:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地方菁英的民主價值取向--一九九三年與二OO一年調查結果之比較分析
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:趙永茂 引用關係
作者(外文):Chao, Yung-mau
出版日期:2002
卷期:17
頁次:頁57-80
主題關鍵詞:地方菁英民主價值取向民主化Local eliteDemocratic value oricentationDemocratization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:45
     本論文為「臺灣地方菁英政治文化及決策影響力之研究」的一部份,目的在比較民國八十二年與九十年兩次對臺灣省地方菁英的調查研究結果。其研究發現如下: 一、民主價值取向方面 綜合而言,在比較一九九三年二○○一年臺灣縣級地方菁英的民主價值取向之後,發現參與取向與多數決取向有明顯下降的現象,而平等取向與地方分權取向則有顯著的上升。此外,亦發現一九九三年第一波的四個民主價值取向,在強度位置上略顯分散;而二○○一年第二波的四個民主價值取向則較為集中。 二、個人基本背景與民主價值取向之關係 綜合而言,依據這兩波有關臺灣地方菁英民主價值取向的比較研究,我們發現各個基本背景變項與四種民主價值取向,均具有某種程度的關聯性,但不可否認的,教育程度是最具有影響力的基本背景因素,尤其在二○○一年的調查結果更為明顯。
     1.The democratic value orientation According to the comparison on the democratic value orientation of county-level elites of Taiwan between 1993 and 2001, it is found that the participation orientation and majority orientation are obviously getting declined. But equity oricentation and decentralization orientation are getting risen apparently during the past 8 years. Besides, this survey approve that these four democratic value orientation are less stronger than 2001. 2.The relationship between the personal background and the orientation of democratic value Comparing to the relationship of personal background and the democratic orientation of participation, equity, decentralization and majority between 1993 and 2001, this research finds that the personal background of age, gender, education and political party all are very significant. But, it is not doubted that the education factor are the most powerfully affected variable than any other personal background factor, especially in they year of 2001.
期刊論文
1.Prothro, James W.、Grigg, Charles W.(1960)。Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement。Journal of Politics,22(2),276-294。  new window
2.Somers, Margaret R.(199310)。Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy。American Sociological Review,58(5),587-620。  new window
3.趙永茂(19950500)。臺灣地方菁英的民主價值取向。政治科學論叢,6,73-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.McClosky, Herbert(1964)。Consensus and Ideology in American Politics。American Political Science Review,58(2),361-382。  new window
5.趙永茂(19940400)。臺灣地方自治發展中政治生態的轉變及其特質--一九八○年代的分析。政治科學論叢,5,99-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.胡佛(19781100)。權力的價值取向:概念架構的建構與評估。社會科學論叢,27,3-40。  延伸查詢new window
7.Walker, J. L.(1966)。A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy。American Political Science Review,60(2),285-295。  new window
8.Key, V. O.(1961)。Public Opinion and the Decay of Democracy。The Virginia Quarterly Review,37,481-494。  new window
9.趙永茂(1989)。臺灣省基層政治菁英之民主價值取向-鄉鎮(市)長與代表會代表之分析(1982-1986)。社會科學論叢,37,153-193。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳國祥、胡鴻仁(1982)。新一代的政治領袖: 三種類型、三項觀察。歷史月刊,6,11-17。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.胡佛、張佑宗、歐陽晟(1994)。臺灣價值分歧的結構及對統獨立場與投票抉擇的影響。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳明通(1994)。尋找派系選民。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖達琪、沈明明(1998)。臺海兩岸地方菁英比較。沒有紀錄。1-261。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.袁頌西、國立臺灣大學政治學系[執行](1988)。臺灣省縣市民選公職人員民主價值取向之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 76-0301-H002-019)。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖達琪(2001)。民主與地方政治:第二波臺灣地方菁英之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.趙永茂(1987)。台灣省基層政治精英之民主價值取向--鄉鎮(市)長、民意代表之分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郭秋永(1980)。政治科學中的價值問題:方法論上的分析,沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.沈明明(1999)。兩岸地方菁英的價值取向。海峽兩岸地方政府與政治。高雄:中山大學政治研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Levin, Michael(1992)。The Spectre of Democracy。London, UK:Macmillan Academic and Professional LTD。  new window
3.Eldersveld, Samuel J.、Stromberg, Lars、Derksen, Wim(1995)。Local Elites in Western Democracies: A Comparative Analysis of Urban Political Leaders in The U.S., Sweden, and The Netherlands。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
4.Eisenstandt, S. N.(1966)。Modernization:Protest and Change。New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Dahl, Robert A.(1961)。Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City。New Haven, Connecticut。  new window
6.Pickles, Dorothy、朱堅章(1978)。民主政治。臺北:幼獅文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Frondizi, R.、黃藿(1984)。價值是什麼?:價值學導論。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
9.Milbrath, Lester W.(1965)。Political Participation: How and why do people get involved in politics?。Chicago:Rand McNally。  new window
10.Putnam, Robert D.(1976)。The Comparative Study of Political Elites。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
11.Rokeach, M.(1968)。Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change。Jossey-Bass。  new window
12.McMahon, C.(1994)。Authority and Democracy。Authority and Democracy。Princeton。  new window
13.Lasswell, H. D.、Daniel, L.、Easton, R. C.(1952)。The Comparative Study of Elites: An Introduction and Bibliography。The Comparative Study of Elites: An Introduction and Bibliography。California。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE