Coleman, P. T., & R. Ferguson(2014)[2015]。解決衝突的關鍵技巧,沈耿立(譯)。台北:商周。
Luhmann, N.(2005)。信任:一個社會複雜性的簡化機制(瞿鐵鵬、李強譯 譯)。上海:上海人民出版社
Rawls, J.(2005)[1997]。再論公共理性的理念。收錄於李國維等(譯),萬民法。台北:聯經。
Schluchter, W.(1980)[1986]。理性化與官僚化—對韋伯之研究與詮釋。顧忠華(譯),台北:聯經。
Simmel, G.(2004)[1908]。社會學:關於社會化形式的研究。林榮遠(譯),北京:華夏。
何明修(2014)。邁向「公民運動」:福島事件後的台灣反核運動。2015年12月6日,取自http://goo.gl/HIWNYX。
余桂霖(2010)。結構方程式模型:專題分析。臺北:秀威。
杜文苓(2011)。環境風險與科技政治:檢視中科四期環評爭議。東吳政治學報,29(2):57-110。
周桂田(2009)。科學專業主義的治理問題-SARS、H1N1、Dioxin、BSE、elamine的管制科學與文化。醫療與社會研討會,南港,中研院社會所。
周桂田(2002)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口-遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究,45:69-122。周桂田(2013)。全球化風險挑戰下發展型國家之治理創新-以台灣公民知識監督決策為分析。政治與社會哲學評論,44:65-148。林子倫、陳亮宇(2009)。重返民主的政策科學—審議式政策分析概念意涵與途徑之探討。台灣民主季刊,6(4):1-47。邱皓政(2011)。當PLS遇上SEM:議題與對話。量化研究學刊,3(1):20-53。
施佳良、黃東益(2010)。政府信任與核廢料處置政策:以低放射性廢棄物最終處置選址政策為例。台灣政治學會2010年學術研討會,台北,東吳大學。
許文鴻(2012)。低放最終處置場選址之政策工具:多元利害關係人觀點。政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳寬裕、王正華(2013)。結構方程模型分析實務—AMOS的運用。台北:五南。
湯京平、蔡瑄庭、范玫芳(2009)。低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施候選場址地方公投之研究。行政院原子能委員會委託研究計畫(編號:97FCMA010),未出版。
黃之棟(2014)。談「核」容易?:從烏坵選址看我國當前低放射性廢棄物最終處置問題。空大人文社會學報,10(1):45-66。黃東益(2003)。民主商議與政策參與-審慎思辯民調的初探。台北:韋伯文化。黃東益(2014)。放射性廢棄物最終處置民眾關心議題蒐集與分析。行政院原子能委員會委託研究計畫研究報告(編號:1032001INER047),未出版。
黃東益、朱文妮(2015)。政府信任與低放射性廢棄物最終處置場接受度:台閩地區、台東縣與達仁鄉之比較。中國行政評論,21(1):77-110。黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。臺北:五南。
蕭代基、黃德秀(2007)。補償對鄰避現象的影響─以烏坵低放射性核廢料場址為例。2015年3月8日,取自http://goo.gl/PBBZFO。
瞿宛文(2011)。民主化與經濟發展:台灣發展型國家的不成功轉型。台灣社會研究季刊,4:243-288。Axelrod, R., & W. D. Hamilton (1981). The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, New Series, 211(4489): 1390-1396.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bickerstaff, K., I. Lorenzoni, N. F. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, & P. Simmons (2008). Reframing Nuclear Power in the UK Energy Debate: Nuclear Power, Climate Change Mitigation and Radioactive Waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2): 145-169.
Bingham, G. (1986). Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
Chung, J. B., & Kim H.-K. (2009). Competition, Economic Benefits, Trust, and Risk Perception in Siting a Potentially Hazardous Facility. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91: 8-16.
Earle, T. C. (2009). Trust, Confidence, and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Risk Analysis, 29(6): 785-792.
Earle, T. C. (2010). Trust in Risk Management: A Model-Based Review of Empirical Research. Risk Analysis, 30(4): 541–574.
Earle, T. C., & G. Cvetkovich (1999). Social Trust and Culture in Risk Management. In G. Cvetkovich & R. Löfstedt (Eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk (Pp.9-21). London: Earthscan.
Earle, T. C., & M. Siegrist (2006). Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction between Trust and Confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2): 383–416.
Earle, T. C., & M. Siegrist (2008). On The Relation between Trust and Fairness in Environmental Risk Management. Risk Analysis, 28(5): 1395–1414.
Earle, T.C., M. Siegrist, & H. Gutscher (2007). Trust, Risk Perception, and the TCC Model of Cooperation. In M. Siegrist, T.C. Earle & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty And Skepticism in the Public Mind (Pp.1–49). London, UK: Earthscan.
Fan, M.-F. (2006). Environmental Justice and Nuclear Waste Conflicts in Taiwan. Environmental Politics, 15(3): 417- 434.
Fan, M.-F. (2009). Public Perceptions and the Nuclear Waste Repository on Orchid Island, Taiwan. Public Understanding of Science, 18: 167.
Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Technical and Democratic Values in Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis, 9(3): 293–299.
Fischer F. (1993). Citizen Participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquiry to Practical Cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3): 165-187.
Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative Policy Analysis as Practical Reason: Integrating Empirical and Normative Arguments. In Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller & Mara S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, And Methods (Pp.223-236). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Hanberger, A. (2012). Dialogue as Nuclear Waste Management Policy: Can a Swedish Transparency Programme Legitimize a Final Decision On Spent Nuclear Fuel? Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 9(3): 181-196.
He, G., Arthur P. J. Mol, & L. Zhang (2013). Public Participation and Trust in Nuclear Power Development in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23: 1-11.
Heclo, H. (1972). Review Article: Policy Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 2: 83-108.
Hill, M. (2003). The Policy Process in Modern State (3rd Ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Hine, D. W., C. Summers, M. Prystupa, & A. Mckenzie-Richer (1997). Public Opposition to a Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository in Canada: An Investigation of Cultural and Economic Effects. Risk Analysis, 17(3): 293–302.
Huang, G. C-L, T. Gray, & D. Bell (2013). Environmental Justice of Nuclear Waste Policy in Taiwan: Taipower, Government, and Local Community. Environ Dev Sustain, 15: 1555–1571.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
IAEA (The International Atomic Energy Agency) (1995). The Principles of Radioactive Waste Management, Safety Series No. 111-F, A Publication within the RADWASS Programme. Retrieved from Http://Goo.Gl/Vi47fh .
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council)(2006). White Paper on Risk Governance towards an Integrative Approach. Retrieved from Https://Goo.Gl/0rdc0c.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., C. L. Silva, M. C. Nowlin, & G. Delozier (2011). Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility. Risk Analysis, 31(4): 629-644.
Johnson G. J., (2007). The Discourse of Democracy in Canadian Nuclear Waste Management Policy, Policy Sciences, 40(2): 79-99.
Jonsson P., J., K. Andersson, R. Bolado, B-M. Drottz Sjöberg, M. Elam, M. Kojo, G. Meskens, J. Pritrsky, Ph. Richardson, L. Soneryd, L. Steinerova, G. Sundqvist, B. Szerszynski, C-O. Wene, & H. Vojtechova (2010). Towards Implementation of Transparency and Participation in Radioactive Waste Management Programmes. Retrieved from Http://goo.gl/1XNEq7.
Kasperson, R., D. Golding, & P. Tuler (1992). Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48: 161-187.
Katz, S. B., & Miller, C. (1996). The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Siting Controversy in North Carolina: Toward a Rhetorical Model of Risk Communication. In C. G. Herndl & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America (pp. 111-40). Madison: University Of Wisconsin Press.
Keller, C., M. Siegrist, & T. C. Earle (2011). The General Confidence Scale: Coping with Environmental Uncertainty and Threat. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(9): 2200–2229.
Kinsella, W. J. (2004). Public Expertise: A Foundation for Citizen Participation in Energy and Environmental Decisions. In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making (pp. 83-95). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Krannich, R. S., & S. L. Albrecht (1995). Opportunity/Threat Responses to Nuclear Waste Disposal Facilities. Rural Sociology, 60(3): 435–453.
Kuhn, R. G. (1998). Social and Political Issues in Siting a Nuclear-Fuel Waste Disposal Facility in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Geographer, 42(1): 14–28.
Lasswell, H. (1951). The Policy Orientation. In D. Lerner & H. Lasswell (Eds.), The Policy Sciences (pp. 3-15). Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Uiversity Press.
Lasswell, H. (1970). The Emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1): 3-14.
Levi, M., & L. Stoker (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3: 475–507.
Lipshitz, R., Z. Gilad, & R. Suleiman (2001). The One-Of-Us Effect in Decision Evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 108(1): 53–71.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley.
Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk: A Sociological Theory. New York: De Gruyter.
Larson, Magali S. (1979). The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. University Of California Press.
Mah, D. N.-Y., P. Hills, & J. Tao (2014). Risk Perception, Trust and Public Engagement in Nuclear Decision-Making in Hong Kong. Energy Policy, 73: 368–390.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). The Second Face of Trust: Reflections on the Dark Side of Interpersonal Trust in Organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6: 87-111.
Messick, D. M. (2000). Context, Norms, and Cooperation in Modern Society: A Postscript. In M. Van Vugt, M. Snyder, T. R. Tyler & A. Biel (Eds.), Cooperation in Modern Society (pp. 231–240). New York: Routledge.
NEA (The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency) (2010). Radioactive Waste in Perspective. Retrieved From Https://Goo.Gl/7mwfcs.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, Mass.: Pearson.
Olsen, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. The American Political Science Review, 9(21): 1-22.
Perko T. (2012). Modelling Risk Perception and Risk Communication in Nuclear Emergency Management: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Retrieved From Http://Goo.Gl/K9mejc.
Petts, J. (2008). Public Engagement to Build Trust: False Hopes? Journal of Risk Research, 11(6): 821-835.
Rau, I., P. Schweizer-Ries, & J. Hildebrand (2012). The Silver Bullet for the Acceptance of Renewable Energies? In S. Kabisch, A. Kunath, P. Schweizer-Ries, A. Steinführer, (Eds.),Vulnerability, Risk and Complexitiy (pp. 177-191). Leipzig: Hogrefe.
Renn, O. (2004). The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk management. In T. L. Macdaniels & M.J. Small (Eds.), Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field (pp. 289-366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Renn, O. (2010). Risk Communication: Insights and Requirements for Designing Successful Communication Programs on Health and Environmental Hazards. In R. L. Heath and H. D. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp.81-99). Routledge, New York, NY.
Renn, O., & D. Levine (1991).Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication. Technology, Risk, And Society, 4: 175-217.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy Networks: A British Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3): 293-317.
Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, & C. Camerer (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. The Academy Of Management Review. 23(3): 393-404.
Rowan, K. E. (1994). Why Rules For Risk Communication are Not Enough: A Problem-Solving Approach to Risk Communication. Risk Analysis, 14(3): 365–374.
Rowe, G., & L. J. Frewer (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1): 3-29.
Shi, T. (2014).The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan. Cambridge University Press.
Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C., & Gutscher, H. (2003). Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks. Risk Analysis, 23: 705–716.
Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H. & Keller, C. (2007). Trust and Confidence in Crisis Communication: Three Case Studies. In M. Siegrist, T.C. Earle & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty And Skepticism in the Public Mind (Pp. 267-286). London: Earthscan.
Siegrist, M., H. Gutscher, & T. C. Earle (2005). Perception of Risk: The Influence of General Trust, and General Confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8: 145–156.
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust. Risk Analysis, 21(1): 189-198.
Sjöberg, L. (2004). Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository. Risk Analysis, 24(3): 737–749.
Sjöberg, L. (2009). Precautionary Attitudes and the Acceptance of a Local Nuclear Waste Repository. Safety Science, 47: 542–546.
Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Refl ections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 117–152). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6): 675–682.
Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4):689-701.
Slovic, P. (2012). The Perception Gap: Radiation and Risk. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(3): 67-75.
Smith, B. C. (1976). Policy Making in British Government. London: Martin Robertson.
Stewart, D. W., & M. A. Kamins (1993). Secondary Research: Information Sources and Methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations. Political Psychology, 19(3): 497-525.
Viklund, M. J. (2003). Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross-National Study. Risk Analysis, 23(4): 727-738.
Walker, G. B., & S. E. Daniels (2004). Dialogue and Deliberation in Environmental Conflict: Enacting Civic Science. In S. L. Senecah (Ed.), The Environmental Communication Yearbook (pp.135-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.