:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:義理與現實的衝突--從丁未漂流人事件看朝鮮王朝之尊明貶清文化心態
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:孫衛國
作者(外文):Sun, Weiguo
出版日期:2007
卷期:25:2=51
頁次:頁187-210
主題關鍵詞:朝鮮王朝中韓關係清代尊明貶清臺灣Choson dynastySino-Korean relationsQing dynastyMing loyalistsTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:237
在清代與朝鮮三百年的交往中,有不少清朝商人遇風漂到朝鮮,但幾乎沒有一次可以同康熙丁未 (1667) 林寅觀等九十五漂流人事件一樣,對朝鮮歷史影響如此之大。林寅觀等九十五人是臺灣鄭氏官商,1667年5月前往日本長崎途中,遇風漂到濟州島。他們留長髮,身著明朝冠服,帶著水曆二十一年的曆書,使朝鮮首次真切地感受到南明的存在,因而引起震動。對於如何處置他們,朝鮮有著完全不同的兩種意見:一派堅持尊明貶清的儒家義理觀,主張將他們送往日本,或放回臺灣;另一派則出於現實的考慮,主張送往遼東。現實的利益最終壓倒了義理的衝動,九十五人皆被送往北京,但全被清朝處死。朝鮮君臣獲知九十五人的悲慘命運,又陷於了長期的自責之中,文人紛紛寫詩作文加以紀念,朝鮮正祖則為九十五人築壇祭奠,構成朝鮮長期尊周思明活動的一個重要組成部分。本文分析了林寅觀等九十五人的具體情況、航行的經過、他們眼中的水曆政權、整個事件中朝鮮君臣內在心態的矛盾等等問題,並論述了這一事件背後深刻的歷史與文化根源,從而透視朝鮮對明、清兩朝完全不同的文化心態。
In the three hundred years of relations between the Qing and Choson dynasties, Chinese merchant ships drifted to Choson Korea several times. However, of all of these, Lin Yinguan's 林寅觀 boat of 95 people drifting from Taiwan in 1667 had one of the biggest impacts on Choson politics. Lin Yinguan and his ninety followers, as the official merchants of Koxinga's (Zheng Chenggong 鄭成功) regime in Taiwan, were swept off-course by a wild storm to Jeju 濟州 Island on their way to Nagasaki in May 1667. People in Choson Korea were shocked by the appearance of the 95 persons, all of who had long hair in the Ming style, wore Ming-era clothing, and carried the Southern Ming Emperor Yongli's 永曆 almanac. Thus, for the first time Choson people saw evidence that the Southern Ming dynasty was real. There were two separate opinions among the Choson ministers, who debated about what to do with the 95 merchants: some ministers indicated that the merchants should be sent to Japan or Taiwan because of a pro-Ming/anti-Qing sentiment; the others advocated from a realistic perspective that they should be sent to Beijing. At last, the second opinion was adopted and the merchants were sent to Beijing and were executed. When the Choson King and ministers heard this news, they were so overtaken with self-condemnation that ministers during the subsequent years wrote many poems and articles to memorialize them, and King Jeonjo 正祖 (1776-1800) built an altar to sacrifice to them. This article focuses on the above issues in order to analyze their profound historical and cultural background, as well as Choson's different attitudes toward the Ming and Qing dynasties.
期刊論文
1.孫衛國(20020600)。朝鮮「皇明遺民傳」的作者及其成書。漢學研究,20(1)=40,163-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.孫衛國(2002)。朝鮮王朝尊周搞夷及其對清關係。韓國學報,17,255-281。  延伸查詢new window
3.大庭脩(1992)。明末清初に來航した中国人。日本学,19,87-115。  延伸查詢new window
4.松浦章(1981)。李朝時代における漂着中国船の一資料—顯宗八年の明船漂着と「漂人問答」を中心に。關西大學東西學術研究所紀要,15,53-101。  延伸查詢new window
5.松浦章(1983)。李朝漂着帆船の「問情別單」について(上)。關西大學東西學術研究所紀要,17,25-83。  延伸查詢new window
6.松浦章(1984)。李朝漂着帆船の「問情別單」について(下)。關西大學東西學術研究所紀要,18,33-96。  延伸查詢new window
7.馮立軍(2000)。清初遷海與鄭氏勢力控制下的廈門海外貿易。南洋問題研究,2000(4),85-94。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄧亦兵(2007)。清代前期的官商。北京社會科學,1997(4),47-55。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳尚勝(1995)。禮義觀與現實衝突—李朝政府對清初漂流海商政策波動的研究。北京。302-317。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫衛國(2002)。明遺民之東去朝鮮及其對明朝之思懷。瀋陽。144-167。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫衛國(2003)。試論朝鮮王朝崇祀明朝東征。牡丹江。25-33。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孫衛國(2007)。大明旗號與小中華意識--朝鮮王朝尊周思明問題研究(1637-1800)。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.韋祖輝(1985)。明遺民東渡述略。明史研究論叢(第三輯)。南京。  延伸查詢new window
3.韓國學文獻研究所(1980)。東賢號錄。東賢號錄。漢城。  延伸查詢new window
4.小松原濤(1962)。陳元贇の硏究。陳元贇の硏究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
5.馮榮燮(1989)。大明遺民史。大明遺民史。漢城。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.宋時烈(1993)。宋子大全,漢城。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)江日昇(1985)。臺灣外記,福州。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1985)。清實錄,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(朝鮮)成海應(1982)。硏經齋全集外集第4冊,漢城。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1963)。顯宗實録,東京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1965)。粛宗實録,東京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1966)。正祖實録,東京。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭昌順(1978)。同文彙考原編,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.韓振華(1982)。一六五〇-一六六二年鄭成功時代的海外貿易和海外貿易商的性質。台灣鄭成功研究論文選。福州:福建人民。  延伸查詢new window
2.朝鮮正祖(1985)。尊周彙編。朝鮮事大斥邪關係資料集。漢城:驪江出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE