美國飛彈防禦對太空軍備管制的挑戰(1996-2008):現實主義理論觀之分析_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	美國飛彈防禦對太空軍備管制的挑戰(1996-2008):現實主義理論觀之分析
作者：	林宗達
作者(外文)：	Tsung-Ta Lin
校院名稱：	臺灣大學
系所名稱：	政治學研究所
指導教授：	蔡政文
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2012
主題關鍵詞：	國家飛彈防禦；太空軍備管制；現實主義；軍備競賽；權力政治；National Missile Defense；Arms Control in Outer Space；Realism；Arms Race；Power Politics
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:1605

美國國家飛彈防禦(National Missile Defense, NMD)是人類有史以來最為龐大、最為繁複、最為昂貴與最具爭議的軍事防衛計畫。該自計劃雖是源自於冷戰時期美國的「戰略防禦方案」(Strategic Defense Initiative, SDI)，但卻是直到二十一世紀小布希(George W. Bush)總統就職後，才獲得充分的發展與獲取重大成就。正因如此，故俄羅斯、中共與美國等強權因NMD的爭議而引起的軍事競逐，即成為當前國際政治的熱點。
據此，本論文即以美國飛彈防禦對太空軍備管制的挑戰(1996-2008)為題，從太空軍備管制的內涵與發展、美國國家飛彈防禦之發展、飛彈防禦系統對太空軍備管制的衝擊、強權國家的反應、美國對強權國家的反應與其破壞國際典則之因應、評估分析與未來展望等六大主題，探究這個論題。並藉由國際關係之現實主義理論來評論和分析美國飛彈防禦對當前與未來之太空軍備管制的挑戰，以及美國、俄羅斯、中共與歐盟等強權之間的軍事外交互動，以及如此之互動對國際政治局勢的影響。
從本論文之研究發現，小布希極力發展美國國家飛彈防禦不僅對以往既有的太空軍備管制造成極為嚴重的負面影響，且阻礙了當前國際社會正在努力創建新的太空軍備管制典則的發展。除此之外，俄羅斯和中共更將美國飛彈防禦之軍事防禦作為，視為是其國家安全之重大威脅。於是乎，中俄除了加強軍備建構因應之外，這兩國並進行外交聯合，以阻止美國飛彈防禦進一步的發展與部署。中俄兩國的聯合外交作為包括倡議創建新的太空軍備管制條約以及在防範飛彈與大規模毀滅性武器(weapons of mass destruction, WMD)擴散之消極不合作或抵制的作為。在此情況下，美國飛彈防禦引起中俄兩大強權的對抗之舉，特別是在防範武器擴散之抵制作為，反而使得飛彈與WMD擴散更為嚴重，而當前伊朗中程彈道飛彈(medium-range ballistic missile, MRBM)與核武發展，都是在俄羅斯的支持下而獲得重大成就者。然此則破壞了美國在外交積極進行防範飛彈與WMD擴散之努力，進而讓其國家安全遭受更為嚴峻的挑戰。
無論是美國建構飛彈防禦之舉，或者是中俄兩國對美國飛彈防禦進行抵制之作為，事實上，這都可從現實主義對國際政治的探究中，獲得良好的解釋與分析，故此論文正是以此優點來探究和分析強權之間的權力競逐。儘管如此，但吾人以為現實主義並無法解決強權國家因軍備競賽而陷入安全困境的問題，故而提出國際關係之後現代主義對解構國家與混合認同之論，作為如何跳脫強權安全困境之思考。

以文找文

The U.S. National Missile Defense (NMD) is the most giant, most complicated, most expensive, and most controversial military defense project in history. The military defense project is derived from the U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) in the Cold War era, but until President George W. Bush performs and pushes it in twenty-first century. President George W. Bush’s effort lets the development and deployment of the U.S. NMD access to significant achievement. For this reason, NMD induces the military race among Russia, China and the U.S, which has become a hot topic of the current international politics.
Accordingly, the doctoral dissertation, the title of the U.S. missile defenses to Arms Control in outer space (1996-2008), I would like to explore this topic from six themes of the content and development of arms control in outer space, the development of the U.S. NMD, missile defense system’s impact on arms control in outer space, the reactions of great powers, the response of the U.S. to great powers’ reaction and its destruction of the international regimes, and assessment, analysis, and prospect. By realist theory of international relations to evaluate and analyze the challenges of the U.S. missile defense on the current and future arms control in outer space, as well as military and diplomatic interactions among Russia, China, European Union and the U.S., and such as interaction how to impact on the current international situation.
From this dissertation research, President George W. Bush makes his best effort to push the development of the U.S. NMD that it not only cause a very serious negative impact on the existed arms control in outer space but also hinder the international society in working to create a new regime of arms control in outer space. In addition, Russia and China regard the military defense of the U.S. missile defense as a considerable threat to their national security. Based on this reason, China and Russia need to strengthen their military capabilities in order to respond to the threat from the U.S. missile defense, and this two countries have very close diplomatic joint actions to impede the further development and deployment of the U.S. missile defense. The joint diplomatic actions from China and Russia are inclusive of initiating to construct a new treaty of arms control in outer space and doing passive non-cooperation or taking resistance in preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
In this case, the U.S. missile defense cause the resistance from China and Russia, especially as to prevent the proliferation of weapons of boycott, on the contrast, it will let the proliferation of missile and WMD more and more serious. For Example, the development of the medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM) and nuclear weapon in Iran, these achievements are supported by Russia. However, this situation destroys the diplomatic effort of the U.S. in actively preventing the proliferation of missile and WMD, and thereby allowing the U.S. national security suffers more severe challenge.
Whether the military construction of the U.S. missile defense or the resistance of China and Russia to the U.S. missile defense system, in fact, these can get an excellent interpretation and analysis form the realist theory of international relations, so this dissertation employs the excellences of realism to explore and analyze the power struggle among great powers. Nevertheless, I think that realism can not resolve the problem of great powers’ security dilemma because of their arms race. For this reason, I provide the discourse of destructing nation and hybridity from postmodernism of international relation to be a thought that great powers how to escape the security dilemma.

以文找文

參考書目
壹、中英文官方文件
“1962 (XVIII).Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space,” United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/gares/html/gares_18_1962.html.
“31/72Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” UN Document, 10 December 1976, http://www.un-documents.net/a31r72.htm.
“34/68. Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies,” United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/gares/html/gares_34_0068.html.
“A Non-paper by Chinese and Russian Delegation to the Conference on Disarmament: Verification Aspect of PAROS,” Permanent Mission of the Russia to the United Nations Office and other International, Last Update: 5 March 2010 http://www.geneva.mid.ru/speeches/34.html.
“Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law: 1976 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), January 2003, http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/57JR8J/$File/1976_ENMOD.pdf.
“CDI Fact Sheet: Legal Aspects Concerning the Militarization of Space,” Center for Defense Information (CDI), 23 April 2003, http://www.cdi.org/friendlyversion/printversion.cfm?documentID=911.
“Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space,” United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/en/SORegister/regist.html.
“Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space,” United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/lpos.html.
“Department of Energy Launches New Global Threat Reduction Initiative, U.S. Department of Energy, 26 May 2004, http://www.energy.gov/news/archives/1359.htm.
“Fact Sheet: Missile Technology Control Regime,” U.S. Department of State (Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation), 4 March 2009, http://www.state.gov/t/isn/rls/fs/120017.htm.
“Fact Sheet: Missile Technology Control Regime,” U.S. Department of State, 4 March 2009, http://www.state.gov/t/isn/rls/fs/120017.htm.
“Fact Sheet: The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism,” The White House, July 2006, http://georgewbush.-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/07/20060715-3.html.
“Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism: Text of Statement of Principles,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 30 October 2006, http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/terrorism/initiative0610.html.
“IAEA Welcome US New Global Threat Reduction Initiative,” IAEA Staff Report, 27 May 2004, http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2004/GTRI_Initiative.html.
“Joint Statement Announcing the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism,” U.S. Department of State, 15 July 2006, http://moscow.usembassy.gov/transcripts_photo_bio/joint-statement-announcing-the-global-initiative-to-combat-nuclear-terrorism-july-15-2006.html.
“National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction,” The White House, December 2002, http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-17.html.
“Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space, G.A. res.51/44, 51 U.N. GAOR Supp.(No.49) at 77, U.N. Doc. A51/49(Vol.1)(1996),” The General Assembly, Last Update: 1 January 2010, http://wwwl.umn.edu/humanarts/resolutions/51/44GA1996.html.
“Prevention of Outer Space Arms Race, Mediterranean Security among Issues,as Disarmament Committee Approves Seven more Texts,” United Nations Information Service, 26 October 2005, http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/pressrels/2005/gadis3310.html.
“Prevention of Outer Space Arms Race, Mediterranean Security among Issues, as Disarmament Committee Approves Seven more Texts,” United Nations Information Service, Last Update: 6 March 2010, http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/pressrels/2005/gadis3310.html.
“Prevention of Outer Space Arms Race, Mediterranean Security among Issues, as Disarmament Committee Approves Seven more Texts,” United Nations Information Service, 26 October 2005, http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/pressrels/2005/gadis3310.html.
“Resolutions Adopted by the General Assembly during Its Eighteen Session,” The General Assembly, Last Update: 4 March 2010, http://www.un.org/document/ga/res/18/ares18.htm.
“Session One: Future and Current Threat to the Peaceful of Outer Space,” Report on the Conference on “Building the Architecture for Sustainable Space Security” (Held on 30-31 March 2006 in Geneva), 22 June 2006.
“START I Treaty,” U.S. Department of State, Last Update: 10 March 2010, http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/starthtm/start/toc.html.
“The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism,” U.S. Department of State, Last Update: 11 March 2010, http://www.state.gov/t/isn/c18406.htm.
“Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water (Limited Test Ban Treaty),” Council on Foreign Relations, Last Update: March 2010, http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/ltbtl.html.
“Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems,” U.S. Department of State, Last Update: 10 March 2010, http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/abm/abm2.html.
“Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies,” United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/lpos.html.
“U.S. National Security Strategy,” Hearing: Before the Committee on Armed Services (House of Representatives, 21 March 2001).
「《2000年中國的國防》白皮書」，中華人民共和國國防部，Last Update: 10 August 2012， http://www.mod.gov.cn/affair/2011-01/07/content_4249945.htm.
「《2002年中國的國防》白皮書」，中華人民共和國國防部，Last Update: 10 August 2012，http://www.mod.gov.cn/affair/2011-01/06/content_4249946_2.htm.
「《2004年中國的國防》白皮書」，中華人民共和國國防部，Last Update: 10 August 2012，http://www.mod.gov.cn/affair/2011-01/06/content_4249947.htm.
「《2006年中國的國防》白皮書」，中華人民共和國國防部，Last Update: 10 August 2012，http://www.mod.gov.cn/affair/2011-01/06/content_4249948_2.htm.
「《2008年中國的國防》白皮書」，中華人民共和國國防部，Last Update: 10 August 2012，http://www.mod.gov.cn/affair/2011-01/06/content_4249949_4.htm.
「《2010年中國的國防》白皮書」，中華人民共和國國防部，Last Update: 10 August 2012，http://www.mod.gov.cn/affair/2011-03/31/content_4249942.htm.
Armenia, Belarus, and China, etc., “Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures in Outer Space Activities,” Agenda Item 90(o)in UN General Assembly Sisty-first Session (11 October 2006).
Department of Defense, National Defense Strategy 2008 (U.S.: Department of Defense, June 2008).
Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report 1997 (U.S.: Department of Defense, May 1997).
Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2001 (U.S.: Department of Defense, 30 September 2001).
Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2006 (U.S.: Department of Defense, 6 February 2006).
Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010 (U.S.: Department of Defense, February 2010).
Grant, Andrew, “Remark at the 2007 Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism Law Enforcement Conference,” U.S. Department of State, 15 June 2007, http://merln.ndu.edu/achivepdf/wmd/State/87320.pdf.
Hildreth, Steve A., “Ballistic Missile Defense,” CRS Report Congress (Order Code RS22120, 5 January 2007).
IAEA, Global Threat Reduction Initiative: International Partners’ Conference (Vienna, Austria, 18-19 September 2004).
Joseph, Robert G., Remarks to Center for Space and Defense Forum (U.S. Department of State, 11 January 2007).
Larson, Garold, “U.S. Statement on Peaceful Use of Outer Space—Thematic Debate of UNGA first Committee,” Statement in the First Committee of the 64th United Nations General Assembly, 19 October 2009, http://geneva.usmission.gov/2009/10/19/outerspace/.
Nikitin, Mary Beth, “Background,” Proliferation Security Initiative (CRS Report for Congress, 16 January 2008).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2002 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2002 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2003 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2003 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2004 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2004 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2005 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2005 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2006 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2006 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2007 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2007 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2008 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2008 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2009 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2009).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2010 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2010 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2011 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2011 ).
Office of the Secretary of Defense, The Military Power of the People’s 2012 (U.S.: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2012 ).
Squassoni, Sharon, Proliferation Security Initiative (CRS Report for Congress), 14 January 2005.
The General Assembly, “Report of the First: Committee Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space,” United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-third session, Agenda item 70, 18 November 1998.
The General Assembly, “Report of the First: Committee Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space,” United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-third session, Agenda item 70, 18 November 1998.
The General Assembly, “Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly: 56/23 Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space,” United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-sixth session, Agenda item 73, 21 December 2001.
The General Assembly, “Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly: 56/23 Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space,” United Nations General Assembly, Fifty-sixth session, Agenda item 73, 21 December 2001.
The Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation and the Permanent Representative of China, “Draft Treaty on Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the threat or use of Force Against Outer Space Objects,” Letter Dated 12 February 2008 from the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation and the Permanent Representative of China to the Conference on Disarmament Addressed to the Secretary-General of the Conference Transmitting the Russian and Chinese Text to the Draft “Draft Treaty on Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the threat or use of Force Against Outer Space Objects” Introduced by the Russian Federation and China, 29 February 2008.
The PRC and The Russia Federation, “Transparency an Confidence-Building Measures in Outer Space Activities and the Prevention of Placement of Weapons in Outer Space,” The People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation Working Paper in Conference on Disarmament(UN), 22 May 2006.
The Security Council, “Adopted by the Security at Its 4956th Meeting on 28 April 2004,” Resolution 1540, 28 April 2004.
The White House, National Security Strategy 2010 (U.S.: The White House, May 2010).
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) ed., Building the Architecture for Sustainable Space Security (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2006).
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) ed., Safeguarding Space Security: Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (Conference Report, 21-22 March 2005).
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) ed., Security in Space: the Next Generation (Conference Summary Report), 31 March-1 April 2008.
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research(UNIDIR) ed., Security in Space: the Next Generation (Conference Summary Report, 21-22 March 2005).
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) ed., United Nations Treaties and Principles on Outer Space (New York: United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, 2005).
United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency ed., Arms Control and Disarmament Agreements (Washington, D.C.: United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, 1980).

貳、英文部分
一、書籍
Adams, Gordon, and Cindy Williams, Buy National Security: How America Plans and Pays for Its Global Role and Safety at Home (New York & London: Routledge, 2010).
Agenes, Michael, Webster’s New World Dictionary and Thesaurus (New York: Hungry Minds, Inc., 2002).
AL-Rodhan, Nayef R. F., Symbiotic Realism: A Theory of International Relations in an Instant and an Interdependent World (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2007).
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (Washington D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1994).
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (Washington D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005).
Anthony, Ian, Reducing Threats at the Source: A European Perspective on Cooperative Threat Reduction (Solna, Sweden: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2004).
Arbatov, Alexey, The Research Paper for the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (New York: the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament, May 2009).
Arvatov, Alexei, and Vladimir Dvorkin, Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: Transforming the U.S. –Russian Equation (Washington, D.C.: Carbegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006).
Barker, Ernest, The Politics of Aristotle (New York & London: Oxford University, 1961).
Belitzky, Boris, tranlated by Gennda Zhoukov, “International Space Law (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1984).
Blix, Hans, Why Nuclear Disarmament Matters (Cambridge, Mass. & London: The MIT Press, 2008), pp. 89-92.
Bluth, Christoph, The Nuclear Challenge: US-Russian Strategic Relations after the Cold War (Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2000).
Bottici, C., Men and States: Rethinking the Domestic Analogy in a Global Age (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009).
Boucher, David, Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).
Brown, Neville, New Strategy through Space (Leicester, London and New York: Leicester University Press, 1990).
Bulkeley, Rip, and Graham Spinardi, Space Weapons: Deterrence or Delusion? (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1986).
Bull, Hedley, The Control of Arms Race (New York: Frederick A Praeger, Publisher, 1966).
Caldicott, Helen, and Craig Eisendrath, War in Heaven: The Arms Race in Outer Space (New York & London: The New Press, 2007).
Caldicott, Helen, The Nuclear Danger: George W. Bush’s Military-Industiral Complex (New York & London: The New Press, 2002).
Cambone, Stephen, Ivo Daalder, Stephen J. Hadley, and Christopher J. Makins, Policy Paper: European Views of National Missile Defense (U.S.: The Atlantic Council of the United States, September 2000).
Campbell, David, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity, and Justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998).
Campbell, David, Politics Without Principle: Sovereign, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993).
Campbell, David, Writing Security : United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Manchester : Manchester University Press, 1998).
Canan, James W., War in Space (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1982).
Cheng, Bin, Studies in International Space Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Cheon, Seongwhun, PSI and the South Korean Position (Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification, 2008).
Coleman, David G., and Joseph M. Siracusa, Reali-World Nuclear Deterrence: The Making of International Strategy (Westport & London: Praeger Security International, 2006).
Committee on International Security and Arms Control, Nuclear Arms Control (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985).
Compbell, Christopher L., Why National Missile Defense: A Test of Three Competing Models (U.S.: Ph. D. Dissertation, the Ebely College of Arts and Science at West Virginia University, 2002).
Cordesman, Anthony H., Strategic Threats and National Missile Defense (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2002).
Couloumbis, Theodore A., and James H. Wolfe, Introduction to International Relations: Power and Justice (Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1978).
Daalder, Ivo H., and James M. Lindsay, America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005).
Dauber, Cori Elizabeth, Cold War Analytical Structures and the Post Post-War World (London: PAREGER, 1986).
Deitchman, S. J., Military Force Transformation: Progress, Costs, Benefits and Tasks Remaining (Occassional Paper) (Washington, D.C.: The Atlantic Council of the United State, December 2004).
Delpech, Therese, Iran and the Bomb: The Abdication of International Responisbility (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), p. 43.
Dembling, Paul G., and Daniel M. Arons, “The Evolution Outer Space Treaty,” Francis Lyall and Paul B. Larsen eds., Space Law (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2007), pp. 159-61.
Dyke, Vernon Van, Political Science: A Philosophical Analysis (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962).
Ellings, Richard K., and Aaron L. Friedfberg, Strategic Asia 2002-03 (Seattle Washington: The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2002).
French, Paul, North Korea: the Paranoid Peninsula (New York: Zed Books Ltd, 2005), p. 214.
Frieman, Wendy, “The Missile Technology Control Regime,” China, Arms Control, and Nonproliferation (London & New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 92-4.
Frieman, Wendy, China, Arms Control, and Nonproliferation (London & New York: Routledge, 2004).
Gaffney, Frank J., and Colleagues, War Footing: 10 Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World (Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2006).
Gamilleri, Joseph A., and Jim Falk, The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World (Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar, 1992).
Gilpin, Ribert, The Political Economy of International Relations (New Jersey：Princeton, 1987).
Global Investment and Business Center, United States Defense Policy Handbook: Strategic Information, Policies, Contacts (Washington, D.C.: International Business Publications, 2008).
Goldblat, Jozef, Arms Control: A Guide to Negotiations and Agreements (London: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Jon C. Pevehouse, International Relations (New York: Longman, 2008).
Gormley, Dennis M., Missile Contagion: Cruise Missile Proliferation and the Threat to International Security (Westport & London: Praeger Security International, 2007).
Graham, Thomas Jr., and Damien J. LaVera, Cornerstones of Security: Arms Control Treaties in the Nuclear Era (Seattle, Washington: University Washington Press, 2003).
Graham, Thomas Jr., and Damien J. LaVera, Cornerstones of Security: Arms Control Treaties in the Nuclear Era (Seattle, Washington: University Washington Press, 2003).
Haanappel, P.P.C., The Law and Policy of Air Space and Outer Space: A Comparative Approach (The Hague, The Netherland: Kluwer Law International, 2003).
Haley, Andrew G., Space Law and Government (New York: Meredith Publishing Company, 1963).
Handberg, Rober, Ballistic Missile Defense and Future of American Security (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 2002).
Hermida, Julian, Legal Basis for a National Space Legislation (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004).
Hughes, Barry B., Continuity and Change in World Politics: The Clash of Perspectives (Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994).
International Business Publication, United States: Nuclear Energy and Military Projects and Facilities Handbook (Washington, DC: International Business Publication, 2008).
International Business Publication, United States: Security Defence Cooperation Agency Handbook (Washington, DC: International Business Publication, 2008).
Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Potential (A Joint Threat Assessment by U.S. and Russian Technical Experts, EastWest Institute, May 2009).
Issak, Allen C., Scope and Methods of Political Science (Homewood The Dorsey Press, 1984).
Jackson, Robert J., and Philip Towle, Temptations of Powers: The United States in Global Politics after 911 (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006).
Jane’s Fighting Ships 1997-98 (UK: Jane’s Information Group, 1997).
Jane’s Land-Based Air Defense 1997-98 (UK: Jane’s Information Group , 1997).
Jane’s Naval Weapon Systems 1997-98 (UK: Jane’s Information Group, 1997).
Jane’s Strategic Weapons System1998-99 (UK: Jane’s Information Group, May 1998).
Jasentuliyana, Nandasiri, International Space Law and the United Nations (Cambridge, MA.: Kluwer Law International, 1999).
Jervis, Robert, American Foreign Policy in a New Era (London & New York: Routledge, 2005).
Ji, You, The Armed Forces of China (Australia：Allen & Unwin, 1999 ), pp. 98-101.
Johnson, Chalmers, The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004).
Johnson, Loch K., Seven Sins of American Foreign Policy (New York: Person Education, Inc., 2007).
Johnson, Smith, and Paulsen Shocket, Political Research Methods: Foundation and Techniques (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1976).
Joyner, Daniel H., International Law and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).
Kaku, Michio, and Daniel Axlender, To Win A Nuclear War: The Pentagon’s Secret War Plans (New York: Black Rose Books, 1987), p. 240.
Kaku, Michio, Weapons in Space (New York: Seven Story Press, 2001).
Kaneda, Hideaki, Jazumasa Kobayashi, Hiroshi Tajima and Hirofumi Tosaki, Japan’s Missile Defense: Diplomatic and Security Polices In a Changing Strategic Environment (Japan: The Japan Institute of International Affairs, March 2007).
Karmel, Solomon M., China and the People’s Liberation Army: Great Power or Struggling Developing State? (New York: Martin’s Press, 2000).
Khalilzad, Zalmay, etc., The United States and Asia: Toward a New U.S. Strategy and Force Posture (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001).
Khan, I.K., Nuclear Security: Strategies and Techniques (New Dehli: MD Publication Pvt Ltd, 2008).
Khan, Saira, Iran and Nuclear Weapons: Protracted Conflict and Proliferation (New York: Routledge, 2010).
Khan, Saira, Nuclear Weapons and Conflict Transformation: The Case of India-Pakistan (London & New York: Routledge, 2009).
Klein, John J., Space Warfare: Strategy, Principles and Policy (London & New York: Routledge, 2006).
Kolodziej, Edward A., Security and International Relations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Kousoulas, D.G., Power and Influence: An Introduction to International Relations (Washington, D.C.: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1985).
Krepon, Michael, and Miachael Katz-Hyman, Building the Architecture for Sustainable Space Security (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2006).
Kuypers, Jim A., Bush’s War: Media Bias and Justifications for War in a Terrorist Age (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC., 2006).
Lakoff, Sanford, Strategic Defense in the Nuclear Age (Wesport, Conneticut: Praeger Security International, 2007).
Lamb, Christopher J., E Elaine Bunn and Christopher Cavoli, Transforming Defense (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, September 2005).
Landau, Martin, Political Theory and Political Science (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1972).
Lennon ed., Alexander T. J., Contemporary Nuclear Debates: Missile Defense, Arms Control, and Arms Races in the Twenty-first Century (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002).
Levi, Michael A., and Michael E. O’Hanlon, The Future of Arms Control (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2005).
Lieber, Robert J., No Common Power: Understanding International Relations (New York: Harper Collins College Publishers, 1995).
Lindsay, James M., and Michael E. O’Hanlon, Defending America: The Case for Limited National Missile Defense (Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press, 2001).
Little, Richard, The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Methods (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Longman Dictionary of the English Language (Harlow, England: Longman Group Limited, 1984).
Lott, Anthony D, Creating Insecurity: Realism, Constructivism, and US Security Policy (Burlington, VT: 2004).
MacDonald, Bruce W., China, Space Weapons, and U.S. Security (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2008).
McCants, Rodbetn X., USAWC Strategy Research Project (U.S.: U.S. Army War College, 3 May 2004).
McDonough, David S., Nuclear Superiority: The ‘New Triad’ and the Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2006).
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001).
Milton, A. Fenner, M. Scott Davis, and John A. Parmentola, Making Space Defense Work: Must the Superpowers Cooperate? (New York: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publishers, Inc., 1989), p. 64.
Mingst, Karen, and Jack Snyder, Essential Reading in World Politics (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001).
Minstry, Dinshaw, Containing Missile Proliferation: Strategic Technology, Security Regimes, and International Cooperation in Arms Control (Seattle & London: University of Washington Press, 2003).
Mitchell, Gordon R., Strategic Deception: Rhetoric, Science, and Politics in Missile Defense Advocacy (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2000).
Moens, Alexander, The Foreign Policy of George W. Bush: Values, Strategy, and Loyalty (Burkubgton, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2004).
Moore, Mike, Twilight War: The Folly of U.S. Space Dominance (Oakland, California: The Independent Institute, 2008).
Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960).
Mulgan, R.G., Aristotle Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
National Academy of Science ed., Nuclear Arms Control: Background and Issues (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985).
Nelson C. Richard, and David H. Saltiel, Policy Paper: Managing Proliferation Issue with Iran (U.S.: The Atlantic Council of the United States, January 2002).
Nester, William, International Relations: Politics and Economics in the 21st Century (London: Wadsworth, 2001).
O’Hanlon, Michael E., Defense Policy Choices for the Bush Administration 2001-05 (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001), p. 175.
O’Hanlon, Michael E., Neither Star Wars Nor Sanctuary: Constraining the Military Uses of Space (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2004).
Office of International Affairs National Research Council, Proliferation Concern: Assessing U.S. effort to help contain nuclear and other dangerous materials and technologies in the former Soviet Union (Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997).
Park, Wilton, Missile Defense, Deterrence and Arms Control: Contradictory Aims or Compatible Goals? (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, April 2004).
Peoples, Columba, and Nick Vanghan-William, “Poststructuralism and International Political Sociology,” Critical Security Studies: An Introduction (London & New York: Routledge, 2010), p. 68.
Perkovich, George, and James M. Acton, Abolishing Nuclear Weapons (London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2008).
Plant, Malcolm, Dictionary of Space (Harlow, England: Longman Group Limited, 1986).
Plischke, Elmer, International Relations Basic Documents (Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., 1953).
Preston, Bob, Dana J. Johnson, Sean J.A. Edwards, Michael Miller and Calvin Shipbaugh, Space Weapons Earth Wars (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002).
Prozorov, Sergei, Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2007).
Randolp, Stephen P., “Controlling Space,” Hans Binnendijk ed., Transforming America’s Military (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, 2002), pp. 309-330.
Reeve, C.D.C., Aristotle/Politics (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1998).
Rengger, N. J., International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory (New York: Routledge, 2000).
Reynolds, Glenn H., and Robert P. Merges, Outer Space: Problems of Law and Policy (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1997).
Romberg, Alan D., and Michael McDevitt, China and Missile Defense: Managing U.S.-PRC Strategic Relations (U.S.: The Henry L. Stimson Center, 2003).
Russett, Bruce, Harvey Starr, and David Kinsella, World Politics: The Menu for Choice (London: Wadsworth, 2006).
Scobell, Andrew, The Report of Strategic Studies Institute: China and North Korea-From Comrades-in-Arm to Allies at Arm’s Length (Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, March 2004).
Sirrs, Owen L., Nasser and the Missile Age in the Middle East (London & New York: Routledge, 2006).
Sorauf, Francis J., Political Science (Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Books, INC, 1996).
Squassoni, Sharon, ed., Globalization Cooperative Threat Reduction (New York: Novinka Books, 2004).
Stares, Paul B., Space Weapons and US Strategy: Origins and Development (London & Sydney: Croom Helm, 1985).
Steans, Jill, and Lloyd Pettiford, Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes (New York: Pearson Educations Ltd., 2005).
Stein, Jonathan B., From H-Bomb to Star Wars (Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Bookd, 1984).
Stocker, Jeremy, Britain and Ballistic Missile Defense 1942-2002 (London & New York: Frank Cass, 2004).
Susser, Bernard, Approaches to the Study of Politics (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992).
Swaine, Michael, Rachel Swanger, and Takashi Kawami, Japan and Ballistic Missile Defense (U.S.: RAND, 2001).
Tanks, David R. National Missile Defense: Policy Issues and Technology Capability (Washington D.C.: The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, 2000).
The Ballistic Missile Defense at the Okazaki Institute, Ballistic Missile Defense for Japan: New Nuclear Strategy and Japan’s BMD (The Okazaki Institute, 2003).
The Ballistic Missile Defense Group, Ballistic Missile Defense for Japan (Japan: The Okazaki Institute, 2003).
The Henry L. Stimson Center Working Group, Theatre Missile Defense in the Asia-Pacific Region (Washington D.C.: The Henry L. Stimson, June 2000).
The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, International Security Dimensions of Space (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, 1982).
The Military Balance 2000-2001(London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2000).
The North Korea Nuclear Calculus: Beyond the Six-Power Talks (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004).
The Office of Technology Assessment, Strategic Defenses: Ballistic Missile Defense Technology Anti-Satellite Weapons, Countermeasures, and Arms Control (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986).
The Office Technology Assessment, Ballistic Missile Defense Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific, 2002).
The Okazaki Institute, Introduction to BMD: Dose Ballistic Missile Defense Make Sense to Japan? (Japan: The Okazaki Institute, 2001).
Thompson, Della, The Oxford Modern English Dictionary (New York: Oxford University, 1996).
Thomson, David B., A Guide to the Nuclear Arms Control Treaties (Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos Historical Society Publication, 2001).
Timperlake, Edward, and William C. Triplett II, Red Dragon Rising (Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1999).
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment ed., Arms Control in Space: Workshop Proceeding (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, May 1984).
US Military R & D (UK：Jane’s Information Group, 1997).
Vasquez, John A., The Power of Power Politics: A Critique (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1983).
Vestergaard, Cindy, Modern Non-Proliferation and Disarmament: Denmark and the G8 Global Partnership (Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2009).
Vuich, Sam, Viable National Missile Defense System (U.S.: Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science at the Claremont Graduated University, 2002).
Walker, R. B. J., Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Walker, Robert B. J., One World, Many Worlds: Struggles for a Just World Peace (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 1988).
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979).
Webster’s II: New College Dictionary (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1995).
Weitz, Richard, Revitalising US-Russian Security Cooperation: Practical Measures (New York: Routledge, 2005).
Wilkening, Dean A., Ballistic-Missile Defence and Strategic Stability (New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 2000).
Wolter, Detlev, Common Security in Outer Space and International Law (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005).
Wood, John Randolph, Mitigating Proliferation: An Assessment of Nonproliferation Institutions, International Law, and Preemptive Counterproliferation Intervention (Boston: The Fletch School of Law and Diplomacy Ph.D. Dissertation, 2004).
Wribel, Loring, Stars Wars: US Tools of Space Supremacy (London: Pluto Press, 2004).
Yanarella, Ernest J., The Missile Defense Controversy: Technology in Search of a Mission (Lexington, Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 2002).
Zhukov, Gennady, and Yuri Kolosov, translated by Boris Belitzky, International Space Law (New York: Praeger Publisher, 1984).
Ziegenhagen, Eduard A., and George Bowlby, Techniques for Political Analysis (Boston: Holbrook Press, 1971).

二、專書論文
Achcar, Gilbert, “The Spirit (and the budget) of a New Cold War,” in Ken Coates ed., The Last Frontier: Preparing War in Space (England: Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd., 2001).
Anselmo, Luciano, Bruno Bertotti and Paolo Farinella, “The Technical Basis for Regulating the Use of Nuclear Power System in Near-Earth Space,” in American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), ed., Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1994).
Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson, “Mathematici versus Dogmatici: Understanding the Realist Project through Hobbes,” in W. David Clinton ed., The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2007).
Blair, Bruce, and Chen Yali, “Editors’ Notes: The Space Security Dilemma,” in Bruce Blair and Chen Yali eds., China Security (Washington, D.C.: World Security Institute, 2006).
Brodie, Bernard, “Introduction: the Proliferation Security Initiative and Its Objectives,” in Mark R. Shulman ed., The Proliferation Security Initiative as a New Paradigm for Peace and Security (This Publication is a work of the United State Government as defined in Title 17, April 2006).
Brown, Chris, “Critical Theory and Postmodernism in International Relations,” in A.J.R. Groom and Margot Light eds., Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory (London & New York: Pinter Publishers, 1994).
Campbell, David, “Why Fight? Humanitarianism, Principles and Poststructuralism,” in Hakan Seckinelgin and Hideaki Shinoda eds., Ethics and International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001).
Chearbhaill, Deirdre Ni, “A Place for the Moon Agreement in the General Convention on Space Law,” in International Institute of Space Law of the International Astronautical Federation ed., Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (U.S.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA, 2005).
Chubin, Shahram, “Understanding Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions,” in Patrick M. Cronin ed., Double Trouble: Iran and North Korea as Challenges to International Security (Westport & London: Praeger Security International, 2008).
Chunsi, Wu, “Development Goals of China’s Space Program,” in Eric Hagt ed., China Security (Washington D.C.: World Security Institute, 2008).
Chyba, Christopher F., Chaim Braun, and George Bunn, “Strategies for Tackling Proliferation Challenges,” in George Bunn and Christopher F. Chyba eds., U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: Confronting Today’s Threats (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2006).
Coates, Ken, “The Last Frontier: Preparing War in Space,” in Ken Coates ed., The Last Frontier: Preparing War in Space (England: Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd., 2001).
Cronberg, Tarja, “US Missile Defense: Technological Primacy in Action,” in Bertel Heurlin and Sten Rynning eds., Missile Defense: International, Regional and National Implications (London & New York: Routledge, 2005).
Cui, Liru, “Security and the Korean Peninsula: China’s Role,” in Patrick M. Cronin ed., Double Trouble: Iran and North Korea as Challenges to International Security (Westport & London: Praeger Security International, 2008).
DeBlois, Bruce M., “Militarization, Weaponization and Space Sanctuary: Past Dialogues, Current Discourse, Important Disstincitons,” in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) ed., Outer Space and Global Security (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2003).
Devetak, Richard, “Postmodernism,” in Scott Burchill etc., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005).
Devorkin, David H., “The Military Origins of the Space Science in the American V-2 Era,” in Paul Forman and Jose M. Sanchez-Ron eds., National Military Establishments and the Advancement of Science and Technology (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1996).
Donnelly, Jack, “Realism,” in Scott Burchill etc., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
Donnelly, Jack, “Realism,” in Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donelly, Terry Nardin, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit, Jacqui True eds., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
Dunne, Tim, and Brian C. Schmidt, “Realism,” in John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Ehteshami, Anoush, “Iranisn Perspectives on the Global Elimination of Nuclear Weapons,” in Barry Blechman ed., North Korea and Iran (Washington D.C.: The Henry L. Stimson Center, May 2009).
Elman, Colin, “Realism,” in Martin Griffiths ed., International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction (New York: Routledge, 2007).
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, “Sovereignty, Identity, Sacrifice,” in V. Spike Peterson ed., Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory (Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992).
Eva, Fabrizo, “International Boundaries, Geopolitics and the (Post)Modern Territorial Discourse: The Functional Fiction,” David Newman ed., Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity (London & Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 2002).
Farrands, Chris, “Society, Modernity and Social Change: Approaches to Nationalism and Identity,” in Jill Krause and Neil Renwick eds., Identities in International Relations (Basingstoke, Hampshire: MacMillan Press Ltd., 1996).
Fish, Richard, “China’s Missile Over the Taiwan Strait: A Political and Military Assessment,” in American Enterprise Institute ed., Conference on the People’s Liberation Army 1996 (US: AEI & T.M.I. ASIA , 1996).
Goldmann, Kjell, “International Relations: An Overview,” in Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann eds., A New Handbook of Political Science (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Gottemoeller, Rose, “Cooperative Inducements Crafting New Tools for Nonproliferation,” in Janne E. Nolan, Bernard I. Finel, and Brian D. Finlay eds., Ultimate Security: Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2003)
Gray, Colin S., “The Strategic Nuclear Policy of the Reagan Administration: Trends, Problems, and the Potential Relevance of Space-Based Laser Weapons,” in Keith B. Payne ed., Laser Weapons in Space: Policy and Doctrine (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1983).
Grego, Laura, “What Should Space Used for? Technical Guidelines,” in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research(UNIDIR) ed., Safeguarding Space Security: Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space(Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005).
Griffiths, Martin, and Terry O’Callaghan, “Realism,” in Richard Devetak, Anthony Burke and Jim George eds., An Introduction to International Relations: Australia Perspective (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Haque, M. Shamsul, “The Revival of Realism in International Politics after September 11 and Its Ethical Impact,” in Mark Evans ed., Ethical Theory in the Study of International Politics (New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2004)
Hildreth, Steven A., and Amy F. Woolf, “Missile Defense: The Current Debate,” in Erin V. Causewell ed., National Missile Defense: Issue and development (New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2002).
Hill, William A. Jr., “Permissible Scope of Military Activity in Outer Space,” in Paul R. Viotti ed., Conflict and Arms Control: An Uncertain Agenda (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1986).
Holloway, David, “Deterrence, Preventive War, and Preemption,” in George Bunn and Christopher F. Chyba eds., U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: Confronting Today’s Threats (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2006).
Hudson, Alan, “Beyond the Borders: Globalization, Sovereignty and Extra-Territoriality,” David Newman ed., Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity (London & Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 2002).
Hui, Zhang, “Space Weaponization and Space Security: A Chinese Perspective,” in Bruce Blair and Chen Yali eds., China Security (Washington, D.C.: World Security Institute, 2006).
Ikegami-Adersson, Masako, “Implication of Missile Defence across the Taiwan Strait: Bringing Conflict Prevention Back,” in National Defense University ed., The 2nd Annual International Seminar on National Security and Military Strategy (Taipei: National Defense University, 11 December 2001).
Jasani, B., “Expansion of the Arms Race into Outer Space,” in Marek Thee eds, Arms and Disarmament (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Jelen, George F., “Space System Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures,” in William J. Durch ed., National Interests and the Military Use of Space (Cambridge, Masschusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984).
Jenkin, Bernard, “Missile Defense and European Politics,” in Jeremy Stocker and David Wiencek eds., Missile Defense in a New Strategic Environment: Policy, Architecture and International Industrial Co-operation After the ABM Treaty (London: The Royal United Service Institute, 2003).
Johnson, Rebecca, “Security without Weapons in Space: Challenges and Options,” in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research(UNIDIR) ed., Outer Space and Global Security (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2003).
Joseph, Robert G., “Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Deterrence and Defense,” in Jacquelyn K. Davis, Charles M. Perry, and Jamal S. Al-Suwaidi eds., Air/Missile Defense, Counterprolifertion and Security Policy Planning (New York: British Academic Press, 1999).
Kamenskiy, Vladimir, “Military and Political Assessment of the Consequences of Weapons Deployment in Outer Space,” in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research ed., Safeguarding Space Security: Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005).
Kanehara, Nobukastu, “Missile Defense: Japan’s Perspective,” in Jeremy Stocker and David Wiencek eds., Missile Defense in a New Strategic Environment: Policy, Architecture and International Industrial Co-operation After the ABM Treaty (London: The Royal United Service Institute, 2003).
Karp, Arron, “The New Indeterminacy of Deterrence and Missile Defense,” in Ian R. Kenyon and Jhon Simpson eds., Deterrence and the New Global Security Environment (New York: Routledge, 2006).
Kassianova, Alla, “Road not (Yet) Taken: Russia approaches to cooperation in missile defense,” in Bertel Heurlin and Sten Rynning eds., Missile Defense: International, Regional and National Implications (London & New York: Routledge, 2005).
Keohane, Robert O., “Neorealism and World Politics,” in Robert O. Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).
Kopar, Valdimir, “The Question of Defining Outer Space,” in Francis Lyall and Paul B. Larsen, eds., Sapce Law (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2007).
Krass, A. S., “Arms Control Verification,” in Marek Thee ed., Arms and Disarmament (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Krause, Jill, and Neil Renwick, “Introduction,” in Jill Krause and Neil Renwick eds., Identities in International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1996).
Lawrence, Timothy, William W. Saylor, Ken Siegenthaler and Thomas G. Ward, Jr., “Space, Science, and Technology,” in Damon Coletta and Frances T. Pilch eds., Space and Defense Policy (New York: Routledge, 2009).
Lewis, Jeffrey, “Space Weapons in the 2005 US Defense Budget Request,” in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research ed., Safeguarding Space for All: Security and Peaceful (Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2004).
Liao, Dr Holmes, “Taiwan’s Missile Defense,” in Jeremy Stocker and David Wiencek eds., Missile Defense in a New Strategic Environment: Policy, Architecture and International Industrial Co-operation After the ABM Treaty (London: The Royal United Service Institute, 2003).
Linster, Bruce, “Space and the Economy,” in Damon Coletta and Frances T. Pilch eds., Space and Defense Policy (New York: Routledge, 2009).
Litwak, Robert S., “Nonproliferation and the Use of Force,” Janne E. Nolan, Bernard I. Finel, and Brian D. Finlay eds., Ultimate Security: Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2003).
Livingstone, Ken, “National Missile Defense,” in Ken Coates ed., The Last Frontier: Preparing War in Space (England: Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation Ltd., 2001).
Lopez, George A., and Michael S. Stohl, “Theories, Policies, and Practice in International Relations: For Furthering Reading,” George A. Lopez and Michael S. Stohl ed., International Relations: Contemporary Theory and Practice (Washington, D.C.: A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1989).
Lopez, George A., and Michael S. Stohl, “Theories, Policies, and Practice in International Relations: For Furthering Reading,” in George A. Lopez and Michael S. Stohl ed., International Relations: Contemporary Theory and Practice (Washington, D.C.: A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1989).
Marchisio, Sergio, “International legal regime on outer space: Liability Convention and Registration Convention,” in Office for Outer Space Affairs (OOSA) ed., Meeting International Responsibilities and Addressing Domestic Needs: Proceeding (Vienna: United Nations, 2006).
McCarthy, Colman, “Anarchism, Education, and the Road to Peace,” in Randall Amster, Abraham DeLeon, Luis A. Fernandez, Anthony J. Nocella, II, and Deric Shannon eds., Contemporary Anarchist Studies: An Introductory Anthology of Anarchy in the Academy (London & New York: Routledge, 2009).
Mclaughlin, Kevin, “Would Space-Based Defense Improve Security?” in Alexander T. J. Lennon ed., Contemporary Nuclear Debates: Missile Defense, Arms Control, and Arms Races in the Twenty-first Century (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002).
McMillan, Joseph, Eugene B. Rumer and Philip C. Saunders, “Engaging Other Major Powers,” in Stephen J. Flanagan and James A. Schear eds., Strategic Challenges: America’s Global Security Agenda (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 2008).
Mcvadon, Eric A., “Chinese Reaction to New U.S. Initiatives on Missile Defense,” in Andrew Scobell and Larry M. Wortzel eds, China’s Growing Military Power: Perspectives on Security, Ballistic Missiles, and Conventional Capabilities (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2002).
Mearsheimer, John J., “Anarchy and the struggle for power,” in Robert J. Art and Robert Jervis eds., International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues (Beijing, The People of Republic China: Peking University Press, 2005).
Mesic, Richard F., “Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction and Ballistic Missiles,” in Zalmay Khalilzad and Jeremy Shapiro eds., United States Air and Space Power in the 21st Century (US.: RAND, 2002).
Meyer, Paul, “Current CD Development Regarding PAROS,” in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) ed., Celebrating the Space Age: 50 Years of Space Technology, 40 Years of the Outer Space Treaty (Conference Report), 2-3 April 2007.
Michishita, Narushige, “Engaging the United States and China: North Korea’s Missile and Nuclear Tests,” in Patrick M. Cronin ed., Double Trouble: Iran and North Korea as Challenges to International Security (Westport & London: Praeger Security International, 2008).
Moltz, James Clay, “Rusia and China,” in Damon Coletta and Frances T. Pilch eds., Space and Defense Policy (New York: Routledge, 2009).
Morgenthau, Hans J., “International Politics as a Struggle for Power,” in Peter A. Toma and Andrew Gyorgy eds., Basic Issues in International Relations (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1968).
Morgenthau, Hans J., “Six Principles of Political Realism,” in Robert J. Art and Robert Jervis eds., International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues (Beijing, The People of Republic China: Peking University Press, 2005).
Newman, Andrew, and Brad Williams, “Australia-Japan Security:The Proliferation Security Initiative,” in Andrew Newman and Brad Williams eds., Japan, Australia and Asia-Pacific Security (New York: Routledge, 2006).
Newman, David, “Geopolitics Renaissant: Terriority, Sovereignty and the World Political Map,” in David Newman ed., Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, (London & Portland, OR: Frank Cass, 2002).
O’Hanlon, Michael, “Alternative Architectures and U.S. Politics,” in James J. Wirtz and Jeffrey A. Larsen, eds., Rocket’s Red Glare Missile Defense and the Future of World Politics (Boulder, Cororado: Westview Press, 2001).
Ong, Siew Gay, “The Proliferation Security Initiative and Counter-Proliferation: A View from Asia,” in Olivia Bosch, Peter van Ham eds., Global non-proliferation and counter-terrorism: the impact of UNSCR 1540 (Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, c2007).
Pilat, Joseph F., “Dealing with Proliferation and Terrorism Involving WMD,” in Nathan E. Busch and Daniel H. Joyner eds., Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Future of International Nonproliferation Policy (Athens and London: The University of Georgian Press, 2009).
Pilat, Joseph F., “Verification and Transparency: Relics or Future Requirements?” in Jeffery A. Larsen ed., Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publisher, 2002).
Podvig, Pavel, “Russia and Military Uses of Space,” in Pavel Podvig and Hui Zhang eds., Russian and Chinese Responses to U.S. Military Plans in Space (Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Science, 2008).
Potter, William C., and John M. Shields, “Introduction,” in John M. Shields and William C. Potter eds., Dismantling the Cold War: U.S. and NIS Perspectives on the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (Cambridge Massachesetts: The MIT Press, 1997).
Raegan, Ronald W., “SDI Speech,” in Steven W. Guerrier and Wayne C. Thompson eds., Perspectives on Strategic Defense (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1987).
Randolp, Stephen P., “Controlling Space,” in Hans Binnendijk ed., Transforming America’s Military (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, 2002).
Roberson, Barbara Allen, “The Relevance of Realism in the Search for Security,” in William Clinton Olson ed., The Theory and Practice of International Relations (Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1991).
Roberts, Guy B., “Cooperative Security Measures,” in Jeffrey A. Larsen ed., Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment (Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner Publisher, 2002).
Robichard, Carl, “Revising the Spread of Nuclear Weapons,” in Jeffrey Laurenti and Carl Robichard eds., Breaking the Nuclear Impasse: New Prospects for Security against Weapons Threats (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2007).
Robinson, Fiona, “Exploring Social Relations, Understanding Power, and Valuing Care: the Role of Critical Feminist Ethics in International Relations Theory,” in Hakan Seckinelgin and Hideaki Shinoda eds., Ethics and International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001).
Rousseau, Charles, “Disarmament Since 1945,” in Nicolas Mateesco Matte ed., Arms Control and Disarmament in Outer Space (Montreal, Canada: Center for Research of Air and Space Law, 1985).
Sanders, David, “International Relations: Neo-realism and Neo-Liberalism,” in Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann eds., A New Handbook of Political Science (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Schmidt, Brian C., “Realist Conception of Power,” in Felix Berenskoetter and M. J. William eds., Power in World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2007).
Scholte, Jan Aart, “Globalization and Collective Identities,” in Jill Krause and Neil Renwick eds., Identities in International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1996).
Shih, Chih-yu, “Taling American, Acting Taiwanese,” in Mel Gurtov and Peter Van Ness eds., Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical View from the Asia-Pacific (London & New York: 2005).
Squassoni, Sharon, “Globalizing Cooperative Threat Reduction a Survey of Opptions,” in Sharon Squassoni and Amy F. Woolf eds., Global Threat Reduction (New York: Novinka Books, 2006).
Suganami, H., “The ‘Peace through Law’ Approach: A Critical Examination of Its Ideas,” in Trevor Taylor ed., Approaches and Theory in International Relations (New York: Longman, 1980).
Tooze, Roger, “Prologue: State, Nationalism and Identities-Thinking in IR Theory,” in Jill Krause and Neil Renwick eds., Identities in International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1996).
Vicas, Alex G., “Negotiation Limitations on Weapons in Outer Space as a Bargaining Problem,” in Nicolas Mateesco Matte, ed., Arms Control and Disarmament in Outer Space (Montreal, Canada: Center for Research of Air and Space Law, 1985).
Walt, Stephen M., “Alliance: Balancing and Bandwagoning,” Robert J. Art and Robert Jervis eds., International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary (Beijing, The People of Republic China: Peking University Press, 2005).
Waltz, Kenneth N., “Reductionist and Systemic Theories,” in Robert O. Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).
Ward, Dennis M., “The Changing Tecnological Environment,” in James J. Wirtz and Jeffrey A. Larsen eds., Rockets’ Red Glare: Missile Defense and the Future of World Politics (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2001).
Weidenfeld, Werner, “America and Europe: Is the Break Inevitable?” in Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones eds., The Future of American Foreign Policy (Beijing: Peking University Press, 2004).
Wilson, Peter A., and Richard D. Sokolsky, “Changing the Strategic Equation,” in Hans Binnendijk ed., Transforming America’s Military (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, 2002).
Wing, Christine, “The Evolution of Nuclear Nonproliferation Institutions,” in Bruce D. Jones, Shepard Forman and Richard Gowan eds., Cooperating for Peace and Security: Evolving Institutions and Arrangements in a Context of Changing U.S. Security Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Woolf, Amy F., “National Missile Defense: Russia’s Reaction,” in Erin V. Causewell ed., National Missile Defense: Issue and development (New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2002).
Zhang Hui, “Space Weaponization and Space Security: A Chinese Perspective,” in Bruce Blair and Chen Yali eds., China Security (Washington, D.C.: World Security Institute, 2006).

三、期刊
“ABL Delay,” Aviations Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 Issues. 6 (5 February 2007), p. 87.
“ABM Treaty’s Key Provision,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 9 (1 March 1999), p. 52.
“Agni-III Take 2,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 Issues. 9 (26 February 2007), p. 32.
“Appendix A: 1972 ABM Treaty and 1974 ABM Treaty Protocol,” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 16 No. 2 (1997(Special Issue)), pp. 205-17.
“Arrow 2 Missile Closer to Operational Status,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 29 (January 1996), p. 5.
“Asat Strategy,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 Issues. 5 (29 January 2007), p. 94.
“Ballistic boom,” Jane’s Defense weekly, Vol. 32 No. 10 (8 September 1999), p. 31.
“Chinese Nuclear Forces,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 32 No. 6 (11 August 1999), p. 22.
“Designing Defenses,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issues. 12 (25 September 2006), pp. 48-9.
“DoD boosts THAAD development programme,” Jane’s Defense Week, Vol. 31 No. 4 (27 January 1999), p. 3.
“Edwards Lab Seeking High-Payoff Technology,” Aviation week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 No. 14(5 April 1999), pp. 57.
“Interceptor Rocket Test,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issues. 12 (26 September 2005), p. 8.
“Iran Fires Weapons in Response to Nearby Exercise,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issue 18 (6 November 2006), p. 50.
“Iran’s Sputnik,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 Issue 5 (29 January 2007), p. 93.
“Israel and US forces warm to high energy laser weapons,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 30 (February 1997), p. 5.
“Israel’s future forces,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 32 No. 8 (25 August 1999), p. 21.
“Japan to test ballistic missile defense system,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 27 No. 13 (2 April 1997), p. 8. new window

“Laser Loser,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 164 Issues. 13 (27 March 2006), p. 8.
“Lifting the lid on Kim’s nuclear workshop,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 38 No. 22 (27 November 2002), p.21.
“Missile Defense,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 36 No. 8 (22 August 2001), p. 23.
“Missile Motor Fired,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issues. 7 (14 August 2006), p. 12.
“Multiplying Missiles,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 Issues. 5 (29 January 2007), p. 95.
“National missile Defense programme hit by delays,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol.31 No.19(May 1999), p. 8.
“News Review: Russia and China Introduce Draft Treaty on Space Weapons,” Disarmament Diplomacy, Issue No. 66 (September 2002), pp. 1-3.
“PAC-3 Proliferation,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issues. 11 (18 September 2006), p. 24.
“Pakistan Stealth,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 167 Issues. 9 (3 September 2007), p. 32.
“Satellite self-Protection Equipment attracts USAF Interest, Investment,” Aviation week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 Issues. 7 (16 August 1999), p. 26.
“Shifting Balance,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 10 (10 March 1999), P. 63.
“Thaad Seeker Views Her a Target Before Hit-to-Kill Intercept,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 26 (28 June 1999), p. 42.
“THAAD test must intercept,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 29 No. 18 (6 May 1999), p. 6. new window

“THAAD will take fast-track route to development,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 32 No. 8 (25 August 1999), p. 4.
“The changing force of China,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 30 No. 24 (16 December 1998), pp. 20-2.
“The US Bush Administration Picks Up the Piece on Strategic Missile Defense,” Defense & Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy, Vol. XXIX No. 3 (March 2001), p. 14.
“Toward Missile Defense from the Sea,” Defense Horizons, No.14 (June 2002), pp. 1-6.
“UK to join European TMD assessment,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 31 (February 1998), p. 6.
“US Army’s PAC-3 proves ‘hit-to-kill’ concept,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 12 (24 March 1999), p. 3.
“USA seeker renegotiation of ABM treaty for NMD,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 4 (January 1999), p. 3.
“USA tests to speed TBMD deployments,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 32 No. 4 (28 July 1999), p. 6.
“Washington imposes Sanctions on Chinese, Pakistani organizations,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 36 No. 11 (12 November 2001), p. 36.
“White Paper: China’s national Defense in 2000,” China Report, Vol. 37 No. 1 (January-March 2001), pp. 73-120.
“Will Star Wars Just work?” Jane’s Foreign Report, No. 2594 (1 June 2000), p. 1.
“World News Roundup,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 24 (14 June 1999), p. 56.
Abramson, Jeff, “EU Issues Space Code of Conduct,” Arms Control Today, Vol.39 No. 1 (February 2009), pp. 30-1.
ACT, “August 2000 Pentagon on NMD Technology,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 6 (July/August 2001), pp. 32-6.
ACT, “Deadlock and Waiting At the UN Conference on Disarmament,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 10 (December 2000), pp.3-8.
ACT, “Ensuring America’s Space Security,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 1 (January/February 2005), p. 5.
ACT, “Expounding Bush’s Approach To U.S. Nuclear Security: An Interview With John R. Bolton,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 2 (March 2002), pp. 3-8.
ACT, “Global Missile Proliferation: June 2001,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 5 (June 2001), pp. 33-4.
ACT, “Intelligence Estimate Upgrades Chinese, Iranian Missile Threats,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 2 (March 2002), pp. 31-2.
ACT, “Letter of Transmittal and Article-by-Article Analysis of the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reduction,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2001), pp. 28-30.
ACT, “Naval Missile Defense Test Succeeds,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 1 (January/February 2004), pp. 42-3.
ACT, “New Briefs: U.S. Will Upgrade Missile Defense Radar in U.K.,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 2 (March 2003), p. 37.
ACT, “News and Negotiations: Last Minuteman III Missile Silo Destroyed,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), p. 39.
ACT, “News Briefs: India, Pakistan Conduct Missile Test,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 9 (November 2002), p. 30.
ACT, “News Briefs: Russia, Iran Discuss Arms Deal,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 9 (November 2001), p. 25.
ACT, “News Briefs: U.S., Japan Extend Missile Defense Cooperation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 2 (March 2003), p. 37.
ACT, “Remarks by President Bill Clinton On National Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 7 (September 2000), pp. 36-9.
ACT, “Reports of Note: Ensuring America’s Space Security,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 1 (January/February 2005), p. 5.
ACT, “Russia Denies Lowering Nuclear Threshold,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 2 (March 2000), p. 27.
ACT, “Russia’s Military Doctrine,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 4 (May 2000), pp. 29-38.
ACT, “Russia’s National Security Concept,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 1 (January/February 2000), pp. 15-20.
ACT, “Statement by the President on the ABM Treaty,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), p. 14.
ACT, “The Already Reliable U.S. Nuclear Arsenal,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 3 (April 2006), pp. 18-24.
ACT, “The Bush Administration’s Views on the Future of Nuclear Weapons: An Interview With NNSA Administrator Linton Brooks,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 1 (January/February 2004), pp. 3-20.
ACT, “The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: Signatories and Ratifiers,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 10 (December 2001), pp. 29-30.
ACT, “U. S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), pp. 31-4.
ACT, “U.S. Pushing for Missile Defense in Taiwan,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 5 (June 2003), p. 46.
ACT, “U.S. Steps up Missile Defense Marketing Abroad,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 7 (September 2002), p. 24.
ACT, “U.S. Withdraw from the ABM Treaty,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), p. 21.
ACT, “U.S.-Soviet/Russian Nuclear Arms Control,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 5 (June 2002), pp. 12-3.
Adams, Karen Ruth, “Attack and Conquer? International Anarchy and the Offense-Defense-Deterrence Balance,” International Security, Vol. 28 No. 3 (Winter 2003), pp. 45-83.
Aldridge, Edward C. Jr., “The Myths of Militarization of Space,” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 4 (Spring 1987), pp. 151-6.
Allision, Graham, “North Korea Nuclear Challenge,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. XVIII No. 3 (Fall 2006), pp.7-34.
An Arms Control Association Press Conference, “Implications of the Duma’s Approval of START II,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 4 (May 2000), pp. 3-9.
Andreasen, Steve, “Off Target? The Bush Administration’ Plan to Arm Long-Range Ballistic Missile with Conventional Warheads,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 6 (July/August 2006), pp. 6-11.
Andreasen, Steven, “The Bush Strategic Plan,” Survival, Vol. 43 No. 3 (Autumn 2001), pp.79-81.
Antliff, Allan, “Anarchy, Power, and Poststructuralism,” SubStance, Vol. 36 No. 2, Issue 113: The Future of Anarchism (2007), pp. 56-66.
Arbatov, Alexei, “Russia and the United States-Time to End the Strategic Deadlock,” Briefing (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace), Vol. 10 No. 3 (June 2008), pp. 1-12.
Badhgat, Gawdat, “Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Iraq and Iran,” The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 28 No. 4 (Winter 2003), pp. 423-49.
Balance, Ed, “Israel addresses the threats of the new millennium: Part Tow,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 11 No. 3 (March 1999), pp. 27-31.
Ball, Deborah Yarsike, and Theodore P. Cerber, “Russian Scientists and Rogue States,” International Security, Vol. 29 No. 4 (Spring 2005), pp. 50-77.
Barrie, Douglas, and David A. Fulghum, “Iran’s Missile Inventory Continues to Expand,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issue 10 (11 September 2006), p. 35.
Beaver, Paul, “China develops anti-satellite laser system,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 30 No. 32 (2 December 1998), p. 18.
Bender, Baryan, “Taiwan puts $ 600m into missile programmes,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 10 (10 March 1999), p. 4.
Bender, Bryan, “Any country can have ICBM by 2015, says CIA,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 16 (5 May 1999), p. 8.
Bender, Bryan, “Troubled THAAD tests reviewed next week,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 29 No. 23 (10 June 1999), p. 6.
Berry, Nicholas, “China Is Not An Imperialist Power,” Strategic Review, Vol. XXVI No. 1 (Winter 2001), p. 9.
Betts, Richard K., “A Nuclear Golden Age?” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 3 (Winter 1986-87), pp. 3-32.
Biden, Joseph R. Jr., “Finding the Right Path,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 8 (October 2000), pp.10-24.
Bin, Li, “China: A Crucial Bridge for the 2005 NPT Review Conference,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 1 (January/February 2005), pp. 22-4.
Binnedijk, Hans, and George Stewart, “Toward Missile Defense from the Sea,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp.193- 206.
Blechman, Barry M., and Victor A. Utgoff, “The Macroeconomics of Strategic Defense,” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 3(Winter 1986-87), pp. 33-70.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Defense Bill Bars Unilateral Nuclear Reduction, Orders Posture Review,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 9 (November 2000), p. 26.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Democratic Criticize Nuclear Posture Review,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 2 (March 2002), pp.23-4.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Independent Panel Urges Increased Threat Reduction Efforts in Russia,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 2 (March 2001), p. 26.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Nuclear Posture Review Released, Stress Flexible Force Planning,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), pp. 28-9.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Putin Signs New Military Doctrine Fleshing Out Security Concept,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 4 (May 2000), p. 42.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Reports Says U.S. Studying New Nuclear Capabilities,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), p. 37.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Russia Approves Topol-M, Warns Missile Could Defeat U.S. Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 5 (June 2000), p. 26.
Bleek, Philipp C., “Russia Ratifies START II, Extension Protocol; ABM-Related Agreement Also Approval,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 4 (May 2000), ppp. 39-40.
Bleek, Philipp C., “UN Conference Shows Support for Test Ban; U.S. Absent,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 10 (December 2001), p. 21.
Bluth, Christopher, “Russian attitudes to missile Defense,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 8 No. 1 (January 1996), p. 17.
Boese, Wade, “BMDO Renamed ‘Missile Defense Agent’,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32. No. 1(January/February 2002), p. 32.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Administration Aim to Get Rid of ABM Treaty,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), p. 24.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Administration Blunts International Opposition,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 3 (April 2001), p. 23 & 28.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Announces U.S. Intent To Withdraw From ABM Treaty,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), pp. 27-9.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Approves Major Arms Deal to Taiwan, Defer Aegis Sale,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 4 (May 2001), pp. 30-1.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Assembles Pro-Missile defense national Security Team,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 1 (January/February 2001), p. 29.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Budget Revives Cut Warhead,” Arms Control Today, Vol.38 No. 2 (March 2008), p. 29.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Meets Opposition to Missile Defense While in Europe,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 6 (July/August 2001), pp. 20-1.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Push New Strategic Framework, Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 5 (June 2001), pp. 18-20.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Seeks Budget Boost for Future Warhead,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 3 No. 2 (March 2007), pp. 40-1.
Boese, Wade, “Bush Team Unveils Missile Defense Plans; Democrats Upset,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7(September 2001), pp. 22-9.
Boese, Wade, “China Oppose Prospective U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 3 (April 2001), p. 27.
Boese, Wade, “Chinese Satellite Destruction Stirs Debate,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 2 (March 2007), pp. 27-8.
Boese, Wade, “Clinton NMD Decision Welcomed Abroad, Reaction at Home Are Mixed,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 7 (September 2000), p. 20-3.
Boese, Wade, “Clinton Says No to NMD as Program Lags; Cites Technology Doubts and Foreign Concerns,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 7 (September 2000), pp.19-21.
Boese, Wade, “Conference on Disarmament Starts 2001 Session in Stalemate,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 2 (March 2001), p. 30.
Boese, Wade, “Congress Responds to Bush Missile Plans Along Party Lines,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 5(June 2001), p. 20.
Boese, Wade, “Countries Draft Guidelines for Intercepting Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 7 (September 2003), p. 27 & 48.
Boese, Wade, “DOD Mull Missile Defense Test Site; Plan Could Violate ABM Treaty,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 6 (July/ August 2002), p. 17.
Boese, Wade, “Downsize the U.S. Nuclear Stockpile,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 1 (January/February 2008), p. 38.
Boese, Wade, “Global Strike Still on Pentagon Wish List,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 3 (April 2007), p. 43.
Boese, Wade, “Greenland Radar Clear for U.S. Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 6 (July/August 2004), p. 39.
Boese, Wade, “Ground-Based Midcourse Defense Hits Again,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 9 (November 2002), p. 23.
Boese, Wade, “Hill Reviews Defense Policies; Nixes Warhead,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 1 (January/February 2008), pp. 36-9.
Boese, Wade, “Japan Embracing Missile Defense,” Arms Conrtol Today, Vol. 36 No. 3 (April 2006), p. 36.
Boese, Wade, “Japan Seeks Missile Defense Interceptors,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 5 (June 2004), p. 35.
Boese, Wade, “Latest Ground-Based Missile Defense Test Fails,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 1 (January/February 2003), p. 26. new window

Boese, Wade, “Latest Ground-Based Missile Defense Test Fails,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 1(January/February 2003), p. 26. new window

Boese, Wade, “Lawmakers Mixed on Nuclear Funding,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 7 (September 2006), p. 40.
Boese, Wade, “Lawmakers Sideline New U.S. Nuclear Warhead,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 6 (July/August 2007), p. 35.
Boese, Wade, “Lawmakers Want to Retain ICBM Force,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 9 (November 2005), p. 36.
Boese, Wade, “Missile Defense Aims to Hit Target in ‘06,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 7 (September 2005), pp. 38-9.
Boese, Wade, “Missile Defense Consultations Abroad Yield Little Progress,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 5 (June 2001), pp. 19-244.
Boese, Wade, “Missile Defense Interceptor Hits Target, But Not All Perfect in Test,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), pp. 21-7.
Boese, Wade, “Missile Defense under Scrutiny,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 1 (January/February 2007), pp. 35-6.
Boese, Wade, “More States Step Up Anti-Missile Work,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 1 (January/February 2008), pp. 51-2.
Boese, Wade, “New Nuclear Accord Submitted To U.S., Russian Lawmakers,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), p. 17 & 23.
Boese, Wade, “New Nuclear Designs, New Questions,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 1 (January/February 2007), p. 32.
Boese, Wade, “New U.S. Warhead Design Selected,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 3 (March 2007), p. 42.
Boese, Wade, “No Bush-Putin Agreement on ABM Treaty, Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 10 (December 2001), p. 20.
Boese, Wade, “Nuclear Deals Adding Up for South Asia,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 9 (November 2008), pp. 30-1.
Boese, Wade, “Nuke Commander Unhappy With Status Quo,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 3 (April 2008), pp. 8-9.
Boese, Wade, “PAC-3 Production to Continue Despite Program Shortcoming,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), p. 18.
Boese, Wade, “PAC-3 Production to Pick Up,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 1(January/February 2003), p. 26.
Boese, Wade, “Patriot Scorecard Mixed; PAC-3 Use Limited,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 4 (May 2003), p. 33.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Cancles Sea-Based Missile Defense Program,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1(January/February 2002), p. 32.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Claims PAC-3 Success against Iraqi Missiles,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 3 (April 2003), p. 27.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon keeps Satellite System Nixes New Naval Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 5 (June 2002), p. 32.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Puts off Missile Defense Testing, Citing ABM,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 9 (November 2001), p. 18 & 21.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Repearts Missile Defense Test Success,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 9 (November 2007), pp. 34-5.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Report Highlights Hurdles for Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 3 (April 2001), pp. 24-5.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Seeks Missile Defense Budget Increase, Reorganization,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 6 (July/ August 2002), pp. 17-21.
Boese, Wade, “Pentagon Seeks Strategic Arms Shifts,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 2 (March 2006), pp. 38-9.
Boese, Wade, “Putin Boasts about Russian Military Capabilities,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 2 (March 2004), p. 37.
Boese, Wade, “Rumsfeld Restructures Operation Of U.S. Space Program,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 5 (June 2001), p. 23.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Considers Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 2 (March 2003), p. 31.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Joins Proliferation Security Initiative,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 6 (July’August 2004), p. 40.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Pushes Pacts as U.S. Kills Satellite,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 2 (March 2008), pp. 50-1.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Seeks New Nuclear Accord,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 7 (September 2006), p.38.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Sends Conflicting Messages on Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 8 (October 2000), p. 18.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Stands by Decision To Sell Arms to Iran,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 1 (January/February 2001), pp. 31-2.
Boese, Wade, “Russia Want Limits on Prompt Global Strike,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 5 (June 2008), pp. 39-40.
Boese, Wade, “Sea-Based Missile Defense Scores Second Straight Hit,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), p. 19.
Boese, Wade, “Sea-Based Missile Defense System Misses Target,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 6 (July/August 2003), p. 25.
Boese, Wade, “Second NMD Intercept Test Fails; Readiness Review Still Planned for June,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 1 (January/February 2000), pp. 21-25.
Boese, Wade, “Short-Range Missile Defense Show Progress,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 6(July/August 2008), p. 45.
Boese, Wade, “South Korea Clarifies Position on NMD,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 3 (April 2001), p. 23.
Boese, Wade, “Test Hit, Diplomatic Flop for U.S. Missile Defense,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 1 (January/February 2009), pp. 34-5.
Boese, Wade, “U. S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), p. 33.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Defends New Nuclear Weapons Research,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 4 (May 2004), pp. 41-2.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Edges Closer to Europe Anti-Missile Deals,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 3 (April 2008), pp. 31-2.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Eyes Missile Defense Site in Europe,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 6 (July/August 2004), p. 39.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Missile Defense for Europe, Space,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 4 (May 2005), p. 30.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Nixes Arms Control in New Space Policy,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 9 (November 2006), pp. 47-8.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Outlines Plans for Missile Defense Talks With China,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 8 (October 2001), p. 19.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Poised to Cut Ballistic Missiles,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 4 (May 2007), pp. 38-9.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Reafirms Europe Anti-Missile Plan,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 6 (July/August 2007), pp. 23-4.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Sets Missile Defense for Europe, Space,” Arms Control Today, p.30.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Sign European Anti-Missile Deals,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 7 (September 2008), pp. 34-6.
Boese, Wade, “U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty; Global Response Muted,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 6 (July/August 2002), pp. 14-5.
Boese, Wade, “U.S., Europe Anti-Missile Plans Upsets Russia,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 2 (March 2007), pp. 48-9.
Boese, Wade, “U.S., Europe Anti-Missile Plans Upsets Russia,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 2 (March 2007), pp. 48-9.
Boese, Wade, “U.S.-Israeli for Exporting Arrow Missile Undecided,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 7 (September 2002), p. 19.
Boese, Wade, “U.S.-Russia Differences Remain On Missile Defenses, ABM Treaty,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), p. 23 & 32.
Boese, Wade, “Unfinished Business In Iraq: IAEA and UNMOVIC Outline Remaining Disarmament,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 3 (April 2003), p. 22.
Boese, Wade, “United States Retires MX Missile,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 8 (October 2005), pp. 35-6.
Boese, Wade, “Warhead Initiative Looms Large in NNSA Plans,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 2 (March 2006), pp. 35-6.
Bonsignore, Ezio, “MEADS, Anyone?,” Military Technology, Vol. XXII No. 12. (December 1998), pp. 14-6.
Bourget, Le, “New Expcet, ATBM Aster Set,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 157 No. 18 (28 October 2002), p. 7.
Bowen, Wyn, “Missile defense and the transatlantic security relationship,” International Affairs, Vol. 77 No. 3 (July 2001), pp. 485-507.
Bowen, Wyn, and Stanley Shepard, “Living under the Red Missile Theatre,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 8 No. 12 (December 1996), p. 56.
Boyd, Kerry, “Intelligence Chiefs Paint Grim Picture of Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 2 (March 2003), p. 19 & 23.
Bracken, Paul, “The Second Nuclear Age,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79 No. 1 (January/February 2000), pp. 146-156.
Braun, Chaim, and Christopher F. Chyba, “Proliferation Rings: New Challenges to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime,” International Security, Vol. 29 No. 2 (Fall 2004), pp. 5-49.
Brook, Peter, “Missile defense delay undermines security,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 6 (6 February 2008), p. 24.
Brooks, Harvey, “The Strategic Defense Initiative as Science Policy,” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 2 (Fall 1986), pp. 177-84.
Brown, Nick, “SM-3 fails to hit target in Japanese BMD test,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 48 (20 November 2008), p. 27. new window

Brown, Trevor, “Soft Power and Space Weaponization,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue. 1 (Spring 2009), pp. 66-72.
Brugger, Seth, “China Sanctioned for Chem, Bio Transfers to Iran,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 2 (March 2002), p. 30.
Bruno, Michael, “Better Safe,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 164 No. 24 (12 June 2006), p. 55.
Bruno, Michael, “MisDef on the Mat,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 11 (17 March 2008), pp. 29-31.
Bruno, Michael, “Missile Harmony,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 167 No. 11 (17 September 2007), p. 63.
Bruno, Michael, and Army Bulter, “Testy Missile Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 13 (31 March 2008), pp. 28-9.
Bunndy, McGeorge, “The Best of All Possible Nuclear World,” International Security, Vol. 5 No. 1 (Summer 1980), pp. 172-7.
Bunnell, Stephen, “Air Force Leaders Fired Over Nuke Handling,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 6 (July/August 2008), p. 42.
Burt, Richard, “Reassessing the strategic balance,” International Security, Vol. 5 No. 1 (Summer 1980), pp. 37-52.
Butler, Amy “Flat Space Budget for Pentagon,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No.6 (11 February 2008), pp. 30-1.
Butler, Amy, “First Step,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 164 No. 24 (12 June 2006), p. 55.
Butler, Amy, “Low, Slow and Stealthy,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 164 No. 24 (12 Jube 2006), pp. 48-54.
Butler, Amy, “Shopping for Deterrence,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 163 No. 5 (1 July 2005), pp. 49-50.
Butler, Amy, “Space for Change,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 169 No.7 (18 August 2008), pp. 38-9.
Butler, Amy, “Space Gap,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 24 (16 June 2008), pp. 29-30.
Butler, Amy, “Staying Power,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 No. 1 (3 July 2006), p. 29.
Butler, Army, “A Billion Here, A Billion There,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 162 No. 1 (21 March 2005), pp. 22-3.
Butler, Army, “ABL To Flight-test Tracking Laser This Fall,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 No. 10 (11 September 2006), p. 24.
Butler, Army, “Anti-Asat,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 11 (17 March 2008), pp. 28-9.
Butler, Army, “Boosting Confidence,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 163 No. 24 (19 December 2005), p. 20.
Butler, Army, “Missile Monitors,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 No. 4 (24 July 2006), p. 70.
Butler, Army, “Space Tracking for MDA,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 163 No. 13 (3 October 2006), pp. 51-3.
Butler, Army, “Thaad Transition,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 169 No. 6 (11 August 2008), p. 26.
Butler, Army, David A. Fulghum and Craig Covault, “Missile Fallout,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 9 (3 March 2008), pp. 28-9.
Butler, Army, David A. Fulghum and Craig Covault, “Missile Fallout,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, pp. 28-9.
Butler, Army, Michael Bruno, David A. Fulghum and John M. Doyle, “Ambiguous Intercept,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 8 (25 February 2008), pp. 30-1.
Cain, Col. Anthony C., “A Century of Air and Space Power,” Aerospace Power Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4 (Winter 2003), pp. 14-5.
Cambone, Stephen A., “The United States and Theatre Missile Defense in North-east Asia,” Survival, Vol.39 No.3 (Autumn 1997), pp. 66-84.
Camerson, Gavin, “Nuclear terrorism：a real threat?” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 8 No. 9 (September 1996), pp. 422-5.
Campbell, Kurt M., “Nuclear Proliferation beyond Rogues,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 1 (Winter 2002-03), pp. 7-15.
Carpenter, Ted Galen, “Great Expectations, Washington, Beijing, and North Korean Nuclear Crisis,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. XVIII No. 4 (Winter 2006), pp. 7-29.
Carter, Ashton V., “Satellite and Anti-Satellites: The Limits of the Possible,” International Security, Vol. 10 No. 4 (Spring 1986), pp. 46-98.
Chace, James, “Sharing the Atom Bomb,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75 No. 1 (January/February 1996), pp. 129-44.
Chanda, Nayan, “Red Rockets’ Galare,” Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 156 Issue. 36 (9 September 1993), p. 10.
Chase, Michael S., Andrew S. Erickson and Christopher Yeaw, “Chinese Theater and Strategic Missile Force Modernization and Its Implications for the United States,” The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 32 No. 1 (February 2009), pp. 67-114.
Cirincione, Joseph, “Why the Right Lost the Missile defense debate,” Foreign Policy, No. 106 (Spring 1997), pp. 39-55.
Cirincione, Joseph, and Jon B. Wolfsthal, “What If the New Strategic Framework Goes Bad,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 9 (November 2001), pp. 6-8.
Cohen, Avner, and Joseph F. Pilant, “Assessing Virtual Nuclear Arsenals,” Survival, Vol. 40 No. 1 (Spring 1998), pp. 129-44。
Cohen, Eliot A., “Defending America in the Twenty-first Century,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79 No. 6 (November / December 2000), p. 40-56.
Colino, Richard R., “The U.S. Space Program,” International Security, Vol.1 1 No. 4 (Spring 1987), pp. 157-164.
Cook, Nick, “USA may build anti-cruise Patriot if July tests succeed,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 23 (9 June 1999), p. 3.
Copp, Tara, “THAAD proves ready for 2008 separating target tests,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 44 No. 45 (7 November 2007), p. 10.
Costaanzo, Lt Col Charles E., “Shade of Sentinel? National Missile Defense, Then and Now,” Aerospac Power Journal, Vol. XV No. 3 (Fall 2001), pp. 60-66.
Costanzo, Charles E., “Shades of Sentinel? National Missile Defense, Then and Now,” Aerospace Power Journal, Vol. XV No. 3 (Fall 2001), p. 61.
Covault, Crag, “Advancing Milspace,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 25 (21 June 2004), p. 38.
Covault, Crag, “China Seen as Growing Reconnaissance Challenge,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 153 No. 6 (7 August 2000), p. 65.
Covault, Crag, “Covert Chinese Asats,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 No. 10 (5 March 2007), p. 99.
Covault, Crag, “Man Tech Space Initiative Targets Revolutionary Change,” Aviation week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 14 (5 April 1999), p. 46.
Covault, Crag, “Materials Technology Leads ARFL Space Initiative,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 14 (5 April 1999), p. 44.
Covault, Crag, “Radars, AeroSpace Vehicles Advance Power, Propulsion,” Aviation week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 14 (5 April 1999), pp. 55-6.
Coyle, Philip, “Rhetoric or Reality? Missile Defense Under Bush,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 4 (May 2002), pp. 3-6.
Crail, Peter, “Chinese Report Discusses Nuclear Planning,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 2 (March 2009), p. 8.
Crail, Peter, “N. Korea Nuclear Test Prompts Global Rebuke,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 5 (June 2009), pp. 27-8.
Crail, Peter, “Progress Seen in Iranian Missile Test,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 5 (June 2009), pp. 31-35.
Crail, Peter, “U.S., NK Agree on Draft Verification Plan,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 9 (November 2008), pp. 27-9.
Crail, Peter, “UN Iran Sanctions Decision awaits,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 9 (November 2007), pp. 40-1.
Crail, Peter, “West May Seek Alternative Sanctions on Iran,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 9 (November 2008), pp. 55-6.
Crail, Peter, “West May Seek Alternative Sanctions on Iran,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 9 (November 2008), pp. 55-6.
Cutler, Lloyd N., and Roger C. Molander, “Is There Life After Death for SALT?” International Security, Vol. 6 No. 2 (Fall 1981), pp. 3-20.
Daalder, Ivo H., “A Consensus on Missile Defense?” Survival, Vol. 43 No. 3 (Autumn 2001), pp. 61-94.
Daalder, Ivo H., James M. Goldgeier and James M. Lindsay, “Deploying NMD: Not Whether, But How,” Survival, Vol. 42 No. 1 (Spring 2000), pp. 6-28.
Dando, Malcolm, “Bio-weapons convention fails to keep up with evolving threats,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 14 No. 2 (February 2002), p. 30.
Deblois, Bruce M., Richard L. Farwin, R. Scott Kemp, and Jeremy C. Marwell, “Space Weapons: Crossing the U.S. Rubicon,” International Security, Vol. 29 No. 2 (Fall 2004), pp. 50-84.
Deibel, Terry L., “Strategic Before Containment: Patterns for the Future,” International Security, Vol. 16 No. 4 (Spring 1992), pp. 78-108.
Deutch, John, “A Nuclear Posture for Today,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 84 No. 1 (January/February 2005), pp. 49-60.
Dick, Charles J., “Conflict spill into the 21st century,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 12 No. 12 (December 2000), p. 50.
Dingli, Shen, “China’s Military Space Strategy: An Exchange (Forum): China’s Defensive Military Strategy: the Space Question,” Survival, Vol. 50 No. 1 (February 2008), pp.170-6.
Doggrell, Les, “Operationally Responsive Space: A Vision for the Future of Military Space,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 20 Issue. 2 (Summer 2006), pp. 42-9.
Dornheim, Michael A., “New Home for ABL,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 164 No. 3 (16 January 2006), pp. 435-6.
Dornheim, Michael A., “Though Tests for Thaad Are Several Years Off,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 No. 7 (16 August 1999), p. 70.
Dornheim, Michael, “Big BMD Thruster,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No.2 (12 January 2004), p. 44.
Doyle, John M., and William B. Scott, “Words and Watching,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 Issue (17 July 2006), pp. 66
Dumbrell, John, “Unilateral and ‘America First’ President George W. Bush’s Foreign Policy,” The Political Quarterly, Vol. 73 No. 3 (July-September 2002), pp.279-287.
Eikmeier, Col Dale C., “Organizing for Success: Theater Missile Defense in Korea,” Aerospace Power Journal, Vol. XV No. 3 (Fall 2001), p. 66.
Einhorn, Robert J., and Gary Samore, “Ending Russian Assistance to Iran’s Nuclear Bomb,” Survival, Vol. 44 No. 2 (Summer 2002), pp. 51-72.
Eisenstadt, Michael, “Russia Arms and Technology Transfers to Iran: Policy Challenges for the United States,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 2 (March 2001), p. 15.
Evera, Stephen Van, “Offense, Defense, and the Cause of War,” International Security, Vol. 22 No. 4 (Spring 1998), pp. 5-43.
Falkenrath, Richard A., “Theatre Missile Defense and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty,” Survival , Vol. 36 No.4 (Winter 1994-95), pp. 140-160.
Farrer, Mark, “Ballistic Missile Forces of the PLA,” The Defense Reporter, Vol. 27 No. 24 (June/July 2001), p. 28.
Ferguson, Charles, “Sparking a Buildup: U.S. Missile Defense and China’s Nuclear Arsenal,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 2 (March 2000), pp. 13-8.
Fetter, Steve, and Frank von Hippel, “Does the United States Need a New Plutonium-Pit Facility?” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 4 (May 2004), pp. 10-14.
Finelli, Frank, “Transforming Aerospace Power,” Airpower, Vol. XIII No.2 (Summer 1999), pp. 4-14.
Fisher, Richard D., “Northeast Asian Missile Forces: Defense and Offense,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 18 No. 11 (November 2006), pp. 48-53.
Fogleman, Ronald R., “Toward Fusion of Air and Space Power,” Military Technology, Vol. XIII Issue. 5 (May 1999), pp. 15-19.
Foley, James, “USA ponders options after Pyongyang’s nuclear admission,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 15 No. 2 (February 2003), p. 45.
Forden, Geoffrey, “After China’s Test: Time For a Limited Ban on Anti-Satellite Weapons,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 3 (April 2007), pp. 19-23.
Foss, Christopher F., “China’s new ‘supergun’ artillery could hit Taiwan from mainland” , Jane’s Defense Weekly , Vol. 32 No. 11 (15 September 1999), p. 5.
Foss, Cristopher, “Russia reveals new SAMs for S-300,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol.30 No. 16 (October 1998), p. 6.
Frederick, Lt. Col. Lorinda A., “Deterrence and Space-Based Missile Defense,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue. 3 (Fall 2009), pp. 107-18.
Freedman, Lawrence, “Great Power, Vital Interests and Nuclear Weapons,” Survival, Vol. 36 No. 4 (Winter 1994-95), pp. 35-52.
Fulghum, David A., “Light, Laser, Combat,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 162 No. 24. (13 June 2005), pp. 122-4.
Fulghum, David A., “Microwave Weapons Emerge,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 162 No. 24 (16 June 2005), pp. 116-8.
Fulghum, David A., “New Colors of War,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 No. 24 (25 June 2007), pp. 52-3.
Fulghum, David A., “On Japan’s Doorstep,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 167 No. 9 (3 September 2007), pp. 54-6.
Fulghum, David A., “Shift in Strategy,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 167 No. 9 (3 September 2007), pp. 57-8.
Fulghum, David A., “What’s the Threat?” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 11 (17 March 2008), pp. 30-1.
Fulghum, David A., and Amy Butler, “Reassessing Space,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 No. 17 (30 April 2007), pp. 27-9.
Fuller, Jame’s, “Debt for Nonproliferation: The Next Step in Threat Reduction,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), p. 22.
Galeotti, Mark, “Russia’s ‘arsenal of megaterrorism’,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 14 No. 9 (September 2002), p. 48.
Gansler, Jacques S., “Can the Defense Industry Respond to the Reagan Initiatives?” International Security, Vol. 6 No. 4 (Spring 1982), pp. 102-21.
Garrett, Banning, “Facing the China Factor,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 8 (October 2000), pp. 14-6.
Garwin, Richard L., “A Different Kind of Complex: The Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons and the Nuclear Weapons Enterprise,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 10 (December 2008), pp. 13-7.
Garwin, Richard L., “National security Space Policy,” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 4 (Spring 1987), pp. 165-173.
Gates, Robert M., “A Balanced Strategy: Reprogramming the Pentagon for a New Age,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88 No. 1 (January/February 2009), pp. 28-40.
George, James L., “Hope Spring Eternal,” Naval Forces, Vol. IXX No. II (February 1998), p. 6.
Gerardi, Greg, and Richard Fisher Jr, “China’s missile tests show more muscle,” Jane’s Intelligence Review , Vol. 9 No. 3 (March 1997) ,pp. 125-30..
Gill, Bates, “Can China’s Tolerance Last?” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), pp. 7-9.
Glaser, Charles L., “Do We the Missile Defense We Can Build,” International Security, Vol. 10 No. 1 (Summer 1985), p. 25-57.
Glaser, Charles L., “Nuclear Policy without an Adversary: U.S. Planning for the Post-Soviet Era,” International Security, Vol. 16 No. 4 (Spring 1992), pp. 34-78.
Glaser, Charles L., and Steve Fetter, “National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy,” International Security, Vol. 26 No. 1 (Summer 2001), pp. 40-92.
Goldblat, Jozef, “Effort To Control Arms in Outer Space,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 34 No. 1(March 2003), pp. 103-8.
Gord, Rose, “India, Pakistan Trade Tit-for-Tat Missile Testes,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 3 (April 2003), p. 41.
Gorka, Sebstyen, and Richard Sullivan, “Biological Toxin: A Bioweapon Threat,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 33 No. 2 (June 2002), p. 142.
Gottemoeller, Rose, “Nuclear Necessity in Putin’s Russia,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 3 (April 2004), pp. 14-8.
Gottemoeller, Rose, “Offense, Defense, and Unilateralism in Strategic Arms Control,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), pp. 10-5.
Graham, Thomas Jr., “Space Weapons and the Risk of Accidental Nuclear War,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 10 (December 2005), pp. 12-6.
Grand, Gamille, “Missile Defense: The View From the Other Side of the Atlantic,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 7 (September 2000), pp. 12-4.
Gray, Colin S., “European Perspective on U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense,” Comparative Strategic, Vol. 21 No. 4 (2002), pp. 279 -310.
Grege Seigle, “US Army homing in on causes of THAAD failures,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 18 (5 May 1999), p. 10.
Hagt, Eric, “China’s Military Space Strategy: An Exchange (Forum): Mirror-imaging and Worst-Case Scenarios,” Survival, Vol. 50 No. 1 (February 2008), pp. 164-70.
Hai, Hui, “China’s Perspective on Nuclear Deterrence,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2 (Summer 2010), p. 20.
Hammick, Denis, “NATO sees BMD shield as Key to European Security,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 20 (14 May 2008), p. 16.
Harding, Harry, “China,” Foreign Policy, No. 159. (March/April 2007), pp. 26-32.
Harrington, Caitlin, “Signed Defense Bills Rebuff Pentagon Plan,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 9 (November 2006), pp. 46-7.
Hecker, Siegfried S., “North Korea’s Nuclear Threat,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 166 No. 14 (9 April 2007), p. 66.
Hewish, Mark, “The Manace Reawaken: Defense Against Cruise,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 29 (December 1996), p. 28.
Hildreth, Steve A., “Ballistic Missile Defense,” CRS Report Congress (Order Code RS22120) (5 January 2007), p. 4.
Hill, John, “China offended by US ‘Threat’ theory,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 14 No. 9 (September 2002), p. 47.
Hitchens, Theresa, “National Space Policy: Evolution by Stealth?,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 9 (November 2004), pp. 19-20.
Hitchens, Theresa, “Rushing to Weaponize the Final Fronties,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), pp. 16-21.
Hodge, Nathan, “US MDA chooses Boeing for sale source GMD deal,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 14 (2 April 2008), p. 10.
Hodge, Nathan, “US paves way for PAC-3 sales to Kuwait and UAE,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 44 No. 50 (12 Decemeber 2007), p. 14.
Hoffman, Fred S., “The SDI in U.S. Nuclear Strategy: Senate Testimony,” International Security, Vol. 10 No. 1(Summer 1985), pp. 13-24.
Holum, John, “Assessing the New U.S.-Russian Pact,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 5 (June 2002), p. 7.
Hosford, Zachary M., “Congress, Pentagon Probe Nuke Over flight,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. (October 2007), p. 48.
Hosford, Zachary M., “Nuke Overflight Probes Continue,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 9 (November 2007), p. 38.
Jackerson, Robert H., “Pluralism in International Political Theory,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 18 No. 3 (July 1992), pp. 271-81.
Jasani, Bhupendra, “Outer Space Being Turned into a Battlefield,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 17 (1986), pp. 29-39.
Jasani, Bhupendra, and Maria A. Lunderius, “Peaceful Uses of Outer Space-Legal Fiction and Military Reality,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 11 No. 1 (December 1980), pp. 57-70.
Jasinski, Michael, “Russia and India step up cruise missile co-operation,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 14 No. 3 (March 2002), p. 33-4.
Jones, Scott, “Non-proliferation Leadership: Brussels or Washington?” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 14 No. 3 (March 2002), p. 31.
Joseph, Jofi, “The Proliferation Security Initiative: Can Interdiction Stop Proliferation?” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 5 (June 2004), pp. 6-13.
Joseph, Robert, “Proliferation, Counter-Proliferation and NATO,” Survival, Vol. 38 No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp . 111-25.
Kagan, Robert, “Power and Weakness,” Policy Review, No. 113 (June/July 2002), pp. 3-28.
Kamiya, Matake, “A Disillusionned Japan Confronts North Korea,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 4 (May 2003), pp. 19-22.
Kamiya, Matake, “Nuclear Japan: Oxymoron or Coming Soon?” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 1 (Winter 2002-03), pp. 63-75.
Kamps, Charles Tustin, “Strategic Attack,” Aeospace Power Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3 (Fall 2004), p. 84.
Kapstein, Ethan B., “Allies and Armament,” Survival, Vol. 44 No. 2 (Summer 2002), 141-155.
Karniol, Robert, “Japan reiterates importance of missile-Defense accord with US,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 44 No. 24 (13 June 2007), p. 27.
Karp, Aaron, “Going Ballistic? Reversing Missile Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 5 (June 2005), pp. 6-13.
Keeny, Spurgeon M., “Mission Impossible,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 6(July/August 2001), p. 2.
Keeny, Spurgeon M., Jr., “The Buck Stops Here,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 6 (July/August 2000), p. 2.
Keeny, Spurgeon M., Jr., “The First 100 Days,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 4 (May 2001), p. 2.
Keeny, Spurgeon M., Jr., “The Right Thing to Do,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 7 (September 2000), p. 2.
Keeny, Spurgeon M., Jr., “Time to Reason Why,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 10 (December 2000), p. 2.
Kendal, Brown, Lt. Col. K., “Space Power Integration: Perspectives from Space Weapons Officers,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 20 Issue. 2 (Summer 2006), pp. 50-4.
Kenney, Major Laura, “Missile Defense System Goes Operational as North Korea Nathan Hodge, “US Missile Defense Agency unveils plans,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 44 No. 6 (7 February 2007), p. 10.
Kerr, Paul, “Behind Iran’s Diplomatic Behavior,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 5 (June 2006), pp. 32-5.
Kerr, Paul, “IAEA: More Questions on Iran Nuclear Program,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 6 (July/August 2005), pp. 32-3.
Kerr, Paul, “Iran Agrees to Temporarily Suspend Uranium-Enrichment Program,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 10 (December 2004), pp. 26-7.
Kerr, Paul, “North Korea Disavows Missile Moratorium; Talks Remain Stalled,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 3 (April 2005), pp. 38.
Kerr, Paul, “North Korea Nuclear Talks: If at first You Don’t Succeed , Meet Again,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 5 (June 2004), pp. 31-3.
Kerr, Paul, “Questions Surround Iran’s Nuclear Program,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 2 (March 2006), pp. 30-3.
Kerr, Paul, “Security Council Condemns NK Missile Tests,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 7(September 2006), pp. 22-4.
Kerr, Paul, “U.S., Allies Await Iran’s Response to Nuclear Offer,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 6 (July/August 2006), pp. 27-9.
Kerr, Paul, and Wade Boese, “China Seeks to Join Nuclear, Missile Control Groups,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 2 (March 2004), pp. 37-8.
Kerr, Paul, and Wade Boese, “Potential North Korea Missile Test Raise Tension,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 6 (July/August 2006), pp. 47-8.
Kerry, Robert, and William D. Hartung, “Toward a New Nuclear Posture: Challenge for the Bush Administration,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 3 (April 2001), p. 6.
Kim, Scarlet, “Chinese Proud, Defensive About ASAT Test,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 2 (March 2007), p. 29.
Kim, Tae-Hyo, “Missile Test or Test of the Six-Party Talks?” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. XVIII No. 3 (Fall 2006), pp. 71-88.
Kimball, Dary G., “Avoiding a Space Arms Race,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 3 (April 2007), p. 3.
Kimball, Dary G., “Avoiding a Space Arms Race,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 3 (April 2007), p.3.
Kimball, Dary G., “Looking Back: The Mixed Arms Control Legacy of Ronald Reagan,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 6 (July/August 2004), pp. 44-7.
Kimball, Dary G., “New Strategic Experiment,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), p. 2.
Kimball, Dary G., “Nuclear Checks and Balances,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 10 (December 2004), p. 3.
Kimball, Dary G., “Of Madmen and Nukes,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 9 (November 2005), p. 3.
Kimball, Dary G., “Replacement Nuclear Warheads? Buyer Beware,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 4 (May 2005), p. 3.
Kimball, Dary G., “The Test Moratorium Uncertain Future,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 4 (May 2002), p. 2.
Kimball, Dary G., “Will Prudence Prevail?” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 9 (November 2001), p. 2.
Kimball, Dary G., and Miles A. Pomper, “A Fresh Start? An Interview With Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 10 (December 2008), pp. 6-12.
Klein, John J., “Space Power: An III-Suited Space Strategy,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 20 Issue. 3 (Fall 2006), pp. 77-84.
Koch, Andrew, “South Asian rivals Keep test score even,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 11 No. 8 (august 1999), pp. 34-7. new window

Koch, Andrew, “US rethink could spawn ‘mini-nuke’,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 35 No. 21 (23 May 2001), pp. 22-3.
Koch, Andrew, “USA fears ‘secondary WMD proliferation’,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 36. No. 10 (5 September 2001), p. 6.
Kolb, Maj. Eric J., “Book Review: The Star Wars Enigma: Behind the Sciences of the Cold War Race for Missile Defense,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2 (Summer 2010), pp. 108-9.
Kolb, Maj. Eric J., “Book Review: The Star Wars Enigma: Behind the Sciences of the Cold War Race for Missile Defense,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2 (Summer 2010), pp. 108-9.
Konner, Cortney, and Ronald Pope, “Integration of Space-Based Combat Systems,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 20 Issue 3 (Fall 2006), pp. 18-24.
Kortunov, Andrei, and Andrei Shoumikhin, “Current Russian Objection to U.S. NMD and ABM Treaty Revision,” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 16 No. 2 (1997(Special Issue), pp. 157-65.
Krepon, Michael, “Are Missile Defense MAD?” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74 No. 1 (January /February 1995), pp. 19-24.
Krepon, Michael, “China’s Military Space Strategy: An Exchange (Forum): Opening Pandora’s Box,” Survival, Vol. 50 No. 1 (February 2008), pp. 157-63.
Krepon, Michael, “Lost in Space: The Misguided Drive Toward Antisatellite Weapons,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80 No. 3 (May/June 2001), pp. 2-8.
Krepon, Michael, “Weapon in the Heavens: A Radical and Reckless Option,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 9 (November 2004), pp. 11-8.
Kristensen, Hans M., “The Role of U.S. Nuclear Weapons: New Doctrine Fall Short of Bush Pledge,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 7 (September 2005), pp. 13-9.
Kuchins, Andrew C., “Explaining Mr. Putin: Russia’s New Nuclear Diplomacy,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 8 (October 2002), pp. 3-7.
Kucia, Christine, “Chinese Nuclear Forces to Grow, Report Says,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 7 (September 2002), p. 19.
Kucia, Christine, “Russia Mulls Altered Nuclear Doctrine,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 9 (November 2003), p. 34 & 40.
Lamson, James A., and Wy Q. Bowen, “ ‘One arrow, Three stars’: China’s MIRV programme,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 9 No. 5 (May 1997), p. 218.
Lansford, Tom, “The Great Game Renewed? US-Russian Rivalry in the Arms Trade of South Asia,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 33 No. 2 (June 2002), pp. 127-140.
Layne, Christopher, “Offshore Balancing Revisited,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 2 (Spring 2002), pp. 233-48.
Leader, Stefan, “Osama bin Laden and the terrorist search for WMD,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 11 No. 6 (June 1999), pp. 34-7.
Leiber, Keir A., and Dary G. Press, “The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of U.S. Primacy,” International Security, Vol. 30 No. 4 (Spring 2006), pp. 7-44.
Leiber, Keir A., and Gerald Alexander, “Waiting for Balancing: Why the World Is Not Pushing Back,” International Security, Vol. 30 No. 1 (Summer 2005), pp. 109-39.
Lennox, Duncan, “Ballistic missile Defense high on NATO’s agenda,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 13 (26 March 2008), p. 25.
Lennox, Duncan, “Building a consensus on BMD remains difficult,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 46 No. 23 (10 June 2009), p. 49.
Lennox, Duncan, “ICBM threat to the West,” Jane’s defense Weekly, Vol. 30 No. 5 (5 August 1998), p. 24.
Lennox, Duncan, “Iran ballistic missile project: uncovering the evidence,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 10 No. 6 (June 1998), pp. 24-7.
Lennox, Duncan, “More detail on Chinese cruise misile programme’,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 34 No. 10, p. 19.
Lennox, Duncan, “Solid-propellant ballistic missile on parade in Beijing,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 32 No. 15 (13 October 1999), p. 4.
Lewis, George N., and Theodore A. Postol, “European Missile Defense: The Technological Basis of Russian Concerns,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 8 (October 2007), pp. 13-8.
Lieber, Keir A., “Grasping the Technological Peace,” International Security, Vol. 25 No. 1 (Summer 2000), pp.71-104.
Lieven, Anatol, “The Secret Policemen’s Ball: the United States, Russia and the international order after 11 September,” International Affairs, Vol. 78 No. 2 (April 2002), pp. 245-260.
Lindsay, James M., and Michael E. O’Hanlon, “Missile Defense after ABM Treaty,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol.25 No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp. 163-76.
Lindsey, Eben W., “MDA Tests Laser Amid Budget Cutbacks,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 6 (July/August 2009), p. 36.
Lodal, Jan, “Pledging ‘No First Strike’: A Step Toward Real WMD Cooperation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 2 (March 2001), p. 3.
Lok, Joris Janssen, “Aegis Road Map,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 167 No. 22 (12 March 2007), pp. 58-60.
Lok, Joris Janssen, “NATO exercises prop up TMD pillars,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 31 (July 1998), pp. 58-9.
Lok, Joris Janssen, “Naval fire control faces new threats,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 35 (October 2002), p. 49.
Lok, Joris Janssen, “Risk Reduction,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 168 No. 10 (10 March 2008), p. 48.
Lok, Joris Janssen, “Three nations plan combined TMD task force,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 28 No. 15(15 April 1998), p. 6.
Luongo, Kenneth N. “The Uncertain Future of U.S.-Russian Cooperative Nuclear Security,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 1 (January /February 2001), p. 3.
MacDonald, Bruce, “Conventional Trident Provides a Vital Option,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 36 No. 7 (September 2006), p. 52.
Mackey, Lt. Col. James, “Recent US and Chinese Antisatellite Activities,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue.3 (Fall 2009), pp. 82-93.
Mann, Paul, “Economic Woes Shadow Japan’s Missile Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 156 No. 10 (11 March 2002), p.55.
Mann, Paul, “Excess Optimism Assailed In Seaborne Missile Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 153 No. 18 (30 October 2000), p. 71.
Mann, Paul, “Impassioned Responses To Bush Missile Scheme,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 155 No. 3 (16 July 2001), p. 26.
Mann, Paul, “Missile Defense Gains Political Favor Amid Rifts,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 9 (1 March 1999), p. 51
Mann, Paul, “Mixed Prospects at Best for New START/ABM Talks,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 No. 7 (16 August 1999), pp. 74-7.
Mann, Paul, “NMD Requires Tough Choices,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 9 (1 March 1999), p. 53.
Mann, Paul, “No Breakthrough on Chinese Proliferation,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 156 No. 10 (11 March 2002), P. 58.
Manning, Robert A., “The Nuclear Age：The Next Chapter,” Foreign Policy, No. 109 (Winter 1997-98), pp. 70-84.
Mark, Hans, “The Airborne Laser from Theory to Reality: An Insider’s Account,” Defense Horizons, No. 12 (April 2002), p. 4.
Markov, David, “Russia and the International Arms Market,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 7 No. 4 (April 1995), p. 154.
Mathews, Neelam, “Building a Relationship,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 161 No. 13 (4 October 2004), p. 39.
Mathews, Neelam, “India Spend More,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 161 No. 3 (19 July 2004), p. 70.
Matlock, Jack F. Jr., “Security: The Bottom Line,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 8(October 2000), pp. 17-8.
Matthews, Neelam, “Space Engagement,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 4 (26 January 2004), p. 26.
McCants, Rodbetn X., “Ground-Based Missile Defense(National Missile Defense): Is It Feasible,” USAWC Strategy Research Project (U.S.: U.S. Army War College, 3 May 2004), pp. 1-20.
McLaughlin, Kevin, “Would Space-Based Defense Improve Security,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 3 (Summer 2002), pp. 177-191.
McMahon, K. Scott, “Star Wars comes down to earth,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol.No. 30 (August 1997), p. 25.
McNeil, Kirsten, “Air Force Reorganize Nuclear Commands,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 10 (December 2008), pp. 44-5.
McNeil, Kristen, “Report Urges Changes in Air Force Nuke Operations,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 8 (October 2008), pp. 53-4.
Mecham, Michael, “India Test-fires Agni Missile Pakistan Responds With Ghauri,” Aviation Week & Technology , Vol. 150 No. 6 (19 April 1999), p. 37.
Mecham, Michael, and Army Butler, “Satellite Looking,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 169 No. 22 (8 December 2008), pp. 48-50.
Meier, Oliver, “Europeans Splits Over U.S. Missile Defesne Plans,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 3 (April 2007), pp. 36-8.
Minnick, Wendell, “Taiwan starts laying groundwork for Aegis,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 38 No. 20 (13 November 2002), p. 4.
Minnick, Wendell, “Taiwan to test-fire Patriot-2 Plus,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 35 No. 22 (30 May 2001), p. 4.
Mistry, Dinshaw, “European Missile Defense: Assessing Iran’s ICBM,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 8 (October 2007), pp. 19-23.
Moltz, James Clay, “Breaking the Deadlock On Space Arms Control,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 3 (April 2002), pp. 3-9.
Monroe, Robert R., “A Perfect Strom over Nuclear Weapons,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue. 3 (Fall 2009), pp.19-29.
Montgomery, Evan Braden, “Breaking Out of the Security Dilemma: Realism, Reassurance, and the Problem of Uncertainty,” International Security, Vol. 31 No. 2 (Fall 2006), pp. 151-85.
Murray, Lyle Goldstein and William, “Undersea Dragons: China’s Maturing Submarine Force,” International Security, Vol. 28 No. 4 (Spring 2004), pp. 161-96.
NAFO, “Air Defense at Sea,” Naval Forces, Vol. IXX No. I (1998 January), pp. 52-6.
Nayan, Rajiv, “The Anti-Tactic Ballistic Missile of the USA: A Study of Motivation,” Strategic Analysis, Vol. XVIII No. 11 (February 1996), p. 1506.
Nester, William, “Why Nations Go to War or Stay at Peace,” International Relations: Politics and Economics in the 21st Century, p. 214.
Newhouse, John, “The Missile Defense Debate,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80 No. 4 (August 2001), pp.97-109.
O’Halloran, Jim, “Russian air-defense group dogged by old rivalries,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 39 No. 20 (21 May 2003), pp. 14-5.
O’Keefe, Bernard J., “The SDI and American ‘R & D’ ,” International security, Vol. 11 No. 2 (Fall 1986), pp. 190-2.
Obering, Lt Gen. Henry A., “European Missile Defense: The View From The Pentagon,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 8 (October 2007), pp. 6-8.
Obering, Lt. Gen. Henry A., “European Missile Defense: The View from the Pentagon,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 8 (October 2007), pp. 6-8.
Paik, Hakson, “Steering Between Red Lines: A South Korean View,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 4 (May 2003), p. 15.
Pain, Christopher, “Coddling the Nuclear Weapons Complex,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 4 (May 2004), pp. 3-9.
Parachini, John, “Non-Proliferation Policy And the War on Terrorism,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 8 (October 2001), pp. 14-5.
Payne, Keith, and Andrei Kortunov, “Summary and Conclusion,” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 16 No. 2 (1997(Special Issue)), pp. 199-204.
Pena, Charles, and Ivan Eland, “Withdraw Is Premature,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), pp. 10-1.
Phillips, Edward H., “PAC-3 Missile Seeker Test Succeed,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 12 (22 March 1999), p. 30.
Pierre, Andrew J., “Europe and Missile Defense: Tactical Consideration, Fundamental Concerns,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 4 (May 2001), pp. 3-9
Pierre, Andrew J., “The Diplomacy of SALT,” International Security, Vol.5 No. 1 (Summer 1980), pp. 178-97.
Pomper, Miles A., “Bush Second Term: More Diplomacy But Same Policy,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 2 (March 2005), pp. 39-40.
Porteous, Holley, “China’s View of Strategic Weapons,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 8 No. 3 (March 1995), p. 134.
Posen, Barry R., and Stephen Van Evera, “Defense Policy and the Reagan Adminstration: Departure From Containment,” International Security, Vol. 8 No. 1 (Summer 1983), pp. 3-45.
Posnock, Ross, “The Politics of Nonidentity: A Genealogy,” Boundary 2, Vol. 19 No. 1 (Spring 1992), pp. 34-68.
Reporter, Staff, “Missile Defense Agency mull Startegy for GMD,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 13 (16 January 2008), p. 6.
Rethinaraj, TS Gopl, “Nuclear diplomacy returns to South Asia security agenda,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol.14 No.5 (May 2002), pp. 40-3.
Richardson, Doug, “US GMD interceptor hits target,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 51 (17 December 2008), p. 11.
Robert, Brad, Robert A. Manning, and Ronald N. Montaperto, “China: The Forgotten Nuclear Power,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79 No. 4 (July/August 2000), pp. 53-63.
Rodan, Steve, “Israel eyes elements of PAC-3 to boost air defense,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 38 No. 8 (21 August 2002), p. 15.
Rogozin, Dmitry, “Missile defense as a common cause for all,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 46 No. 42 (21 October 2009), pp. 20-1.
Ross, Robert S., “Navigating the Taiwan Strait: Deterrence, Escalation Dominance, and U.S.-China Relations,” International Security, Vol. 27 No. 2 (Fall 2002), pp. 48-85.
Rudney, Robert, “The Contribution of the Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS) to U.S. Post-Cold War,” Comparative Strategy , Vol.16 No.3 (1997), pp. 293-5.
Sagan, Scott D., “1914 Revisited: Allies, Offense, and Instability,” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 2(Fall 1986), pp. 151-75.
Schake, Kori N., “Do European Union Defense Initiative Threaten NATO?” Strategic Forum, No. 184 (August 2001), pp. 1-6.
Schell, Fonathan, “The Folly of Arms Control,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79 Issue 5 (Sep/Oct2000), p. 22-47.
Schlesinger, James R., “Rhetoric and Reality in the Star Wars Debate,” International Security, Vol. 10 No. 1(Summer 1985), pp. 3-12.
Scoblic, J. Peter, “China Issues Missile Export Pledge; U.S. Says It Will Waive Sanctions,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 10 (December 2000), p. 23.
Scott, Richard, “SM-2 Block IIIB finds its range,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol.31 No.26 (30 June 1999), p. 30.
Scott, William B., “New Satellite Sensors Will Direct RF, Laser Attacks,” Aviation week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 Issues. 5 (2 August 1999), p. 57.
Scott, William B., “Nuclear Course Correction,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 163 No. 18 (7 November 2005), pp. 82-6.
Scott, William B., “Space Control Redux,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 No. 18 (6 November 2006), p. 105.
Scott, William B., “Space Warriors,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 162 No. 10 (7 March 2005), pp. 55-7.
Scott, William Q., “Battlefield Laser Weapons,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 23 (7 June 2004), pp. 57-8.
Seigle, Gerg, “USA seeks renegotiation of ABM Treaty for NMD,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 4 (27 January 1999), p. 3.
Seigle, Greg, “MEADS officials meet to choose a prime contractor,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 20 (19 May 1999), p. 6.
Seigle, Greg, “THAAD finally hits its target,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 24 (16 June 1999), p. 3.
Seigle, Greg, “THAAD misses the target again,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 31 No. 14 (7 April 1999), p. 6.
Seigle, Greg, “US Congress U-turn on MEADS funding,” Vol. 32 No. 15(13 October 1999), p. 4.
Seigle, Greg, “US work to fix THAAD problems enters overdrive,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 30 No.15 (14 October 1998), p. 4.
Seigle, Greg, “USA seeks new MEADS funding from partners,” Jane’s Defense weekly, Vol. 31 No.12 (24 March 1999), p. 3.
Sekigawa, Eiichiro, “Arms and Japan,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 161 No. 22 (6 December 2004), pp. 30-1.
Sheppard, Ben, “Ballistic missile proliferation and the geopolitics of terror,” Jane’s International Review, Vol. 10 No. 12 (December 1998), pp. 41-4.
Sheppard, Ben, “UK comes round to missile defense,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 14 No. 3 (March 2002), p. 55.
Shull, Maj. Todd C., “Space-Operation Doctrine: The Way Ahead,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 18 No. 2 (Summer 20004), pp. 96-102.
Shull, Maj. Todd C., “Space-Operation Doctrine: The Way Ahead,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 18 No. 2 (Summer 20004), pp. 96-102.
Simes, Dimitri K., “Deterrence and Coercion in Soviet Policy,” International Security, Vol. 5 No. 3 (Winter 1980-81), p. 80-103.
Sirak, Michael, “America’s BMD stumble,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 37 No. 18 (1 May 2002), p. 23.
Sirak, Michael, “Pacific tested is key to US missile defense plans,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 36 No. 3 (18 July 2001), p. 3.
Sirak, Michael, “Raytheon, Rafael market missile,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 35 No. 23 (6 June 2001), p.14.
Sirak, Michael, “Raytheon’s SM-3 missile scores test success,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 37 No. 6 (6 February 2002), p. 7. new window

Sirak, Michael, “Russia, USA refine BMD co-operation,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 37 No. 8 (20 February 2002), p. 5.
Sirak, Michael, “The ‘Standard’ response,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 38 No. 18 (30 October 2002), p. 22.
Sirak, Michael, “US Air Force consider an update ICBM,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 35 No. 21 (23May 2001), p. 6.
Sirak, Michael, “US Army, Navy in THAAD-CEC test exercise,, Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 35 No. 11 (14 March 2001), p. 8. new window

Sirak, Michael, “USA explore miniature kill vehicles for missile defense,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 37 No. 7 (13 February 2002), p. 6.
Smith, David J., “Bush pushes ahead with plan global missile defense,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 13 No. 7 (July 2001), pp. 45-7.
Smith, Sen. Bob, “The Challeng of Space Power,” Airpower, Vol. XIII No.1 (Spring 1999), p. 33.
Smith, William D., and John E. Carey, “A Naval Ballistic Missile Defense Solution for Europe?” Naval Forces, Vol. XX No. III (March 1999), pp. 8-14.
Snyder, Glenn H., “Mearsheimer World-Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security,” International Security, Vol. 27 No. 1(Summer 2002), pp. 149-73.
Sokolski, Henry, “Pyongyang: The Case for Nonproliferation with Teeth,” Arms Control Today, Vol.33 No.4 (May 2003), p. 8.
Sokolsky, Richard, “Imagining European Missile Defense,” Survival, Vol. 43 No. 3 (Autumn 2001), pp. 111-128.
Sokov, Nikolai, “START I Replacement: The End of Cold War Disarmament,” PONARS Policy Memo, No. 418 (December 2006), p. 2.
Sopko, John F., “The Changing Proliferation Threat,” Foreign Policy, No. 105 (Winter 1996-97), pp. 3-20.
Spector, Leonard S., “Neo-Nonproliferation,” Survival, Vol. 37 No. 1. (Spring 1995), pp.66-85.
Srivastava, Anupam, “China’s Export Controls: Can Beijing’s Actions Match Its Words?,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 35 No. 9 (November 2005), pp. 20-25.
Stanley, Willis, and Keith Payne, “Missile Proliferation：Threat and U.S. Response,” Comparative Strategy, Vol.16 No. 2 (1997, Special Issue), p. 135.
Starr, Barbara, “Boeing win $ 5b deal to develop NMD system,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 29 No. 18 (6 May1998), p. 3.
Starr, Barbara, “China could overwhelm regional missile shield,” Jane’s Defense Weekly , Vol. 27 No.16 (23 April 1997) , p. 16.
Takahashi, Kosuje, “Japan prepares to shoot down North Korean missile if it fails,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 46 No. 13 (April 2009), p. 7.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., “Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited,” International Security, Vol. 25 No. 3 (Winter 2000/01), pp. 128-61.
Tang, Shiping, “Fear in the International Politics: Two Positions,” International Studies Review, Vol. 10 Issue 3 (September 2008), pp. 451-71.
Tauscher, Ellen, “European Missile Defense: A Congressional Perspective,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 37 No. 8 (October 2007), pp. 9-12.
Tellis, Ashley J., “China’s Military Space Strategy,” Survival, Vol. 49 No. 3 (Autumn 2007), pp. 41-72.
Thalassocrates, Alcibiades, “NATO Launches TMD Effort,” Military Technology, Vol. XXII Issue. 8 (August 1998), pp. 87-91.
The EastWest Institute, “Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Potential,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 5 (June 2009), p.5.
The Heritage Foundation, “Alaska’s Strategic Role in the Defense of the United States and the Vital Role of Missile Defense,” Heritage Lectures, No. 1133 (10 September 2009), pp.1-6.
The New Deterrent Working Group, “Toward a New Deterrent: Analysis and Recommendations for the Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue. 1 (Spring 2009), pp. 5-10.
The Royal United Service Institute for Defense and Security Studies (RUSI), “PLA Modernization: Tactical and Strategic Weapons for the Taiwan Strait,” Chinese Military Update, Vol. 1 No. 1 (June 2003), p.7.
The White House, “President Bush’s Speech on Nuclear Strategy; A Response From Senior Democrats,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 5 (June 2001), pp. 29-32.
Thielmann, Greg, “ Looking Back: The National Missile Defense Act of 1999,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 6 (July/August 2009), pp. 45-8.
Tim Fish, “Japanese destroyer scores hit during SM-3 test,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 45 No. 1 (2 January 2008), p. 14. new window

Tompkins, Joanne, “How U.S. Strategic Policy Is Changing China’s Nuclear Plans,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No. 1 (January/February 2003), pp. 11-5.
Twomey, Christopher P., “Chinese-U.S. Strategic Affairs: Danger Dynamic,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 38 No. 1 (January/February 2009), pp. 17-9.
Utgoff, Victor A., “Proliferation , Missile Defense and American Ambitions,” Survival, Vol. 44 No. 2 (Summer 2002), pp. 85-102.
Wagner, Alex, “No Deal Reached on Chinese Missile Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 2 (March 2002), pp. 27-8.
Wagner, Alex, “Pakistan Tests Three Nuclear-Capable Ballistic Missiles,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 5 (June 2002), p. 28.
Wagner, Alex, “U.S. Presses Russia on Nuclear, Missile Cooperation With Iran,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 2 (March 2002), p. 32.
Wagner, Alex, “Washington to Sanction China Pakistan for Missile Cooperation,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 31 No. 7 (September 2001), p. 30 & 37.
Wall, Robert, “ABL Face Funding, Schedule makeover,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 155 No. 26 (31 December 2001), p. 45.
Wall, Robert, “ABL Hits Funding, Technical Turbulence,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 154 No. 3 (15 January 2001), pp. 31-2.
Wall, Robert, “ABL Hopes Advances Will Silence Critics,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 Issues. 12 (20 September 1999), p. 62.
Wall, Robert, “Better Defense, Better Offensive,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 15 (12 April 2004), pp.64-6.
Wall, Robert, “Boost Phase Advances, But ABL Slows,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol.156 No. 12 (25 March 2002), p. 29.
Wall, Robert, “Changing Defenses,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 16 (19 April 2004), pp.73-4.
Wall, Robert, “Collision Course,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 16 (19 April 2004), p. 36.
Wall, Robert, “Cruise Control,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 161 No. 8 (23 August 2004), pp. 30-5.
Wall, Robert, “Future of Missile Defense Lies in Advanced Technology,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 Issues. 7 (16 August 1999), p. 71.
Wall, Robert, “Groundwork,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 169 No. 16 (27 October 2008), pp. 40-1.
Wall, Robert, “Intelligence Lacking on Satellite Threats,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol.150 No. 9 (1 March 1999), p. 54.
Wall, Robert, “Intercept Starts Long Road To Sea-Based Missile Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 156 No. 5 (4 February 2002), pp.34-5.
Wall, Robert, “Laser Realigment,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 1 (5 January 2004), p. 29.
Wall, Robert, “Missile Defense Make Inroads, But Obstacles Still Abound,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 155 No. 24 (10 December 2001), p. 41.
Wall, Robert, “Missile Defense’s New Look To Emerge This Summer,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 156 No. 12 (25 March 2002), p. 28.
Wall, Robert, “Missile Shield,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 162 No. 15 (11 April 2005), p.35.
Wall, Robert, “Modernizing ICBMs,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 26 (28 June 2004), p. 32.
Wall, Robert, “More Changes Ahead For Missile Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 156 No. 11 (18 March 2002), p. 68.
Wall, Robert, “Navy Gain Ground with TMD Test,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 Issues. 14 (4 October 1999), p. 37.
Wall, Robert, “Pentagon Eyes Additions To Anti-Missile Arsenal,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 156 No. 23 (10 June 2002), p. 20.
Wall, Robert, “Rumsfeld Goes Full-Bore For Ballistic Missile Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 155 No. 1 (2 July 2001), pp. 37-40.
Wall, Robert, “Russia Premier SAMs SeenProliferating Soon,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 No. 13 (27 September 1999), pp. 36-41.
Wall, Robert, “Short-, Medium-Range Missile Are Increasing Threats to U.S.,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 No. 1 (20 September 1999), p. 34.
Wall, Robert, “Shotgun Defense,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 160 No. 4 (26 January 2004), p. 50.
Wall, Robert, “Space-Based Missile Defense Program Crystallizing,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 Issues. 7 (16 August 1999), pp. 73-4.
Wall, Robert, “Thaad at Crossroads After Intercept,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 No.6 (9 August 1999), p. 30.
Wall, Robert, “Thaad Missile Target Again：Telemetry Loss Hinder Analysis,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol.150 No.14 (5 April 1999), p. 62.
Wall, Robert, “U.S. Missile Defense System Delayed,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 Issues. 4 (25 January 1999), p. 40.
Wall, Robert, and Bruce D. Nordwall, “Navy’s Missile Defense Closes In on Intercept,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 154 No. 6 (5 February 2001), p. 39.
Wall, Robert, and David A. Fulghum, “Bigger Space,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 162 No. 7 (14 February 2005), pp. 30-4.
Wall, Robert, and Douglas Barrie, “Missile Movement,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 164 No. 22 (29 May 2006), p. 38.
Wallander, Celeste A., “Russia’s Strategic Priorities,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 32 No. 1 (January/February 2002), pp. 4-6.
Wallander, Celeste A., “Wary of the West: Russian Security Policy at the Millennium,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 30 No. 2 (March 2000), pp. 7-12.
Walt, Stephen M., “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power,” International Security, Vol. 9 No. 4 (Spring 1985), pp. 3-43.
Wasserbly, Danie, “Lockheed Martin rolls out new THAAD systems,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 46 No. 16 (22 April 2009), p. 10.
Wasserbly, Danie, “THAAD succeeds in its first salvo test,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 46 No. 12 (25 March 2009), p. 6. new window

Wasserbly, Danie, “US Agies BMD system achieves trial success,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 46 No. 31 (5 August 2009), p. 8.
Weeden, Brian, “Book Review: Defense of US Space Assets,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue. 1 (Spring 2009), pp. 22-3.
Weiss, Leonard, “Nuclear-Weapon State and the Grand Bargain,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 33 No.10 (December 2003), pp. 21-5.
Weitz, Richard, “Time To Give Up on Missile Defense Cooperation With Russia,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 No. 6 (7 August 2006), p. 70.
Weitz, Richard, “Time To Give Up on Missile Defense Cooperation With Russia,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 165 No. 6 (7 August 2006), p. 70.
Werrell, Kenneth P., “The Phantom Defense: America’s Pursuit of the Star Wars Illusion,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4 (Winter 2002), pp. 108-9.
Weston, Maj. Scott A., “Examining Space Warfare: Scenarios, Risks, and US Policy Implications,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 23 Issue. 1 (Spring 2009), pp. 73-82.
Wilkening, Dean A., “Amending the ABM Treaty,” Survival, Vol. 42 No. 1 (Spring 2000), pp. 29-45.
Winner, Andrew C., “The Proliferation Security Initiative: The New Face of Interdiction,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 2 (Spring 2005), pp. 129-36.
Wit, Joel S., “Dealing With North Korea: ‘Diplomatic Warfare’ Ahead,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 1 (January/ February 2009), pp. 14-16.
Xuetong, Yan, “TMD Rocking Regional Ability,” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. XI No. 1 (Summer 1999), pp. 67-86.
Yonas, Gerold, “Research and the Strategic Defense Initiaitve,” International Security, Vol. 11 No. 2 (Fall 1986), pp. 185-9.
Yourish, Karen, with Matthew Johnson, “Proposed Energy Department Budget Would Boost Fund For Nuclear Weapons,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34. No. 2 (March 2004), pp. 16-7.
Yunzhu, Sr. Col. Yao, “China’s Perspective on Nuclear Deterrence,” Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1 (Spring 2010), pp. 27-30.
Zaborsky, Victor, “Does China Belong In the Missile Technology Control Regime?,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 34 No. 8 (October 2004), pp. 20-26.
Zaloga, Steven J., “Back-door TBMs: the proliferation threat posed by converted SAMs,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Vol. 11 No. 4 (April 1999), pp. 51-3.
Zaloga, Steven J., “Global Market Uneven In Missile Development,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 150 No. 2 (11 January 1999), p. 162
Zaloga, Steven J., “Red Star Wars,” Jane’s Defense Weekly, Vol. 9 No. 5 (May 1997), p. 207.
Zhang, Hui, “Ending North Korea’s Nuclear Ambitions: The Need for Stronger Chinese Action,” Arms Control Today, Vol. 39 No. 6 (July/August 2009), pp. 21-7.
Zhang, Yihong, “China’s rising forces,” Jane’s International Defense Review, Vol. No. 35 (August 2002), p. 37.
Zimet, Elihu, “High-Energy Lasers: Technical Operational, and Policy Issues,” Defense Horizons, No. 18 (October 2002), pp. 1-8.

四、研究報告
“Building the Architecture for Sustainable Space Security,” Report of the Conference on Disarmament (Canada’s Working Paper, 22 June 2006).
Fisher, Richard, “How American’s Friends Are Building China’s Military Power,” Backgrounder (Washington D. C.: The Heritage Foundation, 5 November 1997).
Geier, Hans, “Economic Impact of the Boeing Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) Program: Alaska Operations 2007,” Boeing (Research Paper from University of Alaska Fairbank, January 2008).
Gottemoeller, Rose, “Russian-American Security Relations after Georgia,” Policy Brief (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, October 2008).
Holmes, Kim R., and James J. Przystup, “Between Diplomacy and Deterrence: Strategies for U. S. Relations with China,” The Heritage Foundation (25 April 1996).
Leaf, Dan, and Dr. Philip Coyle, “Space Weapons or Space Arms Control,” Los Angeles World Affairs Conference (15 March 2005).
Piella, Guillem Colom, Area: Security & Defense (Real Institute Elcano, 8 October 2007).
Spring, Baker, “Countering North Koera’s Missiles: The Missile Defense System the U.S. Should Have,” WebMemo (Published by The Heritage Foundation, 21 June 2006).
Tellis, Ashley J., “Punching the U.S. Military’s ‘Soft Ribs’: China’s Antisatellite Weapon Test in Strategic Perspective,” Policy Brief 51 (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 2007).

五、報紙
“America’s Infatuation With Missile Defense Baffle Europe,” International Herald Tribune, 8 June 2001, p. 10.
“Bush Begins Visit to a Wary Europe,” International Herald Tribune, 13 June 2001, p. 1.
“Bush stands firm on missile shield plan,” Taiwan News, 31 March 2001, p. 1.
“Bush, Europeans pledge to defense trade tensions,” Taiwan News, 4 May 2002, p. 10.
“China reportedly working on new ‘Star War’ laser,” China News, 30 November 1998, p.1.
“China to boost ability for nuclear 2nd strike,” Taiwan News, 25 October 1999, p. 1.
“Chinese Discloses Neturon Arms Ability,” International Herald Tribune, 16 July 1999, p. 1.
“European myths about American foreign policy,” International Herald Tribune, 9 July 2002, p. 7.
“European myths about American foreign policy,” International Herald Tribune, 9 July 2002, p. 7.
“Europeans Widely Dispprove Of Bush’s International Policy,” International Herald Tribune, 16 August 2001, p. 7.
“Europeans Widely Dispprove Of Bush’s International Policy,” International Herald Tribune, 16 August 2001, p. 7.
“France Softens Stance on a U.S. Missile Shield,” International Herald Tribune, 11 March 2001, p. 1.
“How to Get Europe and Russia into a Consensus on Defense,” International Herald Tribune, 13 June 2001, p.8.
“Taiwan seeks US assistance for missile defense system,” China News, 25 November 1998, p.1.
“Taiwan set to buy US Aegis warships,” China News, 1 March 1999 , p. 2.
“Trade Summit Fail to Solve U.S.-EU Rift,” International Herald Tribune, 20 December 2000, p. 5.
“Trans-Atlantic trade war threatens to explode,” Taiwan News, 23 May 2002, p. 10.

六、網絡資料
“Anti-Satellite Weapons-Overview,” Global Security, Last update: 8 January 2010, http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/asat-overview.htm.
“Appendix A: Soviet Draft Treaty on the Prohibition of the Use of Force in Outer Space and From Space Against the Earth,” U.N. General Assembly document A38/194, 22 August 1983, pp.145-6.
“EKV/GMD: Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle/Ground-Based Midcourse Defense System,” Raytheon, February 2008, http:www.raytheon.com.
“Environmental Modification Convention (1977),” Atomicarchive, Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.atomicarchive.com/Treaties/Treaty12.shtml.
“Fact Sheet: GTRI: Reducing Nuclear Threats,” National Nuclear Security Administration, 2 January 2009, http://www.nnsa.energy.gov/mediaroom/factsheets/reducingthreats.
“Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism,” India Pugwash Society, Last Update: 11 May 2010, http://www.pugwashindia.org/article_details.asp?aid=51.
“Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism: Steady, but Slow Progress,” WMD Insight, Last Update: 11 March 2010, http;//www.wmdinsights.com/I26/I26_G2_GlobalInitiative.htm.
“Governmental Space Arms Control Proposal,” Secure World Foundation, Last Update: 1 March 2010, http://www.secureworldfoundation.org/index.php?id=151&page=Governmental_Proposals.
“Ground-Based Midcourse Defense(GMD),” Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, Last Update: 5 December 2009, http://www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org/web/page/928/sectionid/557/pagelevel/3/interior.apx.
“Ground-Based Midcourse Defense(GMD),” MISSILETHREAT.com, Last Update: 8 December 2009, http://www.missilethreat.com/missiledefensesystems/id.24/s.
“Ground-Based Midcourse Defense,” Wikipedia, Last Update: 10 February 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-Based_Midcourse_Defense.
“JFK In History: Nuclear Test Ban Treaty,” John Kennedy Library and Museum, Last Update: 5 March 2010,http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/JFK+in+History/Nuclear+Test+Ban+Treaty.htm.
“Kinetic Energy Anti-Satellite (KE ASAT),” Global Security, Last Update: 7 January 2010, http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/ke_asat.htm.
“Limited Test Ban Treaty,” Arms Control Association, Last Update: 11 March 2010, http://www.armscontrol.org/documents/LTBT.
“Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR),” The Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 15 June 2009, http://www.nti.org/e_research/official_docs/inventory/pdfs/mtcr.pdf.
“Navy Upper Tier / Navy Theater Wide (NTW),” Global Security, Last Update: 2 December 2010, http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/ntw.htm.
“Outer Space,” Wikipedia, Last Update: 6 February 2010, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space.
“PAAMS-Principal Anti-Air Missile System,” Navy Matter, Last Update: 6 December 2010, http://navy-matters.beedall.com/paams.htm.
“Preventing an Arms Race in Outer Space,” The Reaching Critical Will of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/paros/wgroup/PAROS-factsheet.pdf.
“Rocket Propellant,” Wikipedia, Last Update: 8 January 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_propellant.
“Russia and China Introduce Draft Treaty on Space Weapons,” The Acronym Institute, 6 March 2010, http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd66/66nr07.htm.
“Russia hails UN Support of Confidence-Building in Outer Space,” RIA Novosti, Last Update: 3 March 2011, http://en.rian.ru/russia/20091030/156643568.html.
“Russia Submit Draft UN Resolution against Arms Race in Space,” RIA Novosti, 21 October 2009, http://en.rian.ru/world/20091021/156538973.html.
“SAMP/T,” Thales, Last Update: 6 December 2010, http://www.thalesgroup.com/Portfolio/Defence/Air_Systems_Product_-_SAMP-T/?pid=6900.
“Space: THAAD TMD,” Global Security, Last Update: 8 January 2011, http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/thaad.htm.
“Space-Based Interceptor (SBI),” Global Security, Last Update: 5 December 2010, http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/sbi.htm.
“Space-based Kinetic Kill Vehicle (SBKKV),” Global Security, Last Update: 5 December 2010, http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/sbkkv.htm.
“Space-Based Missile Defense Program Crystallizing,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, Vol. 151 No. 7(16 August 1999), p. 73.
“Strategic Arms Limited Talks,” Wikipedia, Last Update: 11 March 2010, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Arms_Limitation_Talks.
“The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism,” Jewish Virtual Library, 15 July 2006, http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Terrorism?GlobalInitiative.html.
“The Outlook for National Missile Defense,” An Issue Brief from the Center for Arms Control and Non-proliferation, Last Update: 3 March 2011, http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/missiledefense/articles/outlook_missile_defense/.
“Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water (Limited Test Ban Treaty),” Secure World Foundation, Last Update: 11 March 2010, http://www.secureworldfoundation.org/siteadmin/images/files/file_109.pdf.
“U.S. to Pursue Missile Defense with South Korea,” MissileThreat com., Last Update: 29 November 2010, http://www.missilethreat.com/archives/id.7303/detail.asp.
“US Ballistic Missile Defense Timeline: 1945-2008,” Nuclear Weapon & Global Security, 24 November 2009, http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_weapons_and_global_security/missile_defense/policy_issues/us-ballistic-missile-defense.html.
“US Senator Calls For Space-Based Interceptor Missiles,” RIA Novosti, 9 April 2008, http://en.rian.ru/world/20080409/104141025.html.
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, “South Korea to Complete Missile Defense by 2012,” Defense News, 15 February 2009, http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3949088.
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, “South Korea to Complete Missile Defense by 2012,” Defense News, 15 February 2009, http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3949088.
Atomic Energy Commission, “Limited Test Ban Treaty, 1963,” Class Brain com., Last Update: 17 March 2011, http://www.classbrain.com/artteenst/publish/article_98.shtml.
Barrett, Randy, “Missile Defense: The Pentagon Steps Back,” Space News Correspondent, 11 July 2003, http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/missile_defense_030711.html.
Benson, Marynoele, “Northrop Grumman Unveils Innovative Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System for the Warfighter Community,” A Leader in Global Security, Last Update: 8 January 2011, http://www.northropgrumman.com/news/is/2006/12/110462.html.
Bradley Perrett, “Japan Considering THAAD Missile Defense,” Aviation Week, Last Update: 6 July 2009, http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/THAAD070609-2.xml&headline=Japan+Considering+THAAD+Missile+Defense.
Carroll, Conn, “Russia: New START Clearly Links Missile Reduction with Missile Defense,” The Foundry, Last Update: 16 March 2011, http://blog.heritage.org/2010/04/06/russia-new-start-clearly-links-missile-reduction-with-missile-defense/.
Carroll, James, “Preventing an Arms Race in Outer Space,” The Boston Globe, 12 May 2008, http://www.amacad.org/pdfs/ArmsRace.pdf.
Collins, James F., and Matthew Rojansky, “START is Key to Reducing the Nuclear Threat,” The Hill, 16 February 2010, http://carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=30993.
Cooper, Henry F., “Limited Ballistic Missile Strike: GPALS Comes Up with an Answer,” NATO Review, June 1992, http://www.nato.int/docu/review/1992/9203-6.htm.
Cooper, Henry F., “Making Missile Defense Matter,” The Journal of International Security, December 2007, http: www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2007/12/cooper.php.
Crail, Peter, “Six-Party Talks Stall Over Sampling,” Arms Control Association, Last Update: 5 March 2010, http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_01-02/sixpartytalksstall.
Crail, Peter, “The Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) At a Glance,” Arms Control Association, May 2005, http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/PSI.
Dinerman, Taylor, “Space Weapons: the New Debate,” The Space Review, 20 June 2005, http://www.thespacereview.com/article/394/1.
Duffy, Thomas, “Missile Defense Agency Eyeing Space-Based Interceptor Test Bed By 2012,” Inside Missile Defense, 15 September 2004, http://www.cndyorks.gn.apc.org/yspace/articles/bmd/mda_sbi_test_bed.htm. new window

Gard, Lieutenant General Robert G., and John Isaacs, “Star War Turns 25 Years Old, But Effective and Capable Missile Defense Still Elusive,” Center For Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, March 2008, http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/missiledefense/articles/star_wars_turns_25.
Global Security Organization, “Proliferation Security Initiative,” Military Forum, Last Update: 11 March 2010, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/psi.htm.
Hagen, Regina, and Jurgen Scheffran, “Is a space weapons ban feasible? Thoughts on technology and verification of arms control in space,” Disarmament Forum, Last Update: 3 March 2011, http://www.undir.org/pdf/articles/pdf-art1886.pdf.
Hughes Aircraft, “Navy Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD),” Hughesmissiles. Last Update: 2 December 2010, http://www.hughesmissiles.com/develop_programs/tbmd.htm.
Johnson, Rebecca, “Multilateral Approaches to Preventing the Weaponization of Space,” Disarmament Diplomacy, Issue No. 56 (April 2001), http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd56/56rej.htm.
Kimball, Daryl, “Six-Party at Glance,” Arms Control Association, May 2012, http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/6partytalks.
Kimball, Daryl, “U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control Agreements at a Glance,” Arsm Control Association, Last Update: 5 August 2012, http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USRussiaNuclearAgreementsMarch2010
Kimball, Daryl, and Wade Boese, “Limited Test Ban Treaty Turns 40,” Arms Control Association, October 2003, http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_10/LTBT.
Kurtus, Ron, “Statement of Work for the SDI: Space Based Interceptor,” School for Champions, Last Update: 27 November 2007, http://www.schoolforchampions.com/sdi/sbi_sow.htm.
Meier, Oliver, “Europeans Split Over U.S. Missile Plans,” Arms Control Association, Last Update: 12 January 2011, http://www.armscontrol.org/print/2333.
NISA, “Office of Global Threat Reduction,” National Nuclear Security Administration, Last Update: 15 December 2010, http://nnsa.energy.gov/gtri.
Olson, Conrad, “The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism: Progress to Date,” NTI (Working for a Safer World), 5 August 2009, http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_global_initiatives.html.
Permanent Mission of the Russia to the United Nations Office and other International, “A Non-paper by Chinese and Russian Delegation to the Conference on Disarmament: Verification Aspect of PAROS,” United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, Last update: 5 March 2010, http://www.geneva.mid.ru/speeches/34.html.
Prikhodko, Oleg, “Global Protection System: New Challenges,” International Affairs, Vol. 38 No. 11 (1992), http://dlib.eastview.com/browse/doc/19438450.
Prosser, Andrew, and Herbert Scoville, Jr., “The Proliferation Security Initiative in Perspective,” UN Conference on Disarmament, http://www.cdi.org/pdfs/psi.pdf.
RIA Novosti, “Moscow to Present Sino-Russian Space Arms Race Control Initiative,” Space War, 12 February 2008, http://www.spacewar.com/pageone/spacewar-2008-02-12.html.
Rojansky, Mathew, “Senate Set to Vote on START Treaty Today,” The Washington Post, 22 December 2010, http://carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=42183.
Rojansky, Mathew, “U.S., Russia Must Cooperate,” Politico, 1 December 2010, http://carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=42047.
Smith, Daniel, “Space War,” The Defense Monitor, Vol. XXX No. 2 (February 2001), http://www.cdi.org/dm/2001/issue2/space.html.
Spring, Baker, “Countering North Korea''s Missiles: The Missile Defense System the U.S. Should Have,” The Heritage Foundation: WebMemo #1138, June 21, 2006, http://www.heritage.org/Research/MissileDefense/wm1138.cfm.
Staff Writers, “China commander says space weapons inevitable: State Media,” Space War, 25 December 2009, http://www.spacewar.com/reports/china_commander_says_space_weapons_inevitable_state_media_999.html.
Staff Writers, “Moscow to Present Sino-Russian Space Arms Race Control Initiative,” Space War, 12 February 2008, http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Moscow_To_Present_Sino_Russian_Space_Arms_Race_Control_Iniative_999.html.
Staff Writers, “South Korea by Raytheon Patriot Air and Missile Defense Capability Upgrade,” Space Daily, 10 March 2008,http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/South_Korea_Buys_Raytheon_Patriot_Air_And_Missile_Defense_Capability_Upgrade_999.html.
Staff Writers, “US Senator Calls For Space-Based Interceptor Missiles,” Space War, Last Update: 5 December 2010, http://www.spacewar.com/reports/US_Senator_Calls_For_Space_Based_Interceptor_Missiles_999.html.
The Acronym Institute, “News Review: Russia and China Introduce Draft Treaty on Space Weapons,” Disarmament Diplomacy, Issue No. 66 (September 2002), http://www. acronym.org.uk/dd/dd66/66nr07.htm.
The Acronym Institute, “Russia-China CD Working Paper on New Space Treaty, June 27,” Disarmament Document, June 2002, http://www.acronym.org.uk/docs/0206/doc10htm.
The People Republic of China and Russian Federation, “Treaty on Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the threat or use of Force Against Outer Space Objects,” Foreign Minister of the PRC, Last Update: 6 March 2010, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjb/zzjg/jks/jkxw/P020080220634677505482.doc
Theresa Hitchens, “US Space Policy: Time to Stop and Think,” Disarmament Diplomacy, Issue No. 67 (October-November 2002),http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd67/67op2.htm.
Theresa Hitchens, “US Space Policy: Time to Stop and Think,” Disarmament Diplomacy, Issue No. 67 (October-November 2002),http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd67/67op2.htm.
Toki, Masako, “Missile Defense in Japan,” Bulltein of the Atomic Scientists, Last Update: 16 January 2009, http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/missile-defense-japan.
Trenin, Dmitri, “The Pause Button,” Foreign Policy, Last Update: 17 November 2010, http://carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=41960.
U.S. Department of Energy, “Global Threat Reduction Initiative Overview,” Global Threat Reduction Initiative, Last Update: 15 December 2010, http://eota.doeal.gov./eota/gtri/index/aspx.
Woolf, Amy F., “91139: Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I & II): Verification and Compliance Issues,” SCR Issue Brief, 22 November 1996, http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/91-139.htm.

貳、中文部份
一、書籍
Alan D. Romberg and Michael Mcdevitt原著，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，中共與飛彈防禦：美中戰略關係 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2003)。
Brain Steed原著，國防部部長辦公室翻譯，武裝衝突：現代戰爭的啟示 (台北：國防部部長辦公室，2006)。
C. W. Jenks原著，雷崧生譯，太空法 (台北：台灣商務印書館，1968)。
Dana J. Johnson, Scott Pace, and C. Bryan Gabbard原著，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，太空—國力的新選擇 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2000)。
David Marsh and Gerry Stoker原著，陳菁文等譯，陳義彥校閱，政治學方法論 (台北：韋伯出版社，1995)。
Davis R. Tanks, 國防部史政編譯室翻譯，，美國國家飛彈防禦：政策議題與技術能力 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2002)。
Eric L. Haney and Brian M. Thomse編著，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，論21世紀戰爭：超越震撼與威懾 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2010)。
Hans Binnendijk主編，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，美國軍事轉型 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2003)。
Jack Spencer原著，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，彈道飛彈威脅手冊 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2000)。
James C. Mulvenon等著，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，中共對美國軍事變革之反應 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2010)。
Jeffery R. Barnett原著，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，未來戰爭：2010年航太作戰之評估 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，1998)。
Jiemian Yang原著， National Defense University (U.S.)主編，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，中共崛起構成的挑戰—亞洲觀點 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2001)。
Joseph S. Nye Jr.原著，蔡東杰譯，美國霸權的矛盾與未來 (台北：左岸文化，2002)。
Michael D. Swaine, Rachel M. Swanger, and Takashi Kawakami原著，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，日本與彈道飛彈防禦 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2002)。
National Defense University原著，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，布希政府的戰略挑戰 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2001)。
Norman Friedman原著，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，海權太空 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2000)。
日本岡崎研究所彈道飛彈防禦小組原著，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，新核武戰略及日本彈道飛彈防禦 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2004)。
王玉民，社會科學研究方法原理 (台北：洪葉文化，1997)。
王鐵崖編著，王人傑校訂，國際法 (台北：五南圖書，1995)。
弗．謝．別洛烏斯原著，徐錦凍等譯， 20世紀軍事秘密—反導彈防禦和21世紀的武器 (北京：東方出版社，2004)。
朱幼文、馮毅、徐德池，高技術條件下的信息戰 (北京：軍事科學出版社，1997)。
朱峰，彈道導彈防禦計畫與國際安全 (上海：人民出版社，2001)。
朱國強，美國戰略導彈防禦計畫的動因 (北京：世界知識出版社，2004)。
呂亞力，政治學方法論 (台北：三民書局，1991年)。 new window

李永成，霸權的神話—米爾斯海默進攻性現實主義理論研究 (北京：世界知識出版社，2007)。
李中中譯，國防部史政編譯局譯，戰區飛彈防衛 (台北:國防部史政編譯局，1995)。
易君博，政治理論與研究方法 (台北：三民書局，1991)。 new window

林宗達，中共軍事革新之資訊戰與太空戰 (台北：全球防衛雜誌社，2002)。
林宗達，赤龍之爪—中共軍事革新之陸海空三軍暨二砲部隊 (台北:黎明文化事業，2002)。
林宗達，防衛霸權的武力 (台北：晶典文化，2004)。
林宗達，強權較勁—中共與美國飛彈攻防之外交戰略 (台北：晶典文化，2003)。
林宗達，解放軍演習報告書 (台北：尖端科技，1997)。
林宗達，震懾屈敵—中共信息戰之威懾戰 (台北：晶典文化，2005)。
林宗達，戰區飛彈防禦與台海安全 (台北：時英出版社，2000)。
金一南主編，國際戰略形勢分析 (北京：時事出版社，2009)。
美國國防部長辦公室原著，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，核生化武器擴散—威脅與回應 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2002)。
徐岩、李莉，天盾—美國導彈防禦系統 (北京:解放軍文藝出版社，2001)。
馬克-塞拉西尼著，沈旻譯，未來戰爭 (南京：南京出版社，2004)。
張永紅編著，硬戰爭：當前美國軍事實力透視 (北京：經濟管理出版社，2002)。
許禎元，政治研究方法與統計 (台北：五南圖書，1997)。
最新國防科技辭典，(北京：解放軍出版社，1993)。
喻舒曼，冷戰後美國軍事戰略思維評析 (北京：國防大學出版社，2001)。
寒天陽，中美關係敵友莫測 (香港：中國文化評論，2001)。
黃鉦堤，政治學方法論與行政分析立場 (台北：翰蘆圖書出版，2001)。
楊永明，國際安全與國際法 (台北：元照出版社，2008)。
鄒念祖等譯，為和平而戰 (台北：政大國際關係研究中心，1992)。
趙少奎編著，導彈與航天技術 (北京：中國宇航出版社，2008年)。
趙雲，外空商業化和外空法的新發展 (北京：知識產權出版社，2008)。
趙雲山，中共導彈及其戰略 (香港: 明鏡出版社，1997)。
趙魯杰、何仁學、沈方吾，美國全球霸權與中國命運 (北京：北京出版社，1999)。
蔡育岱、譚偉恩，現代國際公法精義 (台北：晶華出版社，2006)。
蔡政文，當前國際關係理論發展及其評估 (台北：蔡政文發行，1989)。 new window

二、專書論文
Michael Kugler原著, 「飛彈防禦合作與飛彈技術管制協定」，Henry Sololski主編，蕭光霈譯，管控戰略武器 (台北：國防部長辦公室，2007)。
Paul H. B. Godwin原著，「中共的國防現代化—願望與能力」，National Defense University主編，國防部史政編譯局翻譯，中共崛起構成的挑戰：亞洲觀點 (台北：國防部史政編譯局，2001)。
Stephen P. R原著，「太空軍備管制」，Hans Binnendijk主編，國防部史政編譯室翻譯，美國軍事轉型 (台北：國防部史政編譯室，2003)。
由旭、由冀，「國家導彈防禦系統與中美關係」，郝雨凡主編，限制性接觸 (北京：新華出版社，2001)。
周力行，「中共跨世紀軍力發展之研究」，南華大學第一屆亞太學術研討會 (嘉義：南華大學亞太亞研究所，1999)，頁39。
張春興，「撰寫研究報告」，張春興、楊國樞、文崇一主編，社會及行為科學研究法(下) (台北:東華書局，1994)。 new window

楊國樞，「科學研究概念」，張春興、楊國樞、文崇一主編，社會及行為科學研究法(上) (台北：東華書局，1994)。 new window

三、期刊
Brian Walters原著，黃淑芬譯，「反彈道飛彈保護傘」，國防譯粹，第28卷第7期 (2001年7月)，頁35-8。
George Le Guelte原著，王在斌譯，「美國戰略新思維：國家飛彈防禦計劃」，《國防譯粹》，第28卷第1期 (2001年1月)，頁43-8。
John G. Morgan Jr.原著，謝豐安譯，「陸、海、空國家飛彈防禦系統：飛彈三角防禦理念」，國防譯粹，第28卷第7期 (2001年7月)，頁28-34。
KDR，「094戰略核潛的露面與航母核潛並存時代」，漢和防務評論 (加拿大)，第35期 (2007年9月)，頁2。
KDR，「再看中國潛水艦的建造過程」，漢和防務評論 (加拿大)，第19期 (2006年5月)，頁27。
KDR編輯部，「實戰部署的中國巡航導彈」，漢和防務評論(加拿大)，第19期 (2006年5月)，頁8。
Larry J. Dodgen原著, 胡堯儲譯，「聯合飛彈防禦」，國防譯粹，第28卷第4期 (2001年4月)，頁60-4。
Li Bin原著，高一中譯，「美國國家飛彈防禦系統對中共戰略的影響」，國防譯粹，第28卷第7期(2001年7月)，頁19-27。
M. W. Leeuw, R.W. Busker, J. P. Langenberg, M. S. Nieuwenhuizen and R. Rumley-van Gurp等著，伊元隆譯，「二十一世紀生化武器的防護需求」，國防譯粹，第29卷第1期 (2002年1月)，頁23-5。
Maj. Todd C. Shull原著，趙復生譯，「太空作戰準則未來發展」，國防譯粹，第31卷第11期 (2004年11月)，頁12-23。
Peter B. Teets原著，黃淑芬譯，「太空計畫突顯作戰優先事項」，國防譯粹，第31卷第11期(2004年11月)，頁24-9。
William K. Lescher原著，潘彥豪譯，「因應現實世界的飛彈防禦」，國防譯粹，第28卷第10期 (2001年10月)，頁4-。
William R. Hawkins原著，唐亞屏譯，「恐怖主義、飛彈防禦及決戰」，國防譯粹，第29卷第1期(2002年1月)，頁53-7。
Wyn Bowen原著，陳嘉生譯，「歐洲國家對全球飛彈防禦計劃的思考」，國防譯粹，第28卷第11期 (2001年11月)，頁49-54。
丁樹範，「中共對美國戰區飛彈防禦的態度」，問題與研究，第38卷第11期 (1999年11月)，頁1-18。 new window

天問，「陸上自衛隊」，全球防衛雜誌，第147期 (1996年11月)，頁24-31。
王孝華，「核武器對軍隊作戰的影響」，現代軍事，第273期(1999年10月)，頁15-7。
王孝華、王瑋，「『武器發展百年路』系列專題之十：核武器」，現代軍事，第273期(1999年10月)，頁12-3。
王孝華、王瑋，「核武器的發展」，現代軍事，第273期 (1999年10月)，頁11-3。
王波、趙新國、趙輝，「美太空戰演習的啟示與建議」，中國航天 (北京)，第278期(2001年6月)，頁34-6。
王建勛，「西歐的『星際戰略』與集體安全之探討—兼論法國的『尤瑞卡』計畫」，問題與研究，第25卷第10期 (1986年7月)，頁64-73。 new window

王愛東，楊曉龍，「核武器的現狀及發展趨勢」，中國航天 (北京)，總第253期 (1999年5月19日)，頁45。
王瑋，「之不散的核戰爭幽靈」，現代軍事，第273期 (1999年10月)，頁18-9。
丘宏達，「聯合國與太空法的發展」，問題與研究，第2卷第1期 (1958年1月10日)，頁13。 new window

曲劍甫，「愛國者防空飛彈系統」，全球防衛雜誌，第73期(1990年9月)，頁38-55。
朱成祥，「美國海軍之盾—神盾戰鬥系統」，國際防衛雜誌，第8期 (1985年3月)，頁24-41。
朱長生、柴國君，「俄羅斯新一代防空導彈系統─『凱旋』S-400登場」，現代軍事 (北京)，第271期(1999年8月)，頁50-1。
朱麗華，「未來戰場上的新銳—電磁炸彈(上)」，現代兵器 (北京)，總256期 (2000年4月)，頁22-4。
何擎，「海珊之劍─今日的伊拉克國防軍力」，全球防衛雜誌，第220期(2002年12月)，頁56-62。
余澤民，「DDG-51級導引飛彈驅逐艦」，全球防衛雜誌，第15期(1985年11月)，頁66-75。
余澤民，「蘇聯彈道飛彈潛艇發展回顧」，軍事家，第13期 (1985年8月)，頁90-6。
吳戈，「倍受關注的中國載人航天飛船計劃」，現代兵器 (北京)，第258期 (2000年6月)，頁2-3。
吳惠民，「印、巴核武實力內幕分析」，國防譯粹，第26卷第2期 (1999年2月)，頁44-52。
李大中，「後冷戰時期美國飛彈防禦政策—爭辯與邏輯」，問題與研究，第39卷第5期(2000年5月)，頁45。 new window

李雪巖，「李登輝欲加入TMD」，鏡報月刊 (北京)，第260期 (1999年3月)，頁70-3。
杜立維譯，「美國彈道飛彈防衛系統」，國防譯粹，第26卷第2期(1999年2月)，頁25-30。
東旺，「中共核武器檔案」，全球防衛雜誌，第185期(2000年2月)，頁90-6。
林宗達，「中共太空戰之內涵」，共黨問題研究，第28卷第6期(2002年6月)，頁19-47。
林宗達，「中國大陸與俄羅斯推動外太空軍備管制條約的過程及困境」，展望與探索，第10卷第3期(2012年3月)，頁65-82。
林宗達，「共軍反制美國飛彈防禦之太空戰的必要性之分析」，中共研究，第45卷第11期(2011年11月)，頁93-107。
林宗達，「俄羅斯因應美國飛彈防禦之外交戰略述評」，展望與探索，第2卷第3期 (2004年3月)，頁12-35。
林宗達，「美國陸基飛彈防禦系統之發展」，軍事連線，第22期(2010年5月)，頁66-81。
林宗達，「論中共的太空戰戰略」，中共研究，第36卷第3期(2002年3月)，頁62-75。
林麗香，「後冷戰時期『中』俄美軍事合作之探討」，共黨問題研究，第26卷4期(2000年4月)，頁73-84。
直心義，「研製中的新型反戰術彈道導彈」，現代軍事，第182期 (1992年3月)，頁28-31。
邵崇章，「美國星戰防禦」，全球防衛雜誌，第57期 (1989年5月)，頁30-3。
侯權峰，「外空物體造成損害之國際責任」，問題與研究，第43卷第5期 (2004年9月-10月)，頁121-49。 new window

侯權峰，「國際太空法的基本原則」，問題與研究，第42卷第5期 (2003年9月-10月)，頁165-207。 new window

俞陽，「台灣能與中國大陸打導彈戰嗎?」，廣角鏡 (香港) ，第324期(1999年9月)，頁14-8。
施列庭，「轉型期中的日本防衛政策」，全球防衛雜誌，第124期(1994年12月)，頁34-47。
范立偉、楊健軍，「反衛星武器裝備發展探討」，飛航導彈 (北京)，第12期 (2004年12月)，頁43。
徐惠忠，「高能激光武器的毀傷機理及飛行器防禦途徑」，中國航天 (北京)，第9期 (2004年9月)，頁34。
徐興慈，「反導中的幾個問題」，中國航天 (北京)，第240期 (1998年4月)，頁39-40。
殷御龍，「戰略彈道飛彈」，全球防衛雜誌，第19期(1986年3月)，頁70-85。
高一中譯，「彈道飛彈的威脅和防禦」，國防譯粹，第26卷第2期 (1999年2月)，頁31-43。
高飛揚，「中共何故研製太空武器」，爭鳴 (香港)，總第311期 (2003年9月)，頁68-9。
高智陽，「X檔案在現—看不見的台海戰爭」，全球防衛雜誌，第215期 (2002年7月)，頁52-9。
高雄柏，「戰略透視戰區飛彈防禦」，尖端科技，第176期(1999年4月)，頁108-15。
康保東，「美軍積極準備太空作戰」，現代軍事 (北京)，第291期(2001年4月)，頁19-21。
張召忠，「TMD：是防禦還是擴散」，兵器知識，第138期(1999年4月)，頁9-11。
張立德，「我國建構飛彈防禦系統之評估(上)」，尖端科技，第187期(2000年3月)，頁54-64。
張羽譯，「戰區飛彈防禦系統發展現況」，國防譯粹，第23卷第2期(1996年2月)，頁52-60。
張明德，「由安邦預警雷達評估案看台灣彈道飛彈預警系統的建立(下)：附錄3:我國早期預警雷達可考慮的其他選項」，尖端科技，第210期(2002年2月)，頁20-7。
張明德，「由安邦預警雷達評估案看台灣彈道飛彈預警系統的建立」，尖端科技，第209期 (2002年1月)，頁16-24。
張雅君，「反彈道導彈條約爭議與中俄關係的發展」，問題與研究，第42卷第3期 (2003年5/6月)，頁27-55。 new window

郭蘅譯，「有限彈道飛彈防衛」，國防譯粹，第26卷第2期 (1999年2月)，頁16-24。
陳文光，「俄羅斯對NMD的應對措施」，中國航天 (北京)，第10期(2001年10月)，頁37。
陳文賢，「國際環境對中共核武政策發展的影響」，問題與研究，第38卷第2期(1999年2月)，頁1-17。 new window

黃大舟，「波斯彎戰爭反彈道飛彈作戰之檢討」，全球防衛雜誌，第96期 (1992年8月)，50-4。
黃河，「塵封的機密─中共光學儀器及其雷射武器回顧與展望」，全球防衛雜誌，第164期 (1998年4月) ，頁110-5。
黃雅媚譯，「中共的國際新態勢」，國防譯粹，第25卷第8期(1998年8月)，頁102。
楊教，「美國謀劃太空轟炸」，軍事文摘 (北京)，第1期 (2002年1月)，頁57。
溫德義，「防禦戰術彈道導彈的武器系統技術」，現代軍事（北京)，182期（1992年3月)，頁22-7。
溫德義，「美國戰區高空區域防禦系統簡介」，現代軍事，第219期 (1995年4月)，頁37-40。
萬緒英，「美俄加緊準備太空戰的啟示」，現代兵器 (北京)，第268期(2001年4月)，頁13-4。
粵儒，「終極截殺—戰區彈道飛彈反制：Part I」，全球防衛雜誌，第174期 (1999年2月)，頁80-8。
粵儒，「終極截殺—戰區彈道飛彈的反制：Part II」，全球防衛雜誌，第175期 (1999年3月)，頁38-45。
粵儒，「終極截殺—戰區彈道飛彈的反制：Part III」，《全球防衛雜誌》，第176期(1999年4月)，頁58-65。
葛路，「俄羅斯的防空衛士：S-300P防空導彈系統(下)」，中國航天 (北京)，第234期(1997年10月)，頁37-8。
葛路，「俄羅斯的防空衛士：S-300P防空導彈系統(上)」，中國航天 (北京)，第233期(1997年9月)，頁41-3。
遇迪，「反導利器：TMD使用的地空導彈」，兵器知識，第138期 (1999年4月)，頁12-5。
廖宏祥，「台海資訊戰爭的評估與展望」，全球防衛雜誌，第180期(1999年8月)，頁58-65。
廖宏詳、張國城，「中共解放軍對資訊戰硬體建設的準備(下)」，全球防衛雜誌，第189期 (2000年5月)，頁91-6。
熊偉，「揭開TMD的面紗」，兵器知識 (北京)，第138期(1999年4月)，頁10-11。
熊鸞祥、熊延峰，「美軍重視發展定向能武器」，現代軍事，第273期 (1999年10月)，頁49-50。
翟玉成，「還太空以和平—從布希的新空間探索計畫談起」，現代軍事 (北京)，第314期 (2004年3月)，頁12。
趙瑞安，「軌道彈道導彈的概念」，中國航天 (北京)，第1期 (2004年1月)，頁39。
劉發來，「反戰術導彈是現代防空的重要任務」，現代軍事，第184期(1992年5月)，頁41-4。
劉發來、劉麗華，「台灣研製的戰術導彈」，兵器知識 (北京) ，總第149期(2000年3月)，頁18-20。
劉鳳景、吳紅映，「美國海軍戰區導彈防禦系統」，現代軍事，第270期 (1999年7月)，頁40-2。
劉曉恩，「2002年空間系統攻防對抗技術發展態勢」，中國航天 (北京)，第5期 (2003年5月)，頁27。
編輯部，「中國紅旗導彈家族」，國際展望 (北京)，第444期 (2002年6月)，頁32。
編輯部，「台灣的導彈裝備概況」，中國航天 (北京)，總第267期(2000年6月) ，頁42。
編輯部，「在太空時代前夕看美國經濟」，問題與研究，第3卷第4期 (1959年4月15日)，頁25。
編輯部，「俄武器研製仍居世界前列」，環球軍事 (北京)，總第36期(2002年8月)，頁22-3。
編輯部，「國內軍事」，尖端科技，第214期(2002年6月)，頁110。
編輯部，「國內軍事」，尖端科技，第217期(2002年9月)，頁107。
編輯部，「電磁戰『神鞭』—微波武器」，航天，第4期 (2000年4月)，頁22。
編輯部，「對付美國NMD 俄羅斯招數多」，環球軍事 (北京)，總第10期 (2001年7月)，頁14-5。
編輯部，「彈道飛彈威脅與防禦」，全球防衛雜誌，第149期 (1997年1月)，頁15-7。
蔡裕明，「北韓核武變局與東北亞安全」，展望與探索，第1卷3期 (2003年3月)，頁89-92。
蔡裕明，「美國的軍事全球化與東亞國際安全」，國防政策評論，第2卷第3期 (2002年春季)，頁54-79。
鄭治仁，「『乾淨』的核武器—中子彈」，兵器知識 (北京)，第144期 (1999年10月)，頁245。
鄭治仁，「反彈道飛彈武器的發展特膽與趨勢」，兵器知識，第141期 (1999年7月)，頁16-8。
鄭治仁，「反彈道導彈四十年」，兵器知識，第140期 (1999年6月)，頁9-11。
鄭治仁，「反衛星武器出擊太空」，兵器知識 (北京)，第150期 (2000年4月) ，頁22-4。
鄭治仁，「太空殺手金間─俄羅斯反衛星武器」，兵器知識 (北京)，第151期 (2000年5月) ，頁32-4。
鄭治仁，「地地導彈：武器競賽新熱點」，兵器知識 (北京)，第99期(1996年1月)，頁6-8。
鄭軍，「靈活機動、便捷高效的固體彈導彈」，兵器知識 (北京)，144期(1999年10月)，頁31-3。
鄭端耀，「飛彈科技管制體制之分析」，問題與研究，第34卷第1期(1995年1月)，頁66-79。 new window

曉義，「太空作戰的未來發展趨勢」，現代兵器 (北京)，第268期(2001年4月)，頁11-12。
應天行，「砲兵火箭與砲兵飛彈的發展與回顧」，軍事家，第9期 (1985年4月)，頁91-97。
鍾堅，「電磁脈衝導彈的震撼」，尖端科技，第179期 (1999年7月)，頁78-81。
魏晨曦、馬婷婷、汪琦，「美國新太空計畫及其影響」，中國航天 (北京)，第4期 (2004年4月)，頁34。
蘇武，「由珠海航空展看俄『中』軍事合作前景」，全球防衛雜誌，第198期(2001年2月) ，頁1-3。

四、報紙
「『中』俄齊聲表明反對ＴＭＤ」，中國時報，1997年3月17日，版一。
「『中俄睦鄰友好合作條約』全文」，聯合報，2001年7月17日，版十三。
「『歐洲巨嬰』觸怒美國」，人民日報，2000年12月22日，版七。
「1999年中俄聯合聲明」，人民日報(北京)，1999年12月11日，版一。
「EU促美放棄部署NMD」，聯合報，2001年3月8日，版十一。
「小布希面前的新課題—歐美『歐美安全紐帶』」，光明日報，2201年2月6日，版四。
「中子彈有限核戰利器」，中國時報，1999年7月16日，版十四。
「中共三年內可改良核彈」，中國時報，1999年5月23日，版十四。
「中共可能從事武器擴散交易」，中國時報，1999年2月11日，版十四。
「中共決發展防衛反擊體系增撥八百人民幣充實戰力」，中國時報，1999年10月25日，版十四。
「中共供應飛彈科技給伊朗等四國」，聯合報，2001年9月9日，版十二。
「中共宣佈擁有製造中子彈能力」，工商時報，1999年7月16日，版十。
「中共宣稱擁有中子彈技術」，中國時報，1999年7月16日，版十四。
「中共研發攻擊美國衛星武器」，中國時報，1998年11月4日，版十四。
「中共研發新型東風三十一型飛彈」，中國時報，1998年7月23日，版十四。
「中共致力太空軍事強權」，中國時報，1998年12月30日，版十四。
「中共飛彈襲美美無法擊毀」，中國時報，1999年9月7日，版十四。
「中共將試射東風31洲際飛彈」，中央日報，1999年6月29日，版十。
「中共揚言：會調整軍事部署」，中國時報，1999年1月25日，版一。
「中共發展摧毀美國衛星武器」，工商時報，1998年11月4日，版八。
「中共開發輕量型多彈頭新式核彈」，聯合報，1993年10月24日，版一。
「中共擴武飛彈可直攻美國心臟」，中央日報，1999年6月15日，版十。
「中俄睦鄰友好條約」，大公報(香港)，2001年7月17日，版二。
「中俄簽署北京宣言」，大公報 (香港)，2000年7月19日，版二。
「中國東風三十一型飛彈最快下週試射」，自由時報，1999年6月29日，版十。
「中國對核裁軍將更謹慎」，香港文匯報 (香港)，2000年7月10日，版一。
「中華人民共和國主席和俄羅斯聯邦總統關於反導問題的聯合聲明」，人民日報(北京)，2000年7月19日，版一。
「五到十年間中國會有顯著改變」，中國時報，1999年6月30日，版十四。
「反制美國中共更新導彈潛艇」，中國時報，1999年12月7日，版一。
「孔繁定—建立防禦彈道飛彈系統是建軍重點」，中國時報，1999年1月13日，版十三。
「世紀之交的中俄關係(1998年中俄高級會晤結果聲明)」，人民日報(北京)，1998年11月25日，版一。
「世紀之交的中俄關係(1998年中俄高級會晤結果聲明)」，人民日報(北京)，1998年11月25日，版一。
「包威爾訪歐引來失望」，中國時報，2001年3月2日，版九。
「北京1988年曾試爆中子彈」，中央日報，1999年7月18日，版十。
「北京打中子彈牌國際痛批黷武」，中央日報，1999年7月17日，版十。
「北京宣佈擁有中子彈技術美國媒體認係對台灣」，中國時報，1999年7月17日，版十四。
「北京曾六度試爆中子彈」，中國時報，1999年5月16日，版十四。
「北京擴武飛彈可直攻美心臟」，中央日報，1999年6月15日，版10。
「布什上台美歐矛盾顯現」，大公報 (香港)，2001年2月7日，版三。
「布什訪歐不輕鬆美法歧見難合」，人民日報，2001年6月14日，版三。
「布什調整政策美歐縮小分歧」，文匯報 (上海)，2001年6月17日，版二。
「布希，我們不要NMD！」，文匯報 (上海)，2001年6月12日，版二。
「布希北約高峰會致詞爭取支持NMD」，中國時報，2001年6月14日，版十。
「布希會見施洛德部署NMD、京都議定書各持己見」，聯合報，2001年3月31日，版十一。
「布希與布萊爾情誼恐不如前兩任」，中國時報，2001年2月5日，版十。
「多彈頭導彈北京年底前試射」，中國時報，1999年6月12日，版十四。
「江澤民：ＴＭＤ將使中美關係嚴重倒退」，中國時報，1999年3月3日，版四。
「考克斯報告摘要」，聯合報，1999年5月26日，版十三。
「東風三十一部署大陸南方」，聯合報，1999年11月6日，版十三。
「林中斌：應重視中第三波武力」，中國時報，1999年6月1日，版十四。
「林中斌—應重視中共第三波武力」，中國時報，1999年6月1日，版十四。
「法外長批美片面主義」，聯合報，2001年8月30日，版十一。
「南韓決部署PAC-3飛彈」，中國時報，2000年3月22日，版十三。
「南韓決購神盾發展大洋海軍」，中國時報，2002年7月25日，版十三。
「南韓表明拒絕加入TMD」，中國時報，1999年3月6日，版一。
「既不安又不滿」，人民日報，2001年2月4日，版三。
「美、日、台、韓如果部署ＴＭＤ將使共軍飛彈作戰能力失效」，中國時報，1999年5月2日，版十四。
「美反飛彈飛機將配備雷射砲」，中國時報，2002年7月21日，版12。
「美英梯陣被控從事經濟間諜」，中國時報，2001年5月30日，版十。
「美英—蜜月結束了」，文匯報 (香港)，2001年2月12日，版四。
「美梯陣系統一從事經濟間諜活動」，中國時報，2000年7月6日，版十一。
「美梯陣截密觸怒法國」，中國時報，2000年7月6日，版十。
「美歐的四大分歧」，文匯報 (香港)，2001年6月15日，版四。
「美歐磋商疑團未消」，人民日報，2001年6月15日，版三。
「美歐關係新障礙」，人民日報，2001年4月25日，版三。
「英媒體指稱：北京威脅如將台灣納入TMD 中共不排除轉移飛彈技術給國」，中國時報，199年2月7日，版四。
「唐飛—建反飛彈系統政策不會突變」，聯合報，1999年2月2日，版四。
「珠海航展閉幕『中』俄軍事合作更緊密」，聯合報，2000年11月13日，版十三。
「神舟升空俄出力不少」，中國時報，2003年10月13日，版十三。
「採購神盾級軍艦表示台灣進一步參與TMD」，中國時報，1998年12月1日，版三。
「部署NMD倫斯斐—歐洲已理解」，聯合報，2001年6月11日，版十一。
「華府示好歐洲難除NMD顧慮」，聯合報，2001年4月26日，版十一。
「華謀突破美日防導網」，星導日報，1999年2月18日，版六；「中共加速研發多彈頭飛彈」，中國時報，1999年2月7日，版一。
「想補籬笆禮物太差」，文匯報 (北京)，2001年6月12日，版二。
「歐洲英法德義民調多數給布希噓聲」，聯合報，2001年8月17日，版十一。
「導彈防禦系統中共也正在研發」，中國時報，1999年11月1日，版十四。
「環保、NMD議題布希斬獲有限」，聯合報，2001年6月18日，版十一。
Bates Gill, 「改革開放下的中共反武器擴散政策」，中國時報，1999年4月7日，版十四。
丁樹範，「中共發展東風31型遂行核武威嚇」，中央日報，1999年8月5日，版十。
朱夢魁，「美歐戰略觀之爭」，人民日報，2002年8月20日，版三。
林中斌，「反制電磁脈衝不可勝者守也」，聯合報，1999年8月13日，版十五。
趙竹成，「中國為主軸次體系國際上漸形成」，聯合報，2000年7月16日，版十五。
謝清志，「台灣反飛彈宜結合太空計劃」，自由時報，2000年1月8日，版四。
鐘敏，「展示新型導彈威力」，大公報 (香港)，1999年8月4日，版二。

五、網路資料
「中俄元首莫斯科聯合聲明」，人民日報(海外版)，2001年7月17日(版一), http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/paper39/3800/461311.html.
「印度在發展低軌道『衛星殺手』誓保『太空資產』」，人民網 (北京)，Last Update: 10 October 2010, http://scitech.people.com.cn/BIG5/10717156.html.
「近地軌道衛星」，維基百科，Last Update: 10 October 2010, http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E4%BD%8E%E8%BB%8C%E9%81%93%E8%A1%9B%E6%98%9F
「美THAAD可攔截射程3500公里彈道飛彈」，中國評論新聞網，2009年10月12日，http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1011/0/1/1/101101196.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=101101196.
「媒體稱美國正援助台灣升級反導預警系統」，人民網，2009年9月11日http://tw.people.com.cn/BIG5/10035798.html.
俞智敏編譯，「美韓軍演北韓祭核武恫赫」，自由時報，2010年7月25日，http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jul/25/today-int1.htm.
姜遠珍，「南韓分析北韓將可能用核武於電磁脈衝彈」，新唐人電台，2009年6月26日，http://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2009/06/26/a310026.html.
洪哲政，「性能提升﹗愛國者三型飛彈抵台部署南港」，聯合晚報，Last Update: 12 April 2012,http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT1/7004439.shtml.
啟元，「傳聞中的殺手武器—打破電子脈衝的迷思」，全球防衛雜誌，第254期(2005年10月)，http://www.diic.com.tw/mag/mag254/254-44.htm.
劉泳暐，「南韓軍演射實彈北韓嗆動核武」，台視新聞，2010年12月24日，http://www.ttv.com.tw/099/12/0991224/099122443125011.htm.
鍾錦隆，「林郁芳：愛國者三型飛彈防禦系統構成北、中、南防禦網」，中央廣播電台，Last Update: 12 April 2012, http://news.rti.org.tw/index_newsContent.aspx?nid=231264.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	從現實主義分析俄羅斯外交政策演變
2.	第七屆金門縣長選舉選民投票行為之研究
3.	中華世界「多層次治理」的歷史實踐--以越南阮氏王朝肇建為例
4.	資訊反饋與休閒行為之研究(1)
5.	以西漢前期對胡越之行動檢視攻勢現實主義
6.	中國涉外關係的政策選項--以明代廷議征伐安南的歷史實踐為例
7.	提升國軍災害防救應變作為之研究
8.	我國特別權力關係之演變：歷史制度主義的觀點
9.	國民小學校長政治領導行為之研究--以桃竹苗四縣市為例
10.	克勞塞維茲《戰爭論》之軍事教育觀點
11.	從中國大陸物權立法看中共意識形態之轉變
12.	我國第三部門法制規範之歷史制度分析
13.	中共地方警務改革研析：理論與實務
14.	社群、典則與當局：大學生政治支持穩定與變遷的邏輯
15.	古柏坦對現代奧運會中的民族主義之認知與作為

1.	運用灰關聯分析法建構共軍高層領導人事甄補之研究
2.	中共「海洋強國」戰略研究（2000-2018 ）—意圖、能力、行為之分析
3.	論島嶼制度之法理與實踐：以中國大陸南沙島礁填礁建島為例
4.	中國對非洲的援外政策：內容、特色與成效
5.	中共江澤民與胡錦濤時期軍隊政治工作之比較研究 -以「三戰」及「非戰爭軍事行動政治工作」為例
6.	毛澤東外交思想與政策之研究
7.	行政院組織改造之研究─歷史制度主義的觀點
8.	南海油氣資源共同開發之國際法研究
9.	中共意識形態的政權建構：經濟基礎與專政理論之探討
10.	李登輝政府1996台海危機管理模式分析
11.	美國與中共軍事交往之研究（1979-2015）：從戰略合作到風險管控
12.	威脅認知與國家行為:一種區域安全複合體理論觀點
13.	美中戰略競合對我國國家安全戰略影響之研究：新古典現實主義的觀點
14.	中國轉變的鍥機：清季自強運動（1860~1894）之研究
15.	蔣中正總統反攻大陸政策：計畫與實踐

1.	竊盜犯罪防治學：原理與策略
2.	中國大陸能源治理之研究(1993~2014)：以「和諧世界觀」為例
3.	中國大陸移民在澳門社會中身分認同之研究1949~2013
4.	文化治療
5.	蘇學中用：中共軍事思想中蘇聯戰略根源
6.	政治行銷
7.	美中強權博弈 : 互賴理論之分析
8.	南海衝突下的臺灣海軍戰略
9.	以小勝出：臺灣安全的抉擇與困境
10.	胡錦濤時期文武關係的持續與變遷
11.	成語的隱喻藝術
12.	歐洲聯盟東擴之研究 : 從國際社會化的途徑分析
13.	文學詮釋學
14.	兩岸是人為造成的制度 : 以建構主義為本體論的新制度分析
15.	領袖的聲音 : 兩岸領導人政治語藝批評,1906-2006

無相關著作

1.	公安在中共反腐執行角色之研究
2.	「歷史若文學」的再思考--海頓．懷特與歷史語藝論
3.	「文本」與「真實」的概念--試論德希達對傳統史學的沖擊
4.	後現代主義的弔詭
5.	中共中央紀檢組織反腐功能研究-以偵辦陳良宇案為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫