:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《四庫全書總目》之「《春秋》學譜系」蘊涵的思維方式
書刊名:淡江中文學報
作者:江毓奇
作者(外文):Chiang, Yuh Chyi
出版日期:2012
卷期:26
頁次:頁197-219
主題關鍵詞:四庫全書總目春秋學譜系思維方式義例方法精神目的範型性經說Catalog of Imperial Collection of FourPedigree of Spring and Autumn AnnalsModes of thinkingSpiritual purposeParadigmatic interpretation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:76
《四庫全書總目》所蘊涵的學術觀點,往往為後世研究者反思性的起點。以《總目》與「《春秋》學」相關論題為例,根據前行研究的成果,主要研究方向有:釐析《總目》內涵之「《春秋》學史」進而提出辨正,並探討其時代性學風的影響因素與意義;反思《總目》對於「《春秋》學」的基本觀念,從而析論其對歷來「《春秋》學」的評價與缺失。除此之外,四庫館臣在撰寫歷代《春秋》學著作提要的過程中,仍有下列幾點值得注意者:1.「館臣以三傳辨分各家春秋學之通變關係時,蘊涵了什麼樣的思維與視角?」2.「『舍傳求經』的評論對於館臣分疏歷代《春秋》學脈有何意義?」3.「館臣又如何根據以上的基礎建構其『官方《春秋》學』的典範?」。對此,本文將嘗試從「《春秋》學譜系」的角度來思考《總目》尚未被闡明的相關思維。即以《總目》之「總敘-小敘-提要-案語」的結構中對於歷代《春秋》學之著作,在「義例方法」與「精神目的」等面向之繼承與分流關係的論述中,試圖揭顯這些論述背後的觀點理路,藉以闡明四庫館臣在其「《春秋》學譜系」中的思維方式。
Academic perspectives implicated in Catalog of Imperial Collection of Four are normally the threshold for the future researchers. Take the relevant issues of ”Catalog” and ”Spring and Autumn Annals” for example, according to the previous research results, the mainly research themes are to Clarify the implications in Spring and Autumn Annals implicated implicate in ”Catalog, to bring up rectification and discuss the influence and meaning of its academia tendency. Reflect the basic concept of Catalog to Spring and Autumn Annals, and analyze its' the appraisal and flaws to Spring and Autumn Annals throughout the history. In addition, there are three notable points during the writing process of the officials in the Four Vaults. What are the thinking and horizon being implicated when the officials use the Three Commentaries to distinguish and analyze the relationship of coherent varieties between each Spring and Autumn Annals sects? What is the meaning of the comment of She Shuan Qiu Jing for the officials to classify the thread of Spring and Autumn Annals throughout the history? How the officials construct the model of official Spring and Autumn Annals according to the foundation above?Therefore, this article tries to use ideas from Pedigree of Spring and Autumn Annals to explore and clarify the related thinking in Catalog which have not been discussed. That is, to use the structure of ”ZongXu-XiaoXu-TiYao-AnYu” of the Catalog to the Spring and Autumn Annals sects research throughout the history in the ”formalized method” and ”Spiritual purpose” discussed in down-passing and branching relationship aspects, and try to reveal the logic sequence view points behind the discussion, and also clarify the modes of thinking of the officials in Four Vaults to the Pedigree of Spring and Autumn Annals.
期刊論文
1.周彥文(20051200)。論提要的客觀性、主觀性與導引性。書目季刊,39(3),23-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊晉龍(19940300)。「四庫學」研究的反思。中國文哲研究集刊,4,349-394。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉兆祐(19830700)。民國以來的四庫學。漢學研究通訊,2(3)=7,146-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.謝德勝、鹿苗苗(2009)。《四庫全書總目提要》。中的宋代「春秋學」,2009(10),33-36。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.夏長樸。《四庫全書總目》對宋代經學的觀察--以《春秋》學爲例。台北。147-168。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.永瑢(2008)。四庫全書總目。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏徵(1975)。隋書。臺北:新文豐出版公司:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.司馬朝軍(2005)。四庫全書總目編纂考。武昌:武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱彝尊、林慶彰、蔣秋華、楊晉龍、馮曉庭(2010)。經義考新校。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.焦循、沈文倬(2007)。孟子正義。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.張舜徽(2005)。四庫提要敘講疏。昆明:雲南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.庫勒納、李光地(1983)。日講春秋解義。景印文淵閣四庫全書。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊晉龍(2000)。「四庫學」研究方法芻議。乾嘉學者的治經方法。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.丁亞傑(2010)。春秋寓於史 :《四庫全書總目》的春秋學觀。儒學研究論叢。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.蔣年豐(19960000)。從「興」的精神現象論《春秋》經傳的解釋學基礎。中國古代思維方式探索。臺北:正中。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE