:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:青少年前期兒童的同儕間接攻擊之受害經驗與反應評鑑
作者:王明傳
作者(外文):Ming-Chuan Wang
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
指導教授:雷庚玲
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1999
主題關鍵詞:間接攻擊同儕受害社會適應社會訊息處理同儕關係indirect aggressionpeer victimizationsocial adjustmentsocial information-processingpeer relationships
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
本研究旨在探討處於發展轉型階段的青少年前期個體,受害於同儕間接攻擊的心痛感受與經驗,以及受害之後對於間接攻擊所涉及的社會訊息處理型態。研究一以550名六至八年級兒童為研究對象,並採用同儕評量法、自我報告法與社會訊息處理團體測量法進行施測。結果發現:一、整體言之,青少年前期的個體受害於操弄社會訊息時,所引發的心痛強度顯著高於操弄社會關係。此外,無論是受害於操弄社會關係或操弄社會訊息的間接攻擊,女生所感受到的心痛強度皆顯著高於男生。二、青少年前期之拒絕型兒童比歡迎型兒童,無論男女,均較常受害於同儕的間接攻擊。三、個體對於間接攻擊手段的反應評鑑具有性別與攻擊類型之交互作用效果。研究二再以797名的六至八年級個體為研究對象,所採用方法同於研究一。結果顯示:除了複製研究一的三個結果之外,本研究亦發現:個體對於間接攻擊手段的反應評鑑具有性別、社會適應類型與事件情境三者之交互作用效果。且「高攻擊高受害」兒童是所有社會適應類型兒童之中,最為偏好以間接攻擊策略來回應他人的間接傷害。最後,本研究從間接攻擊的向度概念、測量與發展議題,討論兩個研究結果之異同,及其理論與實務之意涵。
A new conceptual model is proposed in the present study to investigate preadolescents’ experience, emotions, and cognition of victimization by peer indirect aggression. In this model, two forms of social manipulation as vehicles of harm are specified, namely, social-relationship manipulation and social-information manipulation. In the present research, the validity of this model was investigated across two studies through (1) comparing between the perceived strength of harm of the two forms of indirect aggression, (2) testing how children’s peer status and gender is related to the victimization experience of indirect aggression, and (3) examining how children’s social adjustment status and gender is related to the response evaluation of indirect aggression. Data in both Study 1 and 2 was collected in two group sessions through peer nomination sociometrics, peer estimation technique, self-report, and standardized SIP activity-based procedure. A total of 550 sixth to eighth graders in Taiwan participated in Study 1. Results indicated that the strengths of harm after being attacked by manipulations of social-relationship and social-information varied as a function of gender. Besides, preadolescents felt significantly more painful after being attacked by peer manipulation of social-information than by that of social-relationship. In addition, across gender, rejected preadolescents were more frequently the targets of indirect aggression than were their popular counterparts. Boys evaluated manipulation of social-information as more effective than girls. By contrast, no gender difference was found in the response evaluation of the manipulation of social relationship. In Study 2, a total of 797 sixth to eighth graders were assessed the same way as in Study 1. All of the above findings of Study 1 were successfully replicated in Study 2. In addition, Study 2 also revealed that highly-aggressive/highly-victimized individuals were more likely to evaluate indirectly aggressive responses as effective ways to react back to peer’s indirect aggression. However, this main effect was qualified by the three-way interaction effect of gender, social adjustment status, and peer context. The above results were discussed in terms of the conceptual, measurement, and developmental issues about indirect aggression.
王明傳、雷庚玲(2007)。〈青少年前期的間接攻擊行為:同儕估計法的建構效度〉。《中華心理學刊》,49,205-224。new window
王明傳、雷庚玲(2008)。〈華人青少年前期兒童之間接攻擊行爲的反應評鑑與情緒經驗〉。《中華心理學刊》,50,71-90。new window
洪儷瑜、涂春仁(1996)。〈Coie & Dodge社會計量地位分類公式之修正〉。《中國測驗學會測驗年刊》,43,103-114。new window
黃囇莉(2005)。〈人際和諧與人際衝突〉。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編)《華人本土心理學》,頁521-114。台北:遠流。new window
程景琳(2009)。〈青少年之關係攻擊與同儕拒絕〉。《教育心理學報》,40,511-528。
葉北辰、雷庚玲(2008)。〈兒童對同儕言語挑釁之受傷與易怒敏感度:社會計量差異與發展差異〉。《中華心理學刊》,50,49-69。new window
Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917.
Archer, J. (2001). A strategic approach to aggression. Social Development, 10, 267-271.
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100-110.
Archer, J., & Côté, S. (2005). Sex differences in aggressive behavior: A developmental and evolutionary perspective. In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup, & J. Archer, (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 425-443). New York: The Guilford Press.
Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 9, 212-230.
Baumeister, R. F., Brarslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
Bell-Dolan, D., & Wessler, A. E. (1994). Ethical administration of sociometric measures: Procedures in use and suggestions for improve. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 23-32.
Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177-188.
Björkqvist, K. (1997). Learning aggression from models: From a social learning toward a cognitive theory of modeling. In S. Feshbach & J. Zagrdozka (Eds.), Aggression: Biological, developmental, and social perspectives (pp. 69-81). New York: Plenum Press.
Björkqvist, K. (2001). Different names, same issue. Social Development, 10, 273-274.
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127.
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Österman, K. (1992). Direct and indirect aggression scales (DIAS). Finland: Åbo Akademi University.
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1993). Styles of aggression and sex differences: A developmental theory. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 11-12.
Björkqvist, K., & Niemelä, P. (1992). New trends in the study of female aggression. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 3-16). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect strategies in males and females. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Björkqvist, K., & Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence – empathy = aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 191-200.
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27-33.
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Oommen, T. K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (2001). Physical, verbal, and indirect aggression among Hindu, Muslim, and Sikh adolescents in India. In M. Martinez (Ed.), Prevention and control of aggression and the impact on its victims (pp. 367-376). New York: Kluwer.
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2001). Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 265-289). New York: Guilford Press.
Bright, R. M. (2005). It’s just a Grade 8 girl thing: Aggression in teenage girls. Gender and Education, 17, 93-101.
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Ferguson, L. L., & Gariepy, J. (1989). Growth and aggression: 1. Childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320-330.
Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99-123.
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203-252.
Campbell, A., Muncer, S., & Gorman, B. (1993). Sex and social representations of aggression: A communal-agentic analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 19, 125-135.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2000). Conceptualizing and measuring peer acceptance and rejection. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Fifth Edition, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional and Personality Development (pp. 779-862). New York: Wiley.
Cole, J. C. (2008). How to deal with missing data: Conceptual overview and details for implementing two modern methods. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 214-238). Los Angeles: Sage.
Côté, S. M., Vaillancourt, T., Barker, E. D., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 37-55.
Coyne, S. M., Archer, J., & Eslea, M. (2006). “We’re not friends anymore! Unless…”: The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 294-307.
Craig, W. M. , Pepler, D., Connolly, J., & Henderson, K. (2001). Developmental context of peer harassment in early adolescence: The role of puberty and the peer group. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 242-261). New York: Guilford Press.
Crain, M. M., Finch, C. L., & Foster, S. L. (2005). The relevance of the social information processing model for understanding relational aggression in girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 213-249.
Crick, N. R. (1995). Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 313-322.
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children''s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317-2327.
Crick, N. R. (2007, March). The development of childhood aggression: Boys will be boys, but what about girls? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.
Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 337-347.
Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Mosher, M. (1997). Relational and overt aggression in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 33, 579-588.
Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Toward a more comprehensive
understanding of peer maltreatment: Studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 98-101.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children''s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1996). Children''s treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 367-380.
Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children’s intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer conflicts. Child Development, 73, 1134-1142.
Crick, N. R., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there’d be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 599-607.
Crick, N. R., Nelson, D. A., Morales, J. R., Cullerton-Sen, C., Casas, J. F., & Hickman, S. (2001). Relational victimization in childhood and adolescence: I hurt you through the grapevine. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 196-214). New York: Guilford Press.
Crick, N. R., & Werner, N. E. (1998). Response decision processes in relational and overt aggression. Child Development, 69, 1630-1639.
Crick, N. R., Werner, N. E., Casas, J. F., O’Brien, K. M., Nelson, D. A., Grotpeter, J. K., et al. (1999). Childhood aggression and gender: A new look at an old problem. In D. Bernstein (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 75-141). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Cullerton-Sen, C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Understanding the effects of physical and relational victimization: The utility of multiple perspectives in predicting social-emotional adjustment. School Psychology Review, 34, 147-160.
Currie, D. H., Kelly, D. M., & Pomerantz, S. (2007). ‘The power to squash people’: Understanding girls’ relational aggression. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28, 23-37.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Dellasega, C. (2005). Mean girls grown up: Adult women who are still queen bees, middle bees, and afraid to bees. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
de Castro, B. O., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916-934.
DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor psychology: Social and organization approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) and N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Sixth Edition, Vol. 3: Social, Emotional and Personality Development (pp. 719-788). New York: Wiley.
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., et al. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374-393.
Dodge, K. A., & Schwartz, D. (1997). Social information processing mechanisms in aggressive behavior. In D. M., Stoff, J., Breiling, & J. D., Maser (Eds.), Handbook of antisocial behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100-110.
Duncan, N. (2004). It’s important to be nice, but it’s nicer to be important: Girls, popularity and sexual competition. Sex Education, 4, 137-152.
Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56, 494-508.
Elenbaas, D. M. (1996). Types of aggression and their relationship to sociometric status in preadolescent girls. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(12), 7091B.
Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Gender differences in bullying: Moving beyond mean level differences. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 15-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Feshbach, N. D. (1969). Sex differences in children’s modes of aggressive responses toward outsiders. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 15, 249-258.
Feshbach, N. D., & Sones, G. (1971). Sex differences in adolescent reactions toward newcomers. Developmental Psychology, 4, 381-386.
Fontaine, R. G., Burks, V. S., & Dodge, K. (2002). Response decision processes and externalizing behavior problems in adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 107-122.
Försterling, F. (2001). Attibution: An introduction to theories, research, and applications. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8, 78-99.
French, D. C., Jansen, E. A., & Pidada, S. (2002). United States and Indonesian children’s and adolescents’ reports of relational aggression by disliked peers. Child Development, 4, 1143-1150.
Fry, D. P. (1998). Anthropological perspectives on aggression: Sex differences and cultural variation. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 81-95.
Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589-600.
Geiger, T. C., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Crick, N. R. (2004). The science of relational aggression: Can we guide intervention? In M. M. Moretti, C. L. Odgers, & M. A. Jackson (Eds.), Girls and aggression: Contributing factors and intervention principles (pp. 27-40). New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Glenberg, A. M., & Andrzejewski, M. E. (2008). Learning from data: An introduction to statistical reasoning (3rd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gomes, M. M. (2007). A concept analysis of relational aggression. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14, 510-515.
Grotpeter, J. K., & Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67, 2328-2338.
Harlow, L. L. (2005). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309.
Henington, C., Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., & Thompson, B. (1998). The role of relational aggression in identifying aggressive boys and girls. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 457-477.
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence form young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 231-245.
Hill, V., & Pillow, B. H. (2006). Children’s understanding of reputation. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 137-157.
Hines, N. J., & Fry, D. P. (1994). Indirect modes of aggression among women of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sex Roles, 30, 213-236.
Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032-1039.
Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677-685.
Hubbard, R., & Ryan, P. A. (2000). The historical growth of statistical significance testing in psychology and its future prospects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 661-681.
Hymel, S., Wagner, E., & Butler, L. J. (1990). Reputational bias: View from the peer group. . In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie, (Eds.). Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 156-186). New York: Cambridge University Press.
James, V. H., & Owens, L. D. (2004). Peer victimization and conflict resolution among adolescent girls in a single-sex south Australian school. International Education Journal, 5, 37-49.
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A, & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105-124). New York: Guilford Press.
Kaukiainen, A., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Österman, K., Salmivalli, C., Rothberg, S., et al. (1999). The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 81-89.
Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that matters. New York: Guilford Press.
Kuttler, A. F., Parker, J. G., & La Greca, A. M. (2002). Developmental and gender differences in preadolescents’ judgments of the veracity of gossip. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 105-132.
Ladd, G. W. (2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Björkqvist, K. (1994). Indirect aggression in boys and girls. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 131-150). New York: Plenum Press.
Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403-414.
Lemerise, E., & Arsenio, W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107-118.
Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maassen, G. H., van der Linden, J. L., Goossens, F. A., & Bokhorst, J. (2000). A ratings-based approach to two-dimensional sociometric status determination. In A. H. N., Cillessen & W. M., Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202-223.
Marini, Z. A., Dane, A. V., Bosacki, S. L., & YLC-CURA (2006). Direct and indirect bully-victims: Differential psychosocial risk factors associated with adolescents involved in bullying and victimization. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 551-569.
McEvoy, M. A., Estrem, T. L., Rodriguez, M. C., & Olson, M. L. (2003). Assessing relational and physical aggression among preschool children: Intermethod agreement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 53-63.
Merrell, K. W., Buchanan, R., & Tran, O. K. (2006). Relational aggression in children and adolescents: A review with implications for school settings. Psychology in the School, 43, 345-360.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Murray-Close, D., & Crick, N. R. (2006). Mutual antipathy involvement: Gender and associations with aggression and victimization. School Psychology Review, 35, 472-492.
Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M., & Crick, N. R. (2007). A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: Associations with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalizing problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 187-203.
Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children’s peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 7-27). New York: Routledge.
Osborne, J. W. (2008). Best practices in data transformation: The overlooked effect of minimum values. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 197-204). Los Angeles: Sage.
Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Fraczek, A. et al. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 1-8.
Owen Blakemore, J. E., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Psychological Press.
Owens, L. (1996). Sticks and stones and sugar and spice: Girls’ and boys’ aggression in schools. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 6, 45-55.
Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000). “Guess what I just heard!”: Indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 67-83.
Owens, L., Slee, P., & Shute, R. (2000). ''It hurts a hell of a lot...'': The effects of indirect aggression on teenage girls. School Psychology International, 21, 359-376.
Owens, L., Slee, P., & Shute, R. (2001). Victimization among teenage girls: What can be done about indirect harassment? In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school : The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 215-241). New York: Guilford Press.
Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. K. (1999). Young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Gender differences in accounts of social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 233-258.
Parkhurst, J. T. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144.
Peets, K., & Kikas, E. (2006). Aggressive strategies and victimization during adolescence: Grade and gender differences, and cross-informant agreement. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 68-79.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). Sampling instances of victimization in middle school: A methodological comparison. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 125-144). New York: Guilford Press.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 151-163.
Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-224.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 257-278.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Roseth, C. J. (2006). Relational aggression and relationships in preschoolers: A discussion of methods, gender differences, and function. Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 269-276.
Perry, D. G., Hodges, E. V. E., & Egan, S. K. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review and a new model of family influence. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73-104). New York: Guilford Press.
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
Prescott, K. (1996). Gender differences and developmental trends in aggressive bahaviour: An edited interview with Kaj Björkqvist. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 6, 89-93.
Prinstein, M. J., Cheah, C. S. L., & Guyer, A. E. (2005). Peer victimization, cue interpretation, and internalizing symptoms: Preliminary concurrent and longitudinal findings for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 11-24.
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.
Putallaz, M., Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., McKnight, K., & Grimes, C. L. (2004). A behavioral analysis of girls’ aggression and victimization. In M. Putallaz & K. L. Bierman (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence among girls : A developmental perspective (pp. 110-134). New York: Guilford Press.
Richardson, D. R., & Green, L. R. (1997). Circuitous harm: Determinants and consequences of nondirect aggression. In R. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 171-188). New York: Plenum Press.
Richardson, D. R., & Green, L. R. (1999). Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 425-434.
Rivers, I., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Types of bullying behavior and their correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 359-368.
Robinson, D. H., & Wainer, H. (2002). On the past and future of null hypothesis significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 263-271.
Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384-400.
Roecker, C. E. (2001). Children’s responses to overt and relational aggression. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 240-252.
Rogosch, F. A., & Newcomb, A. F. (1989). Children’s perceptions of peer reputations and their social reputations among peers. Child Development, 60, 597-610.
Russell, A., & Owens, L. (1999). Peer estimates of school-aged boys’ and girls’ aggression to same- and cross-sex targets. Social Development, 8, 364-379.
Rys, G., & Bear, G. (1997). Relational aggression and peer relationships: Gender and development issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 87-106.
Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398-419). New York: Guilford Press.
Schäfer, M., Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2002). Relational victimization, physical victimization, and bullying among German school children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 281-306.
Schuster, B. (1997). Outsiders in schools: Prevalence of victimization and relationship with social status. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 28, 251-264.
Schuster, B. (2001). Rejection and victimization by peers: Social perception and social behavior mechanisms. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school : The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 290-309). New York: Guilford Press.
Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York: Harcourt.
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117-127.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
Toldos, M. P. (2005). Sex and age differences in self-estimated physical, verbal and indirect aggression in Spanish adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 13-23.
Tomada, G., & Scheider, B. H. (1997). Relational aggression, gender, and peer acceptance: Invariance across culture, stability over time, and concordance among informants. Developmental Psychology, 33, 601-609.
Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guildford Press.
Underwood, M. K., Galen, B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can’t we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248-266.
Underwood, M. K., Mayeux, L., & Galperin, M. (2006). Peer relations during middle childhood: Gender, emotions, and aggression. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child Psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 241-261). New York: Psychology Press.
Vaillancourt, T. (2005). Indirect aggression among humans: Social construct or evolutionary adaptation? In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 158-177). New York: The Guilford Press.
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2004). The social context of children’s aggression. In M. M. Moretti, C. L. Odgers, & M. A. Jackson (Eds.), Girls and aggression: Contributing factors and intervention principles (pp. 57-73). New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Warner, R. M. (2008). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Los Angeles: Sage.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59-73.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8, 122-137.
Wilkinson, L., & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25.
Willoughby, J., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Bryant, D. (2001). Overt and covert dimensions of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 177-187.
Xie, H. (1998). The development and functions of social aggression: A narrative analysis of social exchange in interpersonal conflicts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Xie, H., Cairns, B. D., & Cairns, R. B. (2005). The development of aggressive behaviors among girls: Measurement issues, social functions, and differential trajectories. In D. J. Pepler, K. C. Madsen, C. Webster, & K. S. Levene (Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression (pp. 105-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Xie, H., Swift, D. J., Cairns, B. D., & Cairns, R. B. (2002). Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Social Development, 11, 205-224.
Young, E. L., Boye, A., & Nelson, D. A. (2006). Relational aggression: Understanding, identifying, and responding in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 297-312.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE