:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「工作福利」治理下「個人化服務模式」對失業者權利與義務的影響
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:李健鴻 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Chien-hung
出版日期:2015
卷期:27:1
頁次:頁45-88
主題關鍵詞:個人化服務模式工作福利積極促進失業給付Individualized services modelWorkfareActivationUnemployment benefit
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:34
本文探討臺灣的就業保險失業給付制度在「工作福利」治理原則下,導入實施「一案到底」的「個人化服務」模式後,對於失業者在申請失業給付時權利與義務的影響。研究發現,「一案到底」的「個人化服務」模式,基於強化「工作福利」的治理原則,藉由「未執行尋職義務就停止失業給付」做為控制手段,設計出「預約制的尋職時間管理機制」、「強化尋職義務的失業認定機制」、「早期介入的個人化就業諮詢機制」三項治理機制,要求失業給付申請人必須遵守更多的尋職義務與就業諮詢義務,其結果是迫使失業給付申請人處在一種「消極性參與」的處境中,只能被動接受國家安排的尋職義務措施,導致失業給付申請人的自主性下降。
This article aims to analyze the influence of the individualized services model implemented by employment insurance institutions on the rights and obligations of unemployment benefit applicants under workfare governance in Taiwan. The first main finding is that the "one client served by one steward" individualized services model follows the workfare governance principle of requiring the unemployed to performed job-search obligations before receiving unemployment benefits, as a means of control. The second main finding is that the individualized services model was designed with three mechanisms which require unemployment benefit applicants to undertake greater job-search obligations and related counseling. They must make an appointment to manage jobsearch time, carry out greater job-search obligations according to unemployment identity rules, and receive individualized early-intervention employment counseling. As a result, unemployment benefit applicants fall into the situation of passive participation, resulting in decreased autonomy for unemployment benefit applicants because they just passively receive job-search guidelines from the state.
期刊論文
1.郭俊巖(20100200)。美國工作福利政策的形成與轉化:以AFDC改革為例。臺灣社會福利學刊,8(2),117-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李健鴻(20100600)。「積極促進」治理下就業保險失業給付制度的實踐困境。臺灣民主,7(2),125-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.江宛琦(20110600)。就業保險制度下之推介就業情形與後續作法。就業安全,10(1),67-70。  延伸查詢new window
4.王篤強(20010900)。「強制工作」與「財產累聚」--兩種貧窮對策觀點。社區發展季刊,95,85-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王永慈(20070600)。「積極促進」(activation) 概念的解析。東吳社會工作學報,16,151-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Haagh, Louise(2006)。Equality and Income Security in Market Economies: What's Wrong with Insurance?。Social Policy and Administration,40(4),385-424。  new window
7.Handler, Joel F.(2003)。Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe: From Status to Contract。Journal of European Social Policy,13(3),229-243。  new window
8.Clasen, Jochen、Clegg, Daniel(2006)。Beyond Activation: Reforming European Unemployment Protection Systems in Post-Industrial Labour Markets。European Societies,8(4),527-553。  new window
9.Borghi, Vando、Van Berkel, Rik(2007)。Individualised Service Provision in an Era of Activation and New Governance。International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,27(9/10),413-424。  new window
10.許洺滉(20090700)。從失業認定單一窗口談早期再就業服務小組政策規劃設計擬議。就業安全,8(1),70-76。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳淑瑛(20130600)。一案到底就業服務模式之革新及推動情形。就業安全,12(1),5-12。  延伸查詢new window
12.丁玉珍、陳秀玲(20131200)。推動一案到底就業服務模式之意義與實務策略。就業安全,12(2),58-64。  延伸查詢new window
13.Van Berkel, Rik、Borghi, Vando(2008)。Review Article: The Governance of Activation。Social Policy and Society,7(3),393-402。  new window
14.許金龍(20081200)。「失業認定單一窗口一案到底」作業模式之探討。就業安全,7(2),73-80。  延伸查詢new window
15.李健鴻(20080100)。契約主義下「績效」與「公平」的兩難:臺灣就業服務體制的社會風險管理分析。政大勞動學報,23,113-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Kopac, Anja(2002)。Implementation of Activity Testing and the Roles of Discretion。COST A13 Working Meeting。Florence。  new window
2.Dingeldey, Irene(2004)。Welfare State Transformation between 'Workfare' and an 'Enabling' State: New Goals and New Forms of Governance。Espanet Conference, European Social Policy: Meeting the Needs of a New Europe。  new window
3.Bothfeld, Silke、Betzelt, Sigrid(2010)。The Paradoxes of Activation Policies and the Re-definition of the Normative Framework of the Welfare State。Conference of Employment Policies Requested--Social Risk and Risk Management of Globalised Economy。Budapest, Hungary。  new window
研究報告
1.藍科正、林淑慧(2011)。強化公立就業服務機構就業諮詢服務功能之建議。  延伸查詢new window
2.辛炳隆、李健鴻(2012)。就業服務業務中央與地方政府之權責分工及組織設計。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hasselpflug, Søren(2005)。Availability Criteria in 25 Countries。  new window
學位論文
1.吳佳玲(2013)。我國非自願性失業勞工單一窗口全程服務模式成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jessop, Bob、國立編譯館、梁書寧(2008)。思索資本主義國家的未來。韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Peck, Jamie(2001)。Workfare States。New York:Guilford Publish Press。  new window
3.Lødemel, Ivar、Trickey, Heather(2001)。'An Offer You Can't Refuse': Workfare in International Perspect。The Policy Press。  new window
4.Gustafson, Raya(2006)。Workfare Affects Individuals! A Comparative Study on Workfare in a European Context-Italy and Germany。London Metropolitan University。  new window
5.勞動力發展署(2012)。業保險給付要項注意事項。臺北:勞動力發展署。  延伸查詢new window
6.勞動力發展署(2012)。推動就業服務一案到底作業模式計畫。臺北:勞動力發展署。  延伸查詢new window
7.勞動力發展署(2011)。就業保險失業認定作業原則。臺北:勞動力發展署。  延伸查詢new window
8.勞動力發展署(2010)。失業認定單一窗口一案到底作業模式試辦計畫。臺北:勞動力發展署。  延伸查詢new window
9.Marshall, Thomas Humphrey(1950)。Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.勞動部(2009)。98年領取失業給付勞工之就業關懷調查,http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy98/9806menu.htm, 2013/05/22。  延伸查詢new window
2.張舒婷(20090208)。拿納稅人血汗錢 也應負擔義務。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Eichhorst, Werner、Kaufmann, O.、Konle-Seidl, R.、Reinhard, H. J.(2008)。Bringing the Jobless into Work? An Introduction to Activation Policies。Bringing the Jobless into Work: Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US。Berlin, Germany:Springer Verlag Press。  new window
2.Grubb, David(2000)。Eligibility Criteria for Unemployment Benefits。OECD Economic Studies。Paris:Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development。  new window
3.Valkerburg, Ben(2007)。Individualising activation services: thrashing out an ambiguous concept。Making it personal: Individualised activation services in the EU。The Polity Press。  new window
4.Hvinden, Bjørn(1999)。Activation: A Nordic Perspective。Linking Welfare and Work。Luxembourg:Office for official Publications of the European Foundation, European Union。  new window
5.Van Berkel, Rik(2007)。Individualising Activation Services in the EU。Making It Personal: Individualising Activation Services in the EU。The Policy Press。  new window
6.Serrano Pascual, Amparo(2007)。Reshaping Welfare States: Activation Regimes in Europe。Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe。Brussels:P.I.E. Peter Lang Press。  new window
7.Van Berkel, Rik、Møller, Iver Hornemann(2002)。The Concept of Activation。Active Social Policies in the EU: Inclusion through Participation?。The Policy Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE