:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:馬雷夏與郎尼根對超驗觀念的承繼與轉化
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:陳文祥 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Wen-hsiang
出版日期:2014
卷期:41:9=484
頁次:頁101-116
主題關鍵詞:超驗方法超驗多瑪斯主義馬雷夏拉內郎尼根Transcendental methodsTranscendental ThomismMaréchalRahnerLonergan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:12
超驗多瑪斯主義作為當代新士林哲學重要學派之一,具有兼容近代主體轉向之哲學思潮與補充多瑪斯形上學傳統之優勢。一方面,其學說普遍認同康德對主體意識之研究並肯定其對先驗機能存在之論證;另一方面,其重新揭露並體認多瑪斯已深入探究但未被仔細詮釋之主體主動認識能力,並據之肯定以人的探問與暸悟能力作為超驗主體與絕對超驗者之間的中介,以構成超驗能力達到存有本身之證論。闡明這樣的理論承繼與轉化構成本文的主要目的。本文討論超驗多瑪斯主義之主要代表人物-馬雷夏與郎尼根對康德之超驗觀念與方法的融會與批判,並扣緊其側重之不同面向之研究。本文認為,馬雷夏以其「形上批判」補充康德之「超驗批判」、而郎尼根以「洞察」的觀念切入人的超驗性,以及二者共同肯定認知機能中的動態機能與「判斷」作用,作為人的存有之超驗性本質,以此突破康德之直觀主義,是二者在超驗哲學面向中對康德之超驗方法卓有貢獻之理論補足。
As an important school of contemporary neo-scholasticism, transcendental Thomism had the merit of incorporating contemporary philosophical trend of subjective turn and the supplement of Aquinas' traditional metaphysics. On the one hand, its thesis generally recognized Kant's study of subject consciousness and affirm its argument about the existence of transcendental functions; on the other hand, Thomism re-revealed and understood an subject's active cognitive power and approved man's inquisitive and comprehensive power as the medium between the transcendental subject and the absolute transcendentalist in order to construct the argument of achieving being through transcendental power. This article is mainly meant to explicate the inheritance and transformation of such a theory. It discusses the major Thomists- Maréchal and Lonergan's comprehensive and critical study about Kant's concepts and methods of transcendence, and focuses on the studies of different aspects. This article maintains that, Maréchal used his "metaphysical critique" to supplement Kant's "transcendental critique". And Lonergan used the concept of "insight" to point out the transcendental properties of men. They both affirm that the dynamic functions and the use of "critique" in the faculties of cognitivities are the transcendental essence of the being of men. In this manner they surmount Kant's intuitionism. And in the aspect of transcendental philosophy they supplement Kant's transcendental methods with a distinction.
期刊論文
1.Hendry, Ceorege S.(1981)。Kant Anniversary— 'Critique of Pure Reason: Karl Rahner's Transcendental Method'。Theology Today,38,365-368。  new window
圖書
1.Rahber, Karl、Donceel, Joseph(1994)。Hearer of the Word。New York:Continuum Poblishing Company。  new window
2.Cottingham, John(1998)。The Rationalists。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Kant, Immanuel、Smith, Norman Kemp(1965)。Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
4.Kerr, Fergus(2007)。Twentieth-century Catholic Theologians: From Neo-Scholasticism to Nuptial Mysticism。Malden:Blackwell Publishing。  new window
5.Lonergan, Bernard(1957)。Insight: A Study of Human Understanding。London:Longman & Todd。  new window
6.Lonergan, Bernard、Morelli, Elizabeth、Morelli, Mark(2000)。Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan Vol. 5, Understanding and being: The Halifax Lectures on Insight。Toronto:University of Toronto Press。  new window
7.Maréchal, Joseph、Donceel, Joseph(1970)。A Maréchal Reader。New York:Herder & Herder。  new window
8.Meynell, Hugo A.(1998)。Redirecting Philosophy: Reflections on the Nature of Knowledge from Plato to Lonergan。Toronto:University of Toronto Press。  new window
9.Sala, Giovann、Spoerli, Joseph(1994)。Lonergan and Kant: Five Essays on Human Knowledge。Toronto:University of Toronto Press。  new window
10.Stewart, William A.(1996)。Introduction to Lonergan's Insight: An Invitation to Philosophize。New York:The Edwin Mellen Press。  new window
11.牟宗三(1983)。康德純綷理性批判。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊袓陶、郭曉芒(2001)。康德純三大批判精粹。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.武金正(2000)。人與神會晤:拉內的神學人學。臺北:光啓出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Gilson, Étienne、沈清松(2001)。中世紀哲學精神。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.Lonergan, Bernard(1972)。Method in Theology。New York:London:Seabury Press:Herder and Herder:Darton, Longman & Todd。  new window
16.關永中(2002)。知識論(二):近世思潮。臺北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄔昆如、高凌霞(1996)。士林哲學。臺北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.Muck, Otto、Seidensticker, William D.(1968)。The Transcendental Method。New York:Herder and Herder。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fiorenza, Francis Schussler(2005)。Method in Theology。The Cambridge Companion to Karl Rahner。Cambrige:Cambrige University Press。  new window
2.Ceorege S. Hendry、武金正(2004)。超驗方法:由康德到拉内。拉内的基督論及神學人觀。臺北:光啟文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lonergan, Bernard(1967)。Insight: Preface to a Discussion。Collection: Papers by Bernard Lonergan。New York:London:Herder and Herder:Darton, Longman & Todd。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE