臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：質性研究的評鑑規準：各派主張與發展趨勢
書刊名：初等教育學刊
作者：張芬芬 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Fen-fen
出版日期：2002
卷期：12
頁次：頁301-351
主題關鍵詞：質性研究；質的研究；評鑑規準；研究方法論；Qualitative research；Evaluative criteria；Research methodology
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(8) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:643
本研究以理論分析法達成兩項目的，一是探究目前國外不同質性研究派別對評鑑規準的看法，二是梳理出評鑑規準的發展趨勢。 本研究介紹的評鑑規準，包括五派：實證主義、後實證主義 (含建構主義、紮根理論) 、批判理論、後結構主義 (含女性主義、有色婦女研究、與詮釋互動論) ，以及後現代主義。再者，本研究發現評鑑規準的發展有八大趨勢，包括：一由達到研究目的的有效性，到研究達成外在目的的有效性；二由知識建立，到知識實踐；三由科學方法的運用，到倫理關係的講求；四由理性求知，到感性求知、行動求知；五由研究成果呈現，到互動過程呈現；六由研究者隱身，到研究者現身；七由科學化論文格式，到文學化、生活化的表達風格；八由學術界認定的效度觀點，到非學界讀者認定的效度。
There is considerable debate over what constitutes good qualitative research. According to Denzin & Lincoln(1994), there are four basic positions on this issue, that are positivism, postpositivism, poststructuralism, and postmordernism. Specifically speaking, the main purposes of this study are as follows, that are several issues generally concerned by contemporary qualitative researchers in Taiwan: 1) To specify the criteria of various schools of thought, including positivism, postpositivism, critical theory, postconstructivism, and postmordernism. 2) To investigate the trends of criteria for assessing qualitative research.
期刊論文
1.雷霆(19880400)。沒有思想的性格，沒有性格的思想：中國人性格的自主性。當代，24，40-46。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hunt, James G.、Ropo, Arja(1995)。Multi-level Leadership: Grounded Theory and Mainstream Theory Applied to the Case of General Motors。Leadership Quarterly，6(3)，379-412。  new window
3.Irurita, V. F.(1996)。Hidden dimensions revealed: Progressive grounded theory study of quality care in the hospital。Qualitative Health Research，6，331-349。  new window
4.Kearney, M. R.、Murphy, S.、Rosenbaum, M.(1994)。Mothering on crack cocaine: A grounded theory analysis。Social Science and Medicine，38，351-361。  new window
5.Kearney, M. H.、Murphy, S.、Irwin, K.、Rosenbaum, M.(1995)。Salvaging self: A grounded theory of pregnancy on crack cocaine。Nursing Resarch，44，208-213。  new window
6.Lather, P.(1993)。Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism。Sociological Quarterly，35。  new window
7.Richardson, L.(1991)。Postmodern social theory: Representational practices。Sociological Theory，9，173-179。  new window
8.Smith, J. K.(1984)。The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，6，379-391。  new window
9.Smith, D.(1992)。Sociology from women’s perspective: A reaffirmation。Sociological Theory，10，88-97。  new window
10.Seidman, S.(1991)。The end of sociological theory: The postmodern hope。Sociological Theory，9，131-146。  new window
11.Tandon, R.(1989)。Parcipatory research and social transformation。Convergence，21(2/3)，5-15。  new window
12.Sohier, R.(1993)。Filial reconstruction: A theory on development through adversity。Qualitative Health Research，3，465-492。  new window
13.Wright, K. B.(1997)。Shared ideology in alcoholics anonymous: A grounded theory approach。Journal of Health Communication，2(2)，83-99。  new window
14.Wilson, H. S.、Hunchinson, S. A.(1996)。Methodological mistakes in grounded theory。Nursing Research，45，122-124。  new window
圖書
1.胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究慣例。臺北：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
2.Clough, P. T.(1992)。The ends(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism。Newbury Park, CA：London：Sage。  new window
3.Collins, P. H.(1990)。Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment。New York：Routledge。  new window
4.Friere, P.(1982)。Pedagogy of oppressed。New York：Continuum。  new window
5.Heron, J.(1992)。Feeling and personhood: Psychology in another key。London：Sage。  new window
6.Hammersley, M.(1990)。Reading ethnographic research: A critical guide。London：Longman。  new window
7.Krieger, S.(1991)。Social science and the self: Personal essays as art form。New York：Routledge。  new window
8.Prus, R. C.(1991)。Road hustler。New York：Steranko。  new window
9.Sartre, J. P.(1963)。Search for a method。New York：Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
10.Rosaldo, R.(1989)。Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis。Boston：Beacon。  new window
11.Skolimowski, H.(1992)。Living philosophy: Eco-philosophy as a tree of life。London：Arkana。  new window
12.Scheurich, J. J.(1997)。Research method in the postmodern。London：Falmer。  new window
13.Hammersley, M.(1992)。What's wrong with ethnography? Methodological exploration。Routledge。  new window
14.Lather, P.(1991)。Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy within/in the Postmodern。New York：Routledge。  new window
15.Torbert, W. R.(1991)。The power of balance: Transforming self, society, and scientific inquiry。Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publication。  new window
16.Brugger, Walter、項退結(1976)。西洋哲學辭典。臺北：國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
17.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
18.黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
19.Denzin, Norman K.(1989)。Interpretive Interactionism。Sage Publications。  new window
20.Hooks, Bell(1990)。Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics。Boston, MA：South End Press。  new window
21.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
22.Strauss, Anselm Leonard、Corbin, Juliet M.、吳芝儀、廖梅花(2001)。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法。濤石文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet、徐宗國(1997)。質性研究概論。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.Maxwell, J. A.(1996)。Qualitative research design: An interactive approach。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
25.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Carspecken, P. F.、Apple, M.(1992)。Critical research: Theory, methodology, and pratice。The handbook of qualitative reserch in education。New York：Academic Press。  new window
2.Fonow, M. M.、Cook, J. A.(1991)。Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology。Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research。Bloomington：Indiana University Press。  new window
3.Denzin, N. K.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1994)。The art of interpretation, evaluation, and presentation。Handbook of Qualitative Research。London：SAGE。  new window
4.Guba, E. G.(1990)。Subjectivity and Objectivity。Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
5.Guba, E. G.(1990)。Carrying on the dialog。The paradigm dialog。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
6.Gerson, E. M.(1991)。Supplementing grounded theory。Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss。New York：Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
7.Kincheloe, J. L.、McLaren, P. L.(1994)。Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。New York：Thousand Oaks, Calif：Sage。  new window
8.Manning, P. K.、Cullum-Swan, B.(1994)。Narrative, content, and semiotic analysis。Handbook of qualitative research。New York：Sege。  new window
9.Reason, P.(1994)。Three approaches to Participatory Inquiry。Handbook of qualitative research。New York：Sage。  new window
10.Quantz, R. A.(1992)。On critical ethnography (with some postmodern consideration)。The handbook of qualitative research in education。New York：Academic Press。  new window
11.Roman, L. G.(1992)。The politics significance of other ways of narrating ethnography: A feminist materialist approach。The handbook of qualitative reseach in education。New York：Academic Press。  new window
12.Richardson, L.(1992)。The consequences of poetic representations: Writing the other, rewriting the self。Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
13.Star, S. L.(1991)。The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss。Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss。New York：Aldine。  new window
14.Smith, J. K.、Deemer, D. K.(2000)。The problem of criteria in the age of relativism。Handbook of qualitative researching。London：SAGE。  new window
15.張芬芬(2001)。研究者必須中立客觀嗎？行動研究的知識論與幾個關鍵問題。行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北市：揚智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Altheide, D. L.、Johnson, J. M.(1994)。Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。London：Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
17.Guba, Egon G.(1990)。The alternative paradigm dialog。The paradigm dialog。Sage Publications。  new window
18.Woods, P.(1992)。Symbolic interactionism: Theory and method。The handbook of qualitative research in education。London：Academic Press。  new window
19.Lincoln, Y. S.(1990)。The making of a constructivist: A remembrance of transformations past。The paradigm dialog。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
20.Denzin, N. K.(1994)。The art and politics of interpretation。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：517（臺灣：517，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67165186
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上