:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:風險社會:公共治理與公民參與-
作者:周桂田
出版日期:2014
出版項:臺北:五南
集叢:臺灣大學風險社會系列叢書
ISBN:9789571175775
主題關鍵詞:公共行政政治參與社會變遷
學門:社會學
資料類型:專書
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:7
期刊論文
1.王綺年(20080100)。國家角色與產業發展之連結:比較臺灣與韓國之薄膜液晶顯示器產業。東亞研究,39(1),95-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.周桂田(2010)。邁向永續產業政策的里程碑。科技、醫療與社會,11,9-12。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯承恩、戴元峰(20110100)。論遠景思維與國家「前瞻治理」。國會月刊,39(1)=453,23-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃漢華(20050601)。看完報導再決定吃不吃--華盛頓州狂牛病風暴稍歇,台灣就搶先日、韓,開放進口美國牛肉,餐廳、量販店大表歡迎,然而,這塊牛肉到底安不安全,至今猶是個問號。遠見雜誌,228。  延伸查詢new window
5.林錫俊、裴英子(20010900)。Political Economy of Industrial Transformation: The LCD and Footwear Industries in South Korea and Taiwan。Issues & Studies,37(5),35-75。new window  new window
6.Chou, Kuei-Tien、Liou, Hwa-Meei(2009)。System Destroys Trust?-Regulatory Institutions and Public Perception of Food Risks in Taiwan。Social Indicators Research,96(1),41-57。  new window
7.Cruz-Castro, Laura、Sanz-Menéndez, Luis(2005)。Politics and Institutions: European Parliamentary Technology Assessment。Technological Forecasting & Social Change,72(4),429-448。  new window
8.Hartley, Jean(2005)。Innovation in Governance and Public Service: Past and Present。Public Money and Management,25(1),27-34。  new window
9.Hendriks, Carolyn M.、Grin, John(2007)。Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: The Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability。Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning,9(3),333-350。  new window
10.Kim, Eunmee、Kim, Jiyoung(2005)。Developmental State vs. Globalization: South Korea's Developmental State in the Aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-98。Korean Social Science Journal,17(2),43-70。  new window
11.Kim, Manjae(2003)。The Role of the State in the Third Wave of Globalization in Korea。Society in Transition,34(2),338-349。  new window
12.Beck, Ulrich、Sznaider, Natan(2006)。Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda。The British Journal of Sociology,57(1),1-23。  new window
13.Chou, Kuei-Tien、Liou, Hwa-Meei(2011)。Risk and Ethic Governance of Nano-convergence Technology-A Initial Comparison of Technology Impact Assessment between South Korea and Taiwan。Asian Journal WTO & International Health Law and Policy,6(1),235-280。  new window
14.Frankenfeld, Philip J.(1992)。Technological Citizenship: A Normative Framework for Risk Studies。Science, Technology and Human Values,17(4),459-484。  new window
15.Han, Sang-Jin、Shim, Young-Hee(2010)。Redefining Second Modernity for East Asia: A Critical Assessment。The British Journal of Sociology,61(3),465-488。  new window
16.Rip, Arie(2010)。In a Third Wave of Science Studies?。Social Studies of Science,3(33),419-434。  new window
17.Rip, Arie(2010)。Social Robustness and the Mode 2 Diagnosis。Science, Technology & Innovation Studies,1(6),71-74。  new window
18.Sander, Elizabeth B. N.、Stappers, Pieter Jan(2008)。Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design。CoDesing: International Journal of CoCreation in Desing and the Arts,4(1),5-18。  new window
19.Stirling, Andrew(2007)。Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle。EMBO Reports,8(4),309-315。  new window
20.Voß, Jan-Peter、Smith, Adrian、Grin, John(2009)。Designing Long-term Policy: Rethinking Transition Management。Policy Sciences,42(4),275-302。  new window
21.Nakagawa, Yoshinori、Shiroyama, Hideaki、Kuroda, Kotaro、Suzuki, Tatsujiro(2010)。Assessment of Social Implications of Nanotechnologies in Japan: Application of Problem Structuring Method Based on Interview Surveys and Cognitive Maps。Technological Forecasting & Social Change,77(4),615-638。  new window
22.Wang, Jenn-Hwan(2007)。From Technological Catch-up to Innovation-based Economic Growth: South Korea and Taiwan Compared。Journal of Development Studies,43(6),1084-1104。  new window
23.劉華美、周桂田(20051200)。開放性風險評估芻議--以歐盟科技決策評估程序之反省為討論。臺灣科技法律與政策論叢,2(4),73-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Chou, Kuei-Tien(2009)。Reflexive Risk Governance in Newly Industrialized Countries。Development and Society,43(1),57-90。  new window
25.Jasanoff, Sheila(2003)。Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science。Minerva,41(3),223-244。  new window
26.周桂田(20070400)。Public Trust and Risk Perceptions: A Preliminary Study of Taiwan's GMOs, 2003-2004。科技、醫療與社會,4,151-178。new window  new window
27.Hoppe, Robert(1999)。Policy analysis, science and politics: from "speaking truth to power" to "making sense together"。Science and Public Policy,26(3),201-210。  new window
28.周桂田(2007)。Biomedtech island project and risk governance: paradigm conflicts within a hidden and delayed high-tech risk society。Soziale Welt,58(2),123-144。  new window
29.吳嘉苓、曾嬿芬(20060600)。SARS的風險治理:超越技術模型。臺灣社會學,11,57-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Park, Bae-Gyoon(2005)。Spatially selective liberalization and graduated sovereignty: Politics of neo-liberalism and 'special economic zones' in South Korea。Political Geography,24(7),850-873。  new window
31.周桂田(20070900)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論,22,179-233。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究季刊,45,69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.周桂田(20000900)。生物科技產業與社會風險--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究季刊,39,239-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.劉華美(20091200)。科技評估與民主:韓國科技評估組織之法制與程序。政治科學論叢,42,137-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.陳東升(20060300)。審議民主的限制--臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊,3(1),77-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Kim, Yun Tae(2007)。The Transformation of the East Asian States: From the Developmental State to the Market-oriented State。Korean Social Science Journal,34(1),49-78。  new window
37.Shiroyama, Hideaki(2010)。Limits if past practices and possible future institutionalization of TA in Japan。Technihfolgenabschatzung - Theorie und Praxis,2(19)。  new window
38.Chang, Kyung-Sup(2010)。The second modem condition? Compressed modernity as internalized reflexive cosmopolitization。The British journal of sociology,61(3),444-464。  new window
39.王振寰(20071200)。從科技追趕到創新的經濟轉型:南韓、臺灣與中國。臺灣社會研究季刊,68,177-226。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.杜文苓(20110600)。環境風險與科技決策:檢視中科四期環評爭議。東吳政治學報,29(2),57-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Baogang, He、Warren, Mark(2010)。Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development。Workshop on the Cultural Sources of deliberative Politics in East Asia,(會議日期: 2010, May 1-2)。Shanghai:Fudan University。  new window
2.Chou, Kuei-Tien、Liou, Hwa-Meei(2010)。Risk and Ethic Governance of Nano-convergence Technology - A Initial Comparison of Technology Impact Assessment between South Korea and Taiwan。International Conference on Risk and Regulatory Science,(會議日期: 2010/08/12)。Taipei:Taiwan University。  new window
3.Shiroyama, Hideaki、Yoshizawa, Go、Matsuo, Miyako、Suzuki, Tatsujiro(2010)。Institutional Options and Operational Issues in Technology Assessment: Lessons from Experiences in the United States and Europe。Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting with JSSTS,(會議日期: 2010/08/25-08/29)。Tokyo:University of Tokyo。  new window
4.Yoshizawa, Go(2010)。Challenges for Institutionalization of New Generations of Technology Assessment。Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting with JSSTS,(會議日期: 2010/08/25-08/29)。Tokyo:University of Tokyo。  new window
5.Delvenne, Pierre(2010)。Parliamentary Technology Assessment Institutions as Indications of Reflexive Modernization。The Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting with JSSTS,(會議日期: 2010/08/25-08/29)。Tokyo:University of Tokyo。  new window
6.朱雲漢(2011)。王道思想與世界秩序重組。「王道文化與公義社會」研討會,國立中央大學/中華文化總會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
7.周桂田(2009)。科學專業主義的治理問題--SARS、H1N1、Dioxin、BSE、Melamine的管制科學與文化。醫療與社會研討會。中研院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.翁啟惠(2011)。前瞻未來與永續發展。面對公與義.邁向永續研討會。余紀忠文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
9.Shiroyama, Hideaki、Yoshizawa, Go、Matsuo, Miyako、Hatanaka, Ritsuko(2010)。Activities without institutionalization: Limits and lessons of TA and TAlike activities in Japan。Society for social studies of science annual meeting with JSSTS。Tokyo:University of Tokyo。  new window
研究報告
1.章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2011)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第六期第一次調查計畫執行報告。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅仰止、張晉芬(2007)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第五期第二次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 95-2420-H-001-006-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.OECD(2003)。Emerging Systemic Risks, Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
學位論文
1.簡凱倫(2011)。論風險社會下的環評制度與法院--司法系統與社會脈絡的相互建構(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊智元(2009)。毒奶粉的風險論述分析與三聚氰胺的管制爭議(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Boyle, David、Slay, Julia、Stephens, Lucie(2010)。Public Services Inside Out: Putting Co-production into Practice。London:The Lab, Nesta。  new window
2.Miller, Henry I.(1996)。When Politics drives Science: Lysenko, Gore, and U.S. Biotechnology Policy。Scientific Innovation, Philosophy, and Public Policy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Renn, Ortwin(2008)。Risk Governance。London:Earthscan。  new window
4.Beck, Ulrich(1986)。Risikogesellschaft--Auf dem Weg in einen andere Modeme。Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp。  new window
5.Beniger, James R.、俞灝敏、邱辛曄(1998)。控制革命:資訊社會的技術和經濟起源。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
6.瞿宛文、安士敦(2003)。超越後進發展:台灣的產業升級策略。台北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bell, Daniel(1995)。後工業社會的來臨。台北市:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
8.Castells, Manuel、夏鑄九(1998)。網絡社會之崛起。臺北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Jasanoff, Sheila(1990)。The Fifth Branch: Science Adviser as Policymakers。MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Weiss, L.(1998)。The myth of the powerless state: Governing the economy in the global era。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
11.前瞻社(2010)。政策前瞻的思維。前瞻社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Barber, B.(1995)。Starke Demokratie - Uber die Teilhabe am Politischen。Hamburg:Rotbuch Verlag。  new window
13.Bason, Christian(2010)。Leading Public Sector Innovation - Co-creatingfor a better society。Policy Press。  new window
14.Jasanoff, Sheila(2004)。States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order。Routledge。  new window
15.Polanyi, Karl、黃樹民、石佳音、廖立文、陳忠信、吳乃德(1989)。鉅變:當代政治、經濟的起源。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.Jasanoff, Sheila(2005)。Design on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Löfstedt, Ragnar E.(2002)。The precautionary principle: risk, regulation and politics,Oxford:Merton College。  new window
其他
1.公視新聞議題中心(2011)。「學界反對國光石化開發案」記者會實況轉播,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=5578。  延伸查詢new window
2.自由時報(20120307)。顧健康、顧生計、顧民主的人還能再緘默?。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院國家科學委員會(2008)。中部科學園區四期用地遴選結果公布,http://web1.nsc.gov.tw/ctpda.aspx?xItem=10446&ctNode=75&mp=8。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋健生(20090305)。中興新村--變身高等研究園區。  延伸查詢new window
5.施月英(20091111)。中科四期開發案--政府為民眾做了甚麼努力。  延伸查詢new window
6.唐在馨,陳品竹(20100112)。黎明新村.中央想賣.地方要留。  延伸查詢new window
7.許育典(20120309)。牛機爭議.依法行政亂了套。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳鳳麗(20091030)。阻工研院落腳921公園.地方將串聯。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳鳳麗(20101106)。中興園區排水缺對策.環評再踢鐵板。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳鳳麗(20110306)。省府大樓先核列南投縣定古蹟。  延伸查詢new window
11.管婺媛,陳文信,楊毅,朱真楷(20120307)。瘦肉精美牛有條件解禁.藍委:把我們當傻子耍。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉力仁,劉榮,唐在馨,凌美雪(20110611)。南港生技園區、中科五期--環評有條件通過。  延伸查詢new window
13.顏若瑾,張菁雅(20110105)。中科5期將環評--環團為中興新村請命。  延伸查詢new window
14.European Union(2001)。European Governance: A White Paper [Brussels, 25.7.2001 COM(2001) 428 final],http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf。  new window
15.European Union(2001)。Science, Society and the Citizen in Europe [Brussels, 14.11.2000, SEC (2000)],http://ec.europa.eu/research/area/science-society-en.pdf。  new window
16.The World Health Organization(2002)。The World Health 2002 Report: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life,http://www.who.int/entity/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf。  new window
17.European Union(2002)。Science and Society Action Plan,http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society/pdf/ss_ap_en.pdf。  new window
18.Gerold, R.,Liberatore, A.(2001)。Report of the Working Group 'Democratising Expertise and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems' (Group lb) [MAY 2001 (version finale du 2/7/01)],http://ec.europa.eu/governance/areas/group2/report_en.pdf。  new window
19.KISTEP(2005)。KISTEP Document,http://www.kistep.re.kr/index.jsp。  new window
20.Lim, Hyun(2007)。Science Times,http://www.sciencetimes.co.kr/article.do?atidx=0000020843。  new window
21.KISTEP(2004)。2003年技術影響評估報告書,http://www.kistep.re.kr/index.jsp。  延伸查詢new window
22.KISTEP(2008)。2008年技術影響推動計畫報告書,http://www.kistep.re.kr/index.jsp。  延伸查詢new window
23.Lim, Hyun(2007)。科學技術的解毒劑--技術影響評估,http://www.sciencetimes.co.kr/article.do?atidx=0000020843。  延伸查詢new window
24.(20120308)。決策荒腔走板.激起美牛政治風暴。  延伸查詢new window
25.朱淑娟(20090615)。中科四期二林園區引爆土地徵收適法性爭議,委員質疑:科學園區徵收土地公益何在,http://shuchuan7.blogspot.com/2009/06/blog-post_16.html。  延伸查詢new window
26.呂苡蓉(20091106)。中科四期區域計畫審議.爆土地徵收不公.擇期再審,http://e-info.org.tw/node/49057。  延伸查詢new window
27.(20091030)。中科四期環評結論,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/48023。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳寧(20091227)。無視相思寮居民高呼反徵收.中科四期園區.冷血動土,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/49521。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃慧珊(20091014)。污染問題懸而未決.中科四期有條件通過,http://e-info.org.tw/node/48343。  延伸查詢new window
30.詹順貴(20110310)。因應糧荒,儲糧更應儲地儲農,http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=23283。  延伸查詢new window
31.廖本全(20110810)。圈地、搶水與滅農,http://e-info.org.tw/node/69394。  延伸查詢new window
32.劉開元(20110610)。環評要求不准動古蹟.中興新村高等研究園區.有條件過關.環評大會要求國科會只能先開發對文化古蹟無影響的南核心部分約25公頃土地。  延伸查詢new window
33.(20091028)。拒美牛內臟北中市推標章大賣場觀望5大進口商暫不輸入內臟絞肉,http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/32049193/IssueID/20091028/applesearch/。  延伸查詢new window
34.KISTEP(2003)。KISTEP Document, 2.11.2008,http://www.most.go.kr/。  new window
35.KISTEP(2008)。KISTEP Document. 2.11.2008,http://www.most.go.kr/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Irwin, Alan(1995)。Science and the Policy Process。Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Leach, Melissa、Scoones, Ian(2005)。Science and Citizenship in a Global Context。Science and Citizens。London:Zed Books。  new window
3.Nowotny, Helga、Scott, Peter、Gibbons, Michael(2001)。The Co-evolution of Society and Science。Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
4.Grin, John(2006)。Reflexive Modernization as a Governance Issue or Designing and Shaping Re-structuration。Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development。Edward Elgar。  new window
5.Renn, Ortwin(2005)。"Before assessment starts" to "risk appraisal"。Risk governance: towards an integrative approach。International Risk Governance Council。  new window
6.Habermas, J.(1992)。Drei normative Modelle der Demodratie: Zum Begriff deliberativer Politik。Die Chancen der Freiheit: Grundprobleme der Demokratie。Piper Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE