:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用電腦軟體分析質性資料之探析
書刊名:彰化師大教育學報
作者:林重岑吳璧如 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chung-tsenWu, Pi-ju
出版日期:2007
卷期:11
頁次:頁51-73
主題關鍵詞:紮根理論質性研究質性資料分析軟體CAQDASComputer-assisted qualitative data analysis softwareGrounded theoryQualitative research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:97
  • 點閱點閱:76
本文旨在探討應用電腦軟體於質性資料分析的相關議題。研究方法論的思惟會影響資料分析的程序,而資料分析是研究者必須展現「信效度」的所在。質性資料分析軟體是研究者所操弄的工具,資料分析的結果必須能提供良好的論點與證據,同時展現分析的過程是嚴謹的、易於溝通的。是故本文除了探討質性資料分析軟體的本身功能外,亦將視野擴大到「上游的」方法論及「下游的」信效度議題。首先介紹質性資料分析的方法論與分析程序,次論質性資料分析的信效度議題,以及質性資料分析電腦軟體功能概要及其優勢與限制。盼能作爲日後運用軟體分析質性資料的研究者參考與借鏡。
There has been a proliferation of computer software packages designed to facilitate qualitative data analysis. Unlike quantitative studies, rigid formulae do not exist for writing-up qualitative projects. Most researchers, however, agree that transparency is essential when communicating the findings of qualitative research. The use of CAQDAS can help researchers reach better reliability and validity. The programs vary enormously in the extent to which they can facilitate the diverse analytical processes involved. The decision to use computer software to aid analysis in a particular project may be influenced by a number of factors, such as the nature of the data and the researcher's preferred approach to data analysis that will have certain epistemological and ontological assumptions as its basis. When using computer software, researchers need to consider carefully the possible consequences of their decision and to be aware that the use of such programs can alter the nature of the analytical process in unexpected and perhaps unwanted ways.
期刊論文
1.劉淑慧(19990900)。折衷取向的質性資料分析方法。諮商與輔導,165,16-19。  延伸查詢new window
2.Van Hoven, B.、Poelman, A.(2003)。Using computers for qualitative data analysis: An example using NUS. IST。Journal of Geography in Higher Education,27(1),113-120。  new window
3.Lee, R. M.、Esterhuizen, L.(2000)。Computer software and qualitative analysis: Trends, issues and resources。International Journal of Social Research Methodology,3(3),231-243。  new window
4.呂佩佩、丁興祥、陳美伶、唐婉如(20051200)。學術洪流中護理研究的定位--從質性研究與量化研究之源流談起。護理雜誌,52(6),76-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Ashworth, P. D.(1996)。The variety of qualitative research. Part two: Non-positivist approaches。Nurse Education Today,17(3),219-224。  new window
6.Froggatt, K.(2001)。Using computers in the analysis of qualitative data。Palliative Medicine,15,517-520。  new window
7.Long, T.、Johnson, M.(2000)。Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research。Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing,4(1),30-37。  new window
8.Basit, T. N.(2003)。Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis。Educational Research,45(2),143-154。  new window
9.劉世閔(20031100)。教育研究法:裸體者QSR N6 (NUD*IST)。教育研究,115,140-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Malterud, K.(2001)。Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines。The Lancet,358,483-488。  new window
11.張芬芬(20020800)。質性研究的評鑑規準:各派主張與發展趨勢。初等教育學刊,12,301-351。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.管貴貞、連秀鸞(20050900)。詮釋學方法在質性研究中之探究。輔導季刊,41(3),1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鍾聖校(19990600)。質性研究方法論的認識與再議。國立臺北師範學院學報,12,259+261-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉世閔、吳璟(20020600)。NVivo:新世紀的質性研究電腦輔助軟體。慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊,1,135-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡敏玲(20040300)。我看教育質性研究創塑意義的問題與難題:經歷、剖析與再脈絡化。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,17(1),493-518。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.賴文恩、季瑋珠、丁志音(20050900)。以微軟EXCEL®套裝軟體處理質性研究田野資料。臺灣醫學,9(5),696-702。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hammersley, M.、Atkinson, P.(1983)。Ethnography: Principles in practice。NY:Routledge。  new window
2.Moustakas, C.(1994)。Phenomenological Research Methods。Sage。  new window
3.Denzin, N.(1984)。The Research Act。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Tesch, Renata(1990)。Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools。The Falmer Press。  new window
5.Denzin, N. K.、張君玫(2000)。解釋性互動論。台北:弘智。  延伸查詢new window
6.Auerbach, C. F.、Silverstein, L. B.(2003)。Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis。New York:New York University Press。  new window
7.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. J.(1985)。Naturalistic inquiry。Sage。  new window
8.Miller, William L.、Crabtree, Benjamin F.(1999)。Doing Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。  new window
9.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet M.(1998)。Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures theory procedures and techniques。Sage。  new window
其他
1.Richards, L.(2004)。Validity and reliability? Yes! Doing it in software (Powerpoint slides),http://www.dur.ac.uk/strategies.conference/index_new_files/PPS-LRichards.pps。  new window
2.König, T.(2004)。CAQDAS--A primer,http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/mmethods/research/software/caqdas_primer.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Charmaz, K.(2000)。Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist method。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
2.林本炫(2004)。質性研究資料分析電腦軟體ATLAS.ti操作手冊。質性研究方法及其超越。南華大學教育社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.林本炫(2004)。質性研究資料分析電腦軟體在質性研究中的應用。質性研究方法及其超越。南華教育社會所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Weitzman, E. A.(2000)。Software and qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
5.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(2000)。Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences。The handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
6.黃鴻文(2004)。依樣畫葫蘆:對臺灣師範院校量化教育研究的個人觀察。教育研究方法論:觀點與方法。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE