本文以朱堅章先生關於民權主義與民主政治的演講稿及記錄為資料，分析朱先生的民主理念，包括他對民主做為一種神話及一種實踐的看法、他對民主政治基本假定的檢討、以及他對民主政治必要條件的分析。筆者認為:朱堅章先生並非一般所謂民主政治的堅定支持者，而只是將民主政治視為壞處最少的政治制度。他並不相信民主政治的理論預設 (包括人人生而自由或生而平等)，但是在憲政法治、菁英頓導的前提下，他同意民主政治乃是所有政治制度中最好的一種。他把民權主義等同於民主政治，替三民主義的政治論述建立了寬廣發展的可能性，但是八○年代末期興起的台灣主體性論述，終究使這套以憲政法治為核心的政治論述相形失色，不得不退居歷史舞台的邊緣。雖然如此，朱先生民主理念所觸及的某些問題，俯然值得我們深思。

The article examines Mr. Chu Chian-chang’s idea of democracy, such as his analysis of democracy as an idea1 and as a practice, his critique of ,the theoretica1 assumptions of western democracy, and his clarification of the conditions for democracy. The author argues that Mr. Chu is not a simple-minded supporter of democracy, but someone who advocates democracy for its being the least worst political system. He does not believe in the innate freedom and equa1ity of human beings, but agrees that democracy is the best possible government if combined with constitutionalism, the rule of law, and leadership. He tries to equate Dr. Sun Yat-sen's political doctrine with democratic theory, making a best ,possible interpretation of the doctrine of three people. Nevertheless, with the rise of the discourse of Taiwanese subjectivity in the late 1980's, Chu’s interpretation of Sun Yat-sen’s doctrine gradually receded to the margin. Even so, the questions that Mr. Chu raised still deserve our attention and reflection.