科技與媒體，98，16-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.陳聖智、許明潔、張文山、梁朝棟(20120300)。當數位媒體設計學生想像時--促動想像的因素探索與相關性研究。教學科技與媒體，99，2-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.梁朝雲(20131100)。天生設計師？學生人格特質透過想像力的中介以預測創造力。教育研究，235，48-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Wright, C.(1987)。Nurturing creative potential: An interactive model for home and school。The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly，12(1)，31-38。  new window
27.Thompson, E.(2007)。Look again: Phenomenology and mental imagery。Phenomena Cognition Science，6(1/2)，137-170。  new window
28.Taylor, George H.(2006)。Ricoeur's philosophy of imagination。Journal of French Philosophy，16(1/2)，93-104。  new window
29.Shin, U.(1994)。The role of imagination in integrative knowledge: A Polanyian view。Tradition & Discovery，21(2)，16-28。  new window
30.O'Connor, K. P.、Aardema, F.(2005)。The imagination: Cognitive, pre-cognitive, and meta-cognitive aspects。Consciousness and Cognition，14(2)，233-256。  new window
31.Norman, W. T.(1963)。Toward and Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attribute: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Rating。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，66，574-583。  new window
32.Liu, Megan. F.、Chen, S.-C.、Tseng, W.-C.(2014)。Education and Multimedia Applications Toward Older Adults: A Humanistic Interdisciplinary Action Study。Gerontechnology，13(2)，253。  new window
33.Liang, C.、Hsu, Y.、Chang, C.-C.、Lin, L.-J.(2013)。In search of an index of imagination for virtual experience designers。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，23，1037-1046。  new window
34.Glenberg, A. M.(1997)。What memory is for。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，20(1)，1-55。  new window
35.Eymard, A. S.、Douglas, D. H.(2012)。Ageism among health care providers and interventions to improve their attitudes toward older adults: an integrative review。J Gerontol Nurs，38(5)，26-35。  new window
36.Eckhoff, A.、Urbach, J.(2008)。Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Socio-cultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought。Early Childhood Educational Journal，36(2)，179-185。  new window
37.Burchinal, L. G.(1976)。Copyright impact of future technology。Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science，16(2)，70-71。  new window
38.Findeli, Alain(2001)。Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion。Design Issues，17(1)，5-17。  new window
39.Amabile, T. M.(1997)。Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy。Journal of Creative Behavior，31(1)，18-26。  new window
40.McClure, Charles R.(1994)。Network Literacy: A Role for Libraries?。Information Technology and Libraries，13(2)，115-125。  new window
41.Scott, Susanne G.、Bruce, Reginald A.(1994)。Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace。Academy of Management Journal，37(3)，580-607。  new window
42.Barr, J.、Steele, T.(2003)。Revaluing the enlightenment: reason and imagination。Teaching in Higher Education，8(4)，505-515。  new window
43.Brown, Tim(2008)。Design thinking。Harvard Business Review，86(6)，84-92。  new window
44.Ryan, Richard M.、Deci, Edward L.(2000)。Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions。Contemporary Educational Psychology，25(1)，54-67。  new window
會議論文
1.陳聖智、曾威智(2013)。數位設計教學中人格特質，教學成效與學習效果關係之初探。2013年第二屆數位合作學習與個人化學習研討會，258-263。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳聖智、劉芳(2013)。數位服務與互動實踐--e世代數位內容創意與敘事之行動研究。2013數位創世紀學術與實務研討會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kosslyn, S.(1995)。Image and the Brain。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
2.徐業良、盧俊銘(2012)。老人福祉科技與遠距居家照護。台中市：滄海書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gardner, H. E.(1993)。Creating Minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi。New York：Basic Books。  new window
4.Amabile, T. M.(1996)。Creativity in Context。Westview Press。  new window
5.Gatewood, Robert D.、Feild, Hubert S.(1998)。Human Resource Selection。The Dryden Press。  new window
6.葉至誠(2008)。現代社會與公民素養。臺北：秀威資訊科技。  延伸查詢new window
7.Pintrich, P. R.、Schunk, D. H.、Meece, J. L.(2002)。Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
8.Hergenhalhn, B. R.(1980)。An introduction to theories of personality。New Jersy：Prentice-Hall。  new window
9.蔡琰、臧國仁(2011)。老人傳播：理論，研究與教學實例。台北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.徐聯恩、郭靜怡(2012)。提升組織創新活力。臺北：智勝。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.內政部統計處(2013)。內政統計年報。  延伸查詢new window
12.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1996)。Creativity。New York, NY：Harper Collins。  new window
13.Breivik, Patricia Senn、Gee, Gordon E.(1989)。Information Literacy: Revolution in the Library。New York：Macmillan。  new window
14.林建平(1997)。學習輔導：理論與實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Allport, Gordon Willard(1937)。Personality: A Psychological Interpretation。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
16.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York：Freeman。  new window
17.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.吳靜吉，郭俊賢，王文中，劉鶴龍，陳淑惠，李慧賢(1996)。創新行為量表之編制與修訂。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.政大人文素養量表(2013)。國立政治大學通識教育中心政大人文素養指標。  延伸查詢new window
2.政大教學評鑑量表(2013)。國立政治大學教務處政大教學評鑑指標。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Schunk, D. H.(1989)。Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning。Research on motivation in education。San Diego, CA。  new window
2.Beno, B. A.(2004)。The role of student learning outcomes in accreditation quality review。Developing and implementing assessment of student learning outcomes。Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1999)。Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity。The Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1391（臺灣：1385，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67345095
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上