:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為什麼馬殺雞?視障按摩歷史的行動網絡分析
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:邱大昕 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Tasing
出版日期:2011
卷期:83
頁次:頁5-36
主題關鍵詞:身心障礙視覺障礙按摩行動者網絡理論DisabilityVisual impairmentMassageANT
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:118
  • 點閱點閱:167
台灣的盲人在日治時期,除了按摩之外,還從事針灸與電療等工作。但是到了國民政府時期,台灣的視障者的工作卻逐轉變成現在的按摩工作。為什麼盲人會從事「非醫療」的按摩工作呢?本研究採用行動者網絡理論(Actor Network Theory),來分析這個「身體」與「工作」間複雜動態的關係。在本研究中我們可以看到,過去百年間法規、政府、警察、教科書、針灸電療器具、中西醫專業團體,以及視障者如何在這轉變過程中,共同形塑出現在所看到的視障按摩樣貌與內容。2008 年10 月31 日司法院釋字第六四九號解釋,宣告視障按摩保障違憲後,許多視障按摩團體希望能改變視障者就業訓練過程,重新進入醫療體系從事理療工作。然而從本研究的角度與立場來看,這雖然不是不可能的目標,但卻是個百廢待舉重新建構網絡的龐大工程。
The blind in Taiwan used to perform acupuncture, moxibustion, massage, and electrotherapy under the Japanese regime. Why did these blind physical therapists become “non-medical” massagers after the Chinese Nationalist’s takeover of Taiwan? This is the main topic to be explored in the current study. Since the current disability models are incapable of explaining these complicated relations between body and work, this study adopts Actor Network Theory as a tool to analyze and answer these questions. We will examine how government law and policy, medical professionals, blind workers and medical devices coproduce the form and content of today’s blind massage. On October 31, 2008, the Taiwan Justices of the Constitutional Court issued Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 649, which proclaimed that it is unconstitutional to restrict massage work to vision-impaired individuals. Many of the blind-massage groups now intend to retrain the blind back into medical professions. However, though not impossible, there will be a lot of work to do to rebuild the network required.
期刊論文
1.邱大昕(20091200)。被忽略的歷史事實:從視障者工作演變看大法官釋字第六四九號解釋。社會政策與社會工作學刊,13(2),55-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hahn, Harlan(19930701)。The Political Implications of Disability Definitions and Data。Journal of Disability Policy Studies,4(2),41-52。  new window
3.傅大為(20050200)。亞細亞的新身體:性別、醫療與近代臺灣。當代,92=210,76-93。  延伸查詢new window
4.戴麗娟(20040600)。馬戲團、解剖室、博物館--黑色維納斯在法蘭西帝國。臺灣社會研究,54,177-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.肖永芝(1999)。日本古代針灸醫學源流概論。中國針灸,1999(5),309-312。  延伸查詢new window
6.萬明美(19910600)。視覺障礙者從事按摩業之現況及影響其收入之相關研究。特殊教育學報,6,1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張苙雲(19980100)。從不穩定的口碑到主要的求醫場所:臺灣西醫的制度信任建構。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,8(1),161-183。  延伸查詢new window
8.林文源(20070400)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會,4,65-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.朱美滿(1977)。〈簡介操作治療法及其對下背疼痛的施用〉。《物理醫學會雜誌》,2,11-13。  延伸查詢new window
10.栗山茂久(2006)。肩凝考。古今論衡,15,50-70。  延伸查詢new window
11.高宗桂(2005)。〈台灣中醫推拿的源流與發展〉。《中華推拿與現代康復科學雜誌》,2(1),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
12.張妙娟(1999)。〈《台灣府城教會報》教育資料選譯〉。《台灣教育史研究會通訊》。  延伸查詢new window
13.張珣(1983)。〈台灣漢人的醫療體系與醫療行為:一個台灣北部農村的醫學人類學研究〉。《中央研究院歷民族學研究所集刊》,56,29-58。  延伸查詢new window
14.永井彰子(2002)。東北アジアにみる盲人文化。동북아문화연구,3,89-104。  延伸查詢new window
15.Kobayashi, Akiko、Miwa Uefuji、Washiro Yasumo(2008)。History and Progress of Japanese Acupuncture。Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine \doi\10.1093/ecam/nem155。  new window
16.Bendelow, A. Gillian and Simon J. Williams(1995)。Transcending the Dualisms: Towards a Sociology of Pain。Sociology of Health & Illness,17(2),139-165。  new window
17.Bolt, David(2005)。From Blindness to Visual Impairment: Terminological Typology and the Social Model of Disability。Disability & Society,20(5),539-552。  new window
18.Corker, Mairian(1999)。Conflations, Differences and Foundations: The Limits to ‘Accurate’Theoretical Representation of Disabled People’s Experience?。Disability & Society,14(5),627-642。  new window
19.Hughes, Bill、Paterson, Kevin(1997)。The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment。Disability & Society,12(3),325-340。  new window
20.Mestler, Gordon E.(1954)。A Galaxy of Old Japanese Medical Books with Miscellaneous Notes on Early Medicine in Japan: Part II. Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Bathing,Balneotherapy and Massage, Nursing, Pediatrics and Hygiene, Obstetrics and Gynecology。Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,42(4),468-500。  new window
會議論文
1.Law, John(2009)。Engineering Practice and STS。  new window
2.Law, John(2009)。Meltdown: Why ANT?。  new window
學位論文
1.王育瑜(1995)。臺灣視障者的職業困境--以按摩業為例的分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.喻淑蘭(1999)。醫療專業的變遷與互動--以中醫傷科醫師、國術館拳頭師傅與推拿技術員為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.范燕秋(1994)。日據前期台灣之公共衛生--以防疫為中心之研究(1895~1920)(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周建卿(1992)。中華社會福利法制史。臺北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.丸山芳登(1957)。日本領時代に遺した臺灣の医事衛生業績。橫濱市。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭志敏(200412)。日治時期《台灣民報》醫藥衛生史料輯録。國立中國醫藥硏究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Tuner, Bryan S.(1984)。The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory。Blackwell。  new window
5.Gamble, Sidney D.、Burgess, John Stewart(1921)。Peking: A social Survey。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.吳基福(1980)。中國醫政史上的大革命--醫師法修正始末。台北:中華民國醫師公會全國聯合會。  延伸查詢new window
7.甘為霖、許雅琦、陳佩馨(2006)。福爾摩莎素描:甘為霖牧師臺灣筆記。臺北:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.中山太郎(1934)。日本盲人史。東京:昭和書房。  延伸查詢new window
9.Law, John(2004)。After Method。Routledge。  new window
10.Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie(1997)。Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
11.Oliver, Michael(1990)。The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach。New York。  new window
12.Oakley, Ann(1972)。Sex, Gender and Society。London:Maurice Temple Smith Ltd。  new window
13.Thomas, Carol(1999)。Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability。Open University Press。  new window
14.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, A.(1979)。Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison。Lodon:Penguin Books。  new window
15.Oliver, M.(1996)。Understanding disability: From theory to practice。Macmillan Press。  new window
16.Campbell, William(1915)。Sketches from Formosa。Marshall Brothers。  new window
17.徐南號(1996)。臺灣教育史。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
18.Foucault, Michel、Hurley, Robert(1980)。The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction。Vintage Books。  new window
19.莊永明(1998)。臺灣醫療史:以臺大醫院為主軸。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
20.Latour, B.、Sheridan, A.、Law, J.(1988)。The pasteurization of France。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
21.台灣省行政長官公署統計室(1946)。《台灣省51 年來(民國前十七年至民國三十四年)統計提要》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
22.小田俊郎、洪有錫(200011)。台灣醫學五十年。台北市:前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.佐藤會哲(1932)。台灣衛生年鑑。台北:台衛新報社。  延伸查詢new window
24.Callon, Michel(1991)。Techno-Ecnomic Networks and Irreversibility。A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination。London。  new window
25.Doolittle, Justus(1868)。Social Life of the Chinese。London。  new window
26.Barnes, Colin(1991)。Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination。London。  new window
27.Thomson, Rosemarie Garland(1996)。Introduction: From Wonder to Error—A Genealogy of Freak Discourse in Modernity。Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body。New York。  new window
28.Finkelstein, Vic(1980)。Attitudes and Disabled People。NY。  new window
29.Doolittle, Justus(2001)。A Personal Journey into Disability Politics。  new window
其他
1.薛世儀(1958)。〈長笛一聲人依杖 曲巷十里夜未央〉。  延伸查詢new window
2.Law, John(2007)。Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics,http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law-ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf, 20070518。  new window
圖書論文
1.Callon, Michel(1986)。Elements of a Sociology of Translation: the Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay。Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?。London:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
2.Mol, Annemarie(1999)。Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions。Actor Network Theory and After。Blackwell。  new window
3.Shakespeare, Tom、Watson, Nicholas(2002)。The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?。Exploring theories and expanding methodologies : where we are and where we need to go。  new window
4.Latour, Bruno、林宗德、雷祥麟(2004)。給我一個實驗室,我將舉起全世界。科技渴望社會。臺北:群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉寧顏、李雄揮、程大學、陳清添(1994)。文教志.教育行政篇。重修臺灣省通志。南投縣:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bury, Michael(2000)。On Chronic Illness and Disability。Handbook of Medical Sociology。Prentice Hall。  new window
7.Callon, M.(1999)。Actor-network theory: The market test。Actor network theory and after。Oxford, UK:Blackwell:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Finkelstein, Vic(1981)。Disability and the helper/helped relationship: An historical view。Handicap in a Social World。London:Hodder & Stoughton。  new window
9.范燕秋(20080000)。新醫學在臺灣的實踐(1898-1906):從後藤新平《國家衛生原理》談起。帝國與現代醫學。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE