:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政權合法性與憲改模式 : 比較台灣與歐洲後共新興民主國家
作者:吳重禮 引用關係吳玉山 引用關係
書刊名:憲政改革 : 背景、運作與影響
集叢:中研政治;1
頁次:29-62
出版日期:2006
出版項:臺北:五南
主題關鍵詞:政權合法性憲改模式歐洲新興民主國家
學門:政治學
資料類型:專書論文
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
期刊論文
1.Bungs, Dzintra(1992)。Latvia: Laying New Foundations。RFE/RL Research Report,1(1),30-75。  new window
2.Cohen, Ariel(1993)。Competing Visions: Russian Constitutional Drafts and Beyond。RFE/RL Research Report,2(38),50-56。  new window
3.NYU Law(1997)。Constitution Watch。East European Constitutional Review,6(2/3)。  new window
4.Huntington, Samuel(1991)。Democracy’s Third Wave。journal of democracy,2(2),12-34。  new window
5.Kimmage, Daniel(2005)。The Long Wait for the Law in Kyrgyzstan。RFE/RL Reports:Central Asia Report,5(22)。  new window
6.Kowalski, Artur J.、Stanclik, Katarzyna(1998)。The New Constitution of the Polish Republic。RFE/RL Research Report,24。  new window
7.Maksymiuk, Jan(2005)。Europe Urges Kyiv to Push Ahead with Reforms。RFE/RL Reports: Belarus, Moldova, and Ukraine Report,7(36)。  new window
8.Mates, Pavel(1993)。The Czech Constitution。RFE/RL Research Report,2(10),53-57。  new window
9.Nodia, Ghia(2005)。Is Georgia Heading for a New Revolution?。RFE/RL Reports: Caucasus Report,8(31)。  new window
10.Rhodes, Mark(1993)。What Do Russians Think about the Constitution Process?。RFE/RL Research Report,2(29),13-15。  new window
11.Shafir, Michael。Viktor Orban’s ‘Transfiguration’ of the Making of a Radical Conservative。development in central and East European Perspectives, ports,6(12)。  new window
12.Wu, Yu-Shan(2005)。Taiwan’s Domestic Politics and Cross-Strait Relations。China Journal,53,35-60。  new window
13.Tolz, Vera(1993)。Drafting the New Russian Constitution。RFE/RL Research Report,2(29),1-12。  new window
14.Wishnevsky, Julia(1993)。Constitutional Crisis Deepens after Russian Congress。RFE/RL Research Report,2(13),1-7。  new window
15.McFaul, Michael(2002)。The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World。World Politics,54(2),212-244。  new window
16.Obrman, Jan(1992)。Czechoslovakia: Stage Set for Disintegration?。RFE/RL Research Report,1(28),26-31。  new window
17.吳玉山(20010700)。Comparing Third-Wave Democracies: East Central Europe and the ROC。Issues and Studies,37(4),1-37。new window  new window
18.吳志光(20040700)。繼受外國憲法釋義學的他山之石經驗--以東歐民主轉型國家為例。憲政時代,30(1),45-87。  延伸查詢new window
19.Pierson, Paul(2000)。Increasing Return, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics。American Political Science Review,94(2),251-267。  new window
20.Way, Lucan A.(2005)。Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The Cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine。World Politics,57(2),231-261。  new window
21.吳玉山(20000900)。The ROC's Semi-Presidentialism at Work: Unstable Compromise, Not Cohabitation。Issues & Studies,36(5),1-40。new window  new window
會議論文
1.吳志光(20050625)。新興民主國家憲改經驗借鏡--以東歐民主轉型國家的人權保障機制爲例。中央研究院憲改論壇一法政對話之二:「憲法實踐與憲改議題」圓桌討論會。臺北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.李建良(2005)。修憲與制憲的抉擇:憲改基礎的Q&A。中央研究院憲改論壇--法政對話之二:「憲法實踐與憲改議題」圓桌討論會,(會議日期: 2005年6月25日)。臺北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅致政(2005)。國際情勢與憲政改革。中央研究院憲改論壇--法政對話之二:「憲法實踐與憲改議題」圓桌討論會,(會議日期: 6月25日)。臺北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
4.蘇永欽(2005)。轉型社會與憲政改革--從臺灣經驗看形式憲改理念的操作困境。中央研究院憲改論壇一法政對話之二:「憲法實踐與憲改議題」圓桌討論會,(會議日期: 6月25日)。臺北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
5.Horowitz, Donald L.(2005)。Three Ways to Make a Constitution。中央研究 院憲改論壇--法政對話之三:「從制度變遷看憲政改革:背景、程序與 影響」學術研討會,(會議日期: 9月24日)。臺北:中央研究院政治學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭高彥(2005)。「合憲性修憲」與「準制憲」 : 從政治理論看未來修憲的程序正義。憲改論壇--法政對話之一,「憲政回顧與憲法修改」圓桌討論會,中央研究院政治學研究所籌備處主辦 (會議日期: 2005年3月12日)。臺北:中央研究院政治學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Leff, Carol Skalnik(1997)。The Czech and Slovak Republics: Nation versus State。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
2.Ash, Timothy Garton(1990)。The Magic Lantern: The Revolution of 89 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin and Prague。New York:Random House。  new window
3.Banac, Ivo(1992)。Eastern Europe in Revolution。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。  new window
4.Berglund, Sten、Ekman, Joakim、Frank H, Aarebrot(2004)。The Hand--book of Political Change in Eastern Europe。Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar。  new window
5.Crzymala-Busse, Anna M.(2002)。Redeeming the Communist Past: the Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Kostelecký, Tomáš(2002)。Political Parties after Communism:Developments in East--Central Europe。Washington, DC:Woodrow Wilson Center Press。  new window
7.Day, Alan J,、East, Roger、Thomas, Richard(2002)。A Political and Economic Dictionary of Eastern Europe。Cambridge, UK:cambridge university press。  new window
8.Hewett, Edward A.(1988)。Reforming the Soviet Economy: Equality versus Efficiency。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution。  new window
9.Swain, Nigel(1992)。Hungary: The Rise and Fall of Feasible Socialism。London:Verso。  new window
10.吳玉山(20000000)。俄羅斯轉型1992-1999:一個政治經濟學的分析。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.吳玉山(19950000)。共產世界的變遷:四個共黨政權的比較。臺北:東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.吳玉山(19960000)。遠離社會主義:中國大陸、蘇聯和波蘭的經濟轉型。臺北:正中。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳玉山(2001)。後共政黨重新掌握政權的途徑--比較俄羅斯與波蘭。政黨重組:臺灣民主政治的再出發?。臺北:新臺灣人文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.von Beyme, Klaus(2003)。Constitutional Engineering in Central and Eastern Europe。Developments in Central and East European Politics。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
3.Grabbe, Heather(2003)。The Implications of EU Enlargement。Developments in Central and East European Politics。Lewis, Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
4.Jasiewicz, Krzysztof(1997)。Poland: Walesa's Legacy to the Presidency。Postcommunist Presidents。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Millard, Frances(2003)。Poland。Development in central and east European Politics。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
6.Pittaway, Mark(2003)。Hungary。European Politics。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
7.Ulram, Peter A.、Plasser, Fritz(2003)。Political Culture in East--Central and Eastern Europe: Empirical Findings 1990-2001。Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe: Attitude in New Democracies。Hants, UK:Ashgate。  new window
8.吳志光(2002)。東歐民主轉型國家憲法法院對法治國家建構之影響--兼論對我國違憲審查經驗之啓示。憲法解釋之理論與實務。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE