Semi-Presidentialism and Divided Government in Taiwan: Public Perceptions of Government Performance_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Semi-Presidentialism and Divided Government in Taiwan: Public Perceptions of Government Performance
書刊名：	Issues & Studies
作者：	吳重禮
作者(外文)：	Wu, Chung-li
出版日期：	2009
卷期：	45:4
頁次：	頁1-34
主題關鍵詞：	Semi-presidentialism；Divided government；Party politics；Government performance；Cognitive madisonianism
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:51 點閱:40

Assessing differences in government performance based on governmental structure (parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential regimes) and partisan control of government (divided and unified government) is an issue that is still unfolding, having received comparatively little attention outside some Western countries. Using survey data from the 2008 legislative elections in Taiwan, this study sheds light on the issue by examining the public perceptions of government performance, comparing the various consequences of government institutions. The findings indicate that four key factors can be used to evaluate the performance of institutional arrangements: presidential performance, parliamentary performance,preference for party control, and cognition of premier appointment.For the example of Taiwan, the results further reveal that the variables of party identification, ethnic consciousness, unification/independence preference,and political knowledge exert important influences on one’s evaluation of government performance.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Wu, Chung-li(20080300)。Ethnicity, Empowerment, and Political Trust: The 2005 Local Elections in Taiwan。Issues & Studies，44(1)，105-132。
2.	Brady, David W.(1993)。The Causes and Consequences of Divided Government: Toward a New Theory of American Politics?。American Political Science Review，87(1)，189-194。
3.	Lewis-Beck, Michael S.、Nadeau, Richard(2004)。Split-Ticket Voting: The Effects of Cognitive Madisonianism。The Journal of Politics，66(1)，97-112。
4.	Madison, James.(1788)。The Structure of the erovemment Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments。The federalist，51。
5.	Mebane, Walter R., Jr.(2000)。Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections。American Political Science Review，94(1)，37-57。
6.	Nicholson, Stephen P.(2005)。The Jeffords Switch and Public Support for Divided Government。British Journal of Political Science，35(2)，343-356。
7.	Samuels, David J.、Matthew Soberg Shugart.(2003)。Presidentialism, Elections and Presentation。Journal of Theoretical Politics，15(1)，33-66。
8.	McDonagh, E.(2002)。Political Citizenship and Democratization: The Gender Paradox。American Political Science Review，96(3)，535-552。
9.	Petracca, Mark P.(1991)。Divided Government and the Risks of Constitutional Reform。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，634-637。
10.	Protsyk, Oleh(2003)。Troubled Semi-Presidentialism: Stability of the Constitutional System and Cabinet in Ukraine。Europe-Asia Studies，55(7)，1077-1095。
11.	Samuels, David(2004)。Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective。American Political Science Review，98(3)，425-436。
12.	Sigelman, Lee、Wahlbeck, Paul J.、Buell, Emmett H. Jr.(1997)。Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992。American Journal of Political Science，41(3)，879-894。
13.	Linz, Juan J.(1990)。The Perils of Presidentialism。Journal of Democracy，1(1)，51-69。
14.	Binder, Sarah A.(1999)。The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96。American Political Science Review，93(3)，519-533。
15.	Garand, James C.、Lichtl, Marci Glascock(2000)。Explaining Divided Government in the United States: Testing an Intentional Model of Split-Ticket Voting。British Journal of Political Science，30(1)，173-191。
16.	Jacobson, G. C.(1991)。Explaining Divided Government: Why Can't the Republicans Win the House?。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，640-643。
17.	Jones, David R.、McDermott, Monika L.(2004)。The Responsible Party Government Model in House and Senate Elections。American Journal of Political Science，48(1)，1-12。
18.	Norpoth, Helmut(2001)。Divided Government and Economic Voting。Journal of Politics，63(2)，414-435。
19.	Pasquino, Ginafranco(1997)。Nomination: Semi-presidentialism: A Political Model at Work。European Journal of Political Research，31(1/2)，128-137。
20.	Siaroff, Alan(2003)。Comparative Presidencies: the Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidentialism and Parliamentary Distinction。European Journal of Political Research，42(3)，287-312。
21.	吳重禮、黃紀(200711)。Divided Government in Taiwan's Local Politics: Public Evaluations of City/County Government Performance。Party Politics，13(6)，741-760。
22.	Shugart, Matthew S.(199506)。The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government。American Political Science Review，89(2)，327-343。
23.	Menefee-Libey, David(1991)。Divided Government: as Scapegoat。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，643-646。
24.	吳重禮、蕭成泰(20060300)。Empowerment Theory and Ethnic Politics in Taiwan。Issues & Studies，42(1)，103-136。
25.	Balch, George I.(1974)。Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept "Sense of Political Efficacy"。Political Methodology，1(2)，1-43。
26.	Craig, Stephen C.(1979)。Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma。American Politics Research，7(2)，225-239。
27.	Huckfeldt, Robert、Sprague, John、Levin, Jeffrey(2000)。The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy。American Political Science Review，94(3)，641-651。
28.	Alt, James E.、Lowry, Robert C.(1994)。Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States。American Political Science Review，88(4)，811-828。
29.	Coleman, John J.(19991200)。Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness。American Political Science Review，93(4)，821-835。
30.	Sundquist, James L.(1988)。Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States。Political Science Quarterly，103(4)，613-635。
31.	Elgie, Robert(2004)。Semi-presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations。Political Studies Review，2(3)，314-330。
32.	Roper, Steven D.(2002)。Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier-Presidential Regimes。Comparative Politics，34(3)，253-272。
33.	Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research，8(2)，165-187。
34.	林繼文(20020300)。Democratic Stability under Taiwan's Semi-Presidentialist Constitution: Implications for Cross-Strait Relations。Issues & Studies，38(1)，47-79。
35.	吳玉山(20000900)。The ROC's Semi-Presidentialism at Work: Unstable Compromise, Not Cohabitation。Issues & Studies，36(5)，1-40。

研究報告
1.	朱雲漢(2008)。Taiwan's Election and Democratization Study, 2005-2008 (III): The Survey of Legislative Elections in 2008 (計畫編號：NSC 96-2420-H-002-025)。

圖書
1.	Rosenstone, Steven J.、Hansen, John Mark(2003)。Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America。New York：Longman。
2.	Fiorina, Morris(1996)。Divided Government。New York：Macmillan。
3.	Cox, gary W.、Kernell, Samuel(1991)。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, Colo.：Westview Press。
4.	Mayhew, David R.(2005)。Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-2002。New Haven, Conn：Yale University Press。
5.	Moody, Peter R. Jr.(1992)。Political Change on Taiwan。New York：Praeger。
6.	Epstein, Leon D.(1967)。Political Parties in Western Democracies。New York：Praeger。
7.	Conway, M. Margaret(2000)。Political Participation in the United States。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。
8.	Alesina, Alberto、Rosenthal, Howard(1995)。Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy。New York：Cambridge University Press。
9.	Shugart, Matthew S.、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamic。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
10.	Milbrath, Lester W.、Goel, Madan L.(1977)。Political participation: How and why people get involved in politics?。Chicago：Rand McNally College Pub. Co.。
11.	Fiorina, Morris P.(1981)。Retrospective Voting in American National Elections。Yale University Press。
12.	Wachman, Alan M.(1994)。Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization。M. E. Sharpe。
13.	Sartori, Giovanni(1997)。Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes。New York, NY：New York University Press。
14.	Stone, William F.、Schaffner, P. E.(1988)。The Psychology of Politics。New York：Springer-Verlag。
15.	Crotty, William、Jackson, John S. III(1985)。Presidential Primaries and Nominations。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。
16.	Lipset, Seymour Martin(1981)。Political Man--The Social Bases of Politics。Baltimore, Maryland：The Johns Hopkins University Press。
17.	Miller, Warren E.、Shanks, J. Merrill(1996)。The New American Voter。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
18.	Elgie, Robert(1999)。Semi-Presidentialism in Europe。Oxford University Press。
19.	Elgie, Robert、Moestrup, Sophia(2007)。Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe: A Comparative Study。Routledge。
20.	Lijphart, Arend(1999)。Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries。Yale University Press。
21.	Thurber, James A.(1991)。Divided Democracy: Cooperation and Conflict Between the President and Congress。Congressional Quarterly Press。
22.	Delli Carpini, Michael X.、Keeter, Scott(1996)。What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters。Yale University Press。
23.	Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。

圖書論文
1.	McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991)。Government on Lay Away: Federal Spending and Deficits Under Divided Party Control。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO.：Westview Press。
2.	Fiorina, Morris P.(1984)。Explorations of a Political Theory of Party Identification。Controversies in Voting Behavior。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。
3.	Wu, Yu-Shan(2007)。Semi-Presidentialism-Easy to Choose, Difficult to Operate: The Case of Taiwan。Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe: A Comparative Study。Routledge。
4.	Elgie, Robert(2001)。What is Divided Government?。Divided Government in Comparative Perspective。Oxford University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	半總統制與策略性修憲
2.	選制改革對投票穩定與變遷的影響：臺灣五次立委選舉的實證分析
3.	半總統制的憲政秩序與權力轉移--臺灣與蒙古的案例研究
4.	儒家思想的正統觀與兩岸交流前景：「中國印象調查」的實證初探
5.	半總統制下不同政府型態之比較：羅馬尼亞與臺灣
6.	保加利亞「議會化半總統制憲法」的設計與運作
7.	多黨總理總統制民主的政府類型與憲政運作的衝突--以斯洛維尼亞、斯洛伐克、克羅埃西亞、立陶宛為例
8.	陳水扁時期的臺灣政商關係--少數政府、個人化網絡與金融改革
9.	左右共治vs.藍綠共治--法國與臺灣共治與否的賽局分析
10.	半總統制「權力總統化」之比較研究
11.	半總統制下行政體系二元化之內涵
12.	半總統制：全球發展與研究議程
13.	臺灣修憲對兩岸關係之影響
14.	族群、賦權與選舉評價--2004年與2008年總統選舉省籍差異的實證分析
15.	半總統制的崩潰、延續與轉型：威瑪共和與芬蘭的憲政比較

1.	德國威瑪共和半總統制憲法的設計、運作與轉出
2.	半總統制下「少數政府」的形成與存續：台灣二○○○年至二○○四年之研究
3.	我國與法國憲政體制之比較研究

1.	半總統制「總統化」之發展：政黨體系與政府組成
2.	威瑪憲政變奏曲 : 半總統制憲法的生命史
3.	政黨與選舉：理論與實踐
4.	半總統制的理論與實際
5.	總統直選與半總統制憲政運作
6.	誰是投票穩定者與變遷者？2008年總統選舉的實證分析
7.	從半總統制往議會制之轉型：德國與芬蘭經驗比較
8.	左右共治vs.藍綠共治--法國與臺灣共治與否的賽局分析
9.	誰是泛藍、泛綠認同者？臺灣民眾政黨認同的實證分析
10.	憲政設計、政黨政治與權力分立 : 美國分立政府的運作經驗及其啟示
11.	政權合法性與憲改模式 : 比較台灣與歐洲後共新興民主國家

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫