:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政府與客家社團協力指標之析探
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:陳定銘 引用關係陳樺潔游靖宇
作者(外文):Chen, Ting-mingChen, Hu-chiehYou, Ching-yu
出版日期:2012
卷期:54
頁次:頁41-82
主題關鍵詞:新北市政府客家事務局客家社團協力IAD架構Hakka Affairs Department of New Taipei City GovernmentHakka associationsCollaborationIAD framework
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:149
  • 點閱點閱:103
本研究採用 Bryson、Crosby與 Stone提出的協力模型,並結合 Ostrom的制度分析架構( IAD架構)觀點,析探政府如何運用協力機制,提供決策與統合資源,而和客家社團一同傳承與創造新的在地客家文化。本研究以社會中心型的協力途徑,重視客家使命與目標、認同客家意識、強調客家公共價值、課責與參與,以及落實客家公民社會之實踐。研究發現( 1)環境條件的需求與塑造:新北市客家事務局在推動客家文化扮演重要的角色,了解客家社團的需求進而予以協助,特別是政府提供之政策工具的優惠與鼓勵是協力合作的迫切需求項目。(2)資訊公開透明是影響互動關係的程度:新北市客家社團在協力過程中,社團與社團間彼此觀摩,相互經驗交流並密切互動,而客家事務局賦予客家社團一定的自主性,並做好行政溝通與建構信賴的活動網絡,讓協力機制能夠有效運作。
This research studies how the government collaborates with Hakka associations under the framework combined collaboration model of Bryson, Crosby, and Stone with IAD framework (Institutional Analysis and Development Framework) proposed by Ostrom. It analyzes how the government manages the collaborative systems to offer policies, integrate resources, pass on Hakka traditions and create new local culture with Hakka associations. The research adopts the way of collaboration from sociocentric to discuss collaboration between Hakka Affairs and Hakka associations. It not only focuses on the mission and consciousness of Hakka, but emphasizes public value, accountability and public participation of Hakka. Furthermore, through public discussion, a Hakka civil society will be put into practice. The findings are as follows: First, the needing and making of the environment. Department of Hakka Affairs of New Taipei City Government plays an important role in promoting Hakka culture by understanding the needs of Hakka associations and offering assistance. Both preferential and encouraging policies provided by the government are part of the urgent demands. Second, open and see-through information affects the interaction. During the process of collaboration between Hakka associations in New Taipei City, inspecting and exchanging experiences with one another brings the associations close together. As to Department of Hakka Affairs, the collaborative system works better when giving the associations a certain degree of independency, making good administrative communication, and building a trustful activity network.
期刊論文
1.Carlsson, L.(2000)。Policy networks as collective action。Policy Studies Journal,28(3),502-520。  new window
2.Selden, S. C.、Sowa, J. E.、Sandfort, J.(2006)。The impact of nonprofit collaboration in early child care and education on management and program outcomes。Public Administration Review,66(3),412-425。  new window
3.張世賢(20071200)。永續發展政策執行:公私夥伴、倡導聯盟和制度發展之探討。中國行政評論,16(1),95-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Woolcock, Michael(2001)。The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcome。Canadian Journal of Policy Research,2(1),11-17。  new window
5.Imperial, Mark T.(1999)。Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework。Environmental Management,24(4),449-465。  new window
6.Stoker, Gerry(1998)。Governance as Theory: Five Propositions。International Social Science Journal,50(155),17-28。  new window
7.Bryson, John M.、Crosby, Barbara C.、Stone, Melissa Middleton(2006)。The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature。Public Administration Review,66(Supplement 1),44-55。  new window
8.Saaty, Thomas L.(1990)。How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process。European Journal of Operational Research,48(1),9-26。  new window
9.黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素珍(20110600)。社區社會資本的促成、阻礙因素及其發展策略:社區領導者觀點之分析。行政暨政策學報,52,87-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380。  new window
11.陳秋政(2008)。部門治理之內涵與研究啟示。府際關係研究通訊,4,29-31。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hardy, S. D.、Koontz, T. M.(2009)。Rules for collaboration: Institutional analysis of group membership and levels of action in watershed partnerships。Policy Studies Journal,37(3),393-414。  new window
會議論文
1.范振乾(2002)。客家事務行政體系之建構。「客家公共政策」研討會,(會議日期: 6月21-22日)。臺北:行政院客委會。12-17。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳欽春(2009)。建構社會資本內涵的社會福利工作:彭婉如基金會「居家服務方案」 之個案分析。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.汪明生、邱靖蓉(2008)。課責與南部地方政府間夥伴關係建立之研究: PAM與IAD觀點。台中。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳秋政(2008)。社會中心途徑之跨部門治理研究:以「洛杉磯河整治計畫」為例(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sullivan, Helen、Skelcher, Chris(2002)。Working Across Boundaries。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
2.O’Leary R.、L. B. Bingham Eds.(2009)。The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century。Washington, D. C.:Georgetown University Press。  new window
3.Ostrom, Elinor(2005)。Understanding Institutional Diversity: Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Pierre, Jon、Peters, Brainard Guy、謝宗學、劉坤億、陳衍宏、孫本初(2002)。治理、政治與國家。智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.江明修(2003)。公共行政學:理論與社會實踐。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.林水波、李長晏(20050000)。跨域治理。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kettl, Donald F.(2002)。The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America。Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.Kooiman, Jan(2003)。Governing as Governance。Sage Publications。  new window
10.張奕華、許正妹(2010)。質化資料分析:MAXQDA軟體的應用。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Putnam, Robert D.(2000)。Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community。Simon & Schuster。  new window
12.Halpern, D.(2005)。Social Capital。Polity Press。  new window
13.謝劍(1981)。香港的惠州社團--從人類學看客家文化的持續。香港。  延伸查詢new window
14.彭欽清(2002)。台灣客家社團之發展。台灣客家族群史(社會篇)。南投。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.瞿文芳(2001)。行政院客家委員會設置之背景說明,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/090/EC-B-090-001.htm, 20090913。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Ostrom, Elinor(1999)。Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework。Theories of the Policy Process。Boulder, CO:Westviews。  new window
2.丘昌泰(2009)。臺灣客家的社團參與和族群認同。客家族群與文化再現。臺北市:智勝。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ostrom, E.(2007)。Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework。Theories of the Policy Process。Westview Press。  new window
4.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Governance and Governability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity。Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions。Sage。  new window
5.陳定銘(2008)。非營利組織與政府協力之研究:以三個公益組織方案為例。第三部門與政府:跨部門治理。智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE