The purposes of this study were (1) to compare the differences of participation motivation for different background collegiate tennis players; (2) to compare the differences of training satisfaction for different background collegiate tennis players; (3) to understand the effects of perceived coach leadership behaviors on participation motivation and training satisfaction for collegiate tennis players. A total of 360 male and female collegiate tennis players were served as subjects. The instruments administered to the subjects were Leadership Scale for Sport, Sport Motivation Scale, Training Satisfaction Scale, and demographic data. The results were as follow: (1) Private college players had higher intrinsic motivation than national college players; players who has been trained in shorter time per-day had higher extrinsic motivation and amotivation than players who has been trained in longer time per-day. (2) Private college players showed more satisfaction in coach leadership, teammate relationship, team atmosphere, training perception, training plan, and training content than national college players; players who has been trained in longer time per-day showed more satisfaction in teammate relationship and training perception than players who has been trained in shorter time per-day. (3) Tennis players' satisfaction in training was directly influenced by their perception of coach leadership behaviors and indirectly influenced by intrinsic motivation.