This paper argues that the conversion of industrial heritage and associated analysis must takeculture, politics, and economic processes into account as well as the relationship between state andsociety in order for cultural policy to demonstrate its changed internal logic and core values. Thearticle primarily discusses several aspects of these issues, including the controversy surroundingcultural governance networks in Songshan Cultural and Creative Park, civil society protests, and theasymmetric development of park production and consumption. On basis of this investigation, it isconcluded that the structural problems experienced by Songshan Cultural and Creative Park lie in the policy dilemmas faced by cultural governance, namely the discrepancy between concepts of cultureand cultural technologies.