:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:蔣中正對「多田聲明」的因應態度
書刊名:國史館館刊
作者:蕭李居
作者(外文):Hsiao, Li-chu
出版日期:2012
卷期:32
頁次:頁85+87-120
主題關鍵詞:蔣中正汪兆銘多田駿華北自治天皇機關說Chiang Kai-shekWang Ching-weiTada HayaoMovement for Autonomy in Northern ChinaThe Emperor Organ Theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:39
1935年9月24日「支那駐屯軍」司令宮多田駿在天津宴請日本記者餐會上發表「多田聲明」,由聲明的內容可知多田對國民黨與蔣中正極為不信任與排斥。但由他發表聲明的動作說明他將以華北為建功立業的政治舞臺,企圖積極主導華北自治的工作,顯示駐屯軍與關東軍爭奪華北工作主導權的問題。這個聲明對中國引起極大的震撼,一般均認為聲明干涉中國內攻,污辱蔣中正與國民黨。國民政府除了私下透過報紙進行撰文反駁外,也分別在南京與東京由外交人員進行交涉。但此時日本岡田啟介內閣正因「天皇機關說」問題引發倒閣運動所困擾,故僅以此聲明並非日本政府方針及軍部的真正態度,亦非多田本人意思的方式簡單回應,以便專心處理內部倒閣危機。在這期間曾發生武漢警備司令葉蓬因反日行為而遭日本駐漢口總領事要求予以撤職一事,汪兆銘主張將聲明事件與撤職案等同處理,以視兩國主權平等。但蔣中正並未關注聲明污辱中國的內容,而是考量1935年上半年在華日軍推動華北分離活動,認為這是在華日軍將對華北再次展開活動的訊號,以為聲明事件的危險性在於對華北情勢的影響,因此主張應採取分別處理原則,並親自北上安撫華北將領,華北自治運動最後草草了事與此難說不無關係,說明此聲明有其警訊之意義。而由汪兆銘與蔣中正處理聲明事件的不同態度,顯示兩人在個性與外交視野的差異,同時也說明汪兆銘身為外交部長但職權的侷限性,以及蔣中正雖在前線剿匪,但是國民政府的對日外交方針仍是以其態度為依歸。
On 24 September 1935, Tada Hayao, the Commander-in-chief of Japanese China Garrison Army in Northern China, made a declaration at a press conference in Tientsin, which showed that he distrusted and despised the Chinese leader, Chiang Kai-shek. It was clear that Tada wished to use Northern China as the stepping stone for his political career, by making it an autonomous territory. This action also revealed that Japanese China Garrison Army was contending with the Kwantung Anny for the leading role in Northern China.The so-called Tada declaration was a great shock to China for its grave interference in the in tern al affairs of China as well as a huge insult to Chiang Kai-shek and the KMT. The Nationalist Government started to negotiate with Japan on the one hand, and expressed their anger and outrage in the newspapers on the other. Meanwhile, Japan was in the midst of the so-called "Emperorship's Organs Theory" and the prime minister Keisuke Okada was in dangle of being overthrown. Naturally, Keisuke Okada was more concerned about this constitutional issue than the case of the Tada Declaration. He responded rather simply by saying that the declaration was neither the policy of the government, nor the attitude of the army, nor even the real intention of Tada himself.At the same time, the Japanese Consul General at Hankou requested that the Chinese Garrison Commander of Wuhan, Yeh Feng, must be dismissed from his position for his anti-Japanese behaviors. China's Foreign Minister, Wang Ching-wei suggested that in order to show respect for the sovereignty equality of the two nations, the two cases should be taken care of side by side.But Chiang did not pay much attention to the insulting words in the Tada declaration. He felt that since 1935 the Japanese in China had tried every means to dismember Northern China and this very declaration was an evidence of yet another clear threat to further the invasion of China. Judging on the harmful impact the declaration might have on the situation in Northern China, so Chiang instead suggested that the two cases should be handled separately. So, he went north to pacify the high-ranking officials there. It was probable that there was some connection between this act of Chiang and the ending of the Movement for Autonomy in Northern China.The difference in attitudes between Wang and Chiang toward the event showed that they were of very different personalities and views. As the foreign minister, Wang had rather limited powers; while Chiang, on the other hand, was still the very one person who decided policies concerning foreign affairs regardless of wherever he was.
期刊論文
1.蔡銘澤(1996)。三十年代國民黨新聞政策的演變。新聞與傳播研究,2,71-78。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳在俊(1984)。盧溝橋畔的點火者--茂川秀和。近代中國,42。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蕭李居(2011)。中日會談與防共問題(1935-1936)。臺北:中正文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.古野直也(1989)。天津軍司令部,1901-1937。東京:國書刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
2.臧運祜(2000)。七七事變前的日本對華政策。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.內田尚孝(2006)。華北事変の研究--塘沽停戰協定と華北危機下の日中関係,1932-1935。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
4.防衛庁防衛研修所戦史室(1974)。大本営陸軍部(1)昭和十五年五月まで。東京:朝雲新聞社。  延伸查詢new window
5.防衛庁防衛研修所戦史室(1975)。支那事変陸軍作戦:昭和十三年一月まで。東京:朝雲新聞社。  延伸查詢new window
6.李雲漢(1987)。宋哲元與七七抗戰。臺北:傳記文學雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
7.周開慶(1962)。抗戰以前之中日關係。臺北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.重光葵(1997)。外交回想錄。東京。  延伸查詢new window
9.原田熊雄(1951)。西園寺公と政局。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.梁敬錞(1984)。日本侵略華北史述。臺北:傳記文學雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉維開(19950000)。國難期間應變圖存問題之研究:從九一八到七七。臺北:國史館。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王宇高、王宇正、黃自進(2011)。蔣中正總統五記。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
13.周美華(2008)。蔣中正總統文物--事略稿本。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
14.秦孝儀(1981)。中華民國重要史料初編--對日抗戰時期 $a緒編。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會。  延伸查詢new window
15.秦孝儀(1981)。中華民國重要史料初編--對日抗戰時期 $a第6編 傀儡組織。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會。  延伸查詢new window
16.中央研究院近代史研究所(2001)。王子壯日記。中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
17.半藤一利(2010)。昭和史1926-1945。東京:平凡社。  延伸查詢new window
18.李文榮、邵雲瑞(1989)。華北事變。天津:南開大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.秦郁彦(1977)。日中戦争史。東京:河出書房新社。  延伸查詢new window
20.耿成寬、韋顯文(1987)。抗日戰爭時期的侵華日軍。北京:春秋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.歴史学研究会(1972)。太平洋戦争史2日中戦争I。東京:青木書店。  延伸查詢new window
22.土肥原賢二刊行会(1979)。秘録土肥原賢二。東京:芙蓉書房。  延伸查詢new window
23.中央研究院近代史研究所(1990)。徐永昌日記。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究。  延伸查詢new window
24.本庄繁(1990)。本庄日記。東京:原書房。  延伸查詢new window
25.松本重治(1974)。上海時代(中)。東京:中央公論社。  延伸查詢new window
26.南開大學馬列主義教研室中共黨史教研組(1983)。華北事變資料選編。河南:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.小林龍夫、島田俊彦(1964)。現代史資料(7)満洲事変。東京:みすず書房。  延伸查詢new window
28.松下芳男(1976)。日本国防の悲劇。東京:芙蓉書房。  延伸查詢new window
29.姬野德一(1936)。北支の政情。東京:日支問題研究会。  延伸查詢new window
30.江口圭一(1982)。十五年戦争の開幕。東京:小学館。  延伸查詢new window
31.江口圭一(1986)。十五年戦争小史。東京:青木書店。  延伸查詢new window
32.日本近代史料研究会(1984)。日本陸海軍の制度‧組織‧人事。東京:東京大学出版会。  延伸查詢new window
33.御厨貴(2011)。近現代日本を史料で読む。東京:中央公論新社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.特交文卷,交擬稿件(1999-2000)。,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.特交檔案--一般資料,臺北:國史館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
3.特交文電--日寇侵略,臺北:國史館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
4.日駐津司令官多田駿發表談話,臺北:國史館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
5.籌筆,臺北:國史館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
6.特交檔案--分類資料,臺北:國史館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
7.廣田三原則之交涉,臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
8.日本近現代史辞典編集委員会(1978)。日本近現代史辞典,東京:東洋経済新報社。  延伸查詢new window
9.帝国ノ対支外交政策関係一件,東京:日本外務省外交史料館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
10.満洲事変‧華北問題,東京:日本外務省外交史料館(藏)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.島田俊彦、稲葉正夫(1964)。日中戦争。現代史資料。東京:みすず書房。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂芳上(2006)。面對強鄰:1935年〈蔣介石日記〉的考察。蔣中正與近代中日關係。臺北:稻鄉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李雲漢(1986)。挑起戰爭的真正禍首--日本華北駐屯軍。革命文獻第一○七輯:盧溝橋事變史料。臺北:中國國民黨中央黨史委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE