臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：考古資料的脈絡分析：以瑪瑙珠與硬陶甕為例談起
書刊名：考古人類學刊
作者：張光仁
作者(外文)：Chang, Kuang-jen
出版日期：2012
卷期：76
頁次：頁5-31
主題關鍵詞：外來物品；瑪瑙珠；硬陶甕；物質文化；脈絡分析；Exotic objects；Agate beads；Stoneware jars；Material culture；Context analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:125
  • 點閱點閱:74
歷史考古學的貢獻，不僅在於增加新的出土文物，而且是提供具有時空脈絡訊息的出土材料。考古資料的脈絡訊息，在透過有系統的分析探討後，才形成真正有價值的歷史知識。臺灣歷史考古學的一項重要課題，是關於臺灣在參與到早期現代世界體系形成過程中，外來物品進入到臺灣本土的物的意義與價值體系的探討，而這個課題必須要透過有系統的脈絡分析考古資料方得以有效探討。本文的目的有二：一方面透過檢討東南亞考古學與民族學對於瑪瑙珠與硬陶甕兩項物品的研究，嘗試說明外來物轉化為原生物的物質文化變遷，對考古學研究所具有的意義與挑戰。這兩類物品都是臺灣與島嶼東南亞歷史考古脈絡中經常接觸到的外來物品，考古科學日新月異的進展，對於所謂外來物質的分析成果推陳出新，不斷更新我們對於出土遺物的認識。然而民族誌資料顯示許多東南亞社會，會將所珍視的瑪瑙珠以及硬陶甕認定為傳自祖先的原生器物，即使科學分析證實為外來物品。考古學研究不當過於熱衷於科學分析技術的進展，只是在證實出土遺物的原料或技術來源，還必須與社會文化理論攜手，關切外來物品在特定遺址脈絡中的角色與意義，探討特定社會所展現在物質文化上的異／我之分，及其變遷。畢竟這方是朝向考古學者所試圖理解的社會文化議題。第二部分則透過兩個研究個案的探討，說明如何透過遺物出土脈絡的空間分佈、伴隨模式等變項，據此探索考古學如何理解物品價值的課題。近年來人文社會科學理論在物質文化方面的探討，改進了考古學在這方面的研究方法。物的價值體系展現在特定脈絡中對於不同物品的差別待遇，在考古學研究中則可以透過對於出土遺物的脈絡分析，特別是空間分佈的差異模式，以及器物伴隨出土的模式等現象的細膩分析，來合理的推論、建構可能的物品價值體系。透過歐洲東地中海青銅時代的美錫尼類型陶器研究，以及菲律賓呂宋島上，早期現代時期墓葬群中的貿易陶瓷研究，本文嘗試說明此種研究取向的可行貢獻。
The purpose of historical archaeology is not to pile up newly discovered objects but to provide contextual information for unearthed materials. One of the key issues in Taiwanese historical archaeology is how exotic goods were integrated into the existing meaning and value systems of local objects in Taiwan pursuant to participation in the early modern world system. This question could produce valuable historical knowledge through the systematic analysis of archaeological materials with contextual information.This paper serves two purposes: firstly, to examine how exogenous materials become treated as indigenous objects via the archaeological and ethnographic studies of agate beads and stoneware jars in Southeast Asia, two types of objects commonly discussed in Taiwanese and Island Southeast Asian historical archaeology. Continuing advances in the archaeological sciences constantly renew our understanding of unearthed objects. However, ethnographic evidence shows many Southeast Asian societies treat those cherished agate beads and stoneware jars as indigenous objects passed down from their ancestors, even though those same objects were shown by scientific analysis to be exogenous materials. This tells us that archaeological study should be more than the scientific analysis of an object's geographic and technological origin; it needs to take into account of socio-cultural theories in order to appreciate the role and meaning of exotic objects within specific contexts, which is the ultimate goal of archaeological study.The second purpose is to examine how value could be studied archaeologically by utilising information on the spatial distribution and association of discovered objects. Recent advances in the study of material culture have improved archaeological understanding, which suggests that the valuation system could be reconstructed by looking at the differentiation of usage in specific contexts. In other words, a reasonable reconstruction of a value system could be made by a detailed context analysis, especially the spatial pattern of discoveries and association of objects. This paper attempts to approach this issue using two case-studies: one of pottery in the Bronze Age of East Mediterranean, and another dealing with trade ceramics found in early modern Luzon in the Philippines.
期刊論文
1.Gosden, Chris、Marshall, Yvonne(1999)。The Cultural Biography of Objects。World Archaeology，31(2)，169-178。  new window
2.飯塚義之、洪曉純(20050600)。Archaeomineralogy of Taiwan Nephrite: Sourcing Study of Nephritic Artifacts from the Philippines。南島研究學報，1(1)，35-81。new window  new window
3.楊聰榮(20010300)。菲律賓獨立革命與西美戰爭--論東南亞自主歷史史觀下國族歷史論述的成就與侷限。新史學，12(1)，187-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳國棟(19991200)。「在地性歷史」、「自主性歷史」與東南亞研究。東南亞區域研究通訊，9，25-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王淑津、劉益昌(20070300)。十七世紀前後臺灣煙草、煙斗與玻璃珠飾的輸入網絡--一個新的交換階段。國立臺灣大學美術史研究集刊，22，51-81+83-90+268。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉益昌、高淑媛(19950900)。史前文化與原住民關係初步探討。臺灣風物，45(3)，75-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.臧振華、高有德、劉益昌(19931200)。左營清代鳳山縣舊城聚落的試掘。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊，64(3)，763-791+793+795+797+799-803+805+807-865。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.臧振華(1990)。甚麼是歷史考古學。人類與文化，26，48-50。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bellina, Bérénice(2003)。BeadsBeads, Social Change and Interaction between India and South-east Asia。Antiquity，77(2)，285-297。  new window
10.Evans, Ivor(1932)。Excavations at Tanjong Rawa, Kuala Selinsing, Perak。Journal of the Federated Malay States Museums，15(3)，79-134。  new window
11.Francis, Peter Jr.(1991)。Beadmaking at Arikamedu and Beyond。World Archaeology，23(1)，28-43。  new window
12.Glover, Ian C.、Bellina, Bérénice(2001)。Alkaline Etched Beads East of India in the Late Prehistoric and Early Historic Periods。Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient，88，191-215。  new window
13.van Wijngaarden, Gert-Jan(1999)。An Archaeological Approach to the Concept of Value: Mycenaean Pottery at Ugarit (Syria)。Archaeological Dialogues，6(1)，2-46。  new window
14.Lamb, Alastair(1965)。Some Observations on Stone and Glass Beads in Early South-east Asia。Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society，38(2)，87-124。  new window
15.Mabbett, I. W.(1977)。a The 'Indianization' of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the Prehistoric Sources。Journal of Southeast Asia Studies，8(1)，1-14。  new window
16.Mabbett, I. W.(1977)。b The 'Indianization' of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the Historical Sources。Journal of Southeast Asia Studies，8(2)，143-161。  new window
17.Nik Hassan Shuhaimi(1991)。Recent Research at Kuala Selinsing, Perak。Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association，11，141-152。  new window
18.Theunissen, Robert、Grave, Peter、Bailey, Grahame(2000)。Doubts on Diffusion: Challenging the Assumed Indian Origin of Iron Age Agate and Carnelian Beads in Southeast Asia。World Archaeology，32(1)，84-105。  new window
19.Voutsaki, Sofia(1997)。The Creation of Value and Prestige in the Aegean Late Bronze Age。Journal of European Archaeology，5(1)，34-52。  new window
會議論文
1.劉益昌(1998)。臺灣西南平原地區史前時代晚期的文化。南投。15-40。  延伸查詢new window
2.Klokke, Marijke(2008)。In press Foreign Trade, Local Taste: A Consumption-based Study of Trade Ceramics in Late Proto-historic Island Southeast Asia。Singapore。  new window
3.Chen, Kwang-tzuu(2007)。Scientific Analysis of the Trade Ceramics Excavated from Zeelandia: A Preliminary Report。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
4.Grave, Peter、Maccheroni, Michael(2009)。Characterizing Asian Stoneware Jar Production at the Transition to the Early Modern Period, 1550-1650。London。168-204。  new window
5.Voutsaki, Sofia(1995)。Value and Value and Exchange in Pre-monetary Societies: Anthropological Debates and Aegean Archaeology。Jonsered, Sweden。7-15。  new window
研究報告
1.陳有貝、邱水金、李貞瑩(2007)。淇武蘭遺址搶救發掘報告。宜蘭。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝艾倫(2009)。宜蘭淇武蘭遺址出土外來陶瓷器之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱鴻霖(2004)。宜蘭縣礁溪鄉淇武蘭遺址出土墓葬研究--埋葬行為與文化變遷的觀察(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chang, Kuang-jen(2008)。Social Use and Value of Trade Ceramics: An Analysis of Mortuary Practices in Calatagan, Southwest Luzon, the Philippines。University College London。  new window
圖書
1.Helms, Mary W.(1988)。Ulysses' Sail: An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge, and Geographical Distance。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Higham, Charles(2002)。Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia。Bangkok：River Books。  new window
3.Thomas, Nicholas、Thomas, N.(1991)。Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific.。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Francis, Peter Jr.(2002)。Asia’s Maritime Bead Trade: 300 B.C. to the Present。Honululu：University of Hawai’I Press。  new window
5.Guy, John S.(1986)。Oriental Trade Ceramics in South-East Asia: Ninth to Sixteenth Centuries。Singapore：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Brown, Roxanna M.(1988)。The Ceramics of South-East Asia: their dating and identification。Singapore：Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Weiner, Annette B.(1992)。Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving。University of California Press。  new window
8.徐本章、葉文程(1993)。德化瓷史與德化窯。香港。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bailey, Douglass、Mills, Steve(1998)。The Archaeology of Value: Essays on Prestige and the Process of Valuation。Oxford。  new window
10.Barretto-Tesoro, Grace(2008)。Identity and Reciprocity in 15th Century Philippines。Oxford。  new window
11.Glover, Ian C.(1990)。Early Trade between India and Southeast Asia: A Link in the Development of a World Trading System。Hull。  new window
12.Maran, Joseph、Stockhammer, Philipp W.(2012)。Materiality and Social Practice: Transformative Capacities of Intercultural Encounters。Oxford。  new window
13.Bellina, Bérénice(2007)。Cultural Exchange between India and Southeast Asia: Production and Distribution of Hard Stone Ornaments (VI c. BC-VI c. AD)。Paris。  new window
14.Brothwell, Don R.、Pollard, A. M.(2001)。Handbook of Archaeological Sciences。Chichester。  new window
15.Deo, Shantaram Bhalchandra(2000)。Indian Beads: A Cultural and Technological Study。Pune。  new window
16.Ferguson, Leland(1992)。Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African American, 1650-1800。Washington。  new window
17.Goddio, Franck(2002)。Lost at Sea: The Strange Route of the Lena Shoal Junk。London。  new window
18.van Wijngaarden, Gert-Jan(2002)。Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus and Italy (1600-1200 BC)。Amsterdam。  new window
19.Hodder, Ian(2012)。Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things。Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
20.Harrisson, Barbara(1986)。Pusaka: Heirloom Jars of Borneo。Singapore。  new window
21.Henderson, Julian(2000)。The Science and Archaeology of Materials: An Investigation of Inorganic Materials。London。  new window
22.Jones, Andrew(2002)。Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice。Cambridge。  new window
23.曹永和、包樂史(2000)。小琉球民住民的消失：重拾失落的臺灣歷史之一頁。臺灣早期歷史研究續集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.Barbosa, Artemio C.(1992)。Heirloom Jars in Philippine Rituals。A Thousand Years of Stoneware Jars in the Philippines。Manila。  new window
25.Deetz, James(1991)。Archaeological Evidence of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth- Century Encounters。Historical Archaeology in Global Perspective。Washington, DC。  new window
26.Francis, Peter Jr.(1996)。Bead, the Bead Trade and State Development in Southeast Asia。Ancient Trades and Cultural Contacts in Southeast Asia。Bangkok。  new window
27.Glover, Ian C.、Bellina, Bérénice(2003)。Alkaline Etched Beads in Southeast Asia。Ornaments from the Past: Bead Studies after Beck。London。  new window
28.Hodder, Ian(1987)。The Contextual Analysis of Symbolic Meanings。The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings。Cambridge。  new window
29.Janowski, Monica(1998)。Beads, Prestige and Life among the Kelabit of Sarawak, East Malaysia。Beads and Bead Makers: Gender, Material Culture and Meaning。Oxford。  new window
30.Lesure, Richard(1999)。On the Genesis of Value in Early Hierarchical Societies。Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory。Carbondale。  new window
31.Long, Kerry Nguyen(1992)。History behind the Jar。A Thousand Years of Stoneware Jars in the Philippines。Manila。  new window
32.Sherratt, Susan(1999)。E pur si muove: Pots, Markets and Values in the Second Millennium Mediterranean。The Complex Past of Pottery: Production, Circulation and Consumption of Mycenaean and Greek pottery (sixteenth to early fifth centuries BC)。Amsterdam。  new window
圖書論文
1.臧振華(1997)。考古學與臺灣史。中國考古學與歷史學之整合研究。臺北：中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.林瑋嬪(20040000)。臺灣漢人的神像：談神如何具象。物與物質文化。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳文德(20040000)。衣飾與族群認同：以南王卑南人的織與繡為例。物與物質文化。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃應貴(20040000)。導論：物與物質文化。物與物質文化。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：703（臺灣：697，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1520404 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67312821
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上