對網際網路抱持悲觀態度的人主張網際網路將減少人與人之間的相處，降低人類對於社群的參與，並且終將成為孤立人際交往的終極科技，史丹佛大學的奈伊評論說：「網際網路可能成為降低人類對於社群參與的終極孤立科技，甚至比電視這種科技還要厲害。」 我認為抱持這種觀點的人忽視在許多時候，真人之間的互動反而會阻礙人與人之間的溝通，在某些狀況下，想要促成溝通的主體因為遭受壓力，而不方便直接行使強聯繫，他們如果能暫時把自己的主體隱藏起來，而運用一些本身無意志，卻可供主體操弄的工具來做溝通，或許在時機成熟時就能促成「強聯繫」。 我把這些本身無自由意志，而是被想要溝通但又不便現身的主體運用來行使意志的工具稱為「溝通客體」，並且把這樣的溝通方式稱為「客體溝通」。這篇文章主要是以臺灣的一個新興宗教團體「同志同光教會」創立為例，來分析同性戀基督徒如何運用網際網路作「客體溝通」，集結成立組織的起碼關鍵人數而建立實體教會，從這些分析我臆測奈伊等人將需修正他們的主張。

The rise of the Internet has increased theoretical discussion and empirical investigation on communication and religion. In February of 2000, the Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, concludes a large survey of Internet study. Norman Nie, director and principal investigator, announced the key finding of the study that: "the more hours people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Additionally, he comments that: “the Internet could be the ultimate isolating technology that further reduces our participation in communities even more than television did before it.” However, after investigating the vital witnesses of homosexual Christians, I discover that, instead of being the isolating technology, the Internet is a tool that helps them build strong ties among them. Moreover, the ties make the establishment of the Light House Church and many queer groups possible.From the witnesses, I realise, because of the negative attitude of Taiwan society toward homosexuals, the Christians have to isolate themselves from society and are afraid to “come out of the closet”. However, through the Internet, they are able to exchange theological viewpoints without showing themselves or even using their own real names. Namely, they can communicate with each other via objects. It is what I mean by “communication via objects”. Therefore, I argue that Norman Nie might have to amend his comment. In conclusion, I predict that homosexual Christian movements will increase and the Internet will facilitate many more new religious movements.