:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中國大陸國家權力與社會運動分析
書刊名:政治學報
作者:王信賢 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Hsin Hsien
出版日期:2006
卷期:40
頁次:頁85-114
主題關鍵詞:社會抗議孤島效應政治機會結構相對剝奪感國家-社會關係國家能力Island effectsPolitical opportunity structureRelative deprivationSocial resistanceState-society relationshipState capacity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:259
  • 點閱點閱:167
中國大陸近來各種大規模的社會抗議事件層出不窮,已引發各國與學術界高度的關注,本文透過社會心理學分析、資源動員理論以及政治機會結構等相關理論的對話,並考量中國大陸政治體制、發展以及社會運動的現實,將上述理論整合進入當前中國「國家--社會」關係的架構中進行討論,說明收入分配高度差距以及各種貪污腐敗行為是社會弱勢群體「相對剝奪感」的最主要來源。然而,此種受剝削心態由於資源不足以及無法獲得社會菁英的奧援,使其無法形成有效的「組織性反對」,另一方面,國家透過基礎權力與專制權力的「軟硬兼施」,以及各種策略運作,包括製造「孤島效應」、「轉移民怨」策略以及操作「文革」與「蘇東」遺產等,也使得高頻率的社會運動無法形成更廣大的政治效應。但若社會失衡與貪腐行為持續,各種抗議與騷動仍將不會間斷。
Over the past two decades and a half, with the maintenance of political stability and rapid economic growth, China has become the focus of world attention. At the same time, china is faced with various problems, some of which are quite complicated and challenging. These problems include the disparity of income distribution, the corruption of government officials, and dissident resistance, as a central dynamic in understanding the critical social tensions in Chinese society. However, oppression and resistance are symbiotic political acts one almost never occurs without the other. The strenuous conditions of social existence in China offer up plenty of cause for popular protest. But the CCP is still in tight control of political process and social movement. The proliferation of scholarship on cleavages and conflicts in relation to social movements have existed three distinct approaches which are psychology, particularly cognitive psychology, resource mobilization and political opportunity processes. This article integrates the former approaches into the “state-society relations” framework to analyze the dissident resistance and the responses of the Chinese government. It offers us a viewpoint to explore the strategies of CCP to prevent the turmoil from “nationalization”. Although it’s premature to evaluate the effectiveness of the new tactics, this article attempts to place the newly transformed dissident movement in political, institutional, and social context.
期刊論文
1.吳忠民(2005)。中國社會公正的現狀與趨勢。江海學刊,2005(2),82-88。  延伸查詢new window
2.李路路(2004)。社會變遷:風險與社會控制。中國人民大學學報,2,10-16。  延伸查詢new window
3.Goldstone, Jake(198004)。Theories of Revolution: The Third Generation。World Politics,32(3),425-453。  new window
4.趙鼎新(2005)。西方社會運動與革命理論發展之述評:站在中國的角度思考。社會學研究,2005(1),168-209。  延伸查詢new window
5.Goodwin, Jeff、Jasper, James M.、Khattra, Jaswinder(1999)。Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory。Sociological Forum,14(1),27-54。  new window
6.康曉光(2002)。未來3-5年中國大陸政治穩定性分析。戰略與管理,2002(3),1-15。  延伸查詢new window
7.康曉光、韓恒(2005)。分類控制:當前中國大陸國家與社會關係研究。社會學研究,2005(6),73-89。  延伸查詢new window
8.何明修(20041200)。政治機會結構與社會運動研究。國立政治大學社會學報,37,33-80。  延伸查詢new window
9.于建嶸(2003)。農民有組織抗爭及其政治風險:湖南省H縣調查。戰略與管理,2003(3),1-16。  延伸查詢new window
10.寇健文(19991200)。共黨統治下的大規模反抗運動與共黨的預防策略--理論探討。問題與研究,38(12),55-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王信賢、王占璽(20060300)。夾縫求生:中國大陸社會組織的發展與困境。中國大陸研究,49(1),27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王信賢(20060600)。將社會帶回?中國大陸中介組織的發展與理論省思:以W市商會與行業協會為例。人文及社會科學集刊,18(2),293-326。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Meyer, David(2004)。Protest and Political Opportunity。Annual Review of Sociology,30,125-145。  new window
14.王紹光、胡鞍鋼、丁元竹(2002)。经济繁荣背后的社会不稳定。战略与管理,52,26-33。  延伸查詢new window
15.中華人民共和國國家統計局課題組(2000)。目前我國收入分配差異及分析。國家行政學學院學報,5,56-66。  延伸查詢new window
16.Gilboy, George(2004)。The Latin Americanization of China?。Current History,103(670),256-261。  new window
17.蕭紅葉、王健安(2001)。我國居民收入分配格局的統計分析。統計研究,7,9-16。  延伸查詢new window
18.謝岳志(2004)。市場轉型,精英政治化與地方政治秩序。當代中國研究,11(2)。  延伸查詢new window
19.王信賢(2002)。經濟改革與政治穩定:中共十六大前的社會分析。中國事務,10,5-21。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gil Eyal(1998)。Iván Szelényi, and Eleanor Townsley, Making Capitalism without Capitalists。London:Verso。  new window
2.孫立平(2004)。轉型與斷裂。北京:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Perry, Elezabeth J.、Selden, Mark(2000)。Chinese Society: Change, Conflict, and Resistance。New York:Routledge。  new window
4.Perry, Elizabeth J.(2002)。Challenging the Mandate of Heaven: Social Protest and State Power in China。M.E. Sharpe。  new window
5.江時學(2004)。金融全球化與發展中國家的經濟安全:拉美國家的經驗教訓。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Inglehart, Ronald(1977)。The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Wright, Erik Olin(1997)。Class Counts: Camparative Studies in Class Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Dunleavy, Patrick、O'Leary, Brendan(1987)。Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy。The Macmillan Press Ltd.。  new window
9.李英明(1995)。鄧小平與後文革的中國大陸。臺北:時報文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.何清漣(2003)。中國的陷阱。臺北:台灣英文新聞股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Tilly, Charles(1978)。From Mobilization to Revolution。Michigan:Addison-Wesley。  new window
12.Walder, Andrew(1986)。Communist Neo- Traditional ism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
13.Walder, Andrew G.(1995)。The Waning of the Communist State: Economic Origins of Political Decline in China and Hungary。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
14.Scott, James C.(1985)。The Weapon of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
15.陸學藝(2002)。當代中國社會階層研究報告。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Dahl, Robert A.(1971)。Polyarchy: Participation & Opposition。New Haven, CT。  new window
17.張茂桂、吳介民、楊靜文、陳維新(1989)。社會運動與政治轉化。臺北市:國家政策研究資料中心 (政研中心)。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Gurr, Ted Robert(1970)。Why Men Rebel。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
19.何明修(2005)。社會運動概論。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.McAdam, Doug、Tarrow, Sidney G.、Tilly, Charles(2001)。Dynamics of Contention。Cambridge University Press。  new window
21.Carnoy, Martin(1984)。The State and Political Theory。Princeton University Press。  new window
22.Skocpol, Theda(1979)。States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China。Cambridge University Press。  new window
23.Wank, David L.(1999)。Commodifying Communism: Business, Trust, and Politics in a Chinese City。Cambridge University Press。  new window
24.Lukes, Steven Michael(1974)。Power: A Radical View。Macmillan Press。  new window
25.Mann, M.(1993)。The Sources of Social Power。The Sources of Social Power。Cambridge。  new window
26.Johnson, Chalmers(1966)。Revolutionary Change。Revolutionary Change。Boston, MA。  new window
27.陳志柔(2003)。中共十六大後的社會情勢分析。未來中國:退化的極權主義。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
28.Marx, Gary T.、McAdam, Douglas(1994)。Collective Behavior and Social Movements: Process and Structure。Collective Behavior and Social Movements: Process and Structure。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
29.陳峰(2003)。生存危機、管理者腐敗與中國的勞工抗議。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北市:新自然主義。  延伸查詢new window
30.Taylor, Stan(1984)。Social Science and Revolutions。Social Science and Revolutions。New York, NY。  new window
31.何清漣(2001)。我們依然在仰望星空。我們依然在仰望星空。廣西。  延伸查詢new window
32.張學斌(1998)。改革危險期。改革危險期。北京。  延伸查詢new window
33.李連江(2003)。中國農民的國家觀與依法抗爭。兩岸社會運動分析。0。  延伸查詢new window
34.(2005)。2004年北京市社會經濟統計報告。2004年北京市社會經濟統計報告。北京。  延伸查詢new window
35.鄭永年(2003)。國家重建、大眾抗議和集體行動。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華人民共和國國民政部(2003)。二00五年民政事業發展統計公報,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳國光(2003)。資訊傳播、公共空間與集體行動:試論互聯網對中國民主化的政治作用。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北市:新自然主義。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王振寰(1999)。邁向常態化政治:臺灣民主化中統理機制的轉變。兩岸黨國體制與民主發展:哈佛大學東西方學者的對話。臺北:月旦出版社有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.康曉光(2003)。法輪功的興起與衰弱。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北市:新自然主義。  延伸查詢new window
4.Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bring the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research。Bringing the State Back In。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Goodman, David S. G.(1999)。The New Middle Class。The Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Lieberthal, Kenneth G.(1992)。Introduction: The 'Fragmented Authoritarianism' Model and Its Limitations。Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China。University of California Press。  new window
7.歐博文(2004)。Neither Transgressive Nor Contained: Boundary-spanning Contention in China。State and Society in 21st-century China: Crisis, Contention, and Legitimation。New York, NY:Routledge Curzon。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE