:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:獨立的司法、不獨立的法官?--民主化後的司法獨立與民主監督
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:王金壽 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chin-shou
出版日期:2007
卷期:67
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:司法獨立民主監督司法改革人事審議委員會事務分配法官法官法Judicial independenceSupervision under democracyJudicial reformJudicial personnel councilCase assignmentJudgeJudge law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:245
本文主要的目的在指出,台灣在民主化後的司法獨立改革,主要在台中地方法院三○三室改革派法官的推動之下,取得一定的進步,主要的司法獨立改革成就包括:事務分配、參與人事審議委員會,和廢除送閱制度。雖然個別的法官的獨立性有些進步,但是妨礙司法獨立的內部控制和階層化,依舊存在。但是,司法作為一個體系,已經擺脫過去政黨和政治人物控制的局面,台灣的司法並不是如一般印象中,缺乏獨立性,相反的在現階段,司法作為一個體系,根本缺乏一有效的民主監督機制,也就是民主政治根本無法監督司法。但同時,由於台灣司法體制的階層化仍然嚴重的存在,因此它變成現階段妨礙司法獨立的最主要因素。很可惜的是,關於民主政治如何監督司法這個關鍵性問題,不僅被過去改革派法官所忽略,即使包括民間司改會等民間改革團體所提出的「民間版法官法」草案,也沒有對此問題給於適當的關注。
This paper argues that judicial independence has been much achieved mainly by the reform actions carried out by the reform-minded judges of the Room 303 at the Tai-chung District Court. The achievements of judicial independence reform included case assignment reform and attending the Judicial Personnel Council. Although the status of individual judge became more autonomous and independent, the internal control and hierarchy of the judiciary still somehow existed. No matter what, political parties and politicians could not control the judiciary anymore. It is not like the common impression that Taiwan’s judiciary is lack of independence. On the contrary, democratic politics does not have a proper mechanism to make the judiciary accountable. In the meantime, the hierarchy of the judiciary still exists and it is the most serious issue for judicial independence in Taiwan. So far the issue of the relationship between judicial independence and supervision under democracy did not receive proper attentions either from reform-minded judges or from social movement organizers.
期刊論文
1.吳重禮、黃紀(20000500)。雲嘉南地區賄選案件判決的政治因素分析:「層狀勝算對數模型」之運用。選舉研究,7(1),87-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Tate, C. Neal、Haynie, S. L.(1993)。Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1987。Law & Society Review,27(4),707-740。  new window
3.Della Porta, Donatella(2001)。A Judges' Revolution? Political Corruption and the Judiciary in Italy。European Journal of Political Research,39,1-21。  new window
4.Toharia, José J.(1975)。Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian -Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain。Law and Society Review,9(3),475-496。  new window
5.Cohen, Jerome A.(1969)。The Chinese Communist Party and 'Judicial Independence': 1949-1959。Harvard Law Review,82(5),967-1006。  new window
6.呂太郎(20001200)。臺灣之審判獨立與司法行政。法官協會雜誌,2(2),95-106。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉恆妏(20020300)。戰後臺灣司法人之研究--以司法官訓練文化為主的觀察。思與言,40(1),125-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.呂太郎(19960200)。司法改革運動之回顧與前瞻。律師通訊,197,32-41。  延伸查詢new window
9.Dakolias, Maria(2000)。Legal and Judicial Development: The Role of Civil Society in the Reform Process。Fordham International Law Journal,24(6),26-55。  new window
10.Finkel, Jodi(2004)。Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change。Latin American Research Review,39(3),57-80。  new window
11.Finkel, Jodi(2005)。Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s。Latin American Politics and Society,47(1),87-113。  new window
12.Fiss, Owen M.(1993)。The Limits of Judicial Independence。The University of Miami Inter-American Law Revie,25(1),57-76。  new window
13.Larkins, Christopher M.(1996)。Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis。American Journal of Comparative Law,44(4),605-626。  new window
14.陳東豪(1994)。「士林的」大送黃金、「臺中的」大搞革命。新新聞,361,65-67。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉幸義(1989)。真的需要事前審閱制嗎?。中國論壇,325,25-27。  延伸查詢new window
16.憲政時代(2000)。「法官評鑑與身份保障」學術研討會。憲政時代,26(1),3-60。  延伸查詢new window
17.Rosenn, Keith(1987)。The Protection of Judicial Independence in Latin America。Inter-American Law Review,19(1),1-35。  new window
18.田習如(1994)。三0三室是司法改革基地。財訊,9,206-210。  延伸查詢new window
19.王時思(1998)。有權力的人,就應該受監督。司法改革雜誌,17,20-20。  延伸查詢new window
20.王金壽(2003)。臺灣司法獨立的發源地:臺中地方法院三0三室。司法改革雜誌,47,8-9。  延伸查詢new window
21.Dakolias, Maria(1996)。A Strategy for Judicial Reform: The Experience in Latin America。Virginia Journal of International Law,36,167-231。  new window
22.Winn, Jane Kaufman、Yeh, Tang-Chi(1995)。Advocating Democracy: The Role of Lawyer in Taiwan's Political Transformation。Law & Social Inquiry,20,56-599。  new window
23.Tate, C. Neal、Haynie, Stacia L.(1994)。Building a Scientific Comparative Judicial Politics and Arousing the Dragons of Antiscientism。Law & Society Review,28(2),377-394。  new window
24.Sisk, Gregory C.、Heise, Michael、Morriss, Andrew P.(1998)。Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning。New York University Law Review,73,1377-1500。  new window
25.Cohen, Mark A.(1991)。Explaining Judicial Behavior or What's 'Unconstitutional' about the Sentencing Commission?。The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization,7,183-199。  new window
26.Ferejohn, John(1999)。Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence。Southern California Law Review,72,353-384。  new window
27.Pederzoli, Patrizia、Guarnieri, Carlo(1997)。Italy: A Case of Judicial Democracy?。International Social Science Journal,152,253-270。  new window
28.Haley, John O.(1995)。Judicial Independence in Japan Revisited。Law in Japan,25,1-18。  new window
29.蔡炯燉(2003)。Judicial Independence in Taiwan。法官協會雜誌,5(2),483-523。  延伸查詢new window
30.Kelman, Daniel、Klerman, Daniel(1999)。Nonpromotion and Judicial Independence。Southern California Law Review,72,455-464。  new window
31.Gillman, Howard(1994)。On Constructing a Science of Comparative Judicial Politics:. Tate and Haynie Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts。Law & Society Review,28,355-376。  new window
32.Di Federico, Giuseppe(1998)。Prosecutorial Independence and the Democratic Requirement of Accountability in Italy。British Journal of Criminology,38,371-387。  new window
33.Xu, Xiaoqun(1997)。The Fate of Judicial Independence in Republican China, 1912-37。The China Quarterly,149,1-28。  new window
34.Magalhaes, Pedro C.(1999)。The Politics of Judicial Reform in East Europe。Comparative Politics,32,43-62。  new window
35.Gillman, Howard(2001)。What's Law Got to Do with it? Judicial Behavioralists Test 'Legal Model' of Judicial Decision Making。Law & Social Inquiry,26,465-504。  new window
36.Stephenson, Matthew C.(2003)。When the Devil Turns... ': The Political Foundation of Independent Judicial Review。Journal of Legal Studies,32,59-89。  new window
會議論文
1.劉恆妏(2001)。日治以來臺灣司法改革史初探。0。  延伸查詢new window
2.張升星(2005)。民間司改會十年的回顧與檢討。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.王金壽(2006)。法治作為一種動員策略:臺中地院三0三室的故事。0。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.程春益(1988)。法官之職務獨立與職務監督(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kuo, Shu-Chin、郭書琴(2003)。Gender and Discipline in Law,Chicago, IL。  new window
圖書
1.Hirschl, Ran(2004)。Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Perry, H. W.(1991)。Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United, States Supreme Court。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Helmke, Gretchen(2005)。Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Hammergren, A. Linn(2002)。Do Judicial Councils Further Judicial Reform? Lessons from Latin America。Washington, D.C.:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace。  new window
5.Shetreet, Shimon、Deschênes, Jules(1985)。Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
6.Nonet, P.、Selznick, P.、Nonet, Philippe、Selznick, Philip(1978)。Law and Society in Transition:Toward Responsive Law。Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
7.Merryman, John Henry(1985)。The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America。Stanford University Press。  new window
8.Segal, Jeffrey A.、Spaeth, Harold J.(2002)。The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Guarnieri, Carlo、Pederzoli, Patrizia(2002)。The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Kelman, Mark(1987)。A Guide To Critical Legal Studies。MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Rosenberg, G. N.(1991)。The hollow hope。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
12.Sweet, Alec Stone(2000)。Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe。Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Ginsburg, Tom(2003)。Judicial Review in New Democracies。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.謝長廷(1987)。法治的騙局。久大。  延伸查詢new window
15.Chavez, Rebecca Bill(2004)。The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina。Stanford University Press。  new window
16.Domingo, Pilar、Sieder, Rachel(2001)。The Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform。University of London Institute of Latin American Studies。  new window
17.Ramseyer, J. Mark、Rasmusen, Eric(2003)。Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan。University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.McCann, Michael W.(1994)。Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization。University of Chicago Press。  new window
19.Dyzenhaus, David(1998)。Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves: Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order。Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves: Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order。Oxford, UK。  new window
20.Tate, C. N.、Vallinder, Torbjörn、Tate, C. Neal(1995)。The Global Expansion of Judicial Power。The Global Expansion of Judicial Power。New York, NY。  new window
21.司法院史實紀要編輯委員會(1982)。司法院史實紀要,第一冊。司法院史實紀要,第一冊。臺北:司法院。  延伸查詢new window
22.(1992)。論司法改革:系列研討會實錄。論司法改革:系列研討會實錄。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
23.Burbank, Stephen B.、Friedman, Barry(2002)。Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach。Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
24.Kahn, Paul W.(1993)。Independence and Responsibility in the Judicial Role。Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary。Boulder, CO。  new window
25.Ungar, Mark(2002)。Elusive Reform: Democracy and the Rule of Law in Latin America。Elusive Reform: Democracy and the Rule of Law in Latin America。Boulder, CO。  new window
26.Friedrich, C. J.(1950)。Constitutional Government and Democracy。Constitutional Government and Democracy。Boston, MA。  new window
27.Cover, Robert M.(1975)。Justice Accused: Antislavery and Judicial Process。Justice Accused: Antislavery and Judicial Process。New Haven, CT。  new window
28.Unger, Roberto Mangabeira(1983)。The Critical Legal Studies Movement。Harvard University Press。  new window
29.Muller, Ingo(1991)。Hilter's Justice: The Court of the Third Reich。Hilter's Justice: The Court of the Third Reich。Cambridge, MA。  new window
30.Hammergren, A. Linn(1998)。The Politics of Justice and Justice Reform in Latin America: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective。The Politics of Justice and Justice Reform in Latin America: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective。Boulder, CO。  new window
31.Carrington, Paul D.(1999)。Stewards of Democracy: Law as a Public Profession。Stewards of Democracy: Law as a Public Profession。Boulder, CO。  new window
32.Prillaman, William C.(2000)。The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule if Law。The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule if Law。Westport, CT。  new window
33.Barros, Robert J.(2002)。Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution。Cambridge University Press。  new window
34.施啟揚(2004)。源:三十年公職回憶。源:三十年公職回憶。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
35.Shetreet, Shimon(1985)。Judicial Independence: New Conceptual Dimensions and Contemporary Challenges。Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate。Boston, MA/ Dordrecht, Netherlands。  new window
36.Cappelletti, Mauro(1985)。Who Watches the Watchmen?' A Comparative Study on Judicial Responsibility。Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate。Boston, MA/ Dordrecht, Netherlands。  new window
37.Guarnieri, Carlo(2001)。Judicial Independence in Latin Countries of Western Europe。Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World。Charlottesville, VA/ London, UK。  new window
38.Burbank, Stephen B.、Friedman, Barry(2002)。Reconsidering Judicial Independence。Judicial Independence at the Crossroads。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
其他
1.(1994)。司法改革實錄,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ferejohn, John、Pasquino, Pasquale(2003)。Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law。Democracy and the Rule of Law。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Russell, Peter H.(2001)。Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence。Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from Around the World。University Press of Virginia。  new window
3.O'Brien, David M.、Ohkoshi, Yasuo(2001)。Stifling Judicial Independence from Within。Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from Around the World。London:University Press of Virginia。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE