On 24 September 1935, Tada Hayao, the Commander-in-chief of Japanese China Garrison Army in Northern China, made a declaration at a press conference in Tientsin, which showed that he distrusted and despised the Chinese leader, Chiang Kai-shek. It was clear that Tada wished to use Northern China as the stepping stone for his political career, by making it an autonomous territory. This action also revealed that Japanese China Garrison Army was contending with the Kwantung Anny for the leading role in Northern China.The so-called Tada declaration was a great shock to China for its grave interference in the in tern al affairs of China as well as a huge insult to Chiang Kai-shek and the KMT. The Nationalist Government started to negotiate with Japan on the one hand, and expressed their anger and outrage in the newspapers on the other. Meanwhile, Japan was in the midst of the so-called "Emperorship's Organs Theory" and the prime minister Keisuke Okada was in dangle of being overthrown. Naturally, Keisuke Okada was more concerned about this constitutional issue than the case of the Tada Declaration. He responded rather simply by saying that the declaration was neither the policy of the government, nor the attitude of the army, nor even the real intention of Tada himself.At the same time, the Japanese Consul General at Hankou requested that the Chinese Garrison Commander of Wuhan, Yeh Feng, must be dismissed from his position for his anti-Japanese behaviors. China's Foreign Minister, Wang Ching-wei suggested that in order to show respect for the sovereignty equality of the two nations, the two cases should be taken care of side by side.But Chiang did not pay much attention to the insulting words in the Tada declaration. He felt that since 1935 the Japanese in China had tried every means to dismember Northern China and this very declaration was an evidence of yet another clear threat to further the invasion of China. Judging on the harmful impact the declaration might have on the situation in Northern China, so Chiang instead suggested that the two cases should be handled separately. So, he went north to pacify the high-ranking officials there. It was probable that there was some connection between this act of Chiang and the ending of the Movement for Autonomy in Northern China.The difference in attitudes between Wang and Chiang toward the event showed that they were of very different personalities and views. As the foreign minister, Wang had rather limited powers; while Chiang, on the other hand, was still the very one person who decided policies concerning foreign affairs regardless of wherever he was.