:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣民眾為什麼不信任司法?一個模糊集合的分析
書刊名:民主與治理
作者:陳怡如劉從葦呂建德
作者(外文):Chen, Yi-juLiu, Tsung-weiLue, Jen-der
出版日期:2017
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁29-67
主題關鍵詞:司法不信任司法政治多元因果路徑模糊集合質化比較分析Distrust in judiciaryJudicial politicsMultiple conjunctural causationFuzzy setQualitative comparative analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:84
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.吳重禮、黃紀(20000500)。雲嘉南地區賄選案件判決的政治因素分析:「層狀勝算對數模型」之運用。選舉研究,7(1),87-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.孫銘鴻、吳重禮(20120600)。政治因素對於賄選訴訟案件的可能影響:司法專業人士的觀點分析。臺灣政治學刊,16(1),121-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.湯京平、黃宏森(20081200)。民主化與司法獨立:臺灣檢察改革的政治分析。臺灣政治學刊,12(2),67-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ferejohn, John(2002)。Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law。Law & Contemporary Problems,65(3),41-68。  new window
5.Wu, Chung-li(2012)。Charge Me if You Can: Assessing Political Biases in Vote- Buying Verdicts in Democratic Taiwan (2000-2010)。The China Quarterly,211,786-805。  new window
6.Tate, C. Neal、Haynie, S. L.(1993)。Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1987。Law & Society Review,27(4),707-740。  new window
7.王金壽(20120600)。臺灣司法政治的興起。臺灣政治學刊,16(1),61-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Mahoney, James、Goertz, Gary(2006)。A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research。Political Analysis,14(3),227-249。  new window
9.吳重禮、陳慧玟(20000900)。政治與司法:實然面的分析途徑。問題與研究,39(9),1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳重禮(20081200)。司法與公共支持:臺灣民眾對於司法體系的比較評價。臺灣政治學刊,12(2),15-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林常青、陳恭平、黃國昌、賴宏彬(20151200)。臺灣人民常見的法律紛爭類型:城鄉差異、人口及社經特性。臺灣社會學刊,58,157-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Danziger, Shai、Levav, Jonathan、Avnaim-Pesso, Liora(2011)。Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,108(17),6889-6892。  new window
13.王金壽(20140600)。臺灣環境運動的法律動員:從三件環境相關判決談起。臺灣政治學刊,18(1),1-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Ferejohn, John A.、Shipan, Charles(1990)。Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy。Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,6,1-20。  new window
15.Epstein, Lee、King, Gary(2002)。Exchange: Empirical Research and the Goals of Legal Scholarship: The Rules of Inference。University of Chicago Law Review,69(1),1-209。  new window
16.王金壽(20060600)。臺灣的司法獨立改革與國民黨侍從主義的崩潰。臺灣政治學刊,10(1),103-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.王金壽(20081200)。司法獨立與民主可問責性:論臺灣的司法人事權。臺灣政治學刊,12(2),115-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Boyd, C. L.、Epstein, L.、Martin, A. D.(2010)。Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging。American Journal of Political Science,54(2),389-411。  new window
19.Canes-Wrone, B.、Clark, T. S.、Kelly, J. P.(2014)。Judicial selection and death penalty decisions。American Political Science Review,108(1),23-39。  new window
20.Edwards, H. T.(1998)。Collegiality and decision making on the D. C. circuit。Virginia Law Review,84(7),1335-1370。  new window
21.Gibson, J. L.(1978)。Judges' role orientations, attitudes, and decisions: An interactive model。American Political Science Review,72(3),911-924。  new window
22.Gillman, H.(1994)。On constructing a science of comparative judicial politics: Tate & Haynie's "Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts"。Law & Society Review,28(2),355-376。  new window
23.Goertz, G.(2006)。Introduction to the special issue "causal complexity and qualitative methods"。Political Analysis,14(3),223-226。  new window
24.Kastellec, J. P.(2013)。Racial diversity and judicial influence on appellate。American Journal of Political Science,57(1),167-183。  new window
25.Martin, A. D.、Quinn, K. M.、Ruger, T. W.、Kim, P. T.(2004)。Competing approaches to predicting Supreme Court decision making。Perspectives on Politics,2(4),761-767。  new window
26.Pritchett, C. H.(1941)。Divisions of opinion among justices of the U. S. Supreme Court, 1939-1941。American Political Science Review,35(5),1939-1941。  new window
27.Revesz, R. L.(1997)。Environmental regulation, ideology, and the D. C. circuit。Virginia Law Review,83(8),1717-1772。  new window
28.Revesz, R. L.(1999)。Ideology, collegiality, and the D. C. circuit: A reply to chief judge Harry T. Edwards。Virginia Law Review,85(5),805-851。  new window
29.Sotomayor, S.(2002)。A Latina judge's voice。Berkeley la Raza Law Journal,13(1),87-93。  new window
30.Toharia, J. J.(1975)。Judicial independence in an authoritarian regime: The case for contemporary Spain。Law & Society Review,9(3),475-496。  new window
31.林常青、陳恭平、黃國昌、游雅婷(20161000)。2011年臺灣人民法律紛爭面訪:設計及基本統計。調查研究,36,87-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.王金壽(20070900)。獨立的司法、不獨立的法官?--民主化後的司法獨立與民主監督。臺灣社會研究季刊,67,1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.王金壽(20080600)。臺灣司法改革二十年:邁向獨立之路。思與言,46(2),133-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Tate, C. Neal、Haynie, Stacia L.(1994)。Building a Scientific Comparative Judicial Politics and Arousing the Dragons of Antiscientism。Law & Society Review,28(2),377-394。  new window
35.Wang, Chin-shou(2010)。The Movement Strategy in Taiwan's Judicial Independence Reform。Journal of Current Chinese Affairs,39(3),125-147。  new window
研究報告
1.朱雲漢(2003)。2002年至2004年「選舉與民主化調查」三年期研究規劃(II):民國九十二年民主化與政治變遷民調案 (計畫編號:NSC92-2420-H-001-004)。臺北市:中央研究院政治學研究所籌備處:國立中正大學民意調查研究中心:國立台灣大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Segal, Jeffrey A.、Spaeth, Harold J.(2002)。The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Guarnieri, Carlo、Pederzoli, Patrizia(2002)。The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Ragin, Charles C.(2008)。Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Brady, Henry E.、Collier, David(2004)。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
5.Garrett, Brandon L.(2012)。Convicting The Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Schlegel, John Henry(1995)。American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science。University of North Carolina Press。  new window
7.Hardin, Russell(1999)。Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
8.King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Banner, S.(2013)。The baseball trust: A history of baseball's antitrust exemption。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Benforado, A.(2016)。Unfair: The new science of criminal injustice。Broadway Books。  new window
11.Bonneau, C. W.、Hall, M. G.(2009)。In defense of judicial elections。Routledge。  new window
12.Perry, B. A.(1991)。A representative supreme court? The impact of race, religion, and gender on appointments。Greenwood Press。  new window
13.Zaremby, J.(2013)。Legal realism and American law。Bloomsbury。  new window
14.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(1991)。The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.司法院統計處(2012)。101年一般民眾對司法認知調查(AF010007)。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊文山(2008)。2008年第二次社會意向調查(C00227)。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊文山(2009)。2009年第一次社會意向調查(C00234)。  延伸查詢new window
4.瞿海源(2004)。2004年第二次社會意向調查(C00182)。  延伸查詢new window
5.瞿海源(2005)。2005年第一次社會意向調查(C00183)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Webley, Lisa(2010)。Qualitative Approaches To Empirical Legal Research。The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Epstein, Lee、Martin, Andrew D.(2010)。Quantitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research。The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Maravall, J. M.(2003)。The rule of law as a political weapon。Democracy and the rule of law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Gibson, James L.(2006)。Judicial Institutions。The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Ferejohn, J.、Rosenbluth, F.、Shipan, C.(2009)。Comparative judicial politics。The Oxford handbook of comparative politics。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Russell, Peter H.(2001)。Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence。Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from Around the World。University Press of Virginia。  new window
7.Mckeown, Timothy J.(2004)。Case Studies and the Limits of the Quantitative Worldview。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。New York:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
8.Munck, Gerardo(2004)。Tools for Qualitative Research。Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards。New York:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE