:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:受污名的性別、性別化的污名:從臺灣「不孕」男女處境分析污名的性別政治
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:吳嘉苓 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chia-ling
出版日期:2002
卷期:29
頁次:頁127-179
主題關鍵詞:污名不孕性別人工協助生殖科技資訊控制StigmaInfertilityGenderAssisted reproductive technologiesInformation control
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:74
  • 點閱點閱:102
本文以台灣不孕男女處境為例,探究污名的性別政治。本文藉由加入分析男性不孕的社會處境,企圖擺脫「污名化的性別等同於女性」這樣分析角度的侷限,強調「性別化的污名」的研究路數,從「性別化的身體」、「性別化的污名管理」、與「親密關係作為保護網的性別化」這三個影響污名經驗的重要關鍵,來解釋性別關係如何形塑污名處境。就不孕的身體而言,女性擔任懷孕勞動的生物性,的確促使無子女性成為社會規範的聚焦點,但是本文強調,社會對於男女能孕身體存在著不同的評價,再加上不孕檢查的制度設計,使得女體遠比男體更容易受到質疑。男性藉由女性配偶提供了掩藏的資源,再加上能避免上醫院進行助孕科技的實施,都使得不孕男性得以免除公然受窘的可能性,但也是得能孕的女性伴侶污名上身。女性由於在家庭制度中往往以母職為重,親近的親屬網絡更加重了生殖管束力,在醫療體系中又成為不孕「治療」的主要對象,而在經濟體系中也較難以高報酬高聲望的工作作為主要的自我認同,因此較難逃脫因為不孕/無子所遭到的貶抑。我們看見高學歷的專業女性,處於夫妻平權的小家庭,較有資本抵抗不孕污名。在使用助孕科技來矯正不孕狀態成為「本份」之後,女體也因為助孕科技的性質,以及處理污名的社會壓力,得接受較多的侵入性醫療措施。但是男體的持續生殖力,也讓我們看見男性較女性來得恆久的生子壓力──雖然這個壓力往往要藉由女體來完成。本文強調,將污名概念性別化,更能完整理解污名經驗的來源、過程與衝擊。
I analyze the gender politics from the case of infertile men and women in Taiwan. I move beyond the view of equating the stigmatized gender with women. Instead, I emphasize the importance of "gendered stigma" approach through investigating (1) gendered bodies, (2) gendered stigma management, and (3) gendered protective circle from intimates. For the gendered bodies, society easily assigns blames of infertility on women partly due to the biological fact that only women get pregnant. More importantly, the assumption of women's vulnerability, the link of virility with masculinity, and the women-targeted infertility diagnosis system all facilitate the association of women with infertility. For the stigma management, wives often cover for their infertile husbands. Men often successfully control their stigma information through such protective cycle, as well as through avoiding entering medical setting for infertility treatment. However, this often leads to the transfer of stigma to healthy women. No matter whether women are the causes of infertility, they became the discredited. Some women actively find ways to maintain their normal self; they separate themselves from some annoying encounters and seek support from other infertile friends. Urban, professional women of nuclear family have more resources than housewives to resist. As long as assisted reproductive technologies becomes a must for the infertile to "correct" their "defect," women are forced to go through more intrusive medical intervention. Paradoxically, men's association with virility forces them to face lingering pressure to have offspring, but such expectation is mostly fulfilled through women's bodies. I stress that the concept of gendered stigma can help reveal the formation, impacts and management of stigma more adequately.
期刊論文
1.蘇燦煮、鄧素文、楊雅玲(19950600)。接受生殖科技治療婦女所曾尋求受孕之醫療及民俗療法的型態與歷程。護理研究,3(2),127-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Rich, A.(1980)。Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence。Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,5(4),631-660。  new window
3.陳毓文、鄭玲惠(2000)。為什麼是我?--胰島素依頼型糖尿病少年生活經驗之初探。中華心理衛生學刊,13(1),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Zola, Irving Kenneth(1972)。Medicine as an Institution of Social Control。The Sociological Review,20(4),487-504。  new window
5.Kleinman, Arthur、Wang, Wen-Zhi、Li, Shi-Chuo、Cheng, Xue-Ming、Dai, Xiu-Ying、Li, Kun-Tun、Kleinman, Joan(1995)。The Social Course of Epilepsy: Chronic Illness as Social Experience in Interior China。Social Science & Medicine,40(10),1319-1330。  new window
6.吳嘉苓(20020300)。臺灣的新生殖科技與性別政治,1950-2000。臺灣社會研究,45,1-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Goffman, Erving(1977)。The Arrangement between the Sexes。Theory and Society,4(3),301-331。  new window
8.Lin, N.(1982)。Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology。Annual Review of Sociology,24(1),1-24。  new window
9.莊苹、劉仲冬(19970200)。愛滋風暴--愛滋之烙印對感染者及一般民眾之意義。護理研究,5(1),52-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李從業、張昇平、陳嘉琦(19971000)。不孕夫妻的困擾程度、壓力感受及因應策略的比較。護理研究,5(5),425-438。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Meyers, Diana Tietjens(2001)。The rush to motherhood-pronatalist discourse and women's autonomy。Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,26(3),735-773。  new window
12.Moore, Gwen(1990)。Structural Determinants of Men's and Women's Personal Networks。American Sociological Review,55(5),726-735。  new window
13.Link, Bruce G.、Phelan, Jo C.(2001)。Conceptualizing Stigma。Annual Review of Sociology,27(1),363-385。  new window
14.Annandale, Ellen、Clark, Judith(1996)。What is gender? Feminist theory and the sociology of human reproduction。Sociology of Health and Illness,18(1),17-44。  new window
15.Gagne, Patricia、Tewksbury, Richard、McGaughey, Deanna(1997)。Coming out and Crossing Over: Identity Formation and Proclamation in the Transgender Community。Gender & Society,11(4),478-508。  new window
16.Whiteford, L. M.、Gonzalez, L.(1995)。Stigma: The Hidden Burden of Infertility。Social Science & Medicine,40(1),27-36。  new window
17.Weitz, R.(2001)。Women and Their Hair: Seeking Power through Resistance and Accommodation。Gender & Society,15(5),667-686。  new window
18.Schofield, T.、Connell, R. W.、Walker, L.、Wood, J. F.、Butland, D. L.(2000)。Understanding Men's Health and Illness: A Gender-Relations Approach to Policy, Research, and Practice。Journal of American College Health,48,247-256。  new window
19.Rowland, R.(1987)。Technology and Motherhood: Reproductive Choice Reconsidered。Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,12(3),512-518。  new window
20.Riessman, C. K.(2000)。Stigma and Everyday Resistance Practices: Childless Women in South India。Gender & Society,14(1),111-135。  new window
21.Nachtigall, R. D.、Becker, G.、Wozny, M.(1992)。The Effects of Gender-Specific Diagnosis on Men's and Women's Response to Infertility。Fertility and Sterility,57(1),113-121。  new window
22.Lorber, J.(1989)。Choice, Gift, or Patriarchal Bargain? Women's Consent to In Vitro Fertilization in Male Infertility。Hypatia,4(3),23-36。  new window
23.Lloyd, M.(1996)。Condemned to be Meaningful: Non-Response in Studies of Men and Infertility。Sociology of Health and Illness,18(4),433-454。  new window
24.Chao, S. C.、孫光煥、Lee, Tsong-Yeh(2001)。The Effect of an Infertility Diagnosis on the Distress, Marital and Sexual Satisfaction between Husbands and Wives in Taiwan。Human Reproduction,16(8),1762-1767。  new window
25.Jordan, C.、Revenson, T. A.(1999)。Gender Differences in Coping with Infertility: A Meta-Analysis。Journal of Behavioral Medicine,22(4),341-358。  new window
26.Greil, A. L.、Leitko, T. A.、Porter, K. L.(1988)。Infertility: His and Hers。Gender & Society,2(2),172-199。  new window
27.Gardner, C. B.(1989)。Analyzing Gender in Public Places: Rethinking Goffman's Vision of Everyday Life。The American Sociologist,20(1),42-56。  new window
28.Brekhus, W.(1996)。Social Marking and the Mental Coloring of Identity: Sexual Identity Construction and Maintenance in the United States。Sociological Forum,11(3),497-522。  new window
29.Tabet, P.(1987)。Imposed Reproduction: Maimed Sexuality。Feminist Issues,7(2),3-31。  new window
30.Remennick, L.(2000)。Childless in the Land of Imperative Motherhood: Stigma and Coping Among Infertile Israeli Women。Sex Roles,43(11/12),821-841。  new window
31.Miall, C. E.(1986)。The Stigma of Involuntary Childlessness。Social Problems,33(4),268-282。  new window
32.Lorber, J.、Bandlamudi, L.(1993)。The Dynamics of Marital Bargaining in Male Infertility。Gender & Society,7(1),32-49。  new window
33.Knafl, K. A.、Deatrick, J. A.(1986)。How Families Manage Chronic Conditions: An Analysis of the Concept of Normalization。Research in Nursing & Health,9(3),215-222。  new window
34.Daniels, R. W.、Cynthia, R.(1997)。Between Fathers and Fetuses: The Social Construction of Male Reproduction and the Politics of Fetal Harm。Signs,22(3),580-616。  new window
學位論文
1.張家榮(1999)。台灣當代生殖科技的建構--以科學社群與身體論述爲觀察(碩士論文)。淸華大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾凡慈(2001)。看見/看不見--視障學生的生活實體建構(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Becker, H.S.(1963)。The Outsiders。New York:Free Press。  new window
2.紀慧文(1998)。十二個上班小姐的生涯故事:從娼女性之道德生涯研究。唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Becker, Gay(2000)。The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
4.Oliver, Michael(1990)。The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach。New York。  new window
5.Goffman, Erving(1963)。Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
6.Kleinman, Arthur、陳新綠(1994)。談病說痛--人類的受苦經驗與痊癒之道。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Martin, Emily(1987)。The Women in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction。Boston, MA:Beacon Press。  new window
8.Collins, Patricia Hill(1991)。Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment。New York。  new window
9.李鎡堯(1981)。我倆為何不孕?。臺北:健康世界。  延伸查詢new window
10.Wolf, Margery(1972)。Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
11.Connell, Raewyn W.(1995)。Masculinities。Polity Press:Allen & Unwin:University of California Press。  new window
12.(1992)。Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions。Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions。Boston, MA。  new window
13.Schur, E. M.(1984)。Labeling Women Deviant: Gender, Stigma, and Social Control。Labeling Women Deviant: Gender, Stigma, and Social Control。NY。  new window
14.Kessler-Harris, A.、Sacks, K. B.(1987)。The Demise of Domesticity in America。Women, Households, and the Economy。New Brunswick, NJ。  new window
15.Jamieson, L.(1997)。Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies。Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies。Cambridge, UK。  new window
16.Goode, W.(1992)。Why Men Resist?。Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions。Boston, MA。  new window
17.Gardner, C. B.(1995)。Passing By: Gender and Public Harassment。Passing By: Gender and Public Harassment。Berkeley。  new window
18.Davis, F. James(1991)。Who is Black: One Nation's Definition。University Park, PA:Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
19.劉志鴻(1994)。與婦產科醫師對談。與婦產科醫師對談。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.王瓊慧(1998)。為什麼選上我?。為什麼選上我?。高雄縣鳳山市。  延伸查詢new window
21.West, C.(2000)。Goffman in Feminist Perspective。Erving Goffman IV。London, UK。  new window
22.Rothman, Barbara Katz(1989)。Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society。NY:Norton。  new window
23.Lorber, J.(1998)。Believing is Seeing: Biology as Ideology。The Politics of Women's Bodies: Sexuality, Appearance, and Behavior。Oxford。  new window
24.嚴韻(2001)。如果你沒有小孩:挑戰無子的污名。如果你沒有小孩:挑戰無子的污名。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.Jaggar, A. M.(1988)。Feminist Politics and Human Nature。Feminist Politics and Human Nature。Totowa, NJ。  new window
26.Charlesworth, M.(1993)。Bioethics in a Liberal Society。Bioethics in a Liberal Society。Cambridge。  new window
27.曾啟瑞、常玉慧(1995)。走過不孕。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張娟芬(1999)。「人盯人」式的父權。女性主義經典。台北市:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hutchinson, John、Smith, Anthony D.(1996)。[Ethnicity] Introduction。Ethnicity。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.熊瑞梅(2001)。性別、個人網絡與社會資本。華人社會的調查研究方法與發現。香港:牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE