:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:犯罪現場勘察人員勘察思維型態及勘察工作之實證研究
作者:許敏能
作者(外文):Hsu, Min-Neng
校院名稱:中央警察大學
系所名稱:犯罪防治研究所
指導教授:林燦璋、廖有祿
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:現場勘察人員犯罪現場勘察勘察工作表現思維型態crime scene investigatorthinking styleperformance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
摘要
本論文突破傳統重視專業技術研究,從現場勘察人員著手,提供另一研究面向。主要目的在調查國內現場勘察人員的背景、工作現況及其表現;瞭解國內現場勘察人員的勘察思維型態及差異;檢視勘察思維型態與勘察工作表現之間的關係;以及解析現場勘察人員的背景特性和勘察工作現況,對於勘察工作表現的影響情形。
為達研究目的,本文以臺灣地區各警察單位,現職為執行現場勘察工作的人員為對象,採普查的方式,進行全面性問卷調查研究;經施測後,總計回收821份問卷,檢視刪除作廢問卷42份,有效問卷779份,有效率為94.88%。所得資料運用因素分析、邏輯斯廻歸分析及區別分析等統計方法進行處理與分析。
研究結果發現:一、在現場勘察工作方面:(一)國內勘察人員大多有合宜的工作態度、足夠的研發技術能力、適當的工作量、高度的工作滿意和家人支持、及頗受單位肯定,惟多數人員勘察年資淺及認為工作辛苦;(二)不同背景特性的勘察人員,在勘察工作現況及表現上會有顯著差異;另勘察工作表現亦會隨著工作現況的不同而有顯著差異;(三)不同背景特性及工作現況,會影響勘察人員的工作表現;二、在勘察思維型態方面:(一)國內現場勘察人員的勘察思維型態計有五種類型,分別為「創造型」、「挑戰型」、「分析型」、「程序型」及「技巧型」思維型態;其中,勘察人員認為「創造型」最重要,「技巧型」相對最不受重視;「挑戰型」最被勘察人員廣泛使用,「技巧型」運用最少;思維型態複雜度,以「創造型」最大,「程序型」最小;(二)不同背景特性、勘察工作現況及表現的勘察人員,傾向運用的勘察思維型態有明顯的差異;(三)現場勘察人員傾向運用的思維型態不同,會影響其勘察工作表現;其中,近3年考績特優的勘察人員,傾向運用思維型態依序為「挑戰型」及「分析型」;自覺績效良好的勘察人員,傾向運用思維型態由高至低為「創造型」、「挑戰型」及「分析型」。
研究結果提供實務單位在勘察人員和工作管理、勘察制度及教育訓練參考;同時後續學術研究,可依本論文研究成果結合警察知識管理技術,進一步研發及運用。
關鍵字:現場勘察人員、犯罪現場勘察、勘察工作表現、思維型態
Abstract
Since what one had done or his work performance is influenced by his perception, and the factors that affect crime scene investigation task are professional ability, knowledge, working experience and etc. the research is focus on the performance of crime scene investigators.
The purposes of the research are as followed:
1. To examine the crime scene investigators’ investigation status and performance.
2. To investigate the thinking styles of crime scene investigators in Taiwan.
3. To examine the relationship between thinking styles and performance in Taiwan.
4. To analysis the effect about the background and working status to the performance of crime scene investigators in Taiwan.
A total number of 779 valid questionnaires out of 821 copies were distributed and collected from crime scene investigators who work in the crime scene investigation unit. The research results are illustrated as followed:
1. Crime scene investigators with different backgrounds would result in significant difference in the investigation status and performance.
2. In the difference of the investigation status and performance are significant.
3. Crime scene investigators who come from different background and task status would influenced the performance of crime scene investigation.
4. There are five dimensions for crime scene investigators’ thinking style in Taiwan, including Creative style, Challenging style, Concept method style, Procedure method style and Skill style. In the difference of the crime scene investigators’ thinking styles and factors are significant.
5. Crime scene investigators’ thinking style will affect their performance; excellent crime scene investigators are willing to utilize Challenging and Concept method style.
The findings of the research are provided to academic institution as references to employ, educate and train crime scene investigators in the future.
Key words: crime scene investigator, thinking style, performance.
參考文獻
中文部分
王宜安(2008),中天新聞部員工認知之領導型態、工作滿意度與組織公民行為之關聯性研究,銘傳大學傳播管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
內政部警政署(2006),刑事鑑識規範,內政部警政署頒行。
內政部警政署(2008),警察偵查犯罪手冊,內政部警政署頒行。
江美惠(2012),工作投入與工作滿足對工作績效的影響-以A券商中部地區業務員為例,逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
李俊億譯(2003),犯罪現場-李昌鈺刑事鑑定指導手冊,商周出版。
李偉俊(2011),美塔學-一個統合後設認知與創造力的創新理論構想,教育資料與研究雙月刊,第100期,頁75-98。new window
李素卿譯(2003),認知心理學,五南圖書出版。
吳復新(2003),人力資源管理,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
林吉鶴(1995),犯罪偵查理論,宏星文具印刷公司。new window
林燦璋、林茂雄合編(2000),刑事警察,警察百科全書第7 冊,正中書局。
林俊彥、施秀賢、許敏能(2004),電動噴漆槍協助指紋及微弱血跡痕跡顯現採取,2004年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁31-35。
林博億(2008),工作特性、領導風格對員工工作滿意度與工作績效之相關研究-以半導體設備商為例,國立成功大學在職專班碩士論文。
周俊銘、許敏能(2004),人體小腿上可疑車禍撞擊傷,2004年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁61-63。
周俊銘、許敏能、施秀賢(2004),微物跡證採證的省思,2004年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,頁15-17。
施俊堯(2005),犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁70。
施秀賢、許敏能、謝松善(2003),封鎖線外的破案關鍵,2003年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁19-22。
施秀賢、林文煜、許敏能、郭蓬生(2005),樹脂指紋,2005年鑑識科學討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁29-34。
翁景惠(2000),現場處理及重建,書佑文化事業公司。
許敏能(1994),由實務案例探討現場重建技巧,1994年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁177-182。
許敏能、張雍制、謝松善(1996),以辛普森殺妻案為例探討刑案現場之處理,1996年偵查與鑑識研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁29-42。
許敏能、李子文、謝松善(1997),物證與肇事逃逸車輛關聯性,1997年科學警察學術研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁110-115。
許敏能、林俊彥(2003),轉移血跡型態特殊問題之研究,2003年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁61-63。
許敏能、林文煜、陳詰昌(2004),關鍵字條及大花咸豐草,2004年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁19-21。
許敏能、林文煜、陳子凌(2004),離奇電梯命案,2004年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁9-11。
許敏能、陳俞仰、施秀賢(2005),罕見的褲子褲管內面上機車變速桿印痕,2005年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁25-28。
許敏能、施秀賢、陳躍翔(2005),反射式紫外光影像系統增顯指紋之探討,2005年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁373-378。
許敏能、施秀賢、陳躍翔(2005),以高階掃描器配合影像強化應用於指紋採證之探討,2005年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁379-384。
許敏能、楊宗翰(2006),棄置山區屍體搜尋方法之探討,2006年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁323-332。
許敏能、林文煜、陳躍翔(2006),非他殺之頸部多條線狀勒痕,2006年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁333-337。
許敏能、施秀賢、陳躍翔(2006),嫌犯戴手套作案現場的指紋蒐證,2006年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁319-322。
許敏能、施秀賢(2008),疑似自行絞死案件之現場調查,2008年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁339。
莊忠進(2003),論案情研判,警專學報,第3卷第4期,頁145-151。new window
陳振東、林靜珊(2008),應用模糊語意計算於員工績效評估模式建構之研究,人文暨社會科學期刊,4(1),頁35、37。new window
陳躍翔、許敏能、施秀賢(2007),車禍死亡案現場道路證據之探討,2007年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁253-256。
曾咸超(2008),工作滿意與績效關性之研究-以刑事警察局為例,政治大學社會科學學院行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
曾春僑、周俊銘、許敏能、謝松善(2003),無屍命案之現場勘查及採證,2003年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁11-13。
黃富源 (2008),司法心理學的議題及難題,檢察新論,第3期,頁118-137。new window
黃壬鍵、許敏能(2008),證人證詞真實性之探討—以本局轄內孩童墜樓案為例,2008年鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁331-338。
張婷婷、陸洛、郭靜宜(2012),工作資源對工作-家庭衝突及工作表現之影響,組織與管理,5(2),頁139。new window
張耀文、許敏能、謝松善(2003),以邏輯思維重建火災刑案現場,2003年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁27-29。
蔡麗珍(2007),不同屬性照顧服務員工作投入、工作滿足、工作表現相關因素之探討-以中部某教學醫院為例,亞洲大學長期照護研究所碩士論文。
鄭厚(2001),犯罪偵查學,一成印刷公司。
駱宜安主編(2001),刑事鑑識,警察百科全書第12冊,正中書局。
駱宜安等合著(2007),刑事鑑識概論,中央警察大學。
駱宜安(1995),刑事鑑識學,明文書局。
謝松善、許敏能、尤啟忠(2004),血跡型態鑑定案例研究,2004年犯罪偵查與鑑識科學研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁27-29。
謝松善、許敏能、尤啟忠(1995),車禍肇事逃逸案件現場及採證案例研究,1995年偵查與鑑識研討會論文集,中央警察大學,頁31-34。

英文部分
Adderley, R., Townsley, M. & Bond, J. (2007) Use of Data Mining Techniques to Model Crime Scene Investigator Performance, Knowledge-Based Systems, 20, pp. 170-176.
Amabile, T. M.(1983)The social psychology of creativity, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Archbold, C. A. (2005) Managing the Bottom Line: Risk Management in Policing, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(1), pp. 30-48.
Bernstein, E. (2005) Science in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis, International Association of Bloodstain Pattern Analysts News, 21(4), pp. 17-18.
Biloslavo, R. (2005) Use of Knowledge Management Framework as a Tool for Innovation Capability Audit, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 2, pp. 402–424.
Cao, L. & Zhao, j. S. (2005) Confidence in the Police in Latin America, Journal of Criminal Justice,33, pp. 403-412.
Chisum, W. (2001) The Past, Present, and Future of Criminalistics, Science & Justice, 41(1), pp. 55-61.
Chisum, W. J. & Turvey, B. E. (2000) Evidence Dynamics: Locard’s Exchange Principle & Crime Reconstruction, Journal of Behavioral Profiling, 1(1), p. 3.
Chisum, W. J. & Turvey, B. E. (2007) Crime Reconstruction, Elsevier Academic Press.
Churchill, G. A., Ford, N. M., Hartely, S. W., & Walker, O. C.(1985)The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, pp. 103-108.
Cunningham, A., Walters, A., Hales, S. & Futers, C. (2001) Forensic Science and The Crime Scene, Science & Justice, 41(4), pp. 279-286.
Dean, G. (2000) The Experience of Investigation for Detectives, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A. & Gottschalk, P. (2006) Profiling Police Investigative Thinking: A Study of Police Officers in Norway, International Journal of the Sociology of Law , 34, pp. 112-121.
Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A. & Gottschalk, P. (2007) In Search of Police Investigative Styles: An Exploratory Study of Detectives in Norway and Singapore, International Journal of Learning and Change, 2(1), pp. 20-32.
Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A. & Gottschalk, P. (2007) Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Police Investigative Thinking Styles, International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(1), pp. 76-87.
Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A. & Gottschalk, P. (2007) Creativity as a Determinant of Thinking Style in Police Investigative, International Journal of Police Science and Management , 9(2), pp. 112-121.
Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A., Gottschalk, P. & Solli-Sæther, H. (2008) Investigative Thinking and Creativity: An Empirical Study of Police Detective in Norway, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 5(2), pp. 170-185.
Dean, G., Fahsing, I. A., Glomseth, R., & Gottschalk, P. (2008) Capturing knowledge of police investigations: towards a research agenda, Police Practice and Research Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 341–355
Dean, G. & Staines, Z. (2011) Capturing investigative knowledge :methodological scaffolding for measuring thinking styles of police investigators.Home Team Journal, pp.120-132.
EA-5/03 Guidance for the Implementation of ISO/IEC 17020 in the Field of Crime Scene Investigation.
Fisher, B. A. J. (2004) Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation (7th) CRC Press.
Fraser, C. (2004) Strategic information systems for policing, Police Executive Research Forum, Connecticut Avenue, Washington, DC.
Gardner, R. M. (2005) Practical Crime Scene Processing and Investigation, CRC Press.
Geberth, V. J. (2006) Practical Homicide Investigation: Tactics, Procedures, and Forensic Techniques (4th) CRC Press.
Glomseth, R., Gottschalk, P. & Solli-Sæther, H. (2007) Occupational Culture as Determinant of Knowledge Sharing and Performance in Police Investigations, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 35, pp. 96-107.
Gottschalk, P. (2007) Predictors of Police Investigation Performance: An Empirical Study of Norwegian Police as Value Shop, International Journal of Information Management, 27, pp. 36-48.
Gottschalk, P. (2008) Maturity Model for Email Communication in Knowledge Organizations: The Case of Police Investigations, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 36, pp. 54-66.
Gottschalk, P. (2006) Stages of Knowledge Management Systems in Police Investigations, Knowledge-Based Systems, 19, pp. 381-387.
Gottschalk, P.(2001) Descriptions of Responsibility for Implementation: A Content Analysis of Strategic Information Systems/ Technology Planning Documents, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 68, pp. 207-221.
Harrison, K. (2006) Is Crime Scene Examination Science, and Does It Matter Anyway ?, Science & Justice, 46(2), pp. 65-68.
Horswell, J.(2004) The Practice of Crime Scene Investigation, CRC Press.
Hulme, J., & Twiss, A. (2004) Scene it - done it. New Technologies and Approaches Used at Scenes, Science & Justic, 44(3), pp. 187-193.
Jackson, A. L., & Wade, J. E. (2005) Police Perceptions of Social Capital and Sense of Responsibility: An Explanation of Proactive Policing, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(1), pp. 49-68.
James, S. H. & Nordby, J. J. (2005) Forensic Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Investigative Techniques (2nd) CRC Press.
Jamieson, A. (2004) A Rational Approach to the Principles and Practice of Crime Scene Investigation: I. Principles, Science & Justice, 44(1), pp. 3-7.
Kelley, T. M. (2005) Mental Health and Prospective Police Professionals, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(1), pp. 6-29.
Keppensa, J. & Schaferb, B. (2006) Kowledge Based Crime Scenario Modeling, Expert Systems with Applications, 30, pp. 203-222.
Lee, H. C., Palmbach, T. & Miller, M. T. (2001) Henry Lee’s Crime Scene Handbook, Academic Press.
Luen, T. W. & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2001) Kowledge Management in the Public Sector: Principles and Practices in Police Work, Journal of Information Science, 27(5), pp. 311-318.
Mennell, J. & Shaw, I. (2006) The Future of Forensic and Crime Scene Science Part I. A UK Forensic Science User and Provider Perspective, Forensic Science International, 157S, pp. S7-S12.
Margot, P. (2000) A Question of Time, Science & Justice, 40(2), pp. 64-71.
Millen, P. (2000) Is Crime Scene Investigation Forensic Science? Are Crime Scene Investigators Forensic Scientists?, Science & Justice, 40(2), pp. 125-126.
Millen, P. (2004) Crime Scene Investigation - A Defence Perspective, Science & Justice, 44(2), pp. 104-106.
Nunn, S. (2001) Police Technology in Cities: Changes and Challenges, Technology in Society, 23, pp. 11-27.
Palermo, G. B. & Kocsis, R. N. (2005) Offender Profiling : An Introduction to the Sociopsychological Analysis of Violent Crime, Charles C Thomas‧Publisher, LTD.
Ribaux, O., Walsh, S. J. & Margot, P. (2006) The Contribution of Forensic Science to Crime Analysis and Investigation: Forensic Intelligence, Forensic Science International, 156, pp. 171-181.
Saferstein, R.(1998) Criminalistics—an introduction to forensic science, Prentice-Hall, Inc., p. 6.
Staines, Z.(2013) Managing tacit investigative knowledge: measuring investigative thinking styles”, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 604-619
Sternberg R. J. (1997) Thinking Styles, Cambridge Univrsity Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE