:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:西方基督神學對東林人士熊明遇的衝激及其反應
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:徐光台
作者(外文):Hsu, Kuang-tai
出版日期:2008
卷期:26:3=54
頁次:頁191-224
主題關鍵詞:晚明基督神學熊明遇東林黨則草格致草Late MingCatholic theologyXiong MingyuDonglin groupZe CaoGezhi Cao
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:122
  • 點閱點閱:69
明末耶穌會士來華引入西方基督神學,對東林人士熊明遇 (1579-1649) 產生的衝激及影響,與晚明政治息息相關。萬曆後期他與耶穌會士交遊,接觸基督神學,但在萬曆末年 (1620) 完成的《則草》中似未留下明顯影響。天啟年間,遭受魏璫徇私的政治迫害,使他嚮往基督宗教性神學中天主在人死後對其世間善惡的至公審判,反映在擴增的〈則草二〉(1626) 中,但未入教。他也接受自然神學,並以中國事例加以儒學化。當思宗即位後,拔除閹黨,平反受害東林人士,在擴增的《格致草》中,熊明遇調整先前吸納的基督神學,刪改或移除宗教性神學部分,但保留自然神學部分,將其轉化為「格致學」的一部分。 質言之,他對在世政治審判的關切超過來世,加上自然神學是通過理性的推論來認識造物主所創的自然,不必然具有宗教性的信仰,二者對他為何不是位天主教徒提供一個另類解說。
In late Ming, Jesuits introduced Catholic theology to China. Xiong Mingyu 熊明遇 (1579-1649) was very close to the Jesuits during the end of the Wanli 萬曆 period (1573-1620). As such, he most likely read works concerning Catholic theology, but did not write anything on this topic in his Ze Cao 則草 (1620). During the Tianqi 天啟 period (1621-1627), after having experienced the political oppression that Wei Zhongxian 魏忠賢 and members of his party inf1icted on the Donglinists (that is, members of the so-called Donglin group 東林黨), Xiong came to be interested in God’s message. Xiong touched on Catholic teachings in his sequel to Ze Cao, which was published in 1626; however, he never did convert to Catholicism. He was also influenced by natural theology and modified it with Confucian examples. After the Chongzhen 崇禎 reign (1628-1644), the emperor reversed earlier political sentences by exonerating those of the Donglin group and punishing the members of Wei Zhongxian’s party. At this time, Xiong adjusted his response to Catholicism. In 1628, he started a revision of Ze Cao and expanded it and retitled it Gezhi Cao 格致草; in this later text, he deleted the part on Catholic teachings, but kept the part on natural theology, which he developed into a section dealing with ‘learning about gezhi’ 格致學. In brief, the impact of Catholic theology on Xiong and his reaction has something to do with the political situation in 1620s. Xiong’s example represents the view of the members of Donglin group, who were more concerned with political affairs rather than with a religious message. Even though he believed that one can go through natural theology to know Nature as created by the Creator, his acceptance of natural theology did not lead to his becoming a Catholic.
期刊論文
1.徐光台(2004)。明末中西士人在「理」問題上的遭遇:以利瑪竇爲先驅。九州學林,2(2),2-42。  延伸查詢new window
2.馮錦榮(2001)。熊明遇(1579-1649)的西學觀:以熊氏早期的西學著作《則草》爲中心。明清史集刊,2001(5),323-344。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐光台(19980300)。利瑪竇《天主實義》中的格物窮理。清華學報,28(1),47-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.孫邦華(2002)。自然神學在近代中國的傳播─以美國新教傳教士在上海辦的「萬國公報」為中心。中西文化研究,1,84-93。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.徐光台(1996)。明末清初西方「格致學」的衝擊與反應:以熊明遇《格致草》為例。臺北。235-258。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ruggieri, Michele(2002)。天主實錄。臺北利氏學社。  延伸查詢new window
2.龐迪我。七克。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gilson, Étienne(1956)。The Christian Philosophy of St Thomas Aquinas。New York。  new window
4.方豪(1966)。李之藻研究。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lindberg, David C.(1992)。The Beginnings of Western Science。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.郭慶藩(1971)。莊子集釋。臺北:河洛圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.樊樹志(2005)。晚明史(1573-1644年)。上海:復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.沈定平(2001)。明清之際中西文化交流史--明代:調適與會通。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐宗澤(1989)。明清間耶穌會士譯著提要--耶穌會創立四百年紀念(1540-1940年)。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ricci, Matteo(1965)。天主實義。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.張永堂(1994)。明末清初理學與科學關係再論。臺北:台灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李昉(1998)。太平御覽。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.熊人霖。鶴臺先生熊山文選。日本內閣文庫。  延伸查詢new window
14.中央研究院歷史語言研究所(1966)。明實錄。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
15.溝口雄三、林右崇(1994)。中國前近代思想的演變。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳鼎(1983)。東林列傳。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.林金水(1996)。利瑪竇與中國。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.谷應泰(1976)。明史紀事本末。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃一農(2005)。兩頭蛇:明末清初的第一代天主教徒。國立清華大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.王充、黃暉、劉盼遂(1990)。論衡校釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1994)。朱子語類。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.關增建(1991)。中國古代物理思想探索。中國古代物理思想探索。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
23.Weisheipl, James A.(1978)。The Nature, Scope, and Classification of the Sciences。Science in the Middle Ages。Chicago and London。  new window
24.Furtado, Francisco、(明)李之藻(1998)。寰有詮。寰有詮。鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
25.王豐肅(2002)。教要解畧。耶穌會羅馬檔案館明清天主教文獻。臺北:臺北利氏學社。  延伸查詢new window
26.卓新平(2001)。基督教小辭典。基督教小辭典。上海。  延伸查詢new window
27.Grant, Edward(1978)。Physical science in the Middle Ages。Physical science in the Middle Ages。Cambridge。  new window
28.Porter, Roy(1983)。Natural Theology。Dictionary of the History of Science。London。  new window
29.Van Ackeren, Gerald Francis(1967)。Theology。New Catholic Encyclopedia (Vol.14)。Washington。  new window
30.(1979)。聖經。聖經。香港。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Aleni, Giulio(2002)。性學觕述,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)熊明遇(2000)。文直行書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(西漢)司馬遷(1969)。史記,香港。  延伸查詢new window
4.(五代)譚峭(1987)。化書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)吳應箕(1993)。啟禎兩朝剝復錄,成都。  延伸查詢new window
6.(唐)房玄齡(1969)。晉書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(2002)。天主教要,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Ricci, Matteo(2002)。聖經約錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(明)龐迪我(2002)。龐子遺詮,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(明)羅儒望(2002)。天主聖教啟蒙,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.湯若望(1966)。主制群徵,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(明)陽瑪諾。天問畧。  延伸查詢new window
13.熊三拔。泰西水法,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.(明)熊明遇(2000)。則草,北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.(明)熊明遇(1998)。格致草,鄭州。  延伸查詢new window
16.(明)熊明遇(2000)。綠雪樓集,北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.(清)徐午,(清)萬廷蘭(1989)。南昌縣志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.(清)張廷玉(1969)。明史,北京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.利瑪竇、朱維錚(2001)。西國記法。利瑪竇中文著譯集。上海:復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏之推、王利器(1993)。歸心篇。顏氏家訓集解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE