:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:早期療育機構服務評鑑標準建構之研究:標竿化取向
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:林桂如蔡昆瀛 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Kuei-JuTsai, Kuen-Ying
出版日期:2007
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁53-100
主題關鍵詞:早期療育評鑑標準標竿化Early interventionPerformance criteriaBenchmarking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:66
本研究旨在以標竿化取向建構早期療育機構服務評鑑標準。針對獲得內政部第五次身心障礙機構評鑑優等之16家早期療育機構進行普查,以48位主要負責早療服務之管理者為主,得有效機構數14家(87.5%)、有效樣本34位(70.83%)。研究結果:早期療育機構服務評鑑內容可分為四大層面(療育服務規劃、療育服務提供、療育服務管理、療育服務成效評估)、12項向度(服務宗旨與領導者理念建立、服務誰展與宣導規劃、服務計畫擬定與規畫、團隊建立與合作方式、目標整合與彈性修正、資源提供與家庭服務、人力資源管理與運用、服務記錄管理與評核、轉介機制與媒合資源、家庭成員之滿意度、兒童學習之成效性、評鑑結果之運用性)與50個標準。依據研究結果,本研究將針對早療機構評鑑實務與未來研究方向提出具體建議。
The purpose of the study is to structure performance criteria for early intervention service institutes with a benchmarking approach. The subjects of the study are the professional team workers of 5th disability institutes prize early intervention institutes, including 14 institutes and 34 workers. The main conclusions of the study include: The service evaluation content include four levels (service plan, service offer, service management, service efficacy), twelve dimensions (service objective and leader's views, carry out the service and plan of the propaganda, design the service plan, team build and the way of cooperation, target integrated and elasticity revise, offer relative resources and family services, management of human resources, management and estimation of service record, transit and transfer resources, family's satisfaction, children's efficacy, and the use of the evaluation results) and fifty criteria. The study also makes recommendations for future researchers of the early intervention service evaluation practices and relevant topics.
期刊論文
1.萬育維(20020300)。身心障礙福利政策的新思維--突破困境 發展資源 充權自立。社區發展季刊,97,29-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Dunst, C. J.(2000)。Revisiting "Rethinking early intervention"。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,20,95-104。  new window
3.黃源協(2002)。從最佳價値策略談兒童福利機構的管理。兒童福利期刊,2,193-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林初穗(20021200)。桃園縣早期療育服務執行成效研究。中原學報,30(4),489-504。  延伸查詢new window
5.王保進、王俊凱(20030700)。從標竿化探討教師績效評估。教育資料與研究,53,20-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kontos, S.、Diamond, K. E.(2002)。Measuring the Quality of Early Intervention Services for Infants and Toddler: Problem and Prospects。Interventional Journal of Disability Development and Education,49(4),337-350。  new window
7.Marya, L. D.、Brent, D. R.(2002)。Developing More Adaptive, Innovative, and Interactive Organizations'。New Directions for Higher Education,118,5-21。  new window
8.Stufflebeam, D. L.(1971)。The Relevance of CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability。Journal of Research and Develpoment in Education,5(1),19-25。  new window
9.傅秀媚(20020700)。學前階段身心障礙特殊班評鑑項目之調查研究。臺中師院學報,16,353-381。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃源協(20020300)。後民營化時代的身心障礙福利機構管理--最佳價值與標竿計畫的實踐。社區發展季刊,97,80-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.謝建全(2000)。台東地區特殊教育資源規劃及其成效評估之研究:以CIPP評鑑模式為導向。八十九學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會。新竹:國立新竹師範學院。1617-1656。  延伸查詢new window
2.Reisman, K. J.、Macy, D. J.(1981)。Eight Years of Special Education Research in a Large Urban School District。Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,(會議日期: 04/13-04/17)。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.林千惠(2003)。身心障礙福利機構評鑑:修訂臺灣地區身心障礙福利機構服務機構評鑑制度與項目之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李祥豪(2002)。企業知識管理策略與其績效評估--以顧問業為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳明賢(2000)。早期療育整合服務實施方案評估--以高雄市發展遲緩兒童為例(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳銘偉(2003)。國小學校本位課程評鑑標準建構之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Johnson, N.、Lund, H.(2000)。Benchmarking for Higher Colleges。Buckingham:Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press。  new window
2.National Institute of Standards and Technology。Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence。Bedford, Maryland:National Institute of Standards and Technology。  new window
3.Owen, J.(2002)。Making Quality Sense: A Guide to Quality, Tools and Techniques, Awards and the Thinking Behind Them。London:Learning and Skills Development Agency。  new window
4.Weiss, C. M.(1972)。Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Yarbrough, K.(2003)。Planning for Success: Mapping Goals, Services, and Outcomes for Program Improvement. Birth to 5 Best Practices。New Brunswick, NJ:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation。  new window
6.American Productivity & Quality Center(1996)。Knowledge management: Consortium benchmarking study. Final report。American Productivity & Quality Center。  new window
7.曾淑惠(2002)。教育方案評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部兒童局(2004)。兒童福利機構,http://www.cbi.gov.tw/all-service1,php?topage=l&id=3&t_type=s, 2004/04/29。  new window
2.內政部社會司(2004)。臺閩地區身心障礙福利服務機構第六次評鑑實施計畫及評鑑項目,http://sowf.moi.gov_tw/05/i/第六次評鑑實施計畫.doc, 2004/10/03。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Guralnick, M. J.(1997)。Second generation research in the filed of early intervention。The effectiveness of early intervention,。Baltimore:Brookes Publishing co。  new window
2.Stufflebeam, D. L.(2000)。The CIPP model for evaluation。Evaluation models: Viewpoint on educational and human services evaluation。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE