:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:七十三學年度大學聯招制度變革對文法商科系排行榜重組與性別「職業隔離」之影響
書刊名:師大學報. 教育類
作者:陶宏麟 引用關係
作者(外文):Tao, Hung-lin
出版日期:2003
卷期:48:2
頁次:頁191-213
主題關鍵詞:大學聯考排行榜職業隔離Joint college entrance examRankingOccupational segregation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:72
     我國大學聯招第一類組近年來的熱門科系均為法律系包辦,但早期文法商科系的錄取分數多以法律系墊底。本文檢視民國69至85學年度第一類組中主要科系的排名變化,發現法律系的竄起並非逐年來平緩的調整,而是由民國73年學年度聯招改制開始,及至74學年度連續的排名大幅向上跳躍所帶起,再接以歷年波動平緩的調整所達成,而文組科系以對應的反向方式調整,排名大幅下跌,這種排名的跳躍以私立大學最為劇烈。女性考生傳統上較易被區隔成讀文(乙)組的最佳人選,舊制的乙丁分組聯招將性別「聯業隔離」時間提前。數據顯示,新制聯招實施後,許多女性考生有捨文從法商的傾向,這也是法科志願前移及文科志願下降的主要動力,同時打破以往乙丁分組的「聯業隔離」提前效果。
     Law School has been the top choice of students taking Taiwan's college entrance exam in recent years; before 1984 Law School was the last choice. Before that year, the test for entering departments within the College of Arts was quite different from the entrance test used by both the College of Business and college of Law. In 1984 all three groups of students (potential enrollees in the Colleges of Arts, Business and Law) starting taking a much more unified exam, and Taiwan's Colleges of Law (Law School) jumped to a higher ranking in 1984 and 1985l; thereafter the Law School ranking rose is that the ranking of a school is based on the difficulty of entering it, and this is a function of the number of possible applicants competing to enter it: this number increased as a result of the 1984 change in the entrance exam system. Also after 1984, women students-who previously tended to be restricted by the exam system to the College of Arts departments-started entering the Business and Law Colleges and thus moving into law and business related fields. The increasing number of women entering Law School is another important reason-closely tied to the one just mentioned-for the rise in Law School's ranking. The greater availability of Law and Business School to women also was a key factor in the overcoming of women's "occupational segregation." An implicit effect of the pre-1984 exam system. This study explores, then, in greater depth the mechanisms at work here: that is, the relation between the three factors: reform of the exam system, re-ranking of the Colleges of Arts, Law and Business, and the decreasing occupational segregation of women.
期刊論文
1.吳政達(1997)。臺灣地區高等教育性別隔離現象之實證研究。人文及社會學科教學通訊,8(3),188-206。  延伸查詢new window
2.齊光裕(1997)。威權體制的轉型與解嚴。近代中國,117,30-58。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉文仕(1982)。從一份抗議書談律師高考問題的解決。現代國家,215,10-12。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭正忠(1982)。由律師高考錄取率偏低-再論當前法學教育改進之道。大學雜誌,162,17-19。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅天人(1998)。中華民國宣佈解嚴政策探討-決策理論觀點分析。近代中國,124,30-58。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭次融、姚霞玲(1999)。大學入學多元入學方案。從「現行聯招」看「考試分發入學制度」。選才,64。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.孫志麟(2000)。高等教育中的性別隔離。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.大學入學考試中心(1998)。八十三一八十七學年度大學試辦推薦甄選入學招生方案檢討報告。臺北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.丘愛鈴(1998)。我國大學聯招政策變遷之研究(1954-1997)(博士論文)。國立師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳曉穎(1996)。高等教育中的性別隔離與女性就業(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王文中(1985)。大學聯招考生填選志願型態之研究,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Borjas, George J.(2000)。Labor economics。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.中華民國大學入學考試中心(1992)。我國大學入學制度改革建議書:大學多元入學方案。臺北:中華民國大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅文基(1994)。近四十年來我國大學教育發展的回顧與檢討。大學教育的理想。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1980)。大學聯合招生委員會工作報告。大學聯合招生委員會工作報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.林清江(1983)。我國大學入學考試的改進。世界各國大學入學制度之改革動向。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.周進興(2000)。大學聯招的演變。十年辛苦不尋常:大學入學考試中心十週年紀念文集。台北:財團法人大學入學考試中心基金會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1980)。中華民國考選統計,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE