:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後代議民主之參與制度設計-以我國觀光賭場博弈公投為例
作者:李衍儒 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen-Ju Lee
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:趙永茂
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:代議民主後代議民主公民參與參與治理參與式民主商議民主公民投票強勢民主Representative DemocracyPost-Representative DemocracyCitizen ParticipationParticipatory GovernanceParticipatory DemocracyDeliberative DemocracyReferendumStrong Democracy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:95
「後代議民主」(post-representative democracy)是近年來在學術與實務領域中新興的重要議題。後代議民主係對於代議制民主所造成的政府效率不彰、議會監督無力、政商合流把持公共議題、政黨對於民主發展的怠惰;以及當前代議民主國家普遍面臨的投票率日趨低落、代議權限被非民選的專業官僚或司法體系所介入替代、國際整合(如歐盟)的需要或國外霸權的強迫所造成議會職能不彰,與代議民主於實務向政商有權者傾斜,而忽略了代議民主應為公民代議或社會代議的本旨等情形的反思,並提出對代議民主未來的想望,也就是一種基於對當代代議制民主無法解決實務問題,從而找尋未來完美代議體制的努力,其主要共通的論點即在參與的深化。在政治學及行政學等學科領域,都在談公民參與、參與治理、參與式民主理論(包括商議民主、公民投票)等,到底何種參與制度是未來後代議民主所需呈現,且最能補充代議民主之不足呢?。
本研究以2009年9月26日在澎湖舉行「澎湖要不要設置國際觀光度假區附設觀光賭場」的公民投票,以及2012年7月7日在連江縣舉行「馬祖是否設置國際觀光度假區附設觀光賭場」的公民投票為個案,分析我國當前法制以公民投票作為解決離島博弈政策問題的公民參與機制之妥適性。在前述問題意識下,本研究首先針對代議到後代議民主的發展趨勢,以及參與民主、強勢民主、公民投票、商議民主等理論構面進行「文獻資料&;#65379;等次級資料的研究,以期確定既有的研究成果。繼而進行我國政策各階段公民參與制度之研究,以及觀光賭場產業政策的基本環境,包括:全球觀光賭場設置之現況、政策形成方式與發展趨勢,以及我國觀光賭場產業政策之歷史脈絡與法制規範等之分析,以作為個案研究之基礎。
主要研究發現計有12項,包括:一、受訪者對於我國當前代議民主的現況,均肯認代議民主仍為當前民主政治的制度主流;並對於現行代議民主的表現普遍認為「不滿意」;在對後代議民主未來的想法與期望,則呈現多元競逐的現象。二、在釐清阻礙及促進公民參與的因素方面,「公共性」、「誘因」、「資訊公開程度」、「政府立場」及「媒體角色」等,具有影響公民參與意願的雙面效果性。三、在政策形成、合法化與執行過程中,現行法制所提供之公民參與管道,已可滿足多數需求,惟如欲擴大公民參與,尚有許多改善措施。四、「商議民主理論運作形式」及「商議結論與政策聯結」尚無法制化之必要,惟如從促進公民參與的觀點來看,似宜建立公民參與的共識與決策產出之間的連結。五、對於個案所涉《觀光賭場管理條例》(草案)及其各子法制定過程之公民參與程序的具體參與經驗,多數持正面肯定之意見,其中對於資訊公開透明揭露的要求,呈現相當的一致性。六、《觀光賭場管理條例》草案的資料蒐集與法案條文草擬事宜,委託外包予民間的法律事務所,並無違法及不當之疑慮。七、解決爭議性的公共政策問題時,在一定前提下,正反雙方容有進行知識轉化的可能。八、當精英專業理性與常民情感認知產生衝突時,其進行衝突轉化達成合作的方式,以訴諸精英專業理性之可行性較高,但是必須輔以政策行銷、說明等以強化溝通,且衝突轉化係經領導者精密思考設計規劃的結果。九、對於我國整體觀光博弈產業政策之看法及設置場域之抉擇,目前法令雖以開放離島為標的,但在整體政策擘劃上呈現參環捨取的競爭困境。十、對於我國是否「開放離島設置觀光博弈度假區」之議題,我國目前採用公民投票的方式,為多數受訪者所肯定。十一、2009年澎湖博弈公投與2012年馬祖博弈公投2個個案,在「地方政府介入程度」、「公教人員支持取向」、「媒體中立與否」、「促賭方之形象良窳」、「財團介入之有無」、「全國性與地方性反賭團體的關係」等6個面向呈現強烈對比。十二、個案環境議題呈現「非營利組織」、「媒體記者」及「地方人士」(公民社會)支持環保優先;「博弈廠商」(市場)及「政府機關(地方政府)」支持開發主義的競爭結構。作者於文末提出對於我國後代議民主參與制度之設計芻議,並希冀上述研究成果能有助於我國的民主發展。
“Post-Representative Democracy” has recently become a prominent concept in both theories and practices of politics. Despite its many strengths, representative democracy has been faulted for government inefficiency, weak parliamentary oversight, public issues dominated by business and political elite, apathy of marginalized electorate, expert government, supranational government, judicial government and other problems. This research considers why in representative democratic countries politics is often heavily influenced by government and business representation, and much less by the interests of civil society. In disciplines such as political science and public administration, there have been plenty of discussions of citizen participation and participatory governance, including forms of deliberative democracy, referendum, etc.. In this research, I ask the following question: What kind of participatory form will be required in the post-representative democracy, which can complement representative democracy best?
This study examines two referendum cases to analyze the appropriateness of current regulations to apply referendum as a solution to decide whether to approve the construction of casino resorts in islands or not. In 2009, shortly after the passing of the Offshore Islands Development Act, the residents of the Penghu Islands became the first to hold a referendum on the establishment of a local casino. The residents rejected the casino-resort plan. In 2012, the residents of the Matsu Islands voted in favor of allowing the construction of a casino on the islands, surpassing the 50% rate of support required for such a proposal to be passed.
In order to examine the cases, the author first conducted a literature review on research regarding to the trends of post-representative democracy, participatory democracy, strong democracy, referendum and deliberative democracy and so as to identify the most updated research achievements in this field. Then the author studied the various stages of citizen participation in the policy process, as well as the overall policy environment for tourism casino industry to form the basis for these case studies.
The study revealed twelve major results. First, in most understandings of representative democracy, interviewees perceive that representative democracy is still the mainstream of democratic political system. For the current performance of representative democracy, interviewees generally consider the performance “not satisfied”. For the future of post-representative democracy, interviewees are divergent toward the future. Second, in aspects of the factors that hinder or promote citizen participation, such as “publicness”, “incentives”, “open data”, “the attitude of government” and the “role of the media”, show crucial impact on the willingness or unwillingness of citizens to participate. Third, in the policy formation, legitimation and implementation process, existing laws and orders that facilitate citizen participation can meet the needs of most people, but if people want to expand citizen participation, there is still much room for improvement. Fourth, the mode of operation of deliberative democracy and the relations between the consensus of deliberation and policy results, are not yet necessary to be legalized, but if people want to promote citizen participation, it is necessary to build the connection between deliberative consensus and policy results. Fifth, the citizen participation in the policy process of “Tourism Casino Control Act” (bill) and its sub-laws (bill), the majority of comments are positive affirmation. For the requirements of open data and information transparency, the results demonstrate considerable consistency. Sixth, commissioning data collection for “Tourism Casino Control Act”, its sub-laws, and law drafting to private law firm is legal and proper. Seventh, when dealing with controversial issues of public policy, knowledge transformation is possible for both sides under certain premises. Eighth, when facing the conflict between elite’s professional rationale and emotions of ordinary people, appealing to professional rationale provides higher feasibility to facilitate cooperation, but this must be complemented by proper marketing of a policy and other means, so as to strengthen the communication. This kind of conflict transformation needs precise thinking and design derived from policy entrepreneurs. Ninth, for the overall tourism and gaming industry policy and the choice of location, although the current policy set the outlying islands as target, the overall policy still has controversial issues on three different directions. Tenth, the majority of respondents agreed the use of referendum in our country to decide on the matter of tourism casino. Eleventh, in the cases of 2009 and 2012 referendums in Penghu and Matsu, “the degree of involvement of local government”, “the attitude of civil servants and teachers”, “media-neutral”, “the image of pro-gambling side”, “support from casino developers”, “the relationship between national and local anti-gambling groups,” show many contrasts. Twelfth, in the environmental issues, the case presents two counter parts. Nonprofit organization, media reporter and local people (civil society) support environmental protection; however casino developers and local government support the development doctrine. In the end, the author proposes a participatory institutional design for post-representative democracy and expects that these research results provide contribution to our country’s democratic development.
壹、中文部分
Jeff Chiu編著,2010,《博弈詞彙》,新北市:揚智文化。
丁開杰、苟天來、朱曉紅、王燕燕等譯,2011,《慈善資本主義︰富人在如何拯救世界》,北京:社會科學文獻。譯自Bishop, Matthew &; Michael Green. Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich Can Save the World. Bloomsbury Press. 2008.
丁詩同,2009,〈生物科學論文的寫作與發表〉,臺灣大學教學發展中心學習策略網,http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/ls/strategy/lecture.php?index=54&;c1=2&;c2=13,2013/08/10。
于海青,2009,《當代西方參與民主研究》,北京:社會科學文獻。
甘陽,1991,〈「民間社會」概念批判〉,《中國論壇》,32(2):66-73。
戈春源,2004,《賭博史》,臺北市:華成圖書。
方凱弘、梁綰琪,2009,〈政策為何變遷?以桃園縣開徵地方稅為例〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,6(3):125-168。new window
中國科技大學企管系,2008,《我國開放觀光賭場之競爭力分析》,臺北市:行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究。
王五一,2005a,《世界賭博爆炸與中國的經濟利益》,北京:經濟科學出版社。
王五一,2005b,《賭權開放的制度反思》,澳門理工學院出版。
王五一,2012,〈關於以博彩促進旅遊的幾點思考〉,《澳門月刊》,189:18-20。
王文誠、何敏華,2005,〈澎湖縣爭取設置觀光特區附設博弈產業之公共事務互動管&;#63972;:名義團體技術實證研究〉,《公共事務評&;#63809;》,6(1):1-23。new window
王向民、段紅偉譯,2011,《政治科學中的制度理論︰“新制度主義”》,上海市:上海人民。譯自Peters, B. Guy. Institutional Theory in Political Science: “The New Institutionalism” (2nd edition). New York : Continuum. 2005.
王美珍,2013,〈要快,就要慢慢來〉,遠見雜誌網頁,http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_23544.html,2013/08/26。
王晶譯,2008,《為什麼是民主?》,臺北市:聯經。譯自Dunn, John. Setting the people free : the story of democracy. London : Atlantic. 2005.
王業立,2011,〈選舉制度變革與臺灣民主化〉,周育仁、謝文煌(編),《臺灣民主化的經驗與意涵》,臺北市:五南圖書,頁77-100。new window
王業立,2012,〈選舉、民主化與政黨競爭〉,朱雲漢(編),《臺灣民主轉型的經驗與啟示》,北京:社會科學文獻,頁159-191。new window
王業立、蘇子喬、郭銘峰,2013,〈臺灣選舉制度研究的回顧與前瞻〉,吳玉山、林繼文、冷則剛(編),《政治學的回顧與前瞻》,臺北市:五南圖書,頁329-358。new window
王嘉源譯,2002,《民主不民主:直擊「民主」政體》,臺北:書林。譯自Swift, Richard. The No-Nonsense Guide to Democracy. London: Verso. 2002.
王錫鋅主編,2008a,《行政過程中公眾參與的制度實踐》,北京市:中國法制。
王錫鋅主編,2008b,《公眾參與和中國新公共運動的興起》,北京市:中國法制。
立法院,1994,立法院公報,第83卷第10期,臺北市:立法院。
立法院,2013,〈立法院議案關係文書,院總第1586號,政府提案第14583號,案由行政院函請審議「觀光賭場管理條例」案〉,立法院全球資訊網網頁,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfc7cfccceccc8cdc5cecec8d2cecac9,2013/08/26。
田弘茂,1989,《大轉型:中華民國的政治和社會變遷》,臺北市:時報。
石之瑜,1998,〈壓迫性的自由主義—公民投票的政治涵義與制度之安排〉,《中國戰略學刊》,1(1):19-44。new window
石之瑜,2005,〈推薦序:歷史終點的別名〉,閻紀宇(譯),《強國論》,臺北市:時報。譯自Fukuyama, Francis. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. New York: Cornell University Press. 2004.
石凌霜,2011,〈公民投票違反共和(主義)原則?-從政治思想史角度回應相關觀點〉,《北商學報》,20: 205 -220。new window
丘昌泰,1995,《公共政策:當代政策科學理論之研究》,臺北:巨流。
丘昌泰,2001,《臺北市社區參與制度之研究》,臺北:臺北市政府研考會。
丘昌泰,2003,〈解讀公民投票的迷思〉,《全國律師》,7(11): 44-49。
丘昌泰,2008,《公共政策》,高雄:復文出版社。
丘昌泰,2010,《地方政府與自治》,臺北市:三民書局。
外貿協會駐胡志明辦事處,2013,〈越南政府將重新評估博弈產業法規〉,外貿協會駐胡志明市辦事處新聞中心網頁,http://hochiminh.taiwantrade.com.tw/news/detail.jsp?id=12265&;lang=zh_TW,2013/09/10。
交通部,2012,《博弈專法研究委託法律暨專業顧問服務案期末工作成果報告書(定稿本)》,臺北市:交通部(受託單位:恆業法律事務所;計劃主持人:徐小波)。
朱元鴻等譯,1996,《後現代理論-批判的質疑》,臺北市:巨流。譯自Best, Steven & Douglas Kellner. Postmorden Theory: Critical Interrogations. The Guilford Press. 1991.
朱雲漢、林碧炤、蕭高彥,2011a,〈中華民國百年政治學發展〉,王汎森(主編),《中國民國發展史:學術發展》,臺北市:聯經,頁259-285。new window
朱雲漢、張佑宗,2011b,〈東亞民主政體的民主品質如何低落?亞洲民主動態調查第二波資料的分析〉,余遜達、徐斯勤(主編),《民主、民主化與治理績效》,浙江:浙江大學出版社,頁38-66。
朱雲漢等,2012,《臺灣民主轉型的經驗與啟示》,北京:社會科學文獻。
朱雲漢,2014,〈臺灣離民主崩壞還有多遠?〉,天下雜誌第544期網頁,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5057056,2014/07/29。
朱鎮明,2002,〈博弈事業管制制度之研究〉,《中國行政評論》,11(2):139-156。new window
朱鎮明,2003,《政治管理》,臺北市:聯經。
朱鎮明,2007,〈現代化的觀光賭場營運與配套的管制制度〉,《國會月刊》,35(11):25-41。new window
朱鎮明、彭姿榕、蔡敏琪,2008,〈賭場管&;#63972;機制初探—以美國、澳洲、澳門及新加坡為&;#63925;〉,《國會月刊》,36(12):33-60。new window
朱鎮明,2009,〈新加坡發展綜合度假村決策過程暨賭場控法之研究〉,《國會月刊》,37(4):60-86。new window
曲兆&;#64026;,2004,〈公民投票概&;#63907;的定義、性質與種&;#63952;之分析與建議〉,《師大政治&;#63809;叢》,2:1-28。
曲兆祥,2004,《公民投票理論與臺灣的實踐》,新北市:揚智文化。
曲兆祥,2005,〈公民投票理論的辯證分析〉,李炳南(編),《政治學與現代社會》,新北市:威仕曼文化,頁219-241。
曲兆&;#64026;,2006,〈我國公投法提案權設計之探討〉,發表於國家政策基&;#63754;會主辦「憲政民主的成長與挑戰研討會」,2006&;#63886;4月。
江明修,1997,《公共行政學:理論與社會實踐》,臺北市:五南圖書。
江明修、陳定銘,1999,《臺灣非營利組織政策遊說的途徑與策略》,行政院國家科學委員會八十八年度專題研究計畫成果報告。new window
江明修、曾冠球,2009,〈政府再造:跨部門治理的觀點〉,《國家菁英季刊》,5 (1): 97-122。
江明修、李衍儒,2010a,〈非營利政策企業家影響澎湖博弈公投的遊說策略分析〉,「2010兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會」論文(8月20日),高雄:義守大學。
江明修、陳秋政、李衍儒、劉奕宏、蘇美玲,2010b,〈跨部門治理之研究趨勢與應用:以臺灣災難管理機制與經驗分析為例〉,「2010國際都市圈發展論壇會議」論文(6月14日),上海:上海交通大學。
江宜樺,1998,《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》,新北市:揚智文化。new window
江宜樺,2001,《自由民主的理路》,臺北市:聯經。new window
江宜樺,2003,〈公民投票與民主政治的關聯〉,《全國律師》,7(11): 68-72。
江宜樺、林建甫,2004,《社會科學通論》,臺北市:臺灣大學。
宋鎮照等合著,2012,《茉莉花革命浪潮下的新世紀民主化課題與前景:經濟發展、資訊傳播與政治民主》,臺北市:五南圖書。
何明修,2011,《晚近二十年來的臺灣行動主義》,臺北市:群學。
何明修,2014,〈到底什麼是「公民運動」?〉,兩岸公評網網頁,http://www.kpwan.com/news/viewNewsPost.do?id=885,2014/05/15。
杜默譯,2008,《後美國世界:群雄崛起的經濟新秩序時代》,臺北市:麥田。譯自Zakaria, Fareed. The Post-American World. New York : W.W. Norton &; Co. 2008.
阮建中,2010,《澳門博彩產業競爭力研究》,北京:社會科學文獻。
余遜達、趙永茂主編,2009,《參與式地方治理&;#30799;究》,杭州市:浙江大學。
李丁讚編,2004,《公共領域在臺灣》,臺北市:桂冠圖書。
李永展,2012,〈一場偏離主題的公投〉,中國時報電子報網頁,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/69518,2013/07/10。
李昌麟,2013,《比較公民投票制度》,臺北市:五南圖書。new window
李長貴,1974,《社會運動學》,臺北市:大林。
李長貴,1992,《激進社會運動》,臺北市:理論與政策雜誌出版社。new window
李沛軒,2012,《博弈事業之設立與管理相關法治問題之研析—以比較法為中心》,國立臺北大學法律系碩士論文,2012年7月。
李衍儒,2009,〈中央與地方政府對地方人事制度的視框衝突〉,《文官制度季刊》,特刊: 55-91。new window
李衍儒,2010,〈第十章行政機關〉,王業立、林宗達、林麗香(編),《政治學》,新北市:晶典文化,頁255-288。
李衍儒,2010,〈第十二章司法機關〉,王業立、林宗達、林麗香(編),《政治學》,新北市:晶典文化,頁321-342。
李衍儒、江明修,2011,〈社會企業之發展經驗與政策建議:以美國、英國、香港與臺灣為例〉,《中國非營利評論》,7:94-114。
李風華譯,2012,《論民主》,北京市:中國人民大學出版社。譯自Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
李建興、趙峻郁、徐欽祥,2010,〈論澳門博弈觀光未來之多元性發展〉,《休閒保健期刊》,3:87-93。new window
李雪瑩,2013,《澎湖設置觀光賭場政策中公民參與行動之分析-以反賭陣營為例》,臺北:國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。
李登輝,2013,《二十一世紀臺灣要到哪裡去》,臺北市:遠流。
李筱嬋,2010,《觀光賭場監管政策之研究—以美國、澳門、新加坡為中心》,臺北:國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。
吳定,1991,《公共政策》,臺北市:中華電視公司教學部。
吳定,2006,《公共政策辭典》,臺北市:五南圖書。
吳若予,1992,《戰後臺灣公營事業之政經分析》,台北:業強。new window
吳若予,2001,〈臺灣公營事業民營化的政治經濟分析〉,余致力、郭昱瑩、陳敦源(主編),《公共政策分析的理論與實務》,新北市:韋伯文化,頁305-327。new window
吳家林,2009,《合法賭場治理之法律問題研究-以新加坡及澳門法規範為中心》,政治大學法學院在職專班碩士論文。
吳庚,2003,《行政法之理論與實用(增訂八版)》,臺北市:三民書局。new window
&;#63988;水波、李長晏,2005,《跨域治理》,臺北市:五南圖書。new window
林水波、邱靖鈜,2006,《公民投票vs.公民會議》,臺北市:五南圖書。
林水波,2011,〈協力治理〉,《研習論壇》,122:8-22。
林火旺,2005,〈審議民主與公民養成〉,《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》,29:103-143。new window
林佳龍,2007,〈公投民主的理論與實踐:公投立法的奮鬥歷程〉,《民主到底-公投民主在臺灣》,臺北:臺灣智庫。
林佳龍,2009,《公投與民主-臺灣與世界的對話》,臺北:臺灣智庫。
&;#63988;國明、陳東升,2003,〈公民會議與審議式民主:全民健保的公民&;#63851;與經驗〉,《臺灣社會學》,6:61-118。new window
林國明、陳東升,2004,〈公民投票與審議民主〉,《公投民主在臺灣學術研討會》,1-14;http://www.taiwanthinktank.org/ttt/attachment/article_111_attach1.doc。
&;#63988;國明、陳東升,2005,〈審議民主、科技與公民討&;#63809;:臺灣的實作經驗〉,《科技、醫&;#63937;與社會》,3:1-49。
&;#63988;國明,2008,《&;#64008;政民主之實踐:全國型議題審議民主公民&;#63851;與》,臺&;#63843;:&;#64008;政院研考會。
林國彬,2009a,〈美國內華達州博弈管制制度簡介〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,172:218-237。
林國彬,2009b,〈博弈事業之組織型態及其管制〉,《月旦法學雜誌》, 174:261-283。
林國彬,2010a,〈博弈事業經營者適格性及執照核發適當性審查規範〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,181:248-260。
林國彬,2010b,〈博弈產業之行政紀律監理與司法審查之規定〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,182:238-249。
&;#63988;興傑,2005,《澎湖的社會結構-從賭場爭議的過程&;#63789;看》,世新大學社會發展研究所碩士&;#63809;文。
林瓊珠、蔡佳泓,2010,〈從成案到投票-2008 年討黨產與入聯公投的公投意向與參與行為〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,7(3):45-85。new window
法務部,2000,〈行政程序法各條文中『法規』之涵義彙整表〉,法務部網頁,http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=26438&;ctNode=28150&;mp=001,2013/10/12。
法務部,2007,〈行政程序法有關聽證制度之檢討〉,法務部網頁,http://www.moj.gov.tw/public/Attachment/711215392885.pdf,2013/09/11。
官政哲、陳耀宗,2006,〈澎湖地區設置觀光博弈事業對治安影響與對策〉,《中華警政學會會訊》,4:18-28。
房思宏,2004,《全球化》,新北市:揚智文化。
苗延威譯,2002,《社會運動概論》,臺北市:巨流。譯自Della Porta, Donatella &; Mario Diani. Social Movements: an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997.
蔣揚譯,2011,《政策型思考與政治》,北京:社會科學文獻。譯自松下圭一,政策型思考&;#12392;政治,東京:東京大&;#23398;出版&;#20250;,1991年。
范智明,2002,〈運動博弈產發展運動的活水或毒液﹖〉,《國民體育季刊》,135:58-64。
俞可平,1998,《社群主義》,北京市:中國社會科學。new window
周育仁,1995,《政治與經濟之關係:臺灣經驗與其理論意涵》,臺北市:五南圖書。
周育仁,2012,〈憲政主義與臺灣民主化〉,財團法人國家政策研究基金會網頁,憲政(研)101-003號,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/10421,2014/08/11。new window
周奕成,2007,〈解開死結,降低公投門〉,中國時報,4/20,A15。
周桂田,2005,〈全球化下風險社會之政治實踐〉,李炳南(編),《政治學與現代社會》,新北市:威仕曼文化,頁357-399。
周桂田,2014,《風險社會:公共治理與公民參與》,臺北市:五南圖書。new window
周萬來,2004,《立法院職權行使法逐條釋義》,臺北市:五南圖書。new window
洪永泰,2014,《誰會勝選?誰能凍蒜?:預知政治版圖,讓民調數字告訴你》,臺北市:天下文化。
胡文川,2007,〈從政治經濟整合觀點&;#63809;博弈產業之發展〉,《元培學報》,14:79-92。
胡幼慧、姚美華,1996,〈一些質性方法的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?〉,胡幼慧(編),《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性主義研究實例》,臺北市:巨流圖書,頁141-158。
胡佛,2004,《政治學的科學探究(四)政治變遷與民主化》,臺北市:三民書局。
胡佛,2006,〈推薦序言〉,陳曉譯,《參與和民主理論》,上海市:上海人民出版社。譯自Pateman, Carole. Particpation and Democratic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1970 .頁I - XIII。
段小平譯,2007,《代議制政府》,北京市:中國社會科學。譯自Mill, John Stuart. Considerations on Representative Government. New York, H. Holt and Co. 1875.
&;#63945;&;#63991;偉、吳明蒼,2009,〈高雄市設&;#63991;觀光賭場支持&;#64001;之探討〉,《嘉大體育健康休閒期刊》,8(1):35-46。
馬英九,2007,〈馬英九蕭萬長的全方位政策白皮書-國際外交〉,《臺灣向前行:馬英九蕭萬長2.0》,http://2008.ma19.net/policy4you/diplomacy,2009/10/12。
馬駿、劉美麗主編,2009,《公民參與》,北京市:中國人民大學。
原宗麗,2011,《參與式民主理論研究》,北京市:中國社會科學。
高永光,2005,〈朝野國會聯盟及其未來之發展〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,2(3):159-165。new window
高永光,2007,〈地方治理與地方民主〉,《研習論壇月刊》,74:1-6。
高永光,2010a,〈五都形成之後區域治理問題之分析〉,「2010臺灣政治學會年會暨『重新思考國家:五都之後,百年前夕』學術研討會」論文(12月5日),臺北:東吳大學。
高永光,2010b,〈2009年縣市三合一選舉後續政治效應〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,6(4):227-233。new window
高永光,2011,〈國家結構〉,趙永茂(主編),《中華民國發展史:政治與法制》,臺北市:聯經,頁27-54。new window
袁方,2005,《社會研究方法》,臺北市:五南圖書。
袁碩成,2006,〈由民主理論支持超越公投民主與民粹批判的論述:以三二○公投案為例〉,《中華人文社會學報》,4:170-200。new window
袁碩成,2011,《當前臺灣民主困境的出路之探索:權力分享式民主與審議式民主的取徑》,臺北:國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
紀俊臣,2012,〈觀光博弈公投通過後連江縣政的因應與作為〉,《中國地方自治》,65(7):22 -33。
孫迎春譯,2011,《公共行政與公共事務(第十版)》,北京市:中國人民大學。譯自Henry, Nicholas. Public Administration and Public Affairs. Tenth Edition. N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall. 2007.
孫豔等譯,2006,《官僚機構:政府機構的作為及其原因》,北京:生活、讀書、新知三聯書店。譯自Wilson, James Q. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books. 1989.
徐仁輝、陳敦源、黃光雄,2005,《政府失靈-公共選擇的初探》,臺北市:智勝。
徐永明、蔡佳泓,2004a,《臺灣公民投票的經驗與展望》,臺北市:財團法人臺灣民主基金會。
徐永明,2004b,〈公投民主與代議民主之關係—以臺灣經驗為例〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,1(2):1-26。new window
徐欽祥、黃國光,2010,〈我國&;#63978;島博弈觀光&;#63875;遊意象之塑造〉,《運動休閒餐&;#63875;研究》,5(1):175-186。
陳東升編審,2005,《商議民主公民會議操作手冊》,臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。
陳東升,2006,〈審議民主的限制:臺灣公民會議的經驗〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(1):92-104。new window
陳志揚,1994,〈行政程序中聽證制度之研究〉,城仲模(編),《行政法之一般法律原則》,臺北市:三民書局,頁301-302。new window
陳金貴,1992,〈公民參與的研究〉,《行政學報》,24:95-128。new window
陳金貴,2011,〈社會課責在公部門的運用〉,建構公民社會特刊,《空大行政學報》,22:1-16。new window
陳金貴,2013,〈治理之理論與發展〉,《公共治理季刊》,1(1):25-36。
陳孟君譯,1996,《量化的反思:重探社會研究的邏輯》,臺北:巨流圖書。譯自Liberson, Stanley. Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley : University of California Press. 1985.
陳香蘭主編,2012,《絕地逢生 反賭逆轉勝》,臺北:法界出版社。
陳秋政,2008a,《社會中心途徑之跨部門治理研究:以「洛杉磯河整治計畫」為例》,臺北:國立政治大學公共行政&;#30799;究所博士論文。
陳秋政,2008b,〈跨部門治理之內涵與研究啟示〉,《府際關係研究通訊》,4:29-32。
陳俊榮,2008,《論地方性公民投票法制問題》,臺北:臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士學位論文。
陳恆鈞,2012,《治理互賴理論與實務》,臺北市:五南圖書。
陳錦玉,2007,〈離島居民對開放設置觀光娛樂賭博事業之態度認知研究-以金門為例〉,《國立金門技術學院學報》,2:29 -59。
陳隆志、陳文賢主編,2010,《國際重要公民投票案例解析》,臺北市:財團法人新世紀文教基金會、臺灣聯合國研究中心。
陳朝政,2010,〈第四章民主政治與民主理論〉,王業立、林宗達、林麗香(編),《政治學》,新北市:晶典文化,頁97-128。
陳嫈郁,2012,〈治理理論與國家職能的辯證:英國觀點〉,《政治科學論叢》,53:1-52。new window
陳媛玫,2009,《澳門博彩業之研究:發展歷程、政府監管及影響效果》,臺北:淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
陳暢偉,2007,《澳門青少年對賭博的態度與行為:四個犯罪學理論的驗證研究》,臺北:國立臺北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文。
陳毓麟譯,2005,《民主理論現況》,臺北市:商周。譯自Shapiro, Ian. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003.
商紅日、呂鵬譯,2011,《政府的價格-如何應對公共財政危機》,上海:上海譯文。譯自Osborne, David. &; Peter Hutchinson. The Price of Government: Getting the Results We Need in an Age of Permanent Fiscal Crisis, New York : Basic Books. 2004.
盛智明、韓佳譯,2012,《好研究如何設計?:用量化邏輯做質化研究》,臺北市:群學。譯自King, Gary., Robert O. Keohane &; Sidney Verba. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. 1994.
許文傑,2000,《公民參與公共行政之理論與實踐-「公民性政府」的理想型建構》,臺北:國立政治大學公共行政&;#30799;究所博士論文。new window
許立一,2003,《慎思熟慮的民主行政》,新北市:韋伯文化。new window
許怡雯,2012,〈公投前三聖筊恩准;楊綏生:媽祖同意馬祖開賭〉,中時電子報,http://mag.chinatimes.com/mag-cnt.aspx?artid=15018,2013/10/28。
許佩賢等譯,2009,《臺灣:分裂國家與民主化》,臺北:新自然主義,譯自若林正丈,台&;#28286;:分裂&;#22269;家&;#12392;民主化,東京:東京大&;#23398;出版&;#20250;,1992年。
許國賢,1997,《倫理政治論:一個民主時代的反思》,新北市:揚智文化。
莊弘&;#20227;,2012,〈博弈事業特許執照及稅費法制之研析〉,立法院法制局專題研究報告,編號:1019(僅供委員參考未出版)。
郭小東等著,2012,《澳門博彩產業與經濟適度多元化》,北京:社會科學文獻。
郭乃瑩,2011,《論賭博罪之存廢》,臺北:國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。
郭秋永,2007,〈多元民主理論:公民審議的一個理論基礎〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,4(3):63-107。new window
郭春敏,1995,《觀光賭場設置區位條件之研究》,臺北:文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。
郭春敏,2008,《博弈娛樂事業概論》,新北市:揚智文化。
曹重偉,2012,〈正方強調發展博弈,尋取馬祖永續發展機會〉,馬祖日報電子報, http://www.matsu-news.gov.tw/news_info.php?CMD=open&;UID=141781,2013/11/26。
曹勝雄,1995,《臺灣地區設置賭場之研究》,交通部觀光局委託研究報告。
黃長玲,2008,〈分裂社會下的體制發展與爭議:臺灣與南韓民主化經驗的比較〉,彭慧鸞(編),《蕃薯與泡菜:亞洲雙龍臺韓經驗比較》,臺北市:財團法人亞太文化學術交流基金會,頁41-64。
黃東益、陳敦源,2004,〈電子化政府與商議式民主之實踐〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,1(4):1-34 。new window
黃東益,2008,〈審議過後—從&;#64008;政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策&;#63898;結〉,《東吳政治學報》,26(4):59-96。new window
黃昭元等譯,2007,《直接民主指南:瑞士與全球》,臺北:亞洲創制複決中心(IRI-Asia)、歐洲創制複決中心(IRI-Europe)、臺灣民主基金會出版。譯自Bruno, Kaufmann., Rolf Buchi &; Nadja Braun. Guide Book to Direct Democracy: In Switzerland and Beyond. Marburg Germany: Initiative &; Referendum Institute Europe. 2007.
黃齊達、鄭家瑜、李明儒,2010,〈後博弈公投,澎湖博弈特區設置地點的潛力分析〉,《服務業管理評論》,8:125-149。new window
黃瑞琪、羅曉南主編,2005,《人文社會科學的邏輯》,臺北市:松慧。
黃維明譯,2009,《談論式民主》,臺北市:群學。譯自Dryzek, John S. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
黃德福,1990,〈選舉、地方派系與政治轉型 78年底三項公職人員選舉之省思〉,《中山社會科學季刊》,5(1):84-96。
黃錦堂,1996,〈公民投票在我國適用之檢討〉,《問題與研究》,35(7):47-55。new window
黃錦堂,1999,〈地方制&;#64001;法重大問題之探討〉,《研考雙月刊》,23(3):42-51。
黃錦堂,2010,〈評ECFA公投案之駁回〉,財團法人國家政策研究基金會網頁,憲政(評)099-064號,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/7683,2014/08/11。
黃錦堂、何展旭,2011,〈監察制度之回顧與前瞻〉,趙永茂(主編),《中華民國發展史:政治與法制》,臺北市:聯經,頁235-268。new window
黃錦堂,2012a,〈地方立法權的主要問題與制度建立〉,《法令月刊》,63(5):63-80。new window
黃錦堂,2012b,《地方制度法論》,臺北:元照。
梁書寧譯,國立編譯館主譯,2008,《思索資本主義國家的未來》,新北市:韋伯文化。譯自Jessop, Bob. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, UK, Blackwell Publishing. 2002.
梁潔芬、盧兆興編著,2010,《中國澳門特區博彩業與社會發展》,香港:香港城市大學出版社。
游千慧,2003,〈開放澎湖地區設立觀光賭場之芻議〉,立法院法制局專題研究報告,編號:58(僅供委員參考未出版)。
游常山,2007,〈新加坡的新契機 解禁賭場把國家禁忌變國家競爭力〉,《遠見雜誌》,第249期,http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_12832.html。
葉俊榮,1998,〈公民投票在臺灣的實踐〉,《新世紀智庫論壇》,2:52-64。
葉俊榮,1999a,〈公民投票在臺灣的實踐〉,陳隆志(編),《公民投票與臺灣前途》,臺北市:前衛,頁125-147。new window
葉俊榮,1999b,〈公民投票入憲的範圍與必要性〉,《國策專刊》,8:12-14。
葉俊榮,2005,〈時事評析:從任務型國大閉幕展望下一波憲政改革〉,《新世紀智庫論壇》,30:109-111。
葉智魁,2002,《賭博共和國》,臺北市:前衛。
葉智魁,2003,〈他山之石的啟示-賭博合法化的美國經驗之研究〉,《臺灣人文生態研究》,5(1):99-124。
葉智魁、顏怡音,2009,〈「博弈條款」與「觀光賭場」—釐析開設「觀光賭場」會帶來的效應〉,《運動管理季刊》,13:17-25。
程明修,2006,〈聽證、陳述意見與公聽會概念之區別〉,東吳大學網頁,http://myweb.scu.edu.tw/~muenster/Anhoerung_2.pdf,2013/08/15。
彭宗超、鍾開斌等譯,2006,《政策過程理論》,北京市:生活‧讀書‧新知三聯書店。譯自Sabatier, Paul A. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. 1999.
彭國光,2010,《臺灣博弈事業管理法制之探討:以Casino之相關法規為主》,國立高雄大學高階法律暨管理碩士(EMLBA)在職專班碩士論文。
彭雲望譯,2008,《公共政策經典》,北京市:北京大學。譯自Shafritz, Jay M., S. Layne Karen &; Christopher P. Borick. Classics of Public Policy. New York: Pearson Longman. 2005.
彭錦鵬,2005,〈全觀型治理:理論與制度化策略〉,《政治科學論叢》,23:61-100。new window
湯德宗,2000,《行政程序法論》,臺北市:元照出版公司。new window
張玉山,2008,《國土策&;#63862;規劃下觀光賭場之區位因素評估》,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究。
張世杰,2000,《制度變遷的政治過程:英國全民健康服務體系的個案研究1948-1990》,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。new window
張世杰,2009,〈書評:第二代治理網絡的研究-一些理論觀點的省思〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,6(4):253-264。
張世賢,2012,〈馬祖經濟永續發展〉,《中國地方自治》,65(7):3-21。
張於節,2008,〈開放賭場須有完善稅賦配套〉,《稅務旬刊》,2027:7-10。
張明貴,2003,《民主理論》,臺北市:五南圖書。
張怡譯,2007,《為官僚制正名:一場公共行政的辯論》,上海:復旦大學。譯自Goodsell, Charles T. The Case For Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. D.C.: CQ Press. 2003.
張劍寒,1973,〈民主國家之法規聽證制度〉,《憲政思潮》,23:1-9。
張慧芝譯,2003,《多元社會的民主》,臺北市:桂冠圖書。譯自Lijphart, Arend. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press. 1977.
張體偉、孫豫寧譯,2013,《第三次工業革命:世界經濟即將被顛覆,新能源與商務、政治、教育的全面革命》,臺北市:經濟新潮社。譯自Rifkin, Jeremy. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. New York: Palgrave. 2013.
楊志良,2012,《臺灣大崩壞:挑戰沒有希望的未來民主理論》,臺北市:天下文化。
楊孝&;#28634;,1989,〈內容分析法〉,楊國樞(編),《社會及行為科學研究法(下冊)》,臺北:東華,頁809-831。new window
楊湘鈞,2013,〈江揆:新群眾運動違法失序公權力排除〉,聯合新聞網,http://www.udn.com/2014/5/2/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS1/8649450.shtml,2014/05/04。
楊瑪利、游常山,2007,〈新加坡第二次起飛〉,《遠見雜誌》,第249期,http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_12834.html。
楊筠芃,2009,《博弈事業概論與實務》,臺北市:五南圖書。
葛永光,1989,《政治變遷與發展:臺灣經驗的探索》,臺北市:幼獅。
漢寶德,2012,《設計型思考》,臺北市:聯經。
董石桃,2010,〈當代西方參與式民主理論的研究視域〉,《湖北社會科學》,2010(5):38-43。
趙永茂,1998,〈地方政治生態與地方行政的關係〉,《政治科學論叢》,9:305-328。new window
趙永茂,2003,〈臺灣府際關係與跨域管理:文獻回顧與策略途徑初探〉,《政治科學論叢》,18:53-70。new window
趙永茂,2004,〈地方派系依侍結構的演變與特質-高雄縣內門鄉的個案分析〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,1(1):85-117。new window
趙永茂,2007a,〈從地方治理論臺灣地方政治發展的基本問題〉,《政治科學論叢》,31:1-38。new window
趙永茂,2007b,〈英國地方治理的社會建構與發展困境〉,《歐美研究》,37(4):593-633。new window
趙永茂,2008a,〈地方與區域治理發展的趨勢與挑戰〉,《研考雙月刊》,5(2):161-167。new window
趙永茂,2008b,〈二次政黨輪替後對臺灣民主發展的省思〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,91:1-14。new window
趙永茂,2011a,〈總論〉,趙永茂(主編),《中國民國發展史:政治與法制》,臺北市:聯經,頁1-25。
趙永茂,2011b,〈地方自治發展與臺灣民主化〉,周育仁、謝文煌(編),《臺灣民主化的經驗與意涵》,臺北:五南圖書,頁103-116。new window
趙永茂,2011c,〈落實地方分權,引入公民社會〉,王家英(編),《願景2030擁抱夢想、迎向未來》,臺北:遠見,頁60-61。
趙永茂、陳銘顯、王皓平,2011d,〈建構都市多元中心的治理:反思都市發展不對稱與民主赤字問題〉,《政治科學論叢》,49: 1-32。new window
趙永茂,2012a,〈東亞民主社會的重構方向—從政商代議體制到社會代議的結合〉,謝政諭(編),《文化、民主與兩岸關係的東亞觀點》,臺北:東吳大學、愛知大學、松慧出版社,頁7-22。
趙永茂等編,2012b,《府際關係:新興研究議題與治理策略》,北京:社會科學文獻。
趙俊人,2011,〈地方性公民投票問題之研究〉,立法院法制局專題研究報告,編號:915(僅供委員參考未出版)。
廖俊松,2007,〈二十一世紀的公共行政:從新公共管理到民主治理〉,《T&;D飛訊》,56:1-6。new window
廖揆&;#64026;、陳永芳、鄧&;#63860;&;#63917;譯,2003,《公民投票與民主政府》,新&;#63843;市:韋伯文化。譯自Set&;aring;l&;aring;, Maija-Leena. Referendums and Democratic Government: Normative Theory and the Analysis of Institutions. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 1999.
廖錦桂、王興中主編,2007,《口中之光-審議民主的理論與實踐》,臺北市:臺灣智庫。
劉介修、陳逸玲譯,2012,《審議民主指南:21世紀公民參與的有效策略》,臺北市:群學。譯自Gastil, John &; Peter Levine. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2005.
劉正山,2011,〈當前審議式民主的困境及可能的出路〉,梁文韜(編),《審議式民主的理想與侷限》,頁1-25。new window
劉代洋等,1996,《博彩事業管制與稅制規劃》,行政院研究發展考核委員會編印。
劉代洋,2008a,《開放觀光賭場之社會影響評估》,&;#64008;政院經濟建設委員會研究報告。
劉代洋,2008b,《臺灣發展觀光賭場的策略規劃》,&;#64008;政院經濟建設委員會研究報告。
&;#63943;再傑,2009,《臺灣發展觀光賭場之探討-以&;#63754;門為&;#63925;》,國&;#63991;暨南國際大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
劉坤億,2003,〈地方治理與地方政府角色職能的轉變〉,《空大行政學報》,13:233-268。new window
劉坤億,2007,〈英日公私混合型組織發展經驗之探討〉,《T&;D飛訊》,3:8-18。
劉厚連,2008,〈引進博弈產業發展離島經濟-以大陸、港、澳與國外經驗為借鏡〉,《國會月刊》,36(12):87-114。new window
劉厚連,2013,〈觀光賭場管理條例草案評估報告〉,立法院法制局法案評估報告,編號:898(僅供委員參考未出版)。
潘淑滿,2010,《質性研究理論及應用》,臺北市:心理。
鄭惟厚譯,2009,《統計,讓數字說話!》,臺北市:天下文化。譯自Moore, David S. Statistics: Concepts and Controversies. (4th ed.) New York : W. H. Freeman and Company. 1997.
鄭隆正,2011,〈國際觀光渡假區投資計畫草案地方意見暨徵詢說明會週日舉行〉,澎湖日報電子報,http://blog.xuite.net/penghu.dialy/blog/52115092-%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E8%A7%80%E5%85%89%E6%B8%A1%E5%81%87%E5%8D%80%E6%8A%95%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88%E5%9C%B0%E6%96%B9%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B%E6%9A%A8%E5%BE%B5%E8%A9%A2%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E6%9C%83+%E9%80%B1%E6%97%A5%E8%88%89%E8%A1%8C,2014/04/11。
蔡宏明譯,2010,《循證管理:依循證據找問題,正確決策破迷思》,臺北市:梅霖文化。譯自Pfeffer, Jeffrey &; Robert I. Sutton. Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths and Total Nonsense:Profiting From Evidence-Based Management. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press. 2006.
蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯,2003,《敘說探究-質性研究中的經驗與故事》,臺北市:心理。譯自Clandinin, D. J. &; F. Michael Connelly. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story In Qualitative Research. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass. 2000.
蔡智勇,2010,《居民對觀光賭場發展態&;#64001;與意願之研究》,桃園縣:國立中央大學企業管理系博士論文。new window
歐用生,1989,《質的研究》,臺北:師大書苑。
賴宏昇譯,2010,《博弈產業發展:亞太地區的發展與影響》,新北市:揚智文化。譯自Breen, Helen & Nerilee Hing. Casino Industry in Asia Pacific Development, Operation, and Impact. Routledge, 2006.
賴錦珖,2007,《公民投票法釋義-附錄:關於魁北克主權分離公投之裁定》,臺北市:三民書局。
應奇,1999,《社群主義》,新北市:揚智文化。
謝志明,2002,《澎湖地區設置觀光賭場之政策分析》,臺北:國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士論文。
謝美玲,2005,〈地方性公民投票法制之建構及其相關問題〉,《中國地方自治》,58(8):19-30。
謝美玲,2006,〈我國公民投票制度之研究-以二○○四年公民投票法之檢討為中心〉,國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
謝復生,1996,〈主權在民的體現或民粹主義的濫用〉,《問題與研究》,35(7):38-46。new window
謝復生等,1997,《公民投票(創制複決)制度比較研究》,臺北市:行政院研考會。
龍冠海,1989,《社會學》,臺北市:三民書局。
韓旭、楊春學譯,2010,《公共選擇理論(第3版)》,北京市:中國社會科學。譯自Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice III. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2003.
韓保中,2006,《公民社會觀點之民主行政理論-以Denhardt新公共服務論為主軸》,國立臺灣大學政治學系博士論文。new window
羅傳賢,1993,《立法技術》,臺北市:龍文。
蕭全政,1987,〈國家機關在政治過程中的地位〉,《社會科學論叢》,35:133-151。new window
蕭全政,1988,《政治與經濟的整合》,臺北市:桂冠圖書。new window
蕭全政,1989,《臺灣地區的新重商主義》,臺北市:業強。
蕭全政,1991,〈政府與企業間的關係〉,「企業、政府與社會間關係」研討會(9月14日),臺北:國策中心。
蕭全政,1994,〈兩種社會科學典範〉,《政治科學論叢》,5:59-85。new window
蕭全政,1995,《臺灣新思維:國民主義》,臺北市:時英。
蕭全政,1997a,《臺灣地區的新重商主義》,臺北市:業強。
蕭全政,1997b,〈組織與制度的政治經濟分析〉,《暨大學報》,1(1):1-6。
蕭全政,1998,〈從政治學三種觀點看當前的公共行政與公共政策〉,《理論與政策》,12(2):83-95。new window
蕭全政,1999a,〈政府再造與企業家精神〉,《暨大學報》,3(1):321-335。
蕭全政,1999b,〈擺盪於主客體之間的“人”一現代倫理與公德的人性基礎〉,《政治科學論叢》,11:1-20。new window
蕭全政,2001,〈臺灣威權體制轉型中的國家機關與民間社會〉,中央研究院臺灣研究推動委員會(編),《威權體制的變遷:解嚴後的臺灣》,臺北市:中研院臺灣史研究所籌備處,頁63-88。
蕭全政、趙永茂,2011,《我國縣市改制直轄市後問題探討與因應策略子計畫:直轄市發展定位、策略及相關配套措施之研析與規劃》,研考會研究計畫。
蕭阿勤,2012,《重構臺灣:當代民族主義的文化政治》,臺北市:聯經。new window
蕭登元,2010,《博弈事業發展概論》,新北市:全華圖書。
蕭新煌,1989,〈對臺灣發展經驗理論解釋的解謎〉,《中國論壇》,319:156-167。
蕭新煌,2011,〈序:社會運動與社會運動研究的辯證〉,何明修、林秀幸(編),《社會運動的年代:晚近二十年的臺灣行動主義》,臺北市:群學,序章。
蕭瑞麟,2007,《不用數字的研究》,新北市:臺灣培生教育。
懷德主編,2013,《馬祖夜未眠》,臺北市:時英。
顧忠華,2005,《解讀社會力:臺灣的學習社會與公民社會》,臺北:遠足文化。
顧建光譯,2006,《公共政策工具》,北京市:中國人民大學。譯自Peters, B. Guy &; Frans K. M. van Nispen .Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration. Cheltenham, UK.: Edward Elgar Publishing. 1998.&;#8195;
貳、英文部分
Ackerman, Bruce A &; James S. Fishkin. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven : Yale University Press.
AGA. 2013.“The AGA Survey of Casino Entertainment.” in http://www.americangaming.org/sites/default/files/uploads/docs/aga_sos2013_fnl.pdf. Latest update 8 September 2013.
Agranoff, R. &; M. McGuire. 1998. “A Jurisdiction-Based Model of Intergovernmental Management in U.S. Cities.” Publics 28(4): 1-20.
Allison, Graham. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. London: Longman.
Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 35 (4): 216–224.
Arnstein, S. R. 1977. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” In The Politics of Technology, eds. G. Boyle, D. Elliot &; R. Roy. London: Longman &; Open University, 240-243.
Auer, Andreas &; Michael B&;uuml;tzer. 2001. Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Baber, W. &; R. Bartlett. 2005. Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Bachrach, P. 1973. “Interest, Participation and Democratic Theory”, In Participation in Politics, Nomos XVI, eds. J. R. Pennock &; J. W. Chapman. New York: Lieber-Atherton, 39–55.
Bahr, Holger. 2010. The Politics of Means and Ends: Policy Instruments in the European Union. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Balloch, S. &; M. Taylor. 2001. “Introduction”, In Partnership Working: Policy and Practice, eds. S. Balloch &; M. Taylor. Bristol: Policy Press, 1-16.
Barber, B. R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkley: University of California Press.
Barnes, M. &; D. Prior. 2000. Private Lives as Public Policy. Birmingham: Venture Press.
Barry, B. 1965. Political Argument. London: Routledge.
Benhabib, S. 1996. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Bessette, Joseph M. 1980. “Deliberative Democracy: The Majoritarian Principle in Republican Government,” In How Democratic is The Constitution?, eds. Robert A. Goldwin &; William A. Shambra. Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute, 102-116.
Besson, Samantha &; Jose Luis Marti. 2006. Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents. VT: Ashgate.
Birch, Anthony Harold. 2007. The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. New York: Routledge.
Bl&;uuml;hdorn, Ingolfur. 2006. “The Third Transformation of Democracy: On the Efficient Management of Late-modern Complexity,” In Economic Efficiency, Democratic Empowerment: Contested Modernization in Britain and Germany, eds. Ingolfur Bl&;uuml;hdorn and Uwe Jun. Lexington Books, 299-331.
Bohman, J. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bohman, J. 1998. “The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–425.
Borins, Sandford F. 2011. Governing Fables: Learning from Public Sector Narratives. NC: Information Age.
Box, Richard C. 1998. Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century. CA: Sage.
Box, Richard C. 2005. Critical Social theory in public administration. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Bryer, Thomas A. &; Wendell C. Lawther. 2009. “The Future of Civic engagement in Local Governance: 2020 Envisioning a Post-Representative democracy and Expanded Public Value in Third Party Governance.” Paper presented at the lunch meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, September 9, University of Central Florida.
Budge, Ian. 2001. “Direct Democracy.” In Encyclopedia of Political Thought. eds. Paul B. Clarke &; Joe Foweraker. New York: Routledge, 224-226.
Butler, David &; Austin Ranney. 1994. Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. D.C.: The AEI Press.
Cabot, Anthony N. 2001. Casino Gaming: Policy, Economics, and Regulation. UNLV International Gaming Institute.
Carswell, D. 2002. Direct Democracy: Empowering People to Make Their Lives Better. London: C-change.
Chambers, S. 1996. Reasonable Democracy: Jurgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse. New York: Cornell University Press.
Chambers, S. 2001. “Constitutional Referendums and Democratic Deliberation.”In Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaign, eds. M. Mendelsohn &; A. Parkin. New York: Palgrave, 231-255.
Chambers, S. &; W. Kymlicka. 2002. Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society. N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Chambers, S. 2003. “Deliberative democratic theory” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307-326.
Chao, Yung-mau &; Michael Y.M. Kau. 1993. “Local Government and Political Development in Taiwan,” In Establishing Democratic Rule: the Reemergence of Local Governments in Post-Authoritarian Systems, eds. Ilpyong J. Kim &; Jane Shapiro Zacek, Washington, DC: Paragon House Publishers, 285-306.
Chao, Yung-mau. 2013. “The Restructuring of Local Politics and Political Parties in East Asia: From Establishments of Money-Politics to the Emergence of Active Civic Engagement”, Panorama: Insights into Asian and European Affairs. 02/2012: 27-38.
Chisholm, D. 1995. “Problem Solving and Institutional Design.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(4): 451-491.
Claire, Guy S. 1934. Administocracy:The Recovery Laws and Their Enforcement. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Clarke, M. &; J. Stewart. 1997. “Handling the Wicked Issues”, INLOGOV Discussion paper. Institute for Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.
Cohen, J. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”, In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, eds. A. Hamlin and P. Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell, 17-34.
Cohen, J. 1997. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy”, In Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, eds. J. Bohman and W. Rehg. MA: MIT Press, 407-437.
Collins, D. 2003. “The Social Costs and Benefits of Gambling: An Introduction to the Economic Issues.” Journal of Gambling Studies 15(3): 181-212.
Connor, D.M. 1988. “A new ladder of citizen participation.” National Civic Review 77 (3): 249–257.
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. New York: Cambridge.
Dahl, Robert A. 1970. After the Revolution? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. and Charles E. Lindblom. 1976. Politics, Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 2006. On Political Equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dalton, Russell J. 2009. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation is Reshaping American Politics. D.C.: CQ Press.
Davis, L. 1964. “The Cost of Realism: Contemporary Restatements of Democracy.” Western Political Quarterly 17(1):37-46.
deLeon, P. 1992.“The Democratization of the Policy Sciences.” Public Administration Review 52(2): 125-129.
Denhardt, R. B. &; B. R. Hammond. 1993. Public Administration in Action: Readings, Profiles and Cases. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.
Denhardt, R. B. &; J. V. DenHardt. 2000. “The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering.” Public Administration Review 60(6): 549-557.
Denhardt, R. B. &; J. V. DenHardt. 2003. The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering. New York: Armonk.
Dinsdale, Geoff. 1997. “The New Public Management and the Future Public Service: Push, Pull, Balance and Beyond.” Canadian Public Administration 40(2): 370-386.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Dryzek, J. 2008. “The Empirical Turn in Deliberative Democracy”. Paper presented at the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Democracy Workshop, February 7, Australian National University.
Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. 2001. “Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy.” Political Theory 29(5): 651-669.
Dryzek, J. &; S. Niemeyer. 2006. “Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideal.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 634-49.
Dryzek, J. &; S. Niemeyer. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, W. N. 2008. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Fourth Edition. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Dunn, W. N. 2012. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Fifth Edition. Boston: Pearson.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
Eadington, William R. 2003. “Measuring Costs from Permitted Gaming: Concepts and Categories in Evaluating Gambling’s Consequences.” Journal of Gambling Studies 19(2): 185-213.
Ellis, Richard J. &; Michael Nelson. 2011. Debating Reform: Conflicting Perspectives on How to Fix the American Political System. D.C.: CQ Press.
Elster, Jon. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Elstub, S. 2010. “The Third Generation of Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies Review 2010(8): 291-307.
Ernst &; Young. 2011. “Mark overview: the 2011 global gaming bulletin.” in http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/2011_global_gaming-bulletin/$FILE/2011%20Global%20Gaming%20Bulletin.pdf. Latest update 8 August 2013.
Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer &; Theda Skocpol. eds. 1985. Bringing The State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Farmer, David John. 1995. The Language of Public Administration: Bureaucracy, Modernity, and Postmodernity. Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.
Fischer, Frank &; John Forester. 1987. Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. CA: Sage.
Fishkin, James, S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, James, S. 1992. The Dialogue of Justice : Toward a Self-Reflective Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, James, S. 1997. The Voice of The People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, James S. &; Peter Laslett. 2003. Debating Deliberative Democracy. MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Fishkin, James, S. 2011. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, James S. 2013. “Deliberative Polling: Executive Summary.”Center for Deliberative Democracy. in http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/docs/summary/. Latest update 12 October 2013.
Fishman, Ethan M. 1991. Public Policy and the Public Good. New York: Greenwood Press.
Flathman, R.E. 1966. The Public Interest: An Essay Concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Flynn, Thomas William. 2011. Debating Deliberative Democracy: How Deliberation Changes the Way People Reason. PhD Dissertation, University of York.
Forester, John. 2009. Dealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fox, C. J. and Miller, H. T. 1995. Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse. CA: Sage.
Frankfort-Nachmias, Chava. &; David Nachmias. 2008. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: Worth Publishers.
Frederickson, H. George. 1980. New Public Administration. AL:University of Alabama Press.
Frederickson, H. George. 1999. “The Repositioning of American Public Administration.” Political Science &; Politics 32(4): 701-711.
Friedman, Thomas L. 2006. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus &; Giroux.
Friedrich, Carl J. 1967. An Introduction to Political Theory: Twelve Lectures at Harvard. New York: Harper &; Row.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. New York: Cornell University Press.
Gastil, J. &; P. Levine. 2005. The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gaus, Gerald F. 2008. “The (Severe) Limits of Deliberative Democracy as the Basis for Political Choice.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 55(117):26-53.
Ghemawat, Pankaj. 2011. World 3.0: Global Prosperity and How To Achieve It. Mass.: Harvard Business Review Press.
Glendinning, C., M. Powell &; K. Rummery (eds.). 2002. Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.
Goodin, R. 2000. “Democratic Deliberation Within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(1): 81-109.
Goodin, R. 2003. Reflective Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, R. &; S. Niemeyer. 2003. “When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51(4): 627–649.
Gustafson, Sandra M. 2011. Imagining Deliberative Democracy in the Early American Republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gutmann, A. &; D. Thompson. 1997. “Deliberating about Bioethics.” Hastings Center Report 27(3): 38-41.
Gutmann, A. &; D. Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gyford, John. Steve Leach &; Chris Game. 1989. The Changing Politics of Local Government. London: Unwin Hyman.
Gyford, John. 1991. Citizens, Consumers, and Councils: Local Government and The Public. Hampshire: Macmillan.
Hamlin, Alan &; Philip Pettit. (eds.) 1989. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Head, B.W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 101-118.
Heckscher, C. &; A. Donnellon. (eds) 1994. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. New Delhi: Sage.
Heinelt, H. 2010. Governing Modern Societies: Towards Participatory Governance. New York: Routledge.
Heineman, Robert A., William T. Bluhm, Steven A. Peterson &; Edward N. Kearny. 2001. The World of the Policy Analyst: Rationality, Values and Politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Hendriks, C. 2006. “Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 54 (3): 486–508.
Hodgson, Susan M. &; Zo&;euml; Irving. 2007. Policy Reconsidered: Meanings, Politics and Practices. Bristol: Policy Press.
Hoppe, R. 2010. The Governance of Problems : Puzzling, Powering, Participation. Bristol: Policy Press.
Howlett, Michael. 2011. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. New York: Routledge.
Irvin, R. A., and Stansbury, J. 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1):55-65.
James, Michael R. 2004. Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Jessop, Bob. 2000. “The Dynamics of Partnership and Governance Failure.” In The New Politics of Local Governance in Britain, ed. Gerry Stoker. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 11-32.
Jessop, Bob. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
Jun, Jong S. 1994. Philosophy of Administration. Seoul, Korea: Daeyoung Moonhwa International.
Jones, Charles O. 1984. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. CA.: Wadsworth.
Jones, Michael D. &; Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 2009. “Trans-Subsystem Dynamics: Policy Topography, Mass Opinion, and Policy Change.” The Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 37-58.
Kaufman, Amold S. 1960. “Human Nature and Participatory Politics.” In The Bias of Pluralism, ed. William E. Connolly. New York: Atherton Press, 178-311.
Keane, J. 1991. The Media and Democracy. MA : Blackwell.
Keane, J. 2003. Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keane, J. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: W. W. Norton &; Company.
Keane, J. 2010. “Democracy in the 21st Century: Global Questions”. In Globality, Democracy and Civil Society, eds.Terrell Carver &; Jens Bartelson. New York : Routledge, 1-18.
King, C. S. &; C. Stivers. 1998. Government is Us:Public Administration in Anti- Government Era. CA: Sage.
Kingdon, John W. 2002. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. London: Longman.
Knight J. &; Johnson J. 1994. “Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democracy Legitimacy.” Political Theory 22(2): 277-298.
Kobach, Kris W. 1993. The Referendum: Direct Democracy In Switzerland. Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Koliba, Christopher, Jack W. Meek &; Asim Zia. 2011. Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. FL: CRC Press.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. CA: Sage.
Kuzel, A. J. 1992. “Sampling In Qualitative Inquiry.” In Doing Qualitative Research, eds. B. F. Crabtree &; W. L. Miller. CA:Sage, 31-44.
Laslett, P. 1956. “The Face to Face Society.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, ed. P. Laslett. Oxford: Blackwell, 157–84.
Lee, C. K., K. S. Kwon, K. Y. Kim &; C. K. Park. 2003. Understanding of the Casino Industry. Seoul: Ilsingsa.
Leib, Ethan J. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America : A Proposal for A Popular Branch of Government. Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lerner, Daniel &; Harold D. Laswell, eds. 1951. The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Methods. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levine, David P. 2011. The Capacity for Civic Engagement: Public and Private Worlds of the Self. New York: Palgrave.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1992. The Policy-Making Process. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson, C. B. 1966. The Real World of Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marshall, Katherine. 1996. “A Sure Bet Industry.” Perspectives on Labor and Income 8(3):37-41.
Martin, S. 2003. “Engaging with citizens and other stakeholders”, In Public management and governance, eds. T. Bovaird &; E. L&;ouml;ffler. London: Routledge, 189-203.
Matravers, Matt &; Lukas H. Meyer. 2011. Democracy, Equality, and Justice. London: Routledge.
McGrew, Anthony G. 1997. The Transformation of Democracy?: Globalization and Territorial Democracy. MA: Polity Press.
McMurtrie, William. 2011. The Expansion of Legalized Gambling: Should State and Local Governments Take The chance? Thesis, Department of Public Policy, University of Georgetown.
Miller, Hugh T. &; Charles J. Fox. 2007. Postmodern Public Administration. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Munger, Michael C. 2000. Analyzing Policy: Choices, Conflicts and Practices. New York: W.W. Norton Press.
Naisbitt, John. 1994. Global Paradox: The Bigger The World Economy, The More Powerful Its Smallest Players. New York: W. Morrow.
NCDD. 2004. “NCDD''s Engagement Streams Framework”in http://cnrep.org/documents/tools/ddStreams1-08.pdf. Latest update 26 October 2013.
North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nye, Steven. 2009. Resolving Messy Policy Problems: Handling Conflict in Environmental, Transport, Health and Ageing Policy. London: Earthscan.
OECD .2002. Distributed Public Governance: Agencies, Authorities and Other Government Bodies. Paris:OECD.
O’Flynn, I. 2006. Deliberative Democracy and Divided Societies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Okun, Arthur M. 1975. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Osborne, David &; Peter Plastrik. 1997. Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government. Mass.: Addison Wesley.
Osborne, Stephen P. 2010. The New Public Governance?: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. New York: Routledge.
Ott, Steven. 1998. “Government Reform or Alternatives to Bureaucracy? Thickening, Tides and the Future of Governing.” Public Administration Review 58 (6): 540-545.
Parkinson, J. 2006. Deliberating In the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy In Deliberative Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Passerin d''Entr&;egrave;ves, Maurizio. 2002. Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives. New York: Manchester University Press.
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. London : Cambridge University Press.
Patton, C. V. &; D. S. Sawicki. 1993. Basic Methods of Policy Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
Pennington, Mark. 2003. “Hayekian Political Economy and the Limits of Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51(12):722-739.
Peters, B. Guy. 1996. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Peters, B. Guy. 2010. The Politics of Bureaucracy : An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. New York: Routledge.
Prugh, Thomas, Robert Costanza &; Herman Daly. 2000. The Local Politics of Global Sustainability. D.C.: Island Press.
PWC. 2012. “Global Gaming Outlook - The Casino and Online Gaming Market to 2015. ” International PwC Sites. in http://www.pwc-china.com/home/eng/em_casino_online_gaming_jan2012.html. Latest update 14 October 2013.
Ranney, Austin. 2001. Governing: An Introduction to Political Science. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Rayton, D. 1972. Shop Floor Democracy in Action. Nottingham: Russell Press.
Rhodes, R. 1996. “The New Governance: Governing without Government. ” Political Studies 44: 652-667.
Richard, Brian Walter. 2007. Diffusion of An Economic Development Policy Innovation: Explaining the International Spread of Casino Gambling. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.
Rivlin, Alice M. 1971. Systematic Thinking for Social Action. D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Roberts, Nancy Charlotte. 2008. The Age of Direct Citizen Participation. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Ross, Carne. 2011. The Leaderless Revolution: How Ordinary People will Take Power and Change Politics in the 21st Century. US: Blue Rider Press.
Rouban, L. (ed.) 1999. Citizens and the New Governance: Beyond New Public Management. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Rowe, G. &; L. J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, &; Human Values 30(2): 251-290.
Roy, Indrajit. 2008. “Civil Society and Good Governance:(Re-)Conceptualizing the Interface.” World Development 36(4): 677–705.
Sabatier, Paul, and Hank Jenkins-Smith,eds. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul &; Hank Jenkins-Smith. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Paul A. Sabatier. CO: Westview Press, 117–66.
Salamon, Lester M. 1995. Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sam Agere. 2000. Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives. Commonwealth Secretariat.
Sandel, Michael J. 1996. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Sandel, Michael J. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, Michael J. 2009a. Justice: What''s The Right Thing To Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sandel, Michael J. 2009b. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Mass.: Belknap Press.
Sandel, Michael J. 2013. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Penguin Group.
Savas, E. S. 2000. Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Saward, M. 2006. “Representation” In Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge, eds. A. Dobson &; R. Eckerson. New York: Cambridge University Press, 183-199.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micro Motives and Macro Behavior. New York: W.W. Norton.
Schultze, Charles L. 1977. The Public Use of Private Interest. D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1994. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smouts, Marie-Claude. 1998. “The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations.” International Social Science Journal 155: 81-90.
Solomon, Stephanie &; Julia Abelson. 2012.“Why and When Should We Use Public Deliberation?” Hastings Center Report 42(2): 17-20.
Stanley, J. Woody, Christopher Weare &; Juliet Musso. 2002. “Participation, Deliberative Democracy, and the Internet: Lessons from a National Forum On Commercial Vehicle Safety.” Prospects for Electronic Democracy, .
Steets, Julia. 2010. Accountability in Public Policy Partnerships. New York: Palgrave.
Stewart, John. 1998. “Advance or Retreat: From the Traditions of Public Administration to the New Public Management and Beyond.” Public Policy and Administration 13(4):12-27.
Stoker, G. 1998a. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50(155): 17-28.
Stoker, G. 1998b. “Public-Private Partnership and Urban Governance.” In Partnership in Urban Governance: European and American Experience, ed. J. Pierre. London: Macmillan Press, 34-51.
Stoker, G. 2004. Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. New York: Palgrave.
Stone, Deborah. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W. Norton.
Strange, Susan. 1994. States and Markets. New York: Pinter Publishers.
Strange, Susan. 1997. Casino Capitalism. New York: Manchester University Press.
Torfing, Jacob &; Peter Triantafillou. 2011. Interactive Policy Making, Metagovernance and Democracy. ECPR press.
True, James L., Bryan D. Jones &; Frank R. Baumgartner. 1999. “Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory.” In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Paul A. Sabatier. Colo.: Westview Press, 97-115.
UHD. 2013. “What is Public Deliberation? ” Center for Public Deliberation. in http://www.uhd.edu/academic/colleges/humanities/uhd_cpd/what_is.html . Latest update 9 October 2013.
UN. 2008. Participatory governance and the millennium development goals (MDGs) : publication based on the Expert Group Meeting on Engaged Governance: Citizen Participation in the Implementation of the Developmental Goals including the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 1-2 November 2006, New York: United Nations Press.
Valadez, Jorge M. 2001. Deliberative Democracy: Political Legitimacy and Self-determination in Multicultural Societies. Colo.: Westview Press.
Van Gelder, S. 2011. This Changes Everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% Movement Summary. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Vigoda, Eran. 2002. “From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 62(5): 527-539.
Voβ, Jan-Peter, Dierk Bauknecht &; Ren&;eacute; Kemp. 2006. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. MA: Edward Elgar.
Waldo, D. 1948. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: Ronald Press.
Waldo, D. 1980. The Enterprise of Public Administration: A Summary View. New York: Chandler &; Sharp.
Walzer, Michael. 1995. Toward a Global Civil Society. Providence: Berghahn Books.
Warren, Mark E. &; H. Pearse. 2008. Designing Deliberative Democracy: the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weeks, E. C. 2008. “The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large-Scale Tials.” In The Age of Direct Citizen Participation, ed. Nancy C. Roberts. NY: M. E. Sharpe, 296-313.
Weimer, D. L. &; A. R. Vining. 2005. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice . N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Weale, A. 2007. Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wenz, M. 2006. Casino Gambling and Economic Development. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Wilkinson, Paul. 1971. Social Movement. New York:Praeger.
Wilson, David &; Chris Game. 2011. Local Government in the United Kingdom. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
Winckler, Edwin A. 2001. “Regime Type and Regime Change on Taiwan: Some Conceptual Issues and Comparative Implications,” In Change of an Authoritarian Regime: Taiwan in the Post-Martial Law Era, ed. Taiwan Studies Pro-motion Committee of Academia Sinica, Taipei: Institute of Taiwan History (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica Press, 19-62.
Wolf, Charles Jr. 1990. Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives. Mass.: MIT Press.
Wu, Nai-Teh 1987. The Politics of a Regime Patronage System: Mobilization and Control within an Authoritarian Regime. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago, Department of Political Science.
Yin, R. K. 1989. Case Study Research: Deign and Methods. London: Sage Publications.
Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Youngs, Richard. 2004. International Democracy and the West: the Role of Governments, Civil Society, and Multinational Business. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zimmerman, Joseph F. 1986. Participatory Democracy: Populism Revived. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Zittel, Thomas &; Dieter Fuchs. 2007. Participatory Democracy and Political Participation: Can Participatory Engineering Bring Ctizens Back In? New York: Routledge.
Zolo, D. 1992. Democracy and Complexity : A Realist Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
6, Perri. 1997. Holistic Government. London: Demos.
6, Perri, Diana Leat, Kimberly Seltzer &; Gerry Stoker. 1999. Governing In the Round: Strategies for Holistic Government. London: Demos.
6, Perri, Diana Leat, Kimberly Seltzer &; Gerry Stoker. 2002. Toward Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE